The shock deal that golf’s traditional tours have agreed with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) – which bankrolled the breakaway LIV series – is a stunning example of the shift in power that the kingdom’s investment in sport is bringing about.
Under its ruling crown prince, the country’s multi-billion pound interest in sports through acquisitions, hosting and sponsorship is now well established.
First it was the staging of tennis, boxing, Formula 1 and European club football finals, among many other events.
Then came the takeover of Premier League club Newcastle United by the Saudi sovereign wealth fund – the PIF – and the luring of Cristiano Ronaldo to play in the country’s domestic league.
But not until now has such investment – no matter how audacious and ambitious – extended to what many are interpreting as effectively buying up an entire sport.
The sense is that this remarkable advance into sport by Saudi Arabia is now gathering pace. That it has just moved to the next level.
Within hours of the announcement that golf’s warring factions had struck a truce, came confirmation that another legendary player – reigning Ballon d’Or holder Karim Benzema – would be joining Ronaldo in the Saudi Pro League. PIF has just taken control of four of the country’s top clubs, with a new round of spending now anticipated.
At one stage, there was speculation that even the greatest player of his generation – Lionel Messi – could end up joining them. He is now heading to Inter Miami instead. But expectation is growing that these signings are all designed to pave the way for a Saudi bid to host the 2030 World Cup, regardless of the inevitable controversy that would unleash.
To human rights campaigners, this simply reinforces their belief that the global appeal of sport is being used by the Saudi government, to ‘sportswash’ and distract from long-standing reputation issues, including women’s rights abuses, the criminalisation of homosexuality, the restriction of free speech, the use of the death penalty, the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and scrutiny over the country’s involvement in the conflict in Yemen.
Some of the more high-profile cases in the country to have drawn criticism include the execution of 81 people in a single day, and the jailing of Leeds University student Salma al-Shehab for 34 years for tweets considered critical of the state.
The Saudi authorities reject this as unfair and hypocritical, insisting that the investment in sport is a key plank of the ruler’s ‘Vision 2030’ strategy designed to modernise the kingdom, and is intended to inspire people to become more active, boost tourism and diversify the economy in preparation for a post-oil world.
Geopolitics and local rivalries are also seen as a major factor in Saudi’s investments, the kingdom vying with neighbours the UAE and Qatar to establish itself as the Gulf’s capital of sport.
Last year Yasir Al-Rumayyan – the PIF governor, and chairman of both Newcastle United and the new merged golf entity – told me he was unfamiliar with the term ‘sportswashing’ when I asked him what he made of the criticism at the inaugural LIV event.
Defenders of Saudi investment in sport point to the trade that Western countries conduct with the Middle Eastern state, asking why golf, for instance, should turn its back on unprecedented funding when some governments sell billions of pounds worth of arms to the nation.
Others say the exposure and scrutiny that accompanies sport may have played a role in some of the reforms that have been introduced in recent years, pointing to the kingdom’s investment in women’s football,
Fifa recently hailed the “broader social change” the game had inspired in Saudi Arabia, and in the past decade, China has hosted the Olympics, and successive World Cups have been staged in Russia and Qatar, so Saudi is far from the only country with human rights issues that sport does business with.
Yet there is no doubt that sport’s willingness to embrace Saudi investment presents significant challenges for those in charge, as well as opportunities.