ChatGPT has become a constant when it comes to making headlines. With the ability to provide novel and human-like responses to any query in mere seconds, it quickly gained popularity among users. ChatGPT’s responses surpassed what Google or Bing could provide, from essays on historical events to creative writing.
Not to be outdone, Google recently made its AI chatbot Bard available in over 180 countries. The tech giant has also added several features to enhance the user experience. This move comes when OpenAI’s ChatGPT is making waves across industries with its impressive abilities in natural language processing. Bard, Google’s answer to ChatGPT, was unveiled in March and piqued many tech enthusiasts’ interest.
After using Bard for a few days, I did a little digging to see how it will stack up against ChatGPT—and the main differences between the two chatbots. Here’s what we know so far. We used the free-to-use versions of both bots to keep the comparison parameters level.
Exploring key differences between Bard and ChatGPT
Both chatbots employ natural language processing at a fundamental level, enabling users to input a prompt or inquiry and receive a human-like response. However, the critical distinction lies in the data sources and models on which they have been trained.
Here’s a quick breakdown of how they compare
Bard is designed for dialogues, while GPT is designed for textual functions
Both models utilize a transformer architecture, which is a form of neural network that processes sequential input. However, while GPT-3 and GPT-4 were trained on an enormous text dataset gathered from the internet (including books, articles, and documents from the open internet), LaMDA was trained on Infiniset, a dataset that concentrates on dialogue and conversations. This indicates that LaMDA is trained to comprehend the user’s question’s intent and context nuances.
Source: https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/news/bard-vs-chatgpt-key-differences-between-these-two-ai-chatbots/articleshow/100183827.cms