‘Breach of contract…’: Virat Kohli’s Instagram story angers BCCI bosses, India cricketers get ‘verbal’ warning: Report

Not at all pleased by Virat Kohli’s Instagram story, revealing his yo-yo test score, BCCI sprang into action almost immediately.

Virat Kohli, of India (R), takes part in a training session (File photo)(AFP)

Virat Kohli’s Instagram story on Thursday in which he revealed his yo-yo fitness test score has irked the top bosses of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The Indian team management reportedly came up with a strict guideline for all Indian cricketers hours after Kohli’s Instagram story went viral. The players were asked not to post their yo-yo test scores which come under confidential information, on social media platforms. The directive came from BCCI’s top management, reported The Indian Express.

The report claimed that all the cricketers currently present in a fitness and preparatory camp at Alur in Bengaluru before the Asia Cup were given the guideline “verbally.”

Through an Instagram story, Kohli revealed that he had passed the yo-yo test with a score of 17.2. “The happiness of finishing the yo-yo est between the dreaded cones. 17.2 done,” Kohli wrote along with a photo of himself. The BCCI-mandated fitness parameter is 16.5.

Not at all pleased by the public update, BCCI sprang into action almost immediately. They reminded the players revealing such confidential information on public platforms can lead to a ‘breach of contract’

“Players have been informed verbally to avoid posting any confidential matter on social media platforms. They can post pictures while training but posting a score leads to breach of contract clause,” a BCCI official was quoted as saying in the report.

Source: https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/breach-of-contract-virat-kohli-instagram-story-angers-bcci-bosses-india-cricketers-get-verbal-warning-report-101692929174501.html?utm_source=whatsapp&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ht_site

Jennifer Aniston denies supporting antisemitism after ‘liking’ Jamie Foxx’s post: ‘Makes me sick’

Jennifer Aniston clarified on social media why she “liked” Jamie Foxx’s controversial post.
WireImage

Jennifer Aniston is setting the record straight on why she “liked” Jamie Foxx’s controversial post about Jesus Christ, which many deemed to be “antisemitic.”

“This really makes me sick,” the “Friends” alum wrote via her Instagram Story Friday. “I did not ‘like’ this post on purpose or by accident.”

Aniston, 54, then further clarified, “And more importantly, I want to be clear to my friends and anyone hurt by this showing up in their feeds — I do NOT support any form of antisemitism.”

The “Murder Mystery” star concluded, “And I truly don’t tolerate HATE of any kind. Period.”

Page Six has reached out to Aniston’s reps for further comment about what the actress meant by saying she did not “like” the post on “purpose” or “by accident.”

We also asked if the “Horrible Bosses” star had any further response to the criticism, but did not hear back in time for publication.

“I do NOT support any form of antisemitism,” the actress wrote via her Instagram Story.
Getty Images
Fans had conflicting views on Aniston’s response.
Instagram

Aniston was forced to respond to backlash after screenshots of her “liking” Foxx’s post circulated online.

“Just once I’d like to log onto this site and not see antisemitism, especially from huge celebrities like Jamie Foxx and Jennifer Aniston,” one person tweeted. “You don’t want to be an ally, fine, but leave us the heck alone!”

Another added, “Jennifer Aniston liking Jamie Foxx’s antisemitic post. She does know she rose to fame playing a JEWISH woman on a hit sitcom, right? Rachel Green was Jewish.”

The post Foxx shared on Instagram Friday that many perceived as spreading Jewish hate read, “They killed this dude named Jesus … What do you think they’ll do to you?! #fakefriends #fakelove.”

However, the Oscar winner took down the post a few hours later and has not addressed his critics since.

Source: https://pagesix.com/2023/08/05/jennifer-aniston-denies-supporting-antisemitism-after-liking-jamie-foxx-post/

Prosecutors ask judge to issue protective order after Trump post appearing to promise revenge

Former President Donald Trump gestures after speaking at a fundraiser event for the Alabama GOP, Friday, Aug. 4, 2023, in Montgomery, Ala. (AP Photo/Butch Dill)

The Justice Department has asked a federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him.

Prosecutors on Friday requested that U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan issue a protective order concerning evidence in the case, a day after Trump pleaded not guilty to charges of trying to overturn his 2020 election loss and block the peaceful transition of power. The order, different from a “gag order,” would limit what information Trump and his legal team could share publicly about the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

Chutkan on Saturday gave Trump’s legal team until 5 p.m. Monday to respond to the government’s request. Trump’s legal team, which has indicated he would look to slow the case down despite prosecutors’ pledge of a speedy trial, then filed a request to extend the response deadline to Thursday and to hold a hearing on the matter, saying it needed more time for discussion.

Chutkan swiftly denied that extension request Saturday evening, reaffirming that Trump must abide by Monday’s deadline.

Protective orders are common in criminal cases, but prosecutors said it’s “particularly important in this case” because Trump has posted on social media about “witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.”

Prosecutors pointed specifically to a post on Trump’s Truth Social platform from earlier Friday in which Trump wrote, in all capital letters, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!”

Prosecutors said they are ready to hand over a “substantial” amount of evidence — “much of which includes sensitive and confidential information” — to Trump’s legal team.

They told the judge that if Trump were to begin posting about grand jury transcripts or other evidence provided by the Justice Department, it could have a “harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.”

Source: https://apnews.com/article/trump-election-capitol-riot-indictment-protective-order-71cd642e876c47fff4e1283c15f8ca01

Exit mobile version