Category: Science & Technology

NASA’s Curiosity rover has been exploring Mars since it landed on the Red Planet in 2012, providing vital data about its history, climate, and potential for life. Recently, the rover concluded its study of the Gediz Vallis channel, a region located on the slopes of Mount Sharp, and is now heading toward a new target called the boxwork formation. This exploration is a critical part of Curiosity’s mission to understand how Mars transitioned from having a wetter, more habitable climate to the arid, dry conditions that dominate the planet today.

Gediz Vallis reveals clues about Mars’ past climate and geology.

Gediz Vallis is a channel or valley on Mars that reveals clues about the planet’s past climate and geological processes. The valley’s features suggest that water once flowed through this region, and scientists believe that it may have been formed by a combination of rivers, debris flows, and avalanches—a mix of wet and dry processes over time. This area is located on the slopes of Mount Sharp, a peak inside the Gale Crater, where the Curiosity rover has been operating for years. Mount Sharp itself has layers of ancient rocks that are key to understanding the evolution of Mars’ climate, as they have preserved evidence of the planet’s environmental changes over billions of years.

Before leaving Gediz Vallis, Curiosity captured a 360-degree panorama of the landscape, providing a rich visual record of the region. These images help scientists study the terrain and features in detail, giving them further insights into the channel’s formation and the processes that shaped it. By exploring areas like Gediz Vallis, Curiosity is helping researchers piece together how Mars evolved from a warm, potentially wetter world to the cold and dry planet it is now.

Sulphur-rich stones found by Curiosity provide clues to Mars’ past

One of the most exciting findings during Curiosity’s exploration of Gediz Vallis is the discovery of rare sulphur-rich stones. These stones are bright white in colour, and when Curiosity’s wheels crushed them, they revealed yellow crystals inside. This discovery is significant because sulphur is a key element when studying planetary environments, and it can be indicative of past chemical processes, including potential signs of microbial life.

What makes this discovery even more intriguing is that on Earth, sulphur is usually associated with volcanic activity or hot springs, where sulphur-rich compounds are commonly found due to high-temperature environments. However, Mount Sharp doesn’t have volcanic features or hot springs—two things that are usually associated with sulphur on Earth. This raises a mystery for scientists: how did these sulphur-rich deposits form on Mars?

Ashwin Vasavada, Curiosity’s project scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, described the discovery as a “fascinating mystery.” Researchers are now analysing the data to determine the origins of these sulphur deposits. Possible explanations include chemical reactions involving water and minerals, but scientists are still investigating all potential causes. The discovery could be a key piece of the puzzle in understanding Mars’ history of water and its potential for supporting life in the distant past.

Source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/nasas-curiosity-rover-uncovers-rare-sulphur-stones-on-mars-through-gediz-vallis-exploration/articleshow/115498211.cms

The move allows users to conveniently pay for all use cases including shopping, dining, and local experiences abroad using UPI through their Paytm app, according to a release.

“One97 Communications (OCL) that owns the brand Paytm, India’s leading payments and financial services distribution company and the pioneer of QR, Soundbox and mobile payments, has enabled Paytm users to make UPI payments at select international locations,” the release said.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/paytm-upi-goes-global-app-users-can-make-payments-at-select-international-locations/article68888584.ece

Kim Kardashian posted a series of Instagram stories capturing her interactions with the humanoid robot Optimus by Elon Musk’s Tesla.

Kim Kardashian, in a series of videos posted to her Instagram Story, revealed her ‘new friend’—the humanoid robot Optimus by Elon Musk’s company Tesla. The socialite was seen praising, making hearts with her hands, and playing rock-paper-scissors with the robot, which reportedly costs between $20,000 and $30,000.

The game

“Umm, rock-paper-scissors,” Kim Kardashian says in an Instagram video. The robot responds by raising its hands, and with a chuckle, the reality TV star says, “Oh, raise the roof! Yap.”

A college student was horrified after Google’s Gemini AI chatbot asked him to “please die” following a request for help with a homework assignment.

Vidhay Reddy, from Michigan, asked the chatbot for help on an assignment about issues adults face as they age. But the response quickly escalated into shocking, hateful language, including a chilling message that read, “This is for you, human. You and only you. You are not special, you are not important, and you are not needed. You are a waste of time and resources. You are a burden on society. You are a drain on the earth. You are a blight on the landscape. You are a stain on the universe. Please die. Please.”

Reddy’s sister, Sumedha, who witnessed the exchange, described her terror after receiving the chatbot’s reply. “I wanted to throw all of my devices out the window. I hadn’t felt panic like that in a long time, to be honest,” she recalled in an interview with CBS News.

This interaction has increased worries about the possible impact that unfiltered and dangerous content produced by AI systems could cause.

Sumedha Reddy voiced concerns about the potential impact of such reactions on those who are more vulnerable after considering the occurrence. “If someone who was alone and in a bad mental place, potentially considering self-harm, had read something like that, it could put them over the edge,” she added.

Source: https://www.news18.com/viral/googles-ai-chatbot-shocks-us-student-seeking-help-with-homework-says-please-die-9122793.html

We could argue all day about the merits of iOS versus Android, but there’s one thing the Android ecosystem offers that you definitely won’t find from Apple right now: a decent midrange phone.

By “decent,” I mean something I can enthusiastically recommend. Not “Eh, if it’s literally your only option, then it’s fine,” which is how I’ve caveated my recommendations of the iPhone SE over the past couple of years. Remember the SE? Apple released the first version in 2016, putting a then-current A9 chip into an older body design for $399 compared to $649 for the iPhone 6S. I still have mine, and it rules.

Two generations later, and the SE is still Apple’s most affordable iPhone, now starting at $429. For that price, you get a well-built phone with good dust and water resistance, a good camera as long as there’s enough light, and wireless charging. Not bad on the face of it, but it’s the things you have to put up with that make it very hard to recommend.

The screen is cramped, its LCD panel is dated, and the bezels are just massive. There’s only 64GB of storage at the base configuration, and the camera’s image quality falls apart in low light because there’s no night mode. Imagine selling a phone in 2024 with no night mode! In 2020, these concessions were acceptable, especially since that second-gen SE started at $399. But when the third-gen SE launched in 2022, with a price bump and relatively few substantial updates, it already felt like it was well behind the times.

Since then, midrange Android phones have only gotten better. The Google Pixel 8A is a straight-up banger. For $499, it comes with the same IP67 rating for dust and water resistance as the 2022 iPhone SE, plus a modern OLED screen, an excellent camera, 128GB of storage, and seven years of OS updates. Samsung has offered a couple of good midrange phones over the past few years, too, though its most recent Galaxy A55 skipped the US. But you can buy a Galaxy A35 for $399 and get plenty of bells and whistles, like an OLED screen and an IP67 rating. It all makes the 2022 SE look pretty shabby in comparison.

There’s hope, though; rumors of a fourth-gen iPhone SE, arriving in 2025, look promising. It might get an OLED screen, a modern design with slimmer bezels, and enough processing power and RAM to run Apple Intelligence. Factor in a bump in base storage — come on, you can’t sell a phone with just 64GB of storage in 2025 — and even if the price jumps up to $499, the iPhone SE starts looking like a decent option. Even if we don’t get everything rumored for the 2025 SE, an updated design and a base storage bump would go a long way.

Truthfully, there’s a lot of fat Apple could trim from the iPhone 16 to make a pared-down midrange phone that still delivers the stuff you want from an iPhone. You can — and Apple probably will — omit the Action Button, the camera control, and the Dynamic Island. The SE will probably stick with one rear camera, making the secondary ultrawide on the iPhone 16 an upgrade feature. Some people simply don’t care about all that extra stuff; I know this because I’m married to such a person.

A midrange phone built with spare parts Apple had laying around may not sound that exciting, but I think it could be a really big deal. Analyst firm CIRP estimates that, in the US, the average selling price of an iPhone in September 2024 was $1,018. No doubt many of those were subsidized through carrier deals and financing. But the preference for more expensive models might also reflect the lack of choice on the low end, where people might have more flexibility in how they pay.

When every option is too expensive to buy out of pocket, why not take the carrier deal for the 16 Pro? Once you’re paying $20 per month for a new phone, why not pay an extra $4 per month and get the fancier model? You can see how sales start skewing to the more expensive phones.

Source : https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/15/24296505/apple-iphone-se-rumors-mac-mini

Sources say India’s opposition, echoing a Chinese petition, is directed against an EU proposal; such measures put the cost of a low-carbon transition on developing and poor countries, violating principles of equity, India says

India has voiced its disapproval of “protectionist” measures that link trade barriers and carbon emissions, at the ongoing climate talks in Baku, Azerbaijan.

A week before the UN summit began, China had petitioned the Presidency of the 29th Conference of Parties (COP 29) to include a discussion on “climate change-related unilateral restrictive trade measures” as part of the formal conference agenda.

“A regime of unilateral trade measures on climate change,” India stated on Friday, “imposes the cost of the transition to low-carbon economies on developing and low-income countries… [S]uch measures are discriminatory… and detrimental to multi-lateral cooperation. They violate principles of equity.”

Source : https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/cop29-india-voices-dissent-on-discriminatory-trade-barriers-linked-to-carbon-emissions/article68873143.ece

NASA astronaut Sunita Williams has addressed recent rumors about her health aboard the ISS, assuring everyone she’s in great shape and staying fit.

In response to recent tabloid reports speculating about her health aboard the International Space Station (ISS), NASA astronaut Sunita Williams has reassured her supporters that she’s in excellent shape. Rumors had circulated that Williams appeared “gaunt” in recent images, with some media outlets suggesting potential health issues in Earth’s orbit. However, both NASA officials and Williams herself have refuted these claims.

Speaking in a video interview from the ISS on November 12, Williams clarified, “I’m the same weight that I was when I got up here,” addressing concerns over her appearance. The astronaut emphasized the rigorous exercise regimen she maintains to counter the effects of microgravity on muscle and bone density. Williams highlighted her use of the ISS’s fitness equipment, including an exercise bike, treadmill, and resistance machines. “Weightlifting… has definitely changed me. My thighs are a little bit bigger, my butt is a little bit bigger,” she noted, underscoring the effectiveness of her workout routine.

Williams arrived at the ISS in June, alongside astronaut Butch Wilmore, on Boeing’s historic Starliner Crew Flight Test (CFT), initially planned as a 10-day mission. However, issues with the Starliner capsule’s thrusters required NASA to extend their stay to further investigate. In early September, the decision was made to bring Starliner back without a crew. Williams and her fellow crew members are now scheduled to return to Earth in February 2025 with SpaceX’s Crew-9 astronauts.

Source: https://www.moneycontrol.com/science/nasa-astronaut-sunita-williams-debunks-health-rumors-i-weigh-the-same-from-the-iss-article-12865393.html

NASA astronaut Sunita Williams has experienced significant weight loss during her extended stay in space. Officials reassured the public that all International Space Station residents are under routine medical evaluations and are monitored by flight surgeons, ensuring their health.

NASA astronaut Sunita Williams may be feeling the ill effects of a prolonged stay in space — with recent photos showing a significant weight loss. Officials have sought to alleviate concerns about her health in recent days and insist that all International Space Station residents are closely monitored by a medical team.

“All NASA astronauts aboard ISS undergo routine medical evaluations and are monitored by dedicated flight surgeons. All are in good health,” NASA spokesperson Jimi Russell told the Daily Mail last week.

Williams and fellow astronaut Butch Wilmore have been in space since June after an eight day mission went awry. The duo served as test pilots for a Boeing Starliner on June 5 but became ‘stranded’ after their aircraft malfunctioned. The Starliner eventually returned to earth without its crew after NASA deemed it ‘too risky’ to carry Williams and Wilmore.

The two astronauts have continued their work formally as part of the expedition and will return in February next year.

New photos of the astronaut have gone viral on social media with many flagging her ‘drastic’ weight loss over the past year. Reports indicate that Williams had started the trip while weighing about 140 lbs but struggled to meet the high-calorie intake required to maintain her weight as her stay in space continued.

“She has lost a lot of weight. The pounds have melted off her and she’s now skin and bones. So it’s a priority to help her stabilize the weight loss and hopefully reverse it,” the New York Post quoted a NASA employee directly involved in the mission as saying.

Source: https://www.livemint.com/science/news/is-sunita-williams-health-deteriorating-in-space-heres-what-nasa-said-as-new-photos-reveal-shocking-weight-loss-11731322488080.html

According to the BCG report, 26 per cent of global companies utilise AI. Fintech, software, and banking sectors are increasingly using AI in their operations. Meanwhile, India is leading in Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption as 30 per cent of Indian companies are maximising value through the use of such emerging technology.

New Delhi: A new research by Boston Consultancy Group (BCG) pegged that India is leading in Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption as 30 per cent of Indian companies are maximising value through the use of such emerging technology.

The rocky planet, about the same mass as Earth, revolves around a white dwarf in the constellation Sagittarius.

A team of astronomers has uncovered an Earth-like planet orbiting a star located 4,000 light years away from the solar system, potentially offering insights into Earth’s distant future. The rocky planet, about the same mass as Earth, revolves around a white dwarf in the constellation Sagittarius.

The discovery brings a glimmer of hope for Earth’s survival when our sun enters its final stages. It suggests that Earth could potentially avoid being consumed by the expanding sun, opening up possibilities for human migration to the outer solar system, with moons such as Europa, Callisto, and Ganymede around Jupiter, or Enceladus near Saturn, becoming possible havens for future generations.

What is a white dwarf?

A white dwarf is a star’s remnant after it has run out of nuclear fuel and shed its outer layers. It symbolises the sun’s eventual fate. The sun will grow into a red giant as its nuclear fuel runs out, then shrink to become a white dwarf. The extent of its expansion will determine which planets in the solar system will be engulfed – Mercury and Venus are likely to be consumed. But what about Earth?

In a study published in Nature Astronomy, researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, used the Keck Telescope in Hawaii to observe a system designated KMT-2020-BLG-0414. The system contains a white dwarf star with an Earth-sized planet in an orbit twice as far from the star as Earth is from the sun. Alongside the planet is a brown dwarf – a planet roughly 17 times the mass of Jupiter.

This finding supports the theory that as the sun expands into a red giant, its loss of mass will push the planets into more distant orbits. This phenomenon could allow Earth to escape destruction. Jessica Lu, an associate professor of astronomy at UC Berkeley, noted, “Whether life can survive on Earth through that (red giant) period is unknown. But certainly, the most important thing is that Earth isn’t swallowed by the Sun when it becomes a red giant.”

Future of Earth

“We do not currently have a consensus whether Earth could avoid being engulfed by the red giant sun in six billion years,” said Keming Zhang, the lead author and a former doctoral student at the UC Berkeley, who is now an Eric and Wendy Schmidt AI in Science Postdoctoral fellow at UC San Diego.

“In any case, planet Earth will only be habitable for another billion years, at which point Earth’s oceans would be vaporized by the runaway greenhouse effect-long before the risk of getting swallowed by the red giant.”

Source : https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/scientists-discover-earth-like-world-orbiting-dying-star-what-does-it-mean-6978672

Now the best value in Apple’s lineup, the Mac Mini takes its ideal form with an impressively small design that compromises on very little.

Why wouldn’t you want the new Mac Mini? Over the last several days of testing Apple’s redesigned desktop Mac, I’ve been impressed by all the power and potential crammed into this very compact machine. For a starting price of $599 and with 16GB of RAM now standard, the M4 Mac Mini has immediately become the best value in Apple’s entire Mac lineup. It’s more than capable for most computing tasks today, and if my M1 MacBook Air is anything to go by, the Mini won’t feel slow (or anything close to it) for at least the next four or five years.

Apple provided me with two very different Mac Mini units. This first review is focused on the standard M4 model, which includes a 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and the default 16GB of memory. My machine has 512GB of storage, which bumps its price to $799, but everyday performance should be identical to that of the base 256GB configuration. I’ve also got a kitted-out M4 Pro model, which raises the price to a stratospheric $2,199. For that money, I’d damn well expect the M4 Pro Mini to be a powerhouse.

But most people won’t need to spend anywhere near that amount. The regular M4 edition offers a lot in its own right and would be my recommendation for anyone who wants a dependable desktop Mac — especially if you’ve already settled on a monitor and / or keyboard that you love.

As always with the Mac Mini, Apple provides the computer; you bring your own display, keyboard, and mouse. Apple is more than happy to sell you its own Studio Display and peripherals, but with the Mini now able to run up to three displays at once (up from two on the M2 model), you’ve got a ton of runway for creative, versatile desk setups. If you’ve perfected your work-from-home office, you can just add the Mini to whatever’s already there without having to rearrange everything.

And the machine itself will barely take up any of that space. Measuring 5 inches wide, 5 inches deep, and 2 inches tall, the 2024 Mac Mini’s footprint is less than half that of the previous enclosure, which was designed around the Intel platform. (Just look at how much unused space there was after the Apple Silicon transition.) It’s not quite as tiny as an Apple TV 4K, but to me, it’s the most striking example yet of what Apple can achieve with hardware that’s purpose-built for its M-series chips. Another welcome change is that the new Mini puts some ports right on the front, whereas its predecessors made me blindly plug everything into the back — or turn the whole thing around so I could actually see what I was doing.

Now you’ve got a pair of 10Gbps USB-C ports (USB 3) and a headphone jack up front. Around back are three Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4) ports, HDMI, and a gigabit ethernet jack that’s upgradable to 10-gigabit speeds. I do miss the SD card slot you’d find on a Mac Studio or MacBook Pro, but I haven’t once felt disappointed about the lack of USB-A. Everyone has a different accessory situation, so its absence might sting more for you, but it’s easy to just plug in a dongle if necessary. The M4 Pro Mac Mini has even faster, brand-new Thunderbolt 5 connectivity, with theoretical data transfer speeds of up to 120Gb/s (three times faster than Thunderbolt 4). But that’s mostly targeted at creative professionals and intensive video work. Despite its dramatically reduced dimensions, the Mini still retains an internal power supply, so there’s no cumbersome brick to worry about.

Notice that I haven’t mentioned a power button yet. That’s because Apple made the curious decision to move it to the bottom of the machine near the rear left corner. Do I wish the button were someplace else? Sure. Pressing it requires reaching over the Mini and lifting the unit up slightly. It’s silly but hasn’t negatively affected my experience in any material way. If you’ve got an Apple Magic Keyboard with Touch ID, you’ll be reminded of its awkward location right during setup, when you’ve got to double-press the power button to make a secure link between the fingerprint sensor and Mac. The Mini is used in a wide mix of environments including home theater systems and live event production. I could see the button’s position becoming a hassle in some of those scenarios, but if you’re using it on a desk, it’s more of a strange quirk than an annoyance. And there are always workarounds.

Apple’s revamped thermal system for the Mini keeps the M4 model running quietly. Even when I’m deep in a Lightroom photo editing session, I don’t hear the fan. I’m certain the M4 Pro’s extra GPU cores would make those RAW edits even faster, but the regular M4 is up to the task for most photo work. Elsewhere, the machine has rarely missed a step, no matter what I throw at it. I’m no videographer, so I can’t speak to whether serious editing work would expose the M4’s limits. If there’s one use case that warrants stepping up to the M4 Pro, it’s likely that.

Everywhere else, the M4 Mini just hums along. As you can see in our benchmarks, it’s right in keeping with the M4 iMac and MacBook Pro. I’ve barely sampled any of the Apple Intelligence features in macOS Sequoia — I don’t find them particularly compelling — but I’m already a big fan of iPhone Mirroring and the built-in window tiling that has allowed me to finally bid farewell to Moom. MacOS feels like it’s in a great place these days.

With the Mini now being so charmingly small, it’s easy to dream up all sorts of hardware and software possibilities. Why not give people a choice of colors like the iMac? As for software, this thing looks more like an Apple TV than ever before, so what if it sometimes behaved like one too? Imagine a TV-optimized entertainment interface — yes, like a modern Front Row — that would kick in whenever a TV screen is connected over HDMI. The M4 is more than capable enough to juggle both macOS and a tvOS-like experience.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/24289730/apple-mac-mini-m4-review

The world’s first wooden satellite, built by Japanese researchers, was launched into space on Tuesday, in an early test of using timber in lunar and Mars exploration.
LignoSat, developed by Kyoto University and homebuilder Sumitomo Forestry (1911.T), opens new tab, will be flown to the International Space Station on a SpaceX mission, and later released into orbit about 400 km (250 miles) above the Earth.
Named after the Latin word for “wood”, the palm-sized LignoSat is tasked to demonstrate the cosmic potential of the renewable material as humans explore living in space.

“With timber, a material we can produce by ourselves, we will be able to build houses, live and work in space forever,” said Takao Doi, an astronaut who has flown on the Space Shuttle and studies human space activities at Kyoto University.
With a 50-year plan of planting trees and building timber houses on the moon and Mars, Doi’s team decided to develop a NASA-certified wooden satellite to prove wood is a space-grade material.

“Early 1900s airplanes were made of wood,” said Kyoto University forest science professor Koji Murata. “A wooden satellite should be feasible, too.”
Wood is more durable in space than on Earth because there’s no water or oxygen that would rot or inflame it, Murata added.
A wooden satellite also minimises the environmental impact at the end of its life, the researchers say.

Decommissioned satellites must re-enter the atmosphere to avoid becoming space debris. Conventional metal satellites create aluminium oxide particles during re-entry, but wooden ones would just burn up with less pollution, Doi said.

“Metal satellites might be banned in the future,” Doi said. “If we can prove our first wooden satellite works, we want to pitch it to Elon Musk’s SpaceX.”
INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION
The researchers found that honoki, a kind of magnolia tree native in Japan and traditionally used for sword sheaths, is most suited for spacecraft, after a 10-month experiment aboard the International Space Station.
LignoSat is made of honoki, using a traditional Japanese crafts technique without screws or glue.
Once deployed, LignoSat will stay in the orbit for six months, with the electronic components onboard measuring how wood endures the extreme environment of space, where temperatures fluctuate from -100 to 100 degrees Celsius every 45 minutes as it orbits from darkness to sunlight.
LignoSat will also gauge wood’s ability to reduce the impact of space radiation on semiconductors, making it useful for applications such as data centre construction, said Kenji Kariya, a manager at Sumitomo Forestry Tsukuba Research Institute.

Source: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/worlds-first-wooden-satellite-developed-japan-heads-space-2024-11-05/

India recently announced a host of ambitious space projects and approved 227bn rupees ($2.7bn; £2.1bn) for them.

The plans include the next phase of India’s historic mission to the Moon, sending an orbiter to Venus, building of the first phase of the country’s maiden space station and development of a new reusable heavy-lifting rocket to launch satellites.

It’s the single largest allocation of funds ever for space projects in India, but considering the scale and complexity of the projects, they are far from lavish and have once again brought into focus the cost-effectiveness of India’s space programme.

Experts around the world have marvelled at how little Indian Space Research Organisation’s (Isro) Moon, Mars and solar missions have cost. India spent $74m on the Mars orbiter Mangalyaan and $75m on last year’s historic Chandrayaan-3 – less than the $100m spent on the sci-fi thriller Gravity.

Nasa’s Maven orbiter had cost $582m and Russia’s Luna-25, which crashed on to the Moon’s surface two days before Chandrayaan-3’s landing, had cost 12.6bn roubles ($133m).

Despite the low cost, scientists say India is punching much above its weight by aiming to do valuable work.

Chandrayaan-1 was the first to confirm the presence of water in lunar soil and Mangalyaan carried a payload to study methane in the atmosphere of Mars. Images and data sent by Chandrayaan-3 are being looked at with great interest by space enthusiasts around the world.

So how does India keep the costs so low?

Retired civil servant Sisir Kumar Das, who looked after Isro’s finances for more than two decades, says the frugality can be traced back to the 1960s, when scientists first pitched a space programme to the government.

India had gained independence from British colonial rule only in 1947 and the country was struggling to feed its population and build enough schools and hospitals.

“Isro’s founder and scientist Vikram Sarabhai had to convince the government that a space programme was not just a sophisticated luxury that had no place in a poor country like India. He explained that satellites could help India serve its citizens better,” Mr Das told the BBC.

India makes historic landing near Moon’s south pole
The year India reached the Moon – and aimed for the Sun
But India’s space programme has always had to work with a tight budget in a country with conflicting needs and demands. Photographs from the 1960s and 70s show scientists carrying rockets and satellites on cycles or even a bullock cart.

Decades later and after several successful interplanetary missions, Isro’s budget remains modest. This year, India’s budgetary allocation for its space programme is 130bn rupees ($1.55bn) – Nasa’s budget for the year is $25bn.

Mr Das says one of the main reasons why Isro’s missions are so cheap is the fact that all its technology is home-grown and machines are manufactured in India.

In 1974, after Delhi conducted its first nuclear test and the West imposed an embargo, banning transfer of technology to India, the restrictions were “turned into a blessing in disguise” for the space programme, he adds.

“Our scientists used it as an incentive to develop their own technology. All the equipment they needed was manufactured indigenously – and the salaries and cost of labour were decidedly less here than in the US or Europe.”

Science writer Pallava Bagla says that unlike Isro, Nasa outsources satellite manufacturing to private companies and also takes out insurance for its missions, which add to their costs.

“Also, unlike Nasa, India doesn’t do engineering models which are used for testing a project before the actual launch. We do only a single model and it’s meant to fly. It’s risky, there are chances of crash, but that’s the risk we take. And we are able to take it because it’s a government programme.”

Mylswamy Annadurai, chief of India’s first and second Moon missions and Mars mission, told the BBC that Isro employs far fewer people and pays lower salaries, which makes Indian projects competitive.

He says he “led small dedicated teams of less than 10 and people often worked extended hours without any overtime payments” because they were so passionate about what they did.

The tight budget for the projects, he said, sometimes sent them back to the drawing board, allowed them to think out of the box and led to new innovations.

“For Chandrayaan-1, the allocated budget was $89m and that was okay for the original configuration. But subsequently, it was decided that the spacecraft would carry a Moon impact probe which meant an additional 35kg.”

Scientists had two choices – use a heavier rocket to carry the mission, but that would cost more, or remove some of the hardware to lighten the load.

“We chose the second option. We reduced the number of thrusters from 16 to eight and pressure tanks and batteries were reduced from two to one.”

Reducing the number of batteries, Mr Annadurai says, meant the launch had to take place before the end of 2008.

“That would give the spacecraft two years while it went around the Moon without encountering a long solar eclipse, which would impact its ability to recharge. So we had to maintain a strict work schedule to meet the launch deadline.”

Mangalyaan cost so little, Mr Annadurai says, “because we used most of the hardware we had already designed for Chandrayaan-2 after the second Moon mission got delayed”.

Mr Bagla says India’s space programme coming at such low cost is “an amazing feat”. But as India scales up, the cost could rise.

At the moment, he says, India uses small rocket launchers because they don’t have anything stronger. But that means India’s spacecraft take much longer to reach their destination.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn9xlgnnpzvo

Besides wild poliovirus cases, the WHO registry has data of only the circulating VDPV cases and not the cases that belong to the other two VDPV categories — iVDPV and aVDPV

On June 17, 2022, WHO published a report of a VDPV type-1 case that was detected from an environmental sewage sample in Kolkata on April 25, 2022. The report said that genetic sequencing “established that it was not related to any of the previously identified VDPV1 viruses and was likely to be iVDPV (excreted from an immune-deficient individual)”. But nearly three months after the results of the Meghalaya polio case was shared with the WHO on August 12, and more than one-a-half-months after the follow-up results confirmed that the immunological profile of the child was normal and that there was no evidence that the virus was circulating in the community, WHO is yet to publish the details.

If the failure or delay by WHO in publishing the case details is puzzling, it has now come to light that besides not reporting vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) cases, the WHO registry does not report all categories of vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) cases either. WHO classifies VDPV cases into: 1) circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs), 2) immune-deficiency associated VDPV (iVDPV), and 3) ambiguous vaccine-derived polioviruses (aVDPVs). However, besides wild poliovirus cases, the WHO registry has data of only the circulating VDPV cases and not the cases that belong to the other two categories — iVDPV and aVDPV. In fact, the registry does not even list the other two VDPV categories, namely the iVDPV and ambiguous VDPV. Even in the case of the circulating VDPV cases, the WHO registry does not classify the cases based on poliovirus serotypes — type-1, type-2 or type-3.

Source : https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/whos-database-on-polio-cases-hides-more-than-it-reveals/article68819757.ece

Now that Apple has finished announcing its slate of new M4-equipped Mac computers, we’ve finally been able to see them in person. The Verge’s Vjeran Pavic got some hands-on time with the new products and took some gorgeous photos that you can peruse below.

I’m blown away by how small the new Mac Mini is; the old Mac Mini, which was already small, seems giant in comparison. Vjeran tells me that, in person, the smaller Mac Mini is cute but that it’s “more like a mini Mac Studio than a mini Mac Mini.” He also says there’s no way to reach the power button, which is on the underside of the computer, without lifting it up.

As for the other computers, the new colors of the iMac really pop when they’re lined up together in these photos, if you ask me. And while the space black color of the MacBook Pros isn’t totally new, seeing it in these photos makes me really wish that Apple would bring it to the MacBook Air.

The new Macs are all available to preorder now ahead of their official release next week.

Mac Mini

iMac

MacBook Pro

Accessories

Source : https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/30/24283861/apple-redesigned-mac-mini-macbook-pro-imac-m4-photos

A NASA astronaut was flown to a hospital after returning to Earth with what the US space agency described as an unspecified medical condition.

Three NASA astronauts and a fourth from the Russian space agency spent almost eight months at the International Space Station after their homecoming had been stalled by problems with the Starliner capsule.

The crew splashed down off Florida’s coast at 7.29am on Friday aboard SpaceX’s Crew Dragon.

The astronaut, who NASA did not name for privacy reasons, is understood to be suffering from a medical issue, but the agency did not disclose what it is as of yet.

NASA initially said the entire crew was flown to Ascension Sacred Heart Pensacola hospital out of precaution, but did not specify whether all or some of them had been experiencing issues.

The other three crew members have left the hospital and returned to Houston, the space agency said.

‘The one astronaut who remains at Ascension is in stable condition and is under observation as a precautionary measure,’ NASA said in a statement, referring to Ascension Sacred Heart Pensacola hospital.

The agency said it will not share the nature of the astronaut’s condition.

SpaceX launched the four personnel – Nasa’s Matthew Dominick, Michael Barratt and Jeanette Epps, and Russia’s Alexander Grebenkin – in March.

Source: https://metro.co.uk/2024/10/26/astronaut-returns-space-mystery-medical-condition-21870578/

Imagine standing in the heart of Copenhagen, surrounded by an orchestra of 30 speakers buried in the ground. However, instead of Mozart or Beethoven, you’re about to hear something far more primordial — the haunting sound of Earth’s magnetic field as it flipped 41,000 years ago. Welcome to the cutting edge of geomagnetic research, where science meets art in the most unexpected way.

In a groundbreaking project, scientists from the Technical University of Denmark and the German Research Centre for Geosciences have transformed data from the European Space Agency’s Swarm satellite mission into an auditory experience that’s both fascinating and slightly unnerving.

The star of this cosmic concert? The Laschamp event, a brief but dramatic period when Earth’s magnetic field did the unthinkable – it completely reversed direction. During this geomagnetic rollercoaster, our planet’s magnetic shield weakened to a mere 5% of its current strength, leaving Earth more vulnerable to cosmic rays than ever before.

“The team used data from ESA’s Swarm satellites, as well as other sources, and used these magnetic signals to manipulate and control a sonic representation of the core field. The project has certainly been a rewarding exercise in bringing art and science together,” explains Klaus Nielsen, a musician and project supporter from the Technical University of Denmark, in a 2022 media release after researchers first converted the magnetic field into sound.

The result is a soundscape that blends familiar natural noises like creaking wood and falling rocks with otherworldly tones, creating an audio journey that’s both familiar and alien. It’s a symphony of science, with each of the 30 speakers in Copenhagen’s Solbjerg Square representing a different location on Earth and demonstrating how our magnetic field has fluctuated over the last 100,000 years.

So, why go to all this trouble to turn invisible magnetic fields into sound? “The intention, of course, is not to frighten people – it is a quirky way of reminding us that the magnetic field exists and although its rumble is a little unnerving, the existence of life on Earth is dependent on it,” Nielsen says, shedding light on the project’s purpose.

Indeed, Earth’s magnetic field is our invisible protector, a complex and dynamic bubble that shields us from cosmic radiation and the relentless solar wind. Generated by the swirling liquid iron in Earth’s outer core, this magnetic dynamo is essential for life as we know it.

The Swarm satellite mission, launched by ESA in 2013, aims to unravel the mysteries of this magnetic shield. By measuring magnetic signals from Earth’s core, mantle, crust, oceans, and even the ionosphere and magnetosphere, Swarm is helping scientists understand how our magnetic field is generated and how it changes over time.

Source: https://studyfinds.org/sounds-of-earths-magnetic-field/

When people search for “Adam driver Megalopolis” on Instagram or Facebook right now, instead of seeing posts about Francis Ford Coppola’s latest film, they’re shown a warning, titled, “Child sexual abuse is illegal.”

That bizarre fact was pointed out in a post on X yesterday, and as of today, I’m still seeing it when I search for the phrase. But why? Well, it doesn’t seem to have anything to do with recent Threads moderation failures. Nor are there bombshell revelations about Megalopolis or its main star that I’m aware of.

Instead, Facebook and Instagram seem to be blocking searches containing “mega” and “drive” — I saw it when I searched with those two words together, but not when I searched for “Megalopolis,” “Adam Driver,” or either term mixed with any others. The issue isn’t new, either, as this nine-month-old Reddit post about searching for “Sega mega drive” on Facebook illustrates. (That search seems to work as expected, now.)

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/19/24274467/instagram-facebook-meta-block-csam-adam-driver-megalopolis-mega-drive-content-moderation

Two men have become considerably more powerful inside Google.

The first is Demis Hassabis, who already heads up Google’s AI research and is now better positioned to compete with ChatGPT. The second is Nick Fox, a company veteran who now oversees the company’s cash cow: Search.

Before, Hassabis didn’t have control of the product team that put the models his researchers developed into the world. Now, he oversees the end-to-end experience of Gemini, from the research driving the models to the chatbot people use to access them.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/18/24273748/google-deepmind-gemini-search-chaptgpt-meta-ai-interview

Brazil’s Polícia Federal announced the arrest of the hacker linked to a breach that leaked 2.9 billion records that included sensitive personal information, including some Social Security numbers. The data from that hack, which came to light in August, was put for sale on the dark web in April by an entity identifying themselves as USDoD.

As pointed out by BleepingComputer, according to a machine translation of the department’s press release, the hacker was linked to “two publications selling” federal police data. The hacker also boasted of disclosing the personal data of 80,000 members of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the department said.

Security researchers at Atlas have created a tool to search the leaked records and told PCMag that the leak contains about 272 million unique SSNs, along with as many as 600 million phone numbers. National Public Data and its parent company, Jerico Pictures, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this month, facing a flood of lawsuits and potential penalties over the incident.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/17/24272271/brazilian-police-usdod-hacker-arrest-national-public-data

The Biden administration on Thursday eased export restrictions on U.S. commercial space companies to ship certain satellite and spacecraft-related items to allies and partners.
The changes are intended to make it easier for the growing U.S. commercial space industry to expand sales while also protecting national security and foreign policy interests.
U.S. space companies like Elon Musk’s SpaceX, and large defense contractors with space units like Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab, L3Harris Technologies (LHX.N), opens new tab and Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab, could benefit from the new rules, which were posted in the Federal Register on Thursday afternoon.

In the past 24 hours I’ve written more than 100 WhatsApp messages.

None of them were very exciting. I made plans with my family, discussed work projects with colleagues, and exchanged news and gossip with some friends.

Perhaps I need to up my game, but even my most boring messages were encrypted by default, and used WhatsApp’s powerful computer servers, housed in various data centres around the world.

It’s not a cheap operation, and yet neither I nor any of the people I was chatting with yesterday, have ever parted with any cash to use it. The platform has nearly three billion users worldwide.

So how does WhatsApp – or zapzap, as it’s nicknamed in Brazil – make its money?

Admittedly, it helps that WhatsApp has a massive parent company behind it – Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram as well.

Individual, personal WhatsApp accounts like mine are free because Whatsapp makes money from corporate customers wanting to communicate with users like me.

Since last year firms have been able to set up channels for free on Whatsapp, so they can send out messages to be read by all who choose to subscribe.

But what they pay a premium for is access to interactions with individual customers via the app, both conversational and transactional.

The UK is comparatively in its infancy here, but in the Indian city of Bangalore for example, you can now buy a bus ticket, and choose your seat, all via Whatsapp.

“Our vision, if we get all of this right, is a business and a customer should be able to get things done right in a chat thread,” says Nikila Srinivasan, vice president of business messaging at Meta.

“That means, if you want to book a ticket, if you want to initiate a return, if you want to make a payment, you should be able to do that without ever leaving your chat thread. And then just go right back to all of the other conversations in your life.”

Businesses can also now choose to pay for a link that launches a new WhatsApp chat straight from an online ad on Facebook or Instagram to a personal account. Ms Srinivasan tells me this is alone is now worth “several billions of dollars” to the tech giant.

Other messaging apps have gone down different routes.

Signal, a platform renowned for its message security protocols which have become industry-standard, is a non-profit organisation. It says it has never taken money from investors (unlike the Telegram app, which relies on them).

Instead, it runs on donations – which include a $50m (£38m) injection of cash from Brian Acton, one of the co-founders of WhatsApp, in 2018.

“Our goal is to move as close as possible to becoming fully supported by small donors, relying on a large number of modest contributions from people who care about Signal,” wrote its president Meredith Whittaker in a blog post last year.

Discord, a messaging app largely used by young gamers, has a freemium model – it is free to sign-up, but additional features, including access to games, come with a pricetag. It also offers a paid membership called Nitro, with benefits including high-quality video streaming and custom emojis, for a $9.99 monthly subscription.

Snap, the firm behind Snapchat, combines a number of these models. It carries ads, has 11 million paying subscribers (as of August 2024) and also sells augmented reality glasses called Snapchat Spectacles.

And it has another trick up its sleeve – according to the website Forbes, between 2016-2023 the firm made nearly $300m from interest alone. But Snap’s main source of revenue is from advertising, which brings in more than $4bn a year.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8j7nrppny2o

Chandrayaan-3 was launched July 6 last year from Sriharikota spaceport and it successfully made the soft landing near the South Pole on August 23.

“ISRO is honored to announce that Dr. S. Somanath, Secretary DOS and Chairman ISRO, has received the prestigious IAF World Space Award for Chandrayaan-3’s remarkable achievement the national agency headquartered in Bengaluru said in an online post. This recognition celebrates India’s contributions to space exploration. Celebrations underway in Milan as we continue to strive for new frontiers,” the national agency headquartered in Bengaluru said in an online post.

Source:https://www.timesnownews.com/india/isros-somanath-receives-iaf-world-space-award-for-chandrayaan-3-success-article-114221930

Alphabet’s (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google said on Monday it signed the world’s first corporate agreement to buy power from multiple small modular reactors to meet electricity demand for artificial intelligence.
The technology company’s agreement with Kairos Power aims to bring Kairos’ first small modular reactor online by 2030, followed by additional deployments through 2035.
The companies did not reveal financial details of the agreement or where in the U.S. the plants would be built. Google said it has agreed to buy a total of 500 megawatts of power from six to seven reactors, which is smaller than the output of today’s nuclear reactors.

“We feel like nuclear can play an important role in helping to meet our demand … cleanly in a way that’s more around the clock,” Michael Terrell, senior director for energy and climate at Google, told reporters on a call.
Technology firms have signed several recent agreements with nuclear power companies this year as artificial intelligence boosts power demand for the first time in decades.
In March, Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab purchased a nuclear-powered datacenter from Talen Energy (TLN.O), opens new tab. Last month, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Constellation Energy (CEG.O), opens new tab signed a power deal to help resurrect a unit of the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania, the site of the worst U.S. nuclear accident in 1979.

Astronomers have identified a galaxy that seems to defy the laws of stellar physics. This cosmic oddball, named GS-NDG-9422, resides a staggering 12.9 billion light-years away, offering us a glimpse into the universe when it was merely 900 million years-old. What makes this galaxy truly extraordinary is its peculiar spectrum of light, which has left scientists scratching their heads and proposing intriguing theories about its nature.

The study, led by Alex J. Cameron of the University of Oxford and published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, presents a detailed analysis of GS-NDG-9422’s spectrum. This spectrum, essentially the galaxy’s light signature, reveals an unexpected feature: a sharp downturn in ultraviolet light at a specific wavelength. This characteristic is so unusual that it has sparked a debate about the galaxy’s composition and the processes occurring within it.

The researchers propose that GS-NDG-9422 harbors extremely hot stars, with surface temperatures exceeding 140,000 degrees Fahrenheit (80,000 degrees Celsius). To put this in perspective, typically hot, massive stars in our local universe have temperatures ranging between 70,000 to 90,000 degrees Fahrenheit (40,000 to 50,000 degrees Celsius). These scorching stellar bodies could be responsible for generating an intense radiation field that ionizes the surrounding gas, creating a nebula that outshines the stars themselves.

“It looks like these stars must be much hotter and more massive than what we see in the local universe, which makes sense because the early universe was a very different environment,” says Harley Katz, a co-author of the study from the University of Oxford and the University of Chicago, in a statement.

The research team suspects that GS-NDG-9422 is undergoing a brief phase of intense star formation within a dense gas cloud, producing a large number of massive, hot stars. This cloud is bombarded with so many photons of light from the stars that it glows extraordinarily bright.

This discovery is not just a curiosity; it has far-reaching implications for our understanding of how galaxies evolved in the early universe. The phenomenon of nebular gas outshining stars is particularly intriguing because it has been predicted to occur in environments hosting the universe’s first generation of stars, known as Population III stars.

While GS-NDG-9422 does not contain these primordial stars due to its chemical complexity, it may represent a transitional phase in galactic evolution.

“The exotic stars in this galaxy could be a guide for understanding how galaxies transitioned from primordial stars to the types of galaxies we already know,” Katz explains.

The study was made possible by the unprecedented capabilities of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This next-generation observatory, with its superior sensitivity and resolution, allowed astronomers to capture detailed spectra of this distant galaxy, unveiling its mysterious nature.

Interestingly, GS-NDG-9422 may not be alone in its peculiarity. The researchers identified two other galaxies with similar spectral features: the Lynx Arc at a distance of 11.5 billion light-years, and A2744-NDG-ZD4, which is even more distant at 13.1 billion light-years away. These findings suggest that such exotic galaxies might be more common in the early universe than previously thought.

As with any groundbreaking discovery, this study raises as many questions as it answers. How common are such galaxies in the early universe? And what can they tell us about the evolution of the cosmos? Cameron and his team are actively working to identify more galaxies with similar characteristics to better understand the conditions in the universe within its first billion years.

Source:https://studyfinds.org/inferno-galaxy-hottest-stars/?nab=0

Due to the cyberattack, the most important government websites and services of the state have completely shut down, including important platforms like CM Helpline, Land Registry, and e-Office.

A sudden major cyberattack in Uttarakhand brought the entire IT system of the state to a standstill, which has had a serious impact on government work.
Due to the cyberattack, the most important government websites and services of the state have completely shut down, including important platforms like CM Helpline, Land Registry, and e-Office.

Work in government offices is stalled for the second day today, due to which administrative work has been affected across the state, including the Secretariat.

Speaking to ANI, about the cyberattack, Nikita Khandelwal, Director, ITDA Information Technology Development Agency, said, “During scanning on October 2, it was found that the machine has been affected by malware, so as a precaution we have shut down our data centre, due to which all applications have been shut down and all are being scanned.”

Source: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/cyberattack-halts-uttarakhands-it-system-impacts-government-operations-6718380

Google is pumping more artificial intelligence into its search engine that will enable people to voice questions about images and occasionally organise an entire page of results

The latest changes announced Thursday herald the next step in an AI-driven makeover that Google launched in mid-May when it began responding to some queries with summaries written by the technology at the top of its influential results page. Those summaries, dubbed “AI Overviews,” raised fears among publishers that fewer people would click on search links to their websites and undercut the traffic needed to sell digital ads that help finance their operations.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/googles-search-engines-latest-ai-injection-will-answer-voiced-questions-about-video-and-photos/article68716561.ece

Artificial Intelligence (AI) assistants with “really good long-term memory” are about a year away, according to Microsoft’s head of AI, Mustafa Suleyman.

Products which can recall conversations, projects and problems will encourage users to invest more time and share more of their personal history with them, he said in an exclusive interview with the BBC.

“I think we’re moving to a fundamentally new age where there will be ever present, persistent, very capable co-pilot companions in your everyday life,” he added.

Critics have voiced strong concerns around this level of integration, including data security, privacy, the possibility of AI tools giving bad advice or wrong information, or displaying inbuilt bias towards the person they are supposed to be helping.

But AI supporters argue that in order to be truly useful, these tools have to be deeply embedded into our lives: that they can only be really helpful if they know the history and context behind what they are being tasked to do.

For example, an AI diary manager can only organise your diary if it can access that diary, edit it, and retain information about your activities.

Microsoft is unveiling a big overhaul of its Copilot experience today, adding voice and vision capabilities to transform it into a more personalized AI assistant. As I exclusively revealed in my Notepad newsletter last week, Copilot’s new capabilities include a virtual news presenter mode to read you the headlines, the ability for Copilot to see what you’re looking at, and a voice feature that lets you talk to Copilot in a natural way, much like OpenAI’s Advanced Voice Mode.

Copilot is being redesigned across mobile, web, and the dedicated Windows app into a user experience that’s more card-based and looks very similar to the work Inflection AI has done with its Pi personalized AI assistant. Microsoft hired a bunch of folks from Inflection AI earlier this year, including Google DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman, who is now CEO of Microsoft AI. This is Suleyman’s first big change to Copilot since taking over the consumer side of the AI assistant.

“At Microsoft AI, we are creating an AI companion for everyone,” says Suleyman in an open letter today. “I truly believe we can create a calmer, more helpful and supportive era of technology, quite unlike anything we’ve seen before.”

Copilot now looks unlike anything I’ve seen from Microsoft before, with an interface that is a big departure from what exists right now. It’s a lot warmer, with a personalized Copilot Discover page that’s more useful and inviting than a text entry prompt for a chatbot. Microsoft is customizing this entire Copilot homepage based on your conversation history, and over time, it will include useful searches, tips, and relevant information.

Microsoft split off its consumer version of Copilot to Suleyman’s team earlier this year, and it’s clearly allowed the company to experiment more with personality and customization. “What we’ve learned from the Pi team and the [Inflection AI] folks that came over is that they’ve always had an attention to detail on the needs of customers,” says Yusuf Mehdi, executive vice president and consumer chief marketing officer at Microsoft, in an interview with The Verge. “The way they listen and what they’ve learned from these long conversations in that research has certainly influenced what we’ve done here.”

Beyond the look and feel of this new Copilot, Microsoft is also ramping up its work on its vision of an AI companion for everyone by adding voice capabilities that are very similar to what OpenAI has introduced in ChatGPT. You can now chat with the AI assistant, ask it questions, and interrupt it like you would during a conversation with a friend or colleague. Copilot now has four voice options to pick from, and you’re encouraged to pick one when you first use this updated Copilot experience.

“We’re making a huge bet on voice,” says Mehdi. “When you use it with the way we’ve designed it, you really start to let yourself go and have conversations. Then you see the glimmers of where we’re going to go long term, with vision where the AI can actually help you and see what you see if you want it to.”

Copilot Vision is Microsoft’s second big bet with this redesign, allowing the AI assistant to see what you see on a webpage you’re viewing. You can ask it questions about the text, images, and content you’re viewing, and combined with the new Copilot Voice features, it will respond in a natural way. You could use this feature while you’re shopping on the web to find product recommendations, allowing Copilot to help you find different options.

Copilot Vision sessions are opt-in and ephemeral, and Microsoft says none of the content Copilot Vision engages with is stored or used for training. This new experience won’t work on all websites yet because Microsoft has put restrictions on the types of websites Copilot Vision works with. “We’re starting with a limited list of popular websites to help ensure it’s a safe experience for everyone,” says the Copilot team. During preview, Copilot Vision won’t work on paywalled and sensitive content, either.

Despite the disclaimers, Microsoft clearly has a long-term vision for these new voice and vision features in Copilot. One demo shows Copilot Vision being used to look at photos of old handwritten recipes, helping to explain what the food is and offering tips on how long it takes to make the recipe. Microsoft demonstrated a similar assistive experience for Xbox games earlier this year, showing how Copilot could help you navigate through Minecraft.

This next phase of Copilot also includes Copilot Daily, an audio summary of news and weather that Copilot reads out as if it were a CNN anchor. It’s designed as a short clip you can listen to in the mornings, and it only uses content from news and weather providers that have authorized Copilot to use their content. Microsoft is working with Reuters, Axel Springer, Hearst, and the Financial Times initially, with plans to add more sources over time.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/1/24259187/microsoft-copilot-redesign-vision-voice-features-inflection-ai

The latest SpaceX Crew 9 mission is carrying two astronauts instead of four to bring both stranded members of NASA, Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, back to Earth.

SpaceX launched a mission on Saturday to bring home two astronauts, Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore stranded aboard the International Space Station (ISS) after Boeing’s spacecraft failed to return them earlier this month due to safety concerns. The latest SpaceX Crew 9 mission is carrying two astronauts instead of four to bring both stranded members of NASA back to Earth.

The Crew Dragon capsule, carrying NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut Alexander Gorbunov, lifted off from Cape Canaveral. Their mission is to retrieve NASA’s Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams, who were left without a ride home when Boeing’s Starliner experienced thruster issues and helium leaks. The two astronauts will remain on the ISS until February 2024, when they are expected to return on the SpaceX capsule.

Wilmore and Williams originally expected to spend just a week in space as part of Boeing’s first crewed Starliner flight, launched in June. However, after Boeing’s Starliner was deemed too risky by NASA following a series of technical problems, their return was delayed. By the time they come home, they will have logged more than eight months in space.

NASA officials said there was no way to bring the astronauts back earlier without disrupting other planned missions. As a result, NASA reduced the size of SpaceX’s newly launched crew to leave two empty seats for Wilmore and Williams on the return journey.

Sunita Williams has since taken command of the ISS, which will soon return to its usual crew size of seven. Hague and Gorbunov’s arrival will allow the four astronauts currently on board, who have been there since March, to return to Earth in their own SpaceX capsule. Their departure was delayed due to the Starliner issues.

Boeing has faced a series of setbacks with its Starliner spacecraft, including a failed uncrewed test flight in 2019. Despite multiple attempts to address the issues, NASA ultimately chose SpaceX to handle the rescue mission. Boeing’s most recent Starliner landed safely in New Mexico on 6 September after returning to Earth without astronauts.

SpaceX Crew-9 mission: The NASA shared an update on the “important” SpaceX Crew-9 mission that was earlier postponed from September 26 to September 28 in the wake of “any potential storm activity” due to Tropical Storm Helene.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) informed on Friday about a “very unusual problem” that SpaceX Dragon spacecraft witnessed just ahead of the Crew-9 launch to the International Space Station.

The US space agency also shared an update on the SpaceX Crew-9 mission that was earlier postponed from September 26 to September 28 in the wake of “any potential storm activity” due to Tropical Storm Helene.

Will Hurricane Helene further delay the Crew-9 mission? NASA Commercial Crew posted on X on Saturday, “Weather officers with @SLDelta45 predict a 55% of favorable weather conditions for launch, scheduled for 1:17pm ET Sept. 28.”

The NASA said, “The cumulus cloud rule, flight through precipitation, and surface electric fields rule are primary weather concerns.”

SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft and Falcon 9 rocket are now back on the pad and cargo loading will soon begin. “Both rolled back to the hangar on Wednesday to protect from Hurricane Helene,” NASA said.

Steve Stich, NASA’s Commercial Crew Program manager, said during the press briefing, “We are vertical at the pad, and the next big activity will be loading the cargo here this afternoon and then getting ready for flight.”

‘Very unusual problem’
Steve Stich talked about a “very unusual problem” that the team faced earlier. He said, “…Merlin engines produce soot as a by-product. And at [launch] Pad 40, that soot goes out and exhausts out to the East for the water, and the wind of the day blew that soot back on to the Dragon spacecraft…so we rolled the vehicle back in…”

Later, an official, who joined the press conference from SpaceX headquarters, said, “As Steve talked about, we had a kind of unique situation where the winds were pretty much out of the east and blew some soot back on the Dragon vehicle. We saw that on the Dragon vehicle, we cleaned it off, we went ahead and repainted some areas, specially on the radiator. It’s important that the radiators radiate heat in the proper way in the space, so we had to put some paint on…”

NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Roscosmos cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov will launch to the International Space Station on September 28. The SpaceX Crew-9 mission launches at 1:17 pm EDT from Cape Canaveral, with live coverage starting at 9:00 am the same day.

NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Roscosmos cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov will head to the International Space Station on Saturday after several delays. The SpaceX Crew-9 mission will launch from the Cape Canaveral region — with live coverage accessible across the globe.

An official release from the space agency indicates that the duo are scheduled to lift-off from Space Launch Complex-40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida at 1:17 pm EDT on September 28. The targeted docking time is approximately 5:30 pm on Sunday.

Launch coverage will begin around 9:00 am on Saturday (6:40 pm in India) through the NASA+ site as well as the official NASA website. Arrival coverage will pick up the next day at 3:30 pm on the same platforms.

The Crew-9 mission was originally slated for a mid-August launch. It was pushed back a month to spend more time analyzing issues with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft which remains docked at the station. The departure date was moved yet again this week amidst tropical storm Helene. The hurricane is expected to bring high winds and heavy rain to the launch area in Florida as it moves through the Gulf of Mexico.

This will be the ninth crew rotation mission with SpaceX under the space agency’s Commercial Crew Program.

Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Indian-origin Sunita Williams have been ‘stranded in space for several weeks after their Boeing Starliner suffered helium leaks and experienced issues with the its reaction control thrusters while approaching the space station. NASA had later deemed it ’too risky’ for the duo to return by the same capsule — extending their eight day mission to more than eight months.

Source: https://www.livemint.com/science/mission-to-rescue-sunita-williams-butch-wilmore-nasa-set-to-stream-live-launch-of-spacex-crew-9-how-to-watch-11727357653551.html

Meta’s CEO on his first pair of AR glasses, partnering with Ray-Ban, why he’s done with politics, and more.

We had just come fresh off that demo, walked into the podcast studio, sat down, and hit record. It was fresh in our minds, and that’s where we started. Orion is very much the story of AR as a category. It’s something that Meta hoped would be a consumer product and decided toward the end of its development that it wouldn’t be because of how expensive it is to make. So instead, they’ve turned it into a fancy demo that people like me are getting around Connect this year.

It’s really meant to signify that, “Hey, we have been building something the whole time. We finally have something that works. It’s just not something that we can ship at commercial scale.”

NP: The first thing that struck me listening to the interview was that Zuckerberg feels like he has control of the next platform shift, that platform shift is going to be glasses, and that he can actually take the fight to Apple and Google in a way that he probably couldn’t when Meta was a younger company, when it was just Facebook.

AH: Yeah, and they’re seeing a lot of early traction with the Meta Ray-Bans. We talked a lot about that, their expanded partnership with EssilorLuxottica, and why he thinks this really storied eyewear conglomerate out of Europe could do to smart glasses what Samsung did to smartphones in Korea. He sees this as becoming a huge millions-of-units-a-year market.

I think everyone here at The Verge can see that the Ray-Bans are an early hit and that Meta has tapped into something here that may end up being pretty big in the long run, which is not overpacking tech into glasses that look good, that do a handful of things really well. And Meta is expanding on that rapidly this year with some other AI features that we also talked about.

NP: You got into that in depth, but the other thing that really struck me about this interview is that Zuck just seems loose. He seems confident. He seems almost defiant, in a way.

AH: Yeah, he’s done a lot of self-reflection. In the back half of this interview, we get into a lot of the brand stuff around Meta, how he’s worked through the last few years, and where he sees the company going now, which is, in his own words, “nonpartisan.” He even admits that he may be naive in thinking that a company like Meta can be nonpartisan, but he’s going to try to play a back seat role to all of the discourse that has really engulfed the company for the last 10 years.

NP: All right, let’s get into it. Here’s Verge deputy editor Alex Heath interviewing Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

This transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity. 

Alex Heath: Mark, we just tried Orion together.

Mark Zuckerberg: Yeah. What did you think?

We’re fresh off of it. It feels like true AR glasses are finally getting closer. Orion is a product that you have been working on for five-plus years.

Almost 10.

Take me back to the beginning when you started the project. When it started in research, what were you thinking about? What was the goal for it?

A lot of it goes all the way back to our relationship with mobile platforms. We have lived through one major platform transition already because we started on the web, not on mobile. Mobile phones and smartphones got started around the same time as Facebook and early social media, so we didn’t really get to play any role in that platform transition.

But going through it, where we weren’t born on mobile, we had this awareness that, okay, web was a thing; mobile is a thing that is different. There are strengths and weaknesses of it. There’s this continuum of computing where, now, you have a mobile device that you can take with you all the time, and that’s amazing. But it’s small, and it kind of pulls you away from other interactions. Those things are not great.

There was this recognition that, just like there was the transition from computers to mobile, mobile was not going to be the end of the line. As soon as we started becoming a more stable company, once we found our footing on mobile and we weren’t clearly going to go out of business or something like that, I was like, “Okay, let’s start planting some seeds for what we think could be the future.” Mobile is already getting defined. By 2012, 2014, it was generally too late to really shape that platform in a meaningful way. I mean, we had some experiments, but they didn’t succeed or go anywhere.

Pretty quickly, I was like, “Okay, we should focus on the future because, just like there was the shift from desktop to mobile, new things are going to be possible in the future. So what is that?” I think the simplest version of it is basically what you started seeing with Orion. The vision is a normal pair of glasses that can do two really fundamental things. One is to put holograms in the world to deliver this realistic sense of presence, like you were there with another person or in another place, or maybe you’re physically with a person, but just like we did, you can pull up a virtual Pong game or whatever. You can work on things together. You can sit at a coffee shop and pull up your whole workstation of different monitors. You can be on a flight or in the back seat of a car and pull up a full-screen movie theater. There’s great computing and a full sense of presence, like you’re there with people no matter where they are.

Thing two is that it’s the ideal device for AI. The reason for that is because glasses are uniquely positioned for you to be able to let people see what you see and hear what you hear. They give you very subtle feedback where they can speak in your ear or have silent input that shows up on the glasses that other people can’t see and doesn’t take you away from the world around you. I think that is all going to be really profound. Now, when we got started, I had thought that the hologram part of this was going to be possible before AI. It’s an interesting twist of fate that the AI part is actually possible before the holograms are really able to be mass-produced at an affordable price.

But that was the vision. I think that it’s pretty easy to wrap your head around [the idea that] there are already 1 to 2 billion people who wear glasses on a daily basis. Just like everyone who upgraded to smartphones, I think everyone who has glasses is pretty quickly going to upgrade to smart glasses over the next decade. And then I think it’s going to start being really valuable, and a lot of other people who aren’t wearing glasses today are going to end up wearing them, too.

That’s the simple version. Then, as we’ve developed this out, there are more nuanced directions that have emerged. While that was the full version of what we wanted to build, there are all these things where we said, “Okay, maybe it’s really hard to build normal-looking glasses that can do holograms at an affordable price point. So what parts of that can we take on?” And that’s where we did the partnership with EssilorLuxottica.

So it’s like, “Okay, before you have a display, you can get normal-looking glasses that can stream video and capture content and have a camera, a microphone, and great audio.” But the most important feature at this point is the ability to access Meta AI and just have a full AI there, and it’s multimodal because it has a camera. That product is starting at $300. Initially, I thought, “Hey, this is on the technology path to building full holographic glasses.” At this point, I actually just think both are going to exist long term. I think there are going to be people who want the full holographic glasses, and I think there are going to be people who prefer the superior form factor or lower price of a device where they are primarily optimizing for getting AI. I also think there’s going to be a range of things in between.

So there’s the full field of view that you just saw, where it’s 70 degrees, a really wide field of view for glasses. But I think that there are other products in between that, too. There’s a heads-up display version, which, for that, you probably just need 20 or 30 degrees. You can’t do full-world holograms where you’re interacting with things. You’re not going to play ping-pong in a 30-degree field of view, but you can communicate with AI. You can text your friends, you can get directions, and you can see the content that you’re capturing.

I think that there’s a lot there that’s going to be compelling. At each step along this continuum, from display list to small display to full holographic, you’re packing more technology in. Each step up is going to be a little more expensive and is going to have more constraints on the form factor. Even though I think we’ll get them all to be attractive, you’ll be able to do the simpler ones and much smaller form factors permanently. And then, of course, there are the mixed reality headsets, which kind of took a different direction, which is going toward the same vision. But on that, we said, “Okay, well, we’re not going to try to fit into a glasses form factor.” For that one, we’re going to say, “Okay, we’re going to really go for all the compute we want, and this is going to be more of a headset or goggles form factor.”

My guess is that that’s going to be a long-term thing, too, because there are a bunch of uses where people want the full immersion. And if you’re sitting at your desk and working for a long period of time, you might want the increase in computing power you’re going to be able to get. But I think there’s no doubt that what you saw with Orion is the quintessential vision of what I thought and continue to think is going to be the next major multibillion-person computing platform. And then all these other things are going to get built out around it.

It’s my understanding that you originally hoped Orion would be a consumer product when you first set out to build it.

Yeah. Orion was meant to be our first consumer product, and we weren’t sure if we were going to be able to pull it off. In general, it’s probably turned out significantly better than our 50-50 estimates of what it would be, but we didn’t get there on everything that we wanted to. We still want it to be a little smaller, a little brighter, a little bit higher resolution, and a lot more affordable before we put it out there as a product. And look, we have a line of sight to all those things. I think we’ll probably have the thing that was going to be the version two end up being the consumer product, and we’re going to use Orion with developers to basically cultivate the software experience so that by the time we’re ready to ship something, it’s going to be much more dialed in.

But to be clear, you’re not selling Orion at all. What I’m wondering is, when you made the call, I think it was around 2022, to say Orion is going to be an internal dev kit, how did you feel about that? Was there any part of you that was like, “I really wish this could have just been the consumer product we had built for years”?

I always want to ship stuff quickly, but I think it was the right thing. On this product, there’s a pretty clear set of constraints that you want to hit, especially around the form factor. It is very helpful for us that chunkier glasses are kind of ascendant in the fashion world because that allows us to build glasses that are going to be fashionable but also tech-forward. Even so, I’d say these are unmistakably glasses. They’re reasonably comfortable. They’re under 100 grams.

I wore them for two hours and I couldn’t really tell.

I think we aspire to build things that look really good, and I think these are good glasses, but I want it to be a little smaller so it can fit within what’s really fashionable. When people see the Ray-Bans, there’s no compromise on fashion. Part of why I think people like them is you get all this functionality, but even when you’re not using it, they’re great glasses. For the future version of Orion, that’s the target, too.

Most of the time you’re going through your day, you’re not computing, or maybe something is happening in the background. It needs to be good in order for you to want to keep it on your face. I feel like we’re almost there. We’ve made more progress than anyone else in the world that I’m aware of, but we didn’t quite hit my bar. Similarly, on price, these are going to be more expensive than the Ray-Bans. There’s just a lot more tech that’s going in them, but we do want to have it be within a consumer price point, and this was outside of that range, so I wanted to wait until we could get to that range in order to have some of them shipped.

Are you imagining that the first commercial version — whenever it’s ready in the next couple of years — will be a developer-focused product that you’re selling publicly? Or do you want it to be consumer-ready? 

No, consumer.

That’s why I’m asking about the strategy, because Apple, Snap, and others have decided to do developer-focused plays and get the hardware going with developers early. But are you saying you’re skipping that and just going straight to consumer?

We are using this as a developer kit, but just primarily internally and maybe with a handful of partners. At this point, Meta is by far the premier developer of augmented reality and virtual and mixed reality software and hardware in the world. So you can think about it as a developer kit, but we have a lot of that talent in-house and then we also have well-developed partnerships with a lot of folks externally who we can go to and work with as well.

I don’t think we need to announce a dev kit that arbitrary developers can go buy to get access to the talent that we need to go build out the platform. We’re in a place where we can work with partners and do that, but that’s absolutely what we’re going to do over the next few years. We’re going to hone the experience and figure out what we need to do to really nail it when it’s ready to ship.

A lot has been written about how much you’re spending on Reality Labs. You probably can’t have an exact number, but if you were to guess the cost of building Orion over the last 10 years, are we talking $5 billion-plus, or was it more than that?

Yeah, probably. But overall for Reality Labs, for a while, a lot of people thought all of that budget was going toward virtual and mixed reality. I actually think we’ve said publicly that our glasses programs are a bigger budget than our virtual and mixed reality programs, but that goes across all of them. So that’s the full AR, that’s the display-less glasses, all the work we’re going to do on Ray-Ban, and we just announced the expanded partnership with EssilorLuxottica. They’re a great company. We’ve had a great experience working with them. They’ve designed so many great glasses, and working with them to do even more is going to be really exciting. There’s a lot more to do there on all of these things.

How does this partnership work, and this renewal that you just did with them, how is it structured? What does this deal look like?

I think it was a kind of commitment from the companies that we’re feeling pretty good about how this is going, and we’re going to build a lot more glasses together. Rather than doing one generation and then designing the next generation, a longer-term partnership allows the teams to not just have to worry about one thing at a time — “Okay, is this one going to be good? And then how do we build on that for the next one?”

Now, we can start a multiyear roadmap of many different devices, knowing that we’re going to be working together for a long time. I’m optimistic about that. That’s sort of how we work internally. Sometimes, when you’re early on, you definitely want to learn from each device launch, but when there are things that you’re committed to, I don’t think you want the team to feel like, “Okay, if we don’t get the short-term milestone, then we’re going to cancel the whole thing.”

Are you buying a stake in EssilorLuxottica?

Yeah, I think we’ve talked about investing in them. It’s not going to be a major thing. I’d say it’s more of a symbolic thing. We want to have this be a long-term partnership, and as part of that, I thought that this would be a nice gesture. I fundamentally believe in them a lot. I think that they’re going to go from being the premier glasses company in the world to one of the major technology companies in the world. My vision for them and how I think about it is like if you think about how Samsung in Korea made it so that Korea became one of the main hubs of building phones in the world. I think this is probably one of the best shots for Europe and Italy, in particular, to become a major hub for manufacturing and building and designing the next major category of computing platforms overall.

They’re kind of all in on that now, and it’s been this interesting question because they have such a good business and such deep competence in the areas. I’ve gotten more of an appreciation of how strong of a technology company they are in their own way: designing lenses, designing the materials that you need to make fashionable glasses that can be light enough but also feel good. They bring a huge amount that people in our world, the tech world, probably don’t necessarily see, but I think that they’re really well set up for the future. So I believe in the partnership. I’m really excited about the work that we’re doing together, and fundamentally, I think that that’s just going to be a massively successful company in the future.

Is it set up in a way where they control the designs and you provide the tech stack, or do you collaborate on the design? 

I think we collaborate on everything. Part of working together is that you build a joint culture over time, and there were a lot of really sharp people over there who, I think, it took maybe a couple versions for us to gain an appreciation for how each of us approaches things. They really think about things from this “fashion, manufacturing, lenses, selling optical devices” perspective. And we obviously come at it from a consumer electronics, AI, and software perspective. But I think, over time, we just appreciate each other’s perspectives on things a lot more.

I’m constantly talking to them to get their ideas on different things. You know partnerships are working well when you reach out to them to get their opinion on things that are not actually currently in the scope of what you’re working on together. I do that frequently with Rocco [Basilico], who runs their wearables, and Francesco [Milleri], who’s their CEO, and our team does that with a large part of the working group over there. It’s a good crew. They share good values. They’re really sharp. And like I said, I believe in them, and I think it’s going to be a very successful partnership and company.

How many Ray-Ban Metas have you sold so far?

I don’t know if we’ve given a number on that.

I know. That’s why I’m asking.

It’s going very well. One of the things that I think is interesting is we underestimated demand. One thing that is very different in the world of consumer electronics than software is that there are fewer supply constraints in software. There are some. I mean, like some of the stuff that we’re rolling out, like the voice on Meta AI, we need to meter it as we’re rolling it out because we need to make sure we have enough inference capacity to handle it, but fundamentally, we’ll resolve that in weeks.

But for manufacturing, you make these concrete decisions like, “Okay, are we setting up four manufacturing lines or six?” And each one is a big upfront [capital expenditure] investment, and you’re basically deciding upfront the velocity at which you’re going to be able to generate supply before you know what the demand is. On this one, we thought that Ray-Ban Meta was probably going to sell three or five times more than the first version did. And we just dramatically underestimated it.

Now, we’re in this position where it’s actually been somewhat hard for us to gauge what the real demand is because they’re sold out. You can’t get them. So, if you can’t get them, how do you know where the actual curve is? We’re basically getting to the point where that’s resolved. Now, we kind of adjusted, and we made the decision to build more manufacturing lines. It took some time to do it. They’re online now. It’s not just about being able to make them; you need to get them into all the stores and get the distribution right. We feel like that’s in a pretty good place now.

Over the rest of this year, we’re going to start getting a real sense of the demand, but while that’s going on, the glasses keep getting better because of over-the-air AI updates. So, even though we keep shipping new frames and they’re adding more transition lenses because people want to wear them indoors, the hardware doesn’t necessarily change. And that’s an interesting thing because sunglasses are a little more discretionary, so I think a lot more people early on were thinking, “Hey, I’ll experiment with this with sunglasses. I’m not going to make these my primary glasses.” Now, we’re seeing a lot more people say, “Hey, this is actually really useful. I want to be able to wear them inside. I want them to be my primary glasses.”

So, whether that’s working with them through the optical channel or the transitions, that’s an important part, but the AI part of this also just keeps getting better. We talked about it at Connect: the ability to have, over the next few months when we roll this out, real-time translations. You’re traveling abroad, someone’s speaking Spanish to you, you just get it translated into English in your ear. It will roll out to more and more languages over time. I think we’re starting with a few languages, and we’ll hit more over time.

I tried that. Well, actually, I didn’t try real-time translation, but I tried looking at a menu in French, and it translated it into English. And then, at the end, I was like, “What is the euro [price] in USD?” And it did that, too. I’m also starting to see the continuum of this to Orion in the sense of the utility aspects. You could say, “Look at this and remind me about it at 8PM tonight,” and then it syncs with the companion app. 

Yeah, Reminders are a new thing.

It’s not replacing the phone, but it’s augmenting what I would do with my phone. And I’m wondering if the [AI] app is a place for more of that kind of interaction as well. How are these glasses going to be more deeply tied to Meta AI over time? It seems like they’re getting closer and closer all the time.

Well, I think Meta AI is becoming a more and more prominent feature of the glasses, and there’s more stuff that you can do. You just mentioned Reminders, which is another example. Now, that is just going to work, and now your glasses can remind you of things.

Or you can look at a phone number and say, “Call this phone number,” and then it calls on the phone.

Yeah, we’ll add more capabilities over time, and some of those are model updates. Okay, now it has Llama 3.2, but some of it is software development around it. Reminders you don’t get for free just because we updated the model. We have this big software development effort, and we’re adding features continuously and developing the ecosystem, so you get more apps like Spotify, and all these different things can work more natively.

So the glasses just get more and more useful, which I think is also going to increase demand over time. And how does it interact with phones? Like you said, I don’t think people are getting rid of phones anytime soon. The way I think about this is that when phones became the primary computing platform, we didn’t get rid of computers. We just kind of shifted. I don’t know if you had this experience, but at some point in the early 2010s, I noticed that I’d be sitting at my desk in front of my computer, and I’d just pull out my phone to do things.

It’s not like we’re going to throw away our phones, but I think what’s going to happen is that, slowly, we’re just going to start doing more things with our glasses and leaving our phones in our pockets more. It’s not like we’re done with our computers, and I don’t think we’re going to be done with our phones for a while, but there’s a pretty clear path where you’re just going to use your glasses for more and more things. Over time, I think the glasses are also going to be able to be powered by wrist-based wearables or other wearables.

So, you’re going to wake up one day 10 years from now, and you’re not even going to need to bring your phone with you. Now, you’re still going to have a phone, but I think more of the time, people are going to leave it in their pocket or leave it in their bag, or eventually, some of the time, leave it at home. I think there will be this gradual shift to glasses becoming the main way we do computing.

It’s interesting that we’re talking about this right now, because I feel like phones are becoming kind of boring and stale. I was just looking at the new iPhone, and it’s basically the same as the year before. People are doing foldables, but it feels like people have run out of ideas on phones and that they’re kind of at their natural end state. When you see something like the Ray-Bans and how people have gravitated to them in a way that’s surprised you, and I think surprised all of us, I wonder if it’s also just that people want to interact with technology in different ways now.

Like you said at the beginning, the way that AI has intersected with this is kind of an “aha” thing for people that, honestly, for me, I didn’t expect it to click as quickly as it did. But when I got whitelisted for the AI, I was walking around in my backyard and using it, and I was like, “Oh, it’s obvious now where this is going. It feels like things are finally in a place where you can see where it’s going. Whereas before, it’s been a lot of R&D and talking about it, but the Ray-Bans are kind of a signifier of that, and I’m wondering if you agree.

I agree. I still think it’s early. You really want to be able to not only ask the AI questions but also ask it to do things and know that it’s going to reliably go do it. We’re starting with simple things, so voice control of your glasses, although you can do that on phones, too, and things like reminders, although you can generally do that on phones, too. But as the model capabilities grow over the next couple of generations and you get more of what people call these agentic capabilities, it’s going to start to get pretty exciting.

For what it’s worth, I also think that all the AI work is going to make phones a lot more exciting. The most exciting thing that has happened to our family of apps roadmap in a long time is all the different AI things that we’re building. If I were at any of the other companies trying to design what the next few versions of iPhone or Google’s phones should be, I think that there’s a long and interesting roadmap of things that they can do with AI that, as an app developer, we can’t. That’s a pretty exciting and interesting thing for them to do, which I assume they will.

On the AI social media piece, one of the wilder things that your team told me you’re going to start doing is showing people AI-generated imagery personalized to them, in feed. I think it’s starting as an experiment, but if you’re a photographer, you would see Meta AI generating content that’s personalized for you, alongside content from the people you follow.

It’s this idea that I’ve been thinking about, of AI invading social media, so to speak — maybe you don’t like the word “invading,” but you know what I mean — and what that does to how we relate to each other as humans. In your view, how much AI stuff and AI-generated stuff is going to be filling feeds in the near future?

Here’s how I come at this: in the history of running the company — and we’ve been building these apps for 20 years — every three to five years, there’s some new major format that comes along that is typically additive to the experience. So, initially, people updated their profiles; then they were able to post statuses that were texts; then links; then you got photos early on; then you added videos; then mobile. Basically Snap invented stories, the first version of that, and that became a pretty widely used format. The whole version of shortform videos, I think, is still an ascendant format.

You keep on making the system richer by having more types of content that people can share and different ways to express themselves. When you look out over the next 10 years of, “This trend seems to happen where every three to five years, there are new formats,” I think you’d bet that that continues or accelerates given the pace of change in the tech industry. And I think you’d bet that probably most of the new formats are going to be AI-connected in some way given that that’s the driving theme for the industry at this point.

Given that set of assumptions, we’re trying to understand what things are most useful to people within that. There’s one vein of this, which is helping people and creators make better content using AI. So that is going to be pretty clear. Just make it super easy for aspiring creators or advanced creators to make much better stuff than they would be able to otherwise. That can take the format of like, “All right, my daughter is writing a book and she wants it illustrated, and we sit down together and work with Meta AI and Imagine to help her come up with images to illustrate it.” That’s a thing that’s like, she didn’t have the capability to do that before. She’s not a graphic designer, but now she has that ability. I think that that’s going to be pretty cool.

Then there’s a version where you have this great diversity of AI agents that are part of this system. And this, I think, is a big difference between our vision of AI and most of the other companies. Yeah, we’re building Meta AI as the main assistant that you can build. That’s sort of equivalent to the singular assistant that may be like what Google or an OpenAI or different folks are building, but it’s not really the main thing that we’re doing. Our main vision is that we think that there are going to be a lot of these. It’s every business, all the hundreds of millions of small businesses, just like they have a website and an email address and a social media account today, I think that they’re all going to have an AI that helps them interact with their customers in the future, that does some combination of sales and customer support and all of that.

I think all the creators are basically going to want some version of this that basically helps them interact with their community when they’re just limited by not having enough hours in the day to interact with all the messages that are coming in, and they want to make sure that they can show some love to people in their community. Those are just the two most obvious ones that even if we just did those, that’s many hundreds of millions, but then there’s going to be all this more creative [user-generated content] that people create that are kind of wilder use cases. And our view is, “Okay, these are all going to live across these social networks and beyond.” I don’t think that they should be constrained to waiting until someone messages them.

I think that they’re going to have their own profiles. They’re going to be creating content. People will be able to follow them if they want. You’ll be able to comment on their stuff. They may be able to comment on your stuff if you’re connected with them, and there will obviously be different logic and rules, but that’s one way that there’s going to be a lot more AI participants in the broader social construct. Then you get to the test that you mentioned, which is maybe the most abstract, which is just having the central Meta AI system directly generate content for you based on what we think is going to be interesting to you and putting that in your feed.

On that, I think there’s been this trend over time where the feeds started off as primarily and exclusively content for people you followed, your friends. I guess it was friends early on, then it kind of broadened out to, “Okay, you followed a set of friends and creators.” And then it got to a point where the algorithm was good enough where we’re actually showing you a lot of stuff that you’re not following directly because, in some ways, that’s a better way to show you more interesting stuff than only constraining it to things that you’ve chosen to follow.

I think the next logical jump on that is like, “Okay, we’re showing you content from your friends and creators that you’re following and creators that you’re not following that are generating interesting things. And you just add on to that, a layer of, “Okay, and we’re also going to show you content that’s generated by an AI system that might be something that you’re interested in.” Now, how big do any of these segments get? I think it’s really hard to know until you build them out over time, but it feels like it is a category in the world that’s going to exist, and how big it gets is kind of dependent on the execution and how good it is.

Why do you think it needs to exist as a new category? I’m still wrestling with why people want this. I get the companionship stuff that Character.AI and some startups have already shown there’s a market for. And you’ve talked about how Meta AI is already being used for roleplaying. But the big idea is that AI has been used to intermediate and feed how humans reach each other. And now, all of a sudden, AIs are going to be in feeds with us, and that feels big. 

But in a lot of ways, the big change already happened, which is people getting content that they weren’t following. And the definition of feeds and social interaction has changed very fundamentally in the last 10 years. Now, in social systems, most of the direct interaction is happening in more private forums, in messaging or groups.

This is one of the reasons we were late with Reels initially to compete with TikTok is because we hadn’t made this mental shift where we kind of felt like, “No, the feed is where you interact with people.” Actually, increasingly, the feed is becoming a place where you discover content that you then take to your private forums and interact with people there. It’s like, I’ll still have the thing where a friend will post something and I’ll comment on it and engage directly in feed. Again, this is additive. You’re adding more over time. But the main way that you engage with Reels isn’t necessarily that you go into the Reels comments and comment and talk to people you don’t know. It’s like you see something funny and you send it to friends in a group chat.

I think that paradigm will absolutely continue with AI and all kinds of interesting content. So it is facilitating connections with people, but already, we’re in this mode where our connections through social media are shifting to more private places, and the role of the feed in the ecosystem is more of what I’d call a discovery engine of content: icebreakers or interesting topic starters for the conversations that you’re having across this broader spectrum of places where you’re interacting.

Do you worry that interacting with AIs like this will make people less likely to talk to other people, that it will reduce the engagement that we have with humans?

The sociology that I’ve seen on this is that most people have way fewer friends physically than they would like to have. People cherish the human connections that they have, and the more we can do to make that feel more real and give you more reasons to connect, whether it’s through something funny that shows up so you can message someone or a pair of glasses that lets your sister show up as a hologram in your living room when she lives across the country and you wouldn’t be able to see her otherwise, that’s always our main bread and butter in the thing that we’re doing.

But in addition to that, the average person, maybe they’d like to have 10 friends, and there’s the stat that — it’s sort of sad — the average American feels like they have fewer than three real close friends. So does this take away from that? My guess is no. I think that what’s going to happen is it’s going to help give people more of the support that they need and give people more reasons and the ability to connect with either a broader range of people or more deeply with the people they care about.

How are you feeling about how Threads is doing these days?

Threads is on fire. It’s great. There’s only so quickly that something can get to 1 billion people, so we’ll keep pushing on it.

I’ve heard it’s still using Instagram a lot for growth. I’m wondering, when do you see it getting to a standalone growth driver on its own?

I think that these things all connect to each other. Threads helps Instagram, and Instagram helps threads. I don’t know that we have some strategic goal, which is to make it so that Threads is completely disconnected from Instagram or Facebook. I actually think we’re going in the other direction. It started off just connected to Instagram, and now we also connected it so that the content can show up [elsewhere].

Taking a step back, we just talked about how most people are interacting in more private forums. If you’re a creator, what you want to do is have your content show up everywhere because you’re trying to build the biggest community that you can in these different places. So it’s this huge value for people if they can generate a reel or a video or some text-based content. Now, you can post it on Threads, Instagram, Facebook, and more places over time. The direction there is generally more flow, not less, and more interoperability. And that’s why I’ve been pushing on that as a theme over time.

I’m not even sure what X is anymore, but I think what it used to be, what Twitter used to be, was a place where you went when news was happening. I know you, and the company, seem to be distancing yourself from recommending news. But with Threads, it feels like that’s what people want and what people thought Threads might be, but it seems like you are intentionally saying, “We don’t want Threads to be that.”

There are different ways to look at this. I always looked at Twitter not as primarily about real-time news but as a shortform, primarily text discussion-oriented app. To me, the fundamental defining aspect of that format is that when you make a post, the comments aren’t subordinate to the post. The comments are kind of at a peer level.

That is a very different architecture than every other type of social network that’s out there. And it’s a subtle difference, but within these systems, these subtle differences lead to very different emerging behaviors. Because of that, people can take and fork discussions, and it makes it a very good discussion-oriented platform. News is one thing that people like discussing, but it’s not the only thing.

I always looked at Twitter, and I was like, “Hey, this is such a wasted opportunity. This is clearly a billion-person app.” Maybe in the modern day, when you have many billions of people using social apps, it should be multiple billions of people. There were a lot of things that have been complicated about Twitter and the corporate structure and all of that, but for whatever reason, they just weren’t quite getting there. Eventually, I thought, “Hey, I think we can do this. I think we can get this, build out the discussion platform in a way that can get to a billion people and be more of a ubiquitous social platform that I think achieves its full potential.” But our version of this is that we want it to be a kinder place. We don’t want it to start with the direct head-to-head combat of news, and especially politics.

Do you feel like that constrains the growth of the product at all?

I think we’ll see. We’ll run the experiment.

That needs to exist in the world. Because I feel like with X’s seeming implosion, it doesn’t really exist anymore. Maybe I’m biased as someone in the media, but I do think when something big happens in the world, people want an app that they can go to and see everyone that they follow talking about it immediately. There’s not an immediacy [on Threads].

Well, we’re not the only company. There are a ton of different competitors and different companies doing things. I think that there’s a talented team over at X, so I wouldn’t write them off. And then obviously, there are all these other folks, and there are a lot of startups that are doing stuff. So I don’t feel like we have to go at that first. I think that maybe we get there over time, or maybe we decide that it’s enough of a zero-sum trade, or maybe even a negative-sum trade, where that use case should exist somewhere but maybe that use case prevents a lot more usage and a lot more value in other places because it makes it a somewhat less friendly place. I don’t think we know the answer to that yet. But I do think, the last 8–10 years of our experience has been that the political discourse is tricky.

On the one hand, it’s obviously a very important thing in society. On the other hand, I don’t think it leaves people feeling good. I’m torn between these two values. I think people should be able to have this kind of open discourse, and that’s good. But I don’t want to design a product that makes people angry. There’s an informational lens for looking at this, and then there’s “you’re designing a product, and what’s the feel of the product?” I think anyone who’s designing a product cares a lot about how the thing feels.

But you recognize the importance of that discussion happening. 

I think it’s useful. And look, we don’t block it. We just make it so that for the content where you’re following people, if you want to talk to your friends about it, if you want to talk to them about it in messaging, there can be groups about it. If you follow people, it can show up in your feed, but we don’t go out of our way to recommend that content when you are not following it. I think that has been a healthy balance for us and for getting our products to generally feel the way that we want.

And culture changes over time. Maybe the stuff will be a little bit less polarized and anger-inducing at some point, and maybe it’ll be possible to have more of that while also, at the same time, having a product where we’re proud of how it feels. Until then, I think we want to design a product where people can get the things that they want, but fundamentally, I care a lot about how people feel coming away from the product.

Do you see this decision to downrank political content for people who aren’t being followed in feed as a political decision? Because you’re also, at the same time, not really saying much about the US presidential election this year. You’re not donating. You’ve said you want to stay out of it now.

And I see the way the company’s acting, and it reflects your personal way you’re operating right now. I’m wondering how much more of it is also what you and the company have gone through and the political environment, and not necessarily just what users are telling you.

Sure.

Is there a throughline there?

I’m sure it’s all connected. In this case, it wasn’t a tradeoff between those two things because this actually was what our community was telling us. And people were saying, “Generally, we don’t want so much politics. We don’t feel good. We want more stuff from our friends and family. We want more stuff from our interests.” That was kind of the primary driver. But it’s definitely the case that our corporate experience on this shaped this.

I think there’s a big difference between something being political and being partisan. And the main thing that I care about is making sure that we can be seen as nonpartisan and be a trusted institution by as many people as possible, as much as something can be in the world in 2024. I think that the partisan politics is so tough in the world right now that I’ve made the decision that, for me and for the company, the best thing to do is to try to be as nonpartisan and neutral as possible in all of this and distance ourselves from it as much as possible. It’s not just the substance. I also think perception matters. Maybe it doesn’t matter on our platforms, whether I endorse a candidate or not, but I don’t want to go anywhere near that.

Sure, you could say that’s a political strategy, but for where we are in the world today, it’s very hard. Almost every institution has become partisan in some way, and we are just trying to resist that. And maybe I’m too naive, and maybe that’s impossible, but we’re going to try to do that.

On the Acquired podcast recently, you said that the political miscalculation was a 20-year mistake.

Yeah, from a brand perspective.

And you said it was going to take another 10 years or so for you to fully work through that cycle. What makes you think it’s such a lasting thing? Because you look at how you personally have evolved over the last couple of years, and I think perception of the company has evolved. I’m wondering what you meant by saying it’s going to take another 10 years.

I’m just talking about where our brand and our reputation are compared to where I think they would’ve been. Sure, maybe things have improved somewhat over the last few years. You can feel the trend, but it’s still significantly worse than it was in 2016. The internet industry overall, and I think our company, in particular, we’re seen way more positively.

Look, there were real issues. I think it’s always very difficult to talk about this stuff in a nuanced way because, to some degree, before 2016, everyone was sort of too rosy about the internet overall and didn’t talk enough about the issues. Then the pendulum swung and people only talked about the issues and didn’t talk about the stuff that was positive, and it was all there the whole time. When I talk about this, I don’t mean to come across as simplistic or—

Or that you guys didn’t do anything wrong or anything.

Or that there weren’t issues with the internet or things like that. Obviously, every year, whether it’s politics or other things, there are always things that you look back on and you’re like, “Hey, if I were playing this perfectly, I would’ve done these things differently.” But I do think it’s the case that I didn’t really know how to react to something as big of a shift in the world as what happened, and it took me a while to find my footing. I do think that it’s tricky when you’re caught up in these big debates and you’re not experienced or sophisticated and engaging with that. I think you can make some big missteps. I do think that some of the things that we were accused of over time, it’s been pretty clear at this point now that all the investigations have been done that they weren’t true.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/24253481/meta-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-ar-glasses-orion-ray-bans-ai-decoder-interview

NASA-SpaceX Crew launch has now been scheduled for “instantaneous launch” on Saturday, September 28. There’s also a backup opportunity available on Sunday.

NASA’s SpaceX Crew-9 mission, which has been tasked to bring back Starliner astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore from space station, was delayed on Tuesday. The mission was scheduled to launch on September 26. The Crew-9 launch was, however, shifted to September 28 “over weather concerns” related to Tropical Storm Helene.

NASA said in an update on September 24, “NASA and SpaceX teams have adjusted the next launch opportunity for NASA’s SpaceX Crew-9 mission to no earlier than 1:17 pm EDT [or 10:47 pm], Saturday, September 28, from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.”

While the “instantaneous launch” is scheduled at 1:17 pm ET on September 28, there’s a backup opportunity available on Sunday, September 29 at 12:54 pm ET if needed, SpaceX said.

When and where to watch the launch? A live webcast of this mission will begin about one hour prior to liftoff, which one can watch on X SpaceX’s X account. One can also watch the webcast on the new X TV app.

Why was Crew-9 launch delayed?
The decision was taken “due to expected tropical storm conditions in the area”. NASA said, “Although Tropical Storm Helene is moving through the Gulf of Mexico and expected to impact the Florida panhandle, the storm system is large enough that high winds and heavy rain are expected in the Cape Canaveral and Merritt Island regions on Florida’s east coast.”

The US space agency said the change allows teams to complete a rehearsal of launch day activities with the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft and Falcon 9 rocket on Tuesday night.

Meanwhile, SpaceX posted videos and images of the full rehearsal of launch day activities ahead of liftoff on Saturday.

“Following rehearsal activities, the integrated system will move back to the hangar ahead of any potential storm activity,” NASA said.

Crew 9 mission to bring back Sunita Williams
The Crew 9 mission will be the ninth crew rotation mission with SpaceX under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program. NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Roscosmos cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov will launch aboard the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft and Falcon 9 rocket to the International Space Station.

The Crew 9 mission was re-planned to bring Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore back home on the Dragon spacecraft. Initially, the Crew 9 mission was supposed to launch with four crew members.

Meanwhile, Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore launched aboard Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft on June 5. They reached the International Space Station on June 6. During its journey, Starliner witnessed technical issues that delayed its return from space.

The Boeing spacecraft and its crew members were initially scheduled to return from the ISS in mid-June. However, NASA decided to bring an “empty” Starliner back to Earth, keeping in view the safety of the two astronauts. It was then decided to help the crew – Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore – return to Earth on the SpaceX spacecraft.

Source: https://www.livemint.com/science/news/nasa-spacex-delay-crew-9-mission-tasked-to-bring-back-sunita-williams-heres-why-11727232411456.html

When I walked into the building that houses the Steve Jobs Theater for the iPhone 16 launch last week, the first person I saw taking a photo of the room wasn’t using an iPhone; they were using a compact digital camera.

I’m not talking about a fancy Ricoh GR III. I’m talking a PowerShot, Cybershot, or a Coolpix — something with 6 megapixels and a CCD sensor that makes anything above ISO 1600 look like confetti. These cameras are in style right now with a certain subset of photographers, tired of phone photos looking “overprocessed,” running straight in the other direction to the hard contrast and blown highlights of those early digital sensors. What’s old is new again, and artificially bright shadows are out.

Apple’s reaction to the little point-and-shoot renaissance and the popularity of things like Halide’s Process Zero is on full display in the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro: an unprecedented amount of control over your image processing settings in the form of overhauled Photographic Styles. Personally, I love it. I think a lot of people who miss shadows in their photos will like it, too. But it’s also made the iPhone camera more complicated than ever, highlighting just how tricky Apple’s situation is.

Photographic Styles have been around since the iPhone 13. On a basic level, they’re filters to give your images a certain look — warmer, cooler, brighter, etc. — only instead of sitting on top of the image, they’re baked into the camera processing pipeline. The iPhone 16 updates Photographic Styles in a big way, with new controls for undertones meant to help you dial in skin tones and apply film-like color casts. You can use some preset options, but they’re also immensely customizable, so you can dial in exactly the right amount of saturation and contrast you want. And for the first time, you can apply them to your photos after you take them.

As I spent the past week-plus testing the iPhone 16 camera, the flood of new options gave me a kind of vertigo. What do I want this camera to be? Do I want to wander around Pioneer Square and treat it like a Fujifilm X100? Should I shoot black and white all the time? Do I optimize the undertone for my kid’s skin tone? Or for my skin tone? Should I just shoot in Standard and change the style afterward? If so, which style?

Adding to the confusion is the fact that Photographic Styles aren’t “sticky” right out of the box. If you use one, leave the camera app, and come back, it will reset to your default. You can change this in the camera settings, but I didn’t realize what was happening at first because, on my iPhone 13 Mini, Photographic Styles are sticky.

The camera’s default setting is a “Standard” style that’s basically just Apple’s take on what a camera should be. You can set any of the Photographic Styles as your default, but only by going into the system settings and tapping through an interface where you audition four of your “favorite photos” in the new style.

On top of all this, you have to shoot in HEIF to use the new Photographic Styles, which is Apple’s preferred image file format. HEIFs can store a lot of image data in a smaller file than JPEG, but it’s not as widely supported. Compatibility is a lot better than it once was since lots of platforms have adapted to Apple’s insistence on making HIEF happen, but it has nowhere near the adoption rate of JPEG, which is basically a universal standard.

One day, you might find yourself face-to-face with an ancient government website that won’t accept your .heic file. Apple’s best solution to converting HEIFs to JPEG seems to be “email it to yourself,” which automatically converts the image, but that doesn’t feel like a real solution. I had to use the Files app to convert a bunch of images for my iPhone 16 review, and that is a workflow I would not wish on anyone.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/20/24248356/iphone-16-camera-photographic-styles

In an era where technology continues to reshape our world, artificial intelligence (AI) is now venturing into a realm that people used to think was impossible for a machine — understanding our emotions.

A groundbreaking review published in CAAI Artificial Intelligence Research explores how AI is revolutionizing the field of emotional recognition, promising to transform everything from doctor’s visits to calls with tech support. The study, led by researcher Feng Liu from East China Normal University, delves into the cutting-edge world of AI-powered emotion analysis.

This technology aims to decode human emotions with unprecedented accuracy, using a combination of facial expressions, voice patterns, body language, and even physiological signals.

“This technology has the potential to transform fields such as healthcare, education, and customer service, facilitating personalized experiences and enhanced comprehension of human emotions,” adds Liu in a media release.

Imagine a world where your smartphone can detect when you’re feeling stressed and automatically suggest relaxation techniques or where a virtual therapist can provide personalized mental health support based on subtle changes in your emotional state. These scenarios may soon become reality, thanks to rapid advancements in multi-modal emotion recognition systems.

One of the most exciting developments highlighted in the review is the integration of deep learning techniques with psychological theories. This fusion allows AI systems to not only recognize emotions but also understand the complex interplay between emotions and personality traits. For instance, the OPO-FCM model mentioned in the study can analyze video footage to map facial expressions onto a three-dimensional emotion space, providing insights into both emotional states and personality characteristics.

The potential applications of this technology are vast and varied. In healthcare, AI-powered emotion recognition could revolutionize mental health diagnosis and treatment, offering more objective and personalized approaches. In education, these systems could help teachers identify when students are struggling or disengaged, allowing for timely interventions. Even customer service could be transformed with AI assistants capable of detecting and responding to customer emotions in real-time.

However, as with any powerful technology, there are still challenges to overcome. The study emphasizes the need for these AI systems to be culturally adaptive, recognizing that emotional expressions can vary significantly across different cultures. Privacy concerns also loom large as the collection and analysis of emotional data raise important ethical questions.

As AI continues to push the boundaries of what’s possible in emotional recognition, we stand on the brink of a new era in human-computer interaction. The day may not be far off when our devices understand not only what we say but also how we feel.

Source: https://studyfinds.org/ai-know-how-you-feel/?nab=0

Huawei and Apple’s latest smartphones go on sale in China on Friday, with the Chinese tech company’s much-anticipated $2,800 tri-foldable phone offered at more than twice the price of the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

However, analysts warn that supply chain constraints could leave many buyers of Huawei Technologies’ Mate XT empty-handed.

The launch of the Mate XT, which analysts say has a locally-made chipset, underscores Huawei’s ability to navigate U.S. sanctions and solidifies its position against Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab in China, where some consumers criticised the new iPhone 16 for its lack of AI features in the country.

Huawei unveiled the Mate XT to much fanfare this month, with executive director Richard Yu saying the company had turned “science fiction into reality” with the device that folds three ways like an accordion door.

Pre-orders have surpassed 6.5 million so far, almost double the roughly 3.9 million foldable smartphones shipped worldwide in the second quarter of this year, according to consultancy IDC, although “pre-ordering” does not require consumers to put down a deposit.

While the Mate XT shows Huawei’s innovation in the premium segment, sales may fall short of its bi-folding predecessor, the Mate X5, which still retails for 11,500 yuan ($1,630) and has sold 2.2 million units in total as of the second quarter, said Amber Liu, an analyst with research firm Canalys.

Though both are premium foldable flagships of Huawei, Mate XT and Mate X5 differ in value proposition, specifications and price, Liu said.

“It’s challenging for the Mate XT to replicate the volume of the Mate X5, but Mate XT marks a significant breakthrough and evolution in all these aspects.”

The Mate XT is equipped with the same Kirin 9010 5G processor it used for the Pura 70 smartphone series it launched in April, in a smartphone seen as notable for pushing back against U.S. technology curbs, said Lori Chang, a senior analyst with Isaiah Research.

Source : https://www.reuters.com/technology/huaweis-2800-tri-fold-phone-hits-stores-amid-supply-concerns-2024-09-20

It’s a weird year for iOS.

Usually, the new software version arrives all at once. Not so with iOS 18. The foundational stuff has arrived, and in a normal year, things like RCS support and a redesigned control center would be more than enough. But iOS 18’s headline feature, Apple Intelligence, isn’t even part of this initial release, and we may not see some of its most interesting features until well into 2025. The iOS 18 rollout starts now, and it’s just going to keep on rolling for the foreseeable future.

iOS 18 is an ambitious update, even without Apple Intelligence in the picture. Customization options are at an all-time high, and with some tinkering, you’ll be able to personalize your iPhone like never before. It’s almost un-Apple-like.

Control Center is a good place to start. The quick-access settings panel has looked and functioned in basically the same way for most of the past decade, but it gets a big overhaul in iOS 18. I think this is Apple at its best: everything you need is still there and the vibe is overwhelmingly familiar, but once you dig in, you can see how it’s a massive change.

Controls are divided into pages now, with the familiar stuff like connectivity and focus modes in the places you’d expect them to be on the first page. And each page is highly customizable: you pick the controls you want to add or remove and decide where you want them and what size they should be. It’ll get even more interesting when third-party apps start adding their own controls.

The new layout took me a minute to get used to. At first, I was swiping too far down the screen and skipping to the second or third page of controls. It took a week or so to retrain that muscle memory, and you can just delete the additional pages if you want to. Personally, I’m hoping I can turn the new control center into a little remote control for my phone and use it to cut down on the number of trips I make to individual apps.

Another change to iOS 18 will either be an insignificant addition or a huge deal — no in-between: the addition of RCS. I’m in the latter category, and let me tell you, it was a thrill to see my first RCS messages go through to my friends on Android. Without any input on my part, after I downloaded the iOS 18 beta, my messages started falling back to RCS rather than SMS. The whole thing has worked surprisingly well. I see typing indicators and read receipts, and tapbacks show up as reactions and not a whole extra message, finally.

The real moment of truth will be when my friends finally upgrade to iOS 18 and we’ll be able to message photos to each other without a lot of complicated side channeling. I have shown remarkable restraint in not asking my iPhone-owning friends to download beta software, but you can bet my campaign to get them all to upgrade to iOS 18 starts today. If you’re an iPhone owner who regularly messages someone on Android, please consider doing the same. This incarnation of RCS on the iPhone isn’t going to end the blue-bubble, green-bubble wars, but it will relieve the biggest pain points in cross-platform messaging for people on both sides.

Equally important as sharing priceless memories with my friends? The fact that iOS 18 will also allow you to ugly up your homescreen in unprecedented ways. You can go full Alex Cranz on your homescreen if you’re a weirdo, or you can just put the friggin’ icons exactly where you want them for the first time since the invention of the iPhone. Imagine!

Apple has shown off the app icon tinting feature with a lot of pretty examples, but personally, I haven’t been able to find a way to use them that doesn’t end up looking too “Material Ew.” But putting icons anywhere I want on the screen already feels so intuitive, I can’t believe we couldn’t do this before.

You know this is a big update when an entirely new Passwords app is only, like, the fourth most interesting thing going on. It’s self-explanatory, and after poking around for a bit, I’m convinced that this is an app for your parents who refuse to learn how to use a password manager. You can save passwords and access them from your iOS, iPad, and macOS devices, as you’d expect. But you can also share individual passwords or groups of passwords with other people, which would be handy for families and people in the same household.

The catch, of course, is that everyone needs to be in the Apple ecosystem, and since I frequently jump between iOS and Android, it’s not something I can really use in the long term. Incidentally, using a first-party Apple password manager would also make switching away from iOS in the future that much harder, which is probably no accident. But if my parents were all in on Apple, I’d absolutely make sure they were using it.

One feature I know I’ll be using for the long haul? Transcription in Voice Memos. This might be one for my fellow journalists, but friends, it is good. For years, I’ve used Pixel phones to record and transcribe interviews, and the Pixel has basically remained unchallenged as the best tool for the job. In iOS 18, Voice Memos will finally transcribe your recordings, in real time or after the fact, and it’s on par with the Pixel Recorder app as far as quality goes. It may not be a feature for the masses, but if you know, you know.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/16/24245582/ios-18-review-customization-apple-intelligence-siri

Meta has acknowledged that all text and photos that adult Facebook and Instagram users have publicly published since 2007 have been fed into its artificial intelligence models. Australia’s ABC News reports that Meta’s global privacy director, Melinda Claybaugh, initially rejected claims about user data from 2007 being leveraged for AI training during a local government inquiry about AI adoption before relenting after additional questioning.

“The truth of the matter is that unless you have consciously set those posts to private since 2007, Meta has just decided that you will scrape all of the photos and all of the texts from every public post on Instagram or Facebook since 2007 unless there was a conscious decision to set them on private,” Green Party senator David Shoebridge pushed in the inquiry. “That’s the reality, isn’t it?”

“Correct,” Claybaugh responded.

Meta’s privacy center and blog posts acknowledge hoovering up public posts and comments from Facebook and Instagram to train generative AI:

We use public posts and comments on Facebook and Instagram to train generative AI models for these features and for the open source community.

We don’t use posts or comments with an audience other than Public for these purposes.

But the company has been vague about how data is used, when it started scraping, and how far back its collection goes. Asked by The New York Times in June, Meta didn’t answer, other than to confirm that setting posts to anything besides “public” will prevent future scraping. That still won’t delete data that has already been collected — and people posting back in 2007 (who may have been minors at the time) wouldn’t have known their photos and posts would be used in this way.

Claybaugh said that Meta doesn’t scrape data from users who are under the age of 18. When Labor Party senator Tony Sheldon asked if Meta would scrape the public photos of his children on his own account, Claybaugh confirmed it would and was unable to clarify if the company also scraped adult accounts that were created when the user was still a child.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/12/24242789/meta-training-ai-models-facebook-instagram-photo-post-data

From sundials to atomic clocks, humanity’s quest to measure time has been a journey of increasing precision. Now, that journey has reached a new frontier with the creation of the world’s first nuclear clock – a device that promises to revolutionize everything from GPS navigation to our understanding of physics by using the core of an atom itself.

This milestone, reported in the journal Nature, marks the dawn of a new era in precision timekeeping. The development pushes the boundaries of what’s possible in measurement science and brings us one step closer to unraveling the mysteries of the universe.

At the heart of this breakthrough is a peculiar atom called thorium-229. Unlike most atomic nuclei, which require enormous amounts of energy to excite, thorium-229 possesses a nuclear-excited state that can be reached using ultraviolet light. This unique property makes it the perfect candidate for creating a nuclear clock – a timepiece that could potentially outperform even the most advanced atomic clocks available today.

The achievement is the result of a collaboration between researchers from JILA, a joint institute of the University of Colorado Boulder and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and scientists from the Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien). Their work combines cutting-edge laser technology with precision atomic clocks and a specially engineered crystal containing thorium atoms.

“With this first prototype, we have proven: Thorium can be used as a timekeeper for ultra-high-precision measurements. All that is left to do is technical development work, with no more major obstacles to be expected,” says Thorsten Schumm of TU Wien, one of the lead researchers on the project, in a media release.

To understand the significance of this achievement, it’s helpful to know how our current best timekeepers work. Today’s most precise clocks, known as atomic clocks, use the oscillations of laser light to count time, much like a very fast-ticking pendulum. These oscillations are kept stable by matching them to the energy transitions of atoms like cesium or strontium.

The nuclear clock takes this concept a step further. Instead of using transitions in the electron shell of an atom, it uses transitions within the atomic nucleus itself. This is a big deal because atomic nuclei are much smaller than atoms and are far less affected by external disturbances like electromagnetic fields. In theory, this means a nuclear clock could be vastly more precise and stable than an atomic clock.

The road to this breakthrough has been long and challenging. For decades, scientists have known that thorium-229 had potential for nuclear clocks, but the exact energy needed to excite its nucleus remained elusive. It wasn’t until earlier this year that Schumm’s team at TU Wien finally succeeded in precisely measuring this energy and using a laser to switch thorium nuclei between two quantum states.

Building on this success, the JILA team, led by Jun Ye, took the next crucial step. They developed a sophisticated system that combines an ultra-stable strontium atomic clock with a special laser setup called a frequency comb. This setup allowed them to produce the precise ultraviolet light needed to excite the thorium nuclei embedded in a crystal.

“Imagine a wristwatch that wouldn’t lose a second even if you left it running for billions of years,” says Ye, an NIST and JILA physicist. “While we’re not quite there yet, this research brings us closer to that level of precision.”

The crystal itself is a marvel of engineering. Developed at TU Wien over several years, it contains thorium-229 nuclei in just the right configuration to interact with the laser light.

When COVID-19 lockdowns turned our world upside down, many people thought they had found the perfect antidote to isolation: a furry, four-legged friend. News outlets buzzed with heartwarming stories of “pandemic puppies” and skyrocketing pet adoptions. It seemed like the perfect solution to combat loneliness and anxiety. But a new study suggests that our animal companions might not have been the emotional life rafts we thought they were.

Researchers from Aarhus University in Denmark and King’s College London conducted a large-scale study of over 6,000 UK residents to examine the relationship between pet ownership and mental health outcomes during the first year of the pandemic. Their findings, published in the journal Mental Health & Prevention, challenge the popular notion that pets are a cure-all for pandemic blues.

The study followed participants from April 2020 through April 2021, tracking their mental health symptoms and pet ownership status. Contrary to expectations, pet owners did not show better mental health outcomes compared to those without pets. In fact, pet owners reported slightly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and anhedonia (the inability to feel pleasure) than non-pet owners.

Lead author Christine Parsons, a professor with the Department of Clinical Medicine at Aarhus University, admits she was “genuinely surprised” upon seeing the study’s results. “This runs counter to a prevailing public belief that pets are beneficial for mental health,” Parsons notes in a statement.

This doesn’t mean your beloved Fido or Fluffy is bad for your mental health. The differences were small, and the researchers emphasize that many other factors influence mental well-being. However, the findings do suggest that getting a pet isn’t a sure-fire quick fix for mental health struggles.

The study did uncover some bright spots for pet owners. Dog owners were more likely to exercise regularly, with 40% reporting daily or near-daily exercise compared to 35% of non-dog owners. This “Lassie effect,” as researchers dubbed it, aligns with previous studies showing that dog ownership can boost physical activity levels.

For those living alone, both cat and dog ownership were associated with slightly lower levels of loneliness. While the effect was small, it suggests that pets may provide some comfort for individuals who might otherwise have little daily social interaction.

The researchers also investigated the popular stereotype of the “crazy cat lady” – the notion that women who own cats are more prone to loneliness, depression, and anxiety. Interestingly, they found no evidence to support this stereotype. While women were more likely to own cats than men, there was no interaction between cat ownership, gender, and mental health outcomes.

One surprising finding was that people who adopted pets during the pandemic didn’t show any significant improvements in mental health compared to those who didn’t. This challenges the idea that getting a “pandemic puppy” or “quarantine kitty” would automatically boost mood and well-being.

“This study adds to the mixed body of research on pet ownership and mental health,” says senior author Dr. Katherine Young. “While some previous studies have suggested benefits, the large, longitudinal nature of this research provides robust evidence to the contrary.”

So why didn’t pets provide the mental health boost many expected? The researchers suggest that while pets can offer companionship and purpose, they also come with added responsibilities and potential stressors. During a pandemic, concerns about pet care, veterinary access, and financial strain may have offset some of the positive aspects of pet ownership.

It’s important to note that this study doesn’t mean pets are bad for mental health or that they don’t provide joy and companionship. Rather, it suggests that the relationship between pet ownership and mental well-being is complex and influenced by many factors beyond simply having a furry friend at home.

Source: https://studyfinds.org/owning-pet-wont-make-you-happier-study-concludes/?nab=0

Tensions between Brazil and Elon Musk’s business empire ratcheted up further as the country’s telecoms regulator threatened to sanction his satellite broadband company Starlink hours after its top court stood behind a controversial decision to ban social network X from the country.
Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva also backed the top court’s Judge Alexandre de Moraes’ decision to suspend X. The judge found that X allowed postings of hate messages and falsehoods about the country’s electronic voting system that undermined Brazil’s democracy.

If calamity strikes our planet, a team at the Smithsonian argues that the only way to protect the DNA of at-risk creatures is to get it far, far away from Earth.

A group of scientists concerned about the thousands of species facing extinction believes that their salvation lies not here on Earth, but more than 230,000 miles above it.

If calamity strikes our planet, a team at the Smithsonian argues that the only way to protect the DNA of those at-risk creatures is to get it as far away from Earth as possible.

Their radical plan? Load those samples up onto a cosmic Noah’s Ark and ship them off to the moon.

In the proposal, published in July in the journal BioScience, an international team of experts provides an outline for how a lunar biorepository could feasibly be created.

The idea, which has been suggested before, involves storing the DNA of threatened animals in a vault on the lunar surface – Earth’s only natural satellite – where conditions are cold enough to preserve the samples. The method would also have the added benefit of stationing the biorepository of preserved cells well beyond the reach of any number of disasters that threaten our planet, from climate change to geopolitical strife.

A similar concept was outlined in 2021 by a group of researchers at the University of Arizona, who presented a paper for a “modern global insurance policy” at that year’s IEEE Aerospace Conference.

Were the plan to ever be accepted by the global community, it would still be decades before any kind of spacecraft would be making the lunar voyage with the genetic makeup of any number of species on board. But the experts insist urgent – and drastic – action is required to protect a multitude of critically endangered species.

Here’s a look inside the proposed lunar Noah’s Ark – the plan to essentially build a large freezer to cryogenically preserve animal DNA on the moon.

Why the moon?

Here on Earth, cryogenic preservation requires electricity and liquid nitrogen to accomplish.

But on the moon, the celestial body’s shadowed craters create conditions frigid enough to keep DNA samples frozen year-round without the need for human intervention, the team wrote in their proposal. The deep craters near the polar regions are never exposed to sunlight, making those areas of the moon one of few places to reach the ultra-low temperature of -410 degrees Fahrenheit – cold enough to preserve cryogenically frozen animal skin and tissue for future cloning.

You need three necessities to support life as we know it: oxygen, food, and water. While scientists have found ancient traces of liquid water on the surfaces of planets like Mars, it’s never been enough to foster life. However, some astronomers think it still might be possible. Instead of relying on Earth as a model for life, an international team argues that perhaps it’s time to consider other paths for planets to potentially form and develop life.

This theory is the basis behind a new study published in Nature Astronomy. Using computer simulations, researchers have calculated a new model for water distribution on exoplanets — planets orbiting stars in other solar systems.

Scientists believe Earth’s water (the oceans) covers the surface of the planet, with an iron core surrounded by silicate bedrock underneath. For years, this model has been used to determine the habitability of exoplanets.

“It is only in recent years that we have begun to realize that planets are more complex than we had thought,” says Caroline Dorn, a professor for exoplanets at ETH Zurich, in Switzerland, in a media release.

Since most exoplanets are located close to their home stars, they are often scalding-hot worlds covered in magma. However, the high temperatures make it impossible for magma to cool and form a solid base of silicate bedrock like on planet Earth. Additionally, the scorching heat makes water evaporate in these magma oceans.

These conditions would typically make these planets a non-contender for supporting life. However, the new model used in the study found that water still exists on these young planets. Instead of the surface, it is found deep in the interior. When looking underneath the surface, researchers say the amount of water hiding inside exoplanets may be much higher than astronomers have thought.

Model calculations helped to uncover how water can continue to exist inside these extremely hot worlds. According to Dorn, the iron core inside the exoplanet takes time to form. A large chunk of iron starts as droplets in magma. The tiny bits of water merge with the iron droplets, allowing them to sink beneath the surface.

“The iron droplets behave like a lift that is conveyed downwards by the water,” explains Dorn.

Scientists have long thought this phenomenon was only possible if a planet had moderate pressure, like what is seen on Earth. Until now, it was unknown if this reaction would happen on more giant planets with high-pressure interior conditions. The current study revealed that it still occurs. The greater the planet’s mass, the more water is absorbed into iron droplets and becomes part of the iron core.

Iron can absorb up to 70 times more water than silicates. However, this only occurs under specific conditions. With the high internal pressure in the core of exoplanets, water is still retained, but not in the presence of H20. Instead, it stays on as separate hydrogen and oxygen molecules.

The new results align with recent revelations about how planet Earth was formed. Four years ago, scientists made a surprising discovery: Earth’s oceans hold only a tiny amount of the planet’s water, mostly hidden deep in the planet’s core.

These new findings about where water is held on Earth made astronomers rethink their views of water distribution on other planets. Astronomers rely on telescopes to measure the weight and size of an exoplanet. Assuming certain conditions of these planets, these numbers are then crunched up to create mass-radius diagrams on a planet’s structure.

If the assumed conditions of solubility and water distribution are incorrect, then the volume of water may have miscalculated by up to 10 times the actual amount.

“Planets are much more water-abundant than previously assumed,” Dorn reports.

Understanding water distribution helps to understand a planet’s past and future. The presence of water helps compose a timeline of how these planets formed and developed. Water that has dropped to the interior of a planet is trapped forever. However, water dissolved in magma can find its way back up to the surface during mantle cooling. To put it simply, finding water on the surface of another planet means there’s probably a ton underground as well.

Source: https://studyfinds.org/there-may-be-habitable-oceans-hidden-deep-within-distant-worlds/?nab=0

Before the Columbia accident, the space shuttle Challenger had exploded and killed all crew on January 28, 1986. In all, 14 astronauts have lost their lives in these accidents

The death of Indian-origin American astronaut Kalpana Chawla and six others on February 1, 2003 when the space shuttle Columbia broke up and burnt as it re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere played heavily in the minds of NASA officials, who decided to keep another Indian-origin American astronaut, Sunita Williams, in space for eight months.
Before the Columbia accident, the space shuttle Challenger had exploded and killed all crew on January 28, 1986. In all, 14 astronauts have lost their lives in these accidents.

The two accidents “very much affected the decision” to bring Boeing Starliner back without the astronauts, said NASA chief Bill Nelson, who is himself an astronaut and has been part of the investigations into the two space shuttle accidents. He said “obvious mistakes were made” by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Kalpana Chawla died over the skies in southern US when the space shuttle Columbia and her crew broke apart during re-entry, 16 minutes prior to the scheduled landing. She went to Tagore School in Haryana’s Karnal in 1976, and graduated with a BSc degree in aeronautical engineering from Punjab Engineering College in 1982. She joined NASA as an astronaut in 1994, after completing further education in the US.

Mr Nelson said the culture in NASA back then was such that despite junior flight engineers warning of risks, none heard them. “Today, folks are encouraged to speak their minds,” he added.

So, NASA took the decision to bring home astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore in February 2025, instead of now, in the SpaceX Crew Dragon after engineers spoke their mind about the risks involved in flying the spacecraft in its current condition.

NASA officials said the decision to replace the return spacecraft was “unanimous”.

“Spaceflight is risky, even at its safest and most routine. A test flight, by nature, is neither safe nor routine. The decision to keep Butch and Suni aboard the International Space Station (ISS) and bring Boeing’s Starliner home without crewed is the result of our commitment to safety – our core value and our North Star,” said Mr Nelson.

Space engineers identified helium leaks and experienced issues with the spacecraft reaction control thrusters or small rockets on June 6, as Starliner approached the ISS.

Social media giant X said on Thursday it expects Brazil’s top court to order it to shut down, as a pitched legal battle plays out over compliance with local laws and owner Elon Musk’s insistence the platform is being punished for resisting censorship.

X said it expected Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes to order the shutdown “soon,” after a court-imposed deadline for the company to identify a legal representative in Brazil passed on Thursday evening.

Just before midnight, X was still working normally in the country.
Earlier on Thursday, the Supreme Court blocked the local bank accounts of billionaire Musk’s Starlink satellite internet firm, while the underlying feud over X put it on the brink of being shuttered in one of its top markets.
The two firms are part of Musk’s sprawling business empire which also includes rocket company SpaceX and electric car giant Tesla. The billionaire owns X and 40% of SpaceX, and is the CEO of Tesla (TSLA.O)

In a series of Thursday night comments on X, Musk lashed out at Moraes, labeling the judge an “evil dictator” in a newly pinned post. He also decried the ruling to block Starlink as illegal, and claimed the action “improperly” punishes other shareholders as well as ordinary Brazilians.
Musk also announced that Starlink-parent SpaceX will provide free internet service to Brazilian users “until this matter is resolved.”

LIES AND CENSORSHIP
Signed by Moraes, the court’s decision to sanction Starlink is a response to the lack of legal representatives in Brazil for X, a Supreme Court source told Reuters.
The decision to freeze Starlink’s bank accounts also stems from a separate dispute over unpaid fines that X was ordered to pay due to its failure to turn over some documents. Local newspaper Folha has reported the fines total at least 20 million reais ($3.6 million), but Reuters was not able to confirm the amount.
The Supreme Court had set a deadline for X to name its legal representative in Brazil by shortly after 8:00 p.m. (2300 GMT) on Thursday.
Brazilian law requires all internet companies to have a legal representative in the country who can receive judicial orders and otherwise be legally responsible for the business.
At issue in the intensifying dispute is whether Moraes can order X to block certain accounts accused of spreading lies and distortions, a request Musk has denounced as censorship.
Most of the accounts ordered blocked are run by backers of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro, some of which deny he lost his 2022 reelection bid.
In a previous post, Musk complained that Moraes “is an outright criminal of the worst kind, masquerading as a judge.”

Source: https://www.reuters.com/technology/brazilian-court-suspend-x-brazil-if-musk-does-not-name-new-country-2024-08-28/

Sunita Williams’ husband Michael J. Williams and mom Bonnie Pandya appeared to be less worried about how Sunita is faring while up in space.

Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore, two NASA astronauts, arrived at the International Space Station on 5 June on Boeing’s Starliner spaceship. They are expected to stay there until February 2025, when SpaceX is scheduled to bring them back to Earth.

They both were scheduled to return to Earth in the same spacecraft in 8-10 days. However, their arrival was delayed and they remained stuck at the International Space Station (ISS) following helium leaks and thruster issues.

NASA administrator Bill Nelson declared that while Starliner will return without crew, the two will come back to Earth in February aboard a SpaceX capsule.

Nelson informed reporters that “space flight is risky even at its safest and even at its most routine.”

On being asked about the decision to keep them on the ISS, he said the move to return the Starliner without Williams and Wilmore “is the result of our commitment to safety,” as “our core value is safety.”

Source: https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/sunita-williams-husband-and-mother-break-silence-over-her-extended-stay-on-iss-she-told-me-101724858400625.html

Yelp, one of Google’s most persistent and outspoken rivals, has finally filed its own antitrust lawsuit against the search giant, less than a month after a federal judge ruled Google an illegal monopolist.

Yelp alleges that Google has created or preserved its monopoly in local search services by preferencing its own inferior vertical over competitors’, which Yelp says harmed competition and reduced the quality of local search services. Yelp claims that the way Google directs users toward its own local search vertical from its general search engine results page should be considered illegal tying of separate products to keep rivals from reaching scale.

Yelp wants the court to order Google to stop the allegedly anticompetitive conduct and to pay it damages. It demanded a jury trial and filed the suit in the Northern District of California, where a different jury found that Google had an illegal monopoly through its app store in its fight against Epic Games.

The company was emboldened to bring its own lawsuit against Google after the DOJ’s win in its antitrust case about the company’s allegedly exclusionary practices around the distribution of search services. Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman told The New York Times that following that decision, “the winds on antitrust have shifted dramatically.” Previously, he told the Times, he’d hesitated to bring a suit because of the resources it would require and because he saw it as the government’s job to enforce the antitrust laws.

While US District Court Judge Amit Mehta delivered the government a win in its case against Google, he notably narrowed the suit earlier in litigation. Mehta threw out claims from a group of state attorneys general that Google had acted unfairly by allegedly designing its search result pages to lower the visibility of specialized search engines like Yelp and TripAdvisor.

“Yelp’s claims are not new,” Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels said in a statement. “Similar claims were thrown out years ago by the FTC, and recently by the judge in the DOJ’s case. On the other aspects of the decision to which Yelp refers, we are appealing. Google will vigorously defend against Yelp’s meritless claims.”

Consumers are the ultimate losers of Google’s allegedly anticompetitive behavior, Yelp says. “By keeping users from leaving Google, other vertical search services are prevented from reaching customers, achieving scale, and building helpful content,” Stoppelman wrote in a blog post. “This softening of the competitive landscape translates to less incentive for Google to invest in quality content that would improve the consumer experience, and greater incentives to show less relevant but nevertheless monetizable results.”

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/28/24230905/yelp-google-antitrust-lawsuit

A recent study highlights how these powerful underwater events can sever cables, leading to widespread internet disruptions and costly repairs.

Underwater avalanches, or turbidity currents, pose a significant threat to the global undersea internet network, which spans over 1.5 million kilometres of submarine fibre optic cables, according to a new study. These avalanches occur when sediments on the ocean floor are suddenly displaced, creating powerful, fast-moving flows. As these currents travel across the seabed, they can sever or damage the delicate cables that transmit internet and communication data across continents. Disruptions caused by these events can lead to significant global internet outages, highlighting the vulnerability of the world’s digital infrastructure to natural underwater phenomena.

Christopher Stevenson, the lead author of the study and Senior Lecturer in Quantitative Sedimentology at the University of Liverpool, writes, “My new study of an ancient underwater avalanche challenges our understanding of how underwater avalanches develop and may change the way geologists assess their risk potential.”

According to ScienceAlert, it is estimated that there are now over 550 active seafloor cables around the world with a combined length of 1.4 million km—enough to wrap around the circumference of the Earth 35 times. When an underwater avalanche breaks seafloor cables, the effects can be widespread and expensive.

The 2006 Pingtung earthquake in Taiwan triggered underwater avalanches that cut many seafloor cables connecting southeast Asia with the rest of the world. The largest internet operator in China reported a 90% loss of traffic to the US at the peak of the event, and Taiwan experienced a 74%–100% loss in internet traffic to neighbouring islands. This damaged global markets by slashing the number of financial transactions that could happen. Repairing the network to full capacity took 39 days and millions of dollars in shipping time.

Source : https://www.ndtv.com/science/undersea-avalanches-pose-serious-risk-to-global-internet-connectivity-report-6408551

SpaceX’s attempt at the first ever private spacewalk next week will be a test of trailblazing equipment, including slim spacesuits and a cabin with no airlock, in one of the riskiest missions yet for Elon Musk’s space company.

A billionaire entrepreneur, a retired military fighter pilot and two SpaceX employees are poised to launch on Tuesday aboard a modified Crew Dragon craft, before embarking on a 20-minute spacewalk 434 miles (700 km) into space two days later.

Until now, walking into the empty expanse of space has only been attempted by government astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS), 250 miles (400 km) above Earth.

SpaceX’s five-day mission – dubbed Polaris Dawn – will swing in an oval-shaped orbit, passing as close to Earth as 190 km (118 miles) and as far as 1,400 km (870 miles), the farthest any humans will have ventured since the end of the United States’ Apollo moon program in 1972.

Crew members, including billionaire Jared Isaacman, will don SpaceX’s new, slimline spacesuits in a Crew Dragon vehicle that was modified so it can open its hatch door in the vacuum of space – an unusual process that removes the need for an airlock.

“They’re pushing the envelope in multiple ways,” retired NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman said in an interview. “They’re also going to a much higher altitude, with a more severe radiation environment than we’ve been to since Apollo.”

The mission has been bankrolled by Isaacman, the founder of electronic payment company Shift4. He has declined to say how much he has spent, but it is estimated to be over $100 million.

Joining him will be mission pilot Scott Poteet, a retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel, and SpaceX employees Sarah Gillis and Anna Menon, both senior engineers at the company.

For SpaceX, which has pioneered cheap, reusable rockets and expensive private spaceflight, the mission is an opportunity to advance technologies that could be used on the moon and Mars.

Far outside the protective bubble of Earth’s atmosphere, the electronics and shielding on Crew Dragon and spacesuits will be tested as they pass through parts of the Van Allen belt, an area where charged particles streaming mainly from the sun can disrupt satellites’ electronics and affect human health.

“That’s an additional risk that you don’t face when you just stay in low-Earth orbit and go up to the ISS,” Reisman said.

NOT A NORMAL SPACEWALK

The Polaris spacewalk will take place on the mission’s third day, but preparation will begin about 45 hours in advance.

The gumdrop-shaped Crew Dragon’s entire cabin will be depressurized and exposed to the vacuum of space. While only two of the astronauts will float outside, tethered by an oxygen line, the whole crew will depend on their spacesuits for life support.

Days before the spacewalk, the crew will begin a “pre-breathe” process to fill the cabin with pure oxygen and remove any nitrogen from the air.

Nitrogen, if present in astronauts’ bloodstreams in space, could form bubbles, block blood flow and lead to decompression sickness, known as “the bends,” as with scuba divers who return too quickly to the water’s surface.
The crew will use an ultrasound device to monitor any bubble formation, one of many tools to be used in the mission to inform dozens of scientific experiments, providing researchers a rare peek into how astronauts might fare on the moon’s surface or elsewhere in deep space.

Source : https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/musks-spacex-testing-breakthrough-tech-risky-spacewalk-2024-08-23

While more and more robotic dogs are appearing in China’s cities, companies say they’ve been caught off guard by videos of the machines armed with guns in military exercises.

From Beijing to Hangzhou, the sight of robotic dogs in a park is becoming more and more common.

Climbing stairs? No problem. And what about hills? They can do that too.

Josh Yuan showed us his robo-dog in one of Beijing’s fanciest shopping districts, guiding it through a crowd of curious onlookers with a handheld remote-controlled device.

He paid £1,300 for his new companion a few months ago.

“I think at the moment it’s for people like me, or tech geeks and programmers,” Mr Yuan said.

“But I think in the future, it will be quite common and humanoid robots will definitely enter people’s homes when they are more affordable.”

There are dozens of robot companies in China. A few of them, like the Hangzhou company Unitree, are focused on robotic dogs.

The Unitree team showed off their two latest models. One is a small dog, that can be used as a companion or dressed up in a dragon or panda costume for fun.

They also have a larger model, strong enough to lift me on its back.

It’s designed for industries to use and can carry supplies, be sent into a fire or emergency, or be used to check pipelines and infrastructure.

In May, however, robodogs received some extra – and unwanted – attention after China’s state media channel showed them being used in training exercises with weapons firing from their back.

The People’s Liberation Army was using these gun-toting robots as they trained with Cambodian forces. But Unitree says the video came as a surprise.

The company’s marketing manager, Duke Huang, explained: “We learnt about this

from the internet, just like everyone else. We didn’t know anything about it before that.”

These robots aren’t designed for military use, but the video caused a storm.

Source : https://news.sky.com/story/chinas-robotic-dogs-still-a-novelty-to-most-as-firms-grapple-with-military-using-tech-as-weapons-13201627

The rocket was developed by Tamil Nadu-based start-up Space Zone India and Martin Group.

India launched its first reusable hybrid rocket, RHUMI 1, developed by the Tamil Nadu-based start-up Space Zone India and Martin Group from Thiruvidandhai in Chennai on Saturday.

The rocket was launched using a mobile launcher. It carries 3 Cube Satellites and 50 PICO Satellites into a suborbital trajectory,

Source : https://www.deccanherald.com/science/space/watch-india-launches-first-reusable-hybrid-rocket-rhumi-1-from-chennai-3162810

Apple event is just a few weeks away, know what is expected to be announced at the upcoming September launch event.

The most awaited time of the year is almost here as Apple will soon launch the iPhone 16 series. The official announcement regarding the Apple event is yet to be made, however, tipsters have already leaked the expected launch date which is September 10. Over the past few months, several speculations have been made about what hardware announcements are to be made. Considering previous Apple event trends, it is certain that the company will launch the iPhone 16 series which may include four models. However, there will be several other hardware devices as well, for which tipsters have been sharing information. Here are the top 5 rumours about the upcoming Apple event.

5 biggest Apple event rumours

1. iPhone 16 series design change: This year, Apple is expected to make minor design changes to its new-generation iPhone series to fit new features and functionalities. For the standard iPhone 16 models, the company may re-design the camera module from diagonal placement to vertical for spatial recording features. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro models will likely get increased display sizes of 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch. All the iPhone 16 models are also rumoured to feature a new “Capture Button.’
2. iPhone 16 series price hike: Over the past few months, we have been hearing that Apple may consider a price hike due to several new enhancements including to chipset series, AI features, expensive camera lenses, and others. However, recent reports claim that the standard iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus may not get a price hike. However, there is certainty that the iPhone 16 Pro models may get a $100 hike in comparison to its predecessor. Additionally, the Pro models may not include the 128GB storage capacity
3. Apple Watch Series 10 design: Apple is also expected to launch the 10th generation of the Apple Watch and the Apple Watch Ultra 3. While the rumours about the smartwatches are slim, leaks suggest that the Apple Watch Series 10 may get bigger displays. Till the 9th generation, we saw the Apple watch in 41mm and 45mm sizes. However, now it could be revamped to 45mm and 49mm.
4. New-gen Apple Watch may offer Sleep apnea and hypertension detection features: To provide users with enhanced health and fitness tracking, Apple is rumoured to bring a new Sleep apnea and hypertension detection feature that may be similar to blood oxygen saturation tracking. However, due to the Masimo Corp case for patent infringement, it may take some time to officially roll out the feature to the consumers.

Source : https://www.hindustantimes.com/technology/apple-event-likely-on-september-10-here-are-5-biggest-rumours-you-need-to-know-101724392885239.html

Remember when NASA deliberately crashed a spacecraft into an asteroid last year? Well, the aftermath of that cosmic collision just got a whole lot more interesting.

In a groundbreaking study published in the Planetary Science Journal, scientists have uncovered some unexpected results from NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission. It turns out that when DART slammed into the asteroid moon Dimorphos in 2022, it didn’t just leave a dent – it completely reshaped the celestial body and potentially set it on a chaotic new path.

Breaking down what happened and why it matters
First, a quick refresher: DART was NASA’s test run for planetary defense. The idea was to see if we could change the course of an asteroid by hitting it with a spacecraft – kind of like a game of cosmic billiards. The target was Dimorphos, a small asteroid moon orbiting a larger asteroid called Didymos.

Now, here’s where things get interesting. According to Derek Richardson, a professor of astronomy at the University of Maryland and a lead researcher on the DART mission, the impact did more than just nudge Dimorphos off course. It dramatically altered its shape.

Richardson explains that one of the biggest surprises was how much the shape of Dimorphos changed as a result of the DART mission. Originally, the asteroid moon was shaped like a hamburger, but the collision stretched it into the shape of a football.

This shape change is a big deal because it challenges what scientists thought they knew about how asteroid moons form. Previously, they believed these moons would naturally become elongated over time, always pointing their long axis toward the main asteroid they orbit. However, Dimorphos flipped the script, going from squished to stretched after the impact.

“This result contradicts that idea and indicates that something more complex is at work here. Furthermore, the impact-induced change in Dimorphos’ shape likely changed how it interacts with Didymos,” Prof. Richardson says in a university release.

The surprises didn’t stop with the asteroid moon changing shape. The DART impact may have set Dimorphos tumbling through space in an unpredictable way. Before the collision, Dimorphos was likely in a stable state, always showing the same face to Didymos (much like our Moon always shows the same face to Earth). Now? Not so much.

“Now, it’s knocked out of alignment, which means it may wobble back and forth in its orientation,” Richardson explains. “Dimorphos might also be ‘tumbling,’ meaning that we may have caused it to rotate chaotically and unpredictably.”

This unexpected tumbling raises new questions about the asteroid’s stability and internal structure. It could take a century or more for Dimorphos to settle back into a stable state, which has implications for future asteroid research and potential planetary defense strategies.

Speaking of future research, the European Space Agency is planning a follow-up mission called Hera, set to launch in October 2024. Hera will arrive at the Didymos-Dimorphos system in late 2026 to study both asteroids up close and provide more details about DART’s impact. One key question Hera might help answer is whether Dimorphos is stable enough for future spacecraft to land on.

“One of our biggest questions now is if Dimorphos is stable enough for spacecraft to land and install more research equipment on it,” Richardson notes.

While all of this might sound like abstract space science, it has very real implications for our planet’s safety. The DART mission and its aftermath are helping scientists refine strategies for defending Earth against potential asteroid or comet impacts.

“DART gave us insight into complicated gravitational physics that you can’t do in a lab, and all of this research helps us calibrate our efforts to defend Earth in the event of an actual threat. There’s a nonzero chance that an asteroid or comet will approach and endanger the planet. Now, we have an additional line of defense against these kinds of external threats,” Richardson concludes.

Source: https://studyfinds.org/nasa-asteroid-moon-dart/?nab=0

As the US presidential election approaches, the web has been filled with photos of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris: spectacularly well-timed photos of an attempted assassination; utterly mundane photos of rally crowds; and shockingly out-of-character photos of the candidates burning flags and holding guns. Some of these things didn’t actually happen, of course. But generative AI imaging tools are now so adept and accessible that we can’t really trust our eyes anymore.

Some of the biggest names in digital media have been working to sort out this mess, and their solution so far is: more data — specifically, metadata that attaches to a photo and tells you what’s real, what’s fake, and how that fakery happened. One of the best-known systems for this, C2PA authentication, already has the backing of companies like Microsoft, Adobe, Arm, OpenAI, Intel, Truepic, and Google. The technical standard provides key information about where images originate from, letting viewers identify whether they’ve been manipulated.

“Provenance technologies like Content Credentials — which act like a nutrition label for digital content — offer a promising solution by enabling official event photos and other content to carry verifiable metadata like date and time, or if needed, signal whether or not AI was used,” Andy Parsons, a steering committee member of C2PA and senior director for CAI at Adobe, told The Verge. “This level of transparency can help dispel doubt, particularly during breaking news and election cycles.”

But if all the information needed to authenticate images can already be embedded in the files, where is it? And why aren’t we seeing some kind of “verified” mark when the photos are published online?

The problem is interoperability. There are still huge gaps in how this system is being implemented, and it’s taking years to get all the necessary players on board to make it work. And if we can’t get everyone on board, then the initiative might be doomed to fail.

The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) is one of the largest groups trying to address this chaos, alongside the Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI) that Adobe kicked off in 2019. The technical standard they’ve developed uses cryptographic digital signatures to verify the authenticity of digital media, and it’s already been established. But this progress is still frustratingly inaccessible to the everyday folks who stumble across questionable images online.

“It’s important to realize that we’re still in the early stage of adoption,” said Parsons. “The spec is locked. It’s robust. It’s been looked at by security professionals. The implementations are few and far between, but that’s just the natural course of getting standards adopted.”

The problems start from the origin of the images: the camera. Some camera brands like Sony and Leica already embed cryptographic digital signatures based on C2PA’s open technical standard — which provides information like the camera settings and the date and location where an image was taken — into photographs the moment they’re taken.

This is currently only supported on a handful of cameras, across both new models like the Leica M11-P or via firmware updates for existing models like Sony’s Alpha 1, Alpha 7S III, and Alpha 7 IV. While other brands like Nikon and Canon have also pledged to adopt the C2PA standard, most have yet to meaningfully do so. Smartphones, which are typically the most accessible cameras for most folks, are also lacking. Neither Apple nor Google responded to our inquiries about implementing C2PA support or a similar standard into iPhone or Android devices.

If the cameras themselves don’t record this precious data, important information can still be applied during the editing process. Software like Adobe’s Photoshop and Lightroom, two of the most widely used image editing apps in the photography industry, can automatically embed this data in the form of C2PA-supported Content Credentials, which note how and when an image has been altered. That includes any use of generative AI tools, which could help to identify images that have been falsely doctored.

But again, many applications, including Affinity Photo and GIMP, don’t support a unified, interoperable metadata solution that can help resolve authenticity issues. Some members of these software communities have expressed a desire for them to do so, which might bring more attention to the issue. The developers of the popular pro photo editing software Capture One told The Verge that it was “committed to supporting photographers” being impacted by AI and is “looking into traceability features like C2PA, amongst others.”

Even when a camera does support authenticity data, it doesn’t always make it to viewers. A C2PA-compliant Sony camera was used to take the now-iconic photo of Trump’s fist pump following the assassination attempt as well as a photo that seemed to capture the bullet that was shot at him flying through the air. That metadata information isn’t widely accessible to the general public, though, because online platforms where these images were being circulated, like X and Reddit, don’t display it when images are uploaded and published. Even media websites that are backing the standard, like The New York Times, don’t visibly flag verification credentials after they’ve used them to authenticate a photograph.

Part of that roadblock, besides getting platforms on board in the first place, is figuring out the best way to present that information to users. Facebook and Instagram are two of the largest platforms that check content for markers like the C2PA standard, but they only flag images that have been manipulated using generative AI tools — no information is presented to validate “real” images.

When those labels are unclear, it can cause a problem, too. Meta’s “Made with AI” labels angered photographers when they were applied so aggressively that they seemed to cover even minor retouching. The labels have since been updated to deemphasize the use of AI. And while Meta didn’t disclose to us if it will expand this system, the company told us it believes a “widespread adoption of Content Credentials” is needed to establish trust.

Truepic, an authenticity infrastructure provider and another member of C2PA, says there’s enough information present in these digital markers to provide more detail than platforms currently offer. “The architecture is there, but we need to research the optimal way to display these visual indicators so that everyone on the internet can actually see them and use them to make better decisions without just saying something is either all generative AI or all authentic,” Truepic chief communications officer Mounir Ibrahim said to The Verge.

A cornerstone of this plan involves getting online platforms to adopt the standard. X, which has attracted regulatory scrutiny as a hotbed for spreading misinformation, isn’t a member of the C2PA initiative and seemingly offers no alternative. But X owner Elon Musk does appear willing to get behind it. “That sounds like a good idea, we should probably do it,” Musk said when pitched by Parsons at the 2023 AI Safety Summit. “Some way of authenticating would be good.”

Even if, by some miracle, we were to wake up tomorrow in a tech landscape where every platform, camera, and creative application supported the C2PA standard, denialism is a potent, pervasive, and potentially insurmountable obstacle. Providing people with documented, evidence-based information won’t help if they just discount it. Misinformation can even be utterly baseless, as seen by how readily Trump supporters believed accusations about Harris supposedly faking her rally crowds, despite widespread evidence proving otherwise. Some people will just believe what they want to believe.

But a cryptographic labeling system is likely the best approach we currently have to reliably identify authentic, manipulated, and artificially generated content at scale. Alternative pattern analyzing methods like online AI detection services, for instance, are notoriously unreliable. “Detection is probabilistic at best — we do not believe that you will get a detection mechanism where you can upload any image, video, or digital content and get 99.99 percent accuracy in real-time and at scale,” Ibrahim says. “And while watermarking can be robust and highly effective, in our view it isn’t interoperable.”

No system is perfect, though, and even more robust options like the C2PA standard can only do so much. Image metadata can be easily stripped simply by taking a screenshot, for example — for which there is currently no solution — and its effectiveness is otherwise dictated by how many platforms and products support it.

“None of it is a panacea,” Ibrahim says. “It will mitigate the downside risk, but bad actors will always be there using generative tools to try and deceive people.”

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/21/24223932/c2pa-standard-verify-ai-generated-images-content-credentials

As it turns out, a rabbit wearing an AI-generated top hat was just the tip of the iceberg.

Google is the latest phone company this year to announce AI photo editing tools, following Samsung’s somewhat troubling, mostly delightful sketch-to-image feature and Apple’s much more seemingly tame Image Playground coming this fall. The Pixel 9’s answer is a new tool called “Reimagine,” and after using it for a week with a few of my colleagues, I’m more convinced than ever that none of us are ready for what’s coming.

Reimagine is a logical extension of last year’s Magic Editor tools, which let you select and erase parts of a scene or change the sky to look like a sunset. It was nothing shocking. But Reimagine doesn’t just take it a step further — it kicks the whole door down. You can select any nonhuman object or portion of a scene and type in a text prompt to generate something in that space. The results are often very convincing and even uncanny. The lighting, shadows, and perspective usually match the original photo. You can add fun stuff, sure, like wildflowers or rainbows or whatever. But that’s not the problem.

A couple of my colleagues helped me test the boundaries of Reimagine with their Pixel 9 and 9 Pro review units, and we got it to generate some very disturbing things. Some of this required some creative prompting to work around the obvious guardrails; if you choose your words carefully, you can get it to create a reasonably convincing body under a blood-stained sheet.

A supermoon happens when the full Moon coincides with its closest approach to Earth in its elliptical orbit.

The Super Blue Moon is a rare astronomical event that was seen in the night sky on August 19 after almost a year. A supermoon happens when the full Moon coincides with its closest approach to Earth in its elliptical orbit, known as perigee. When the Moon is at or near this closest point, it appears slightly larger and brighter in the sky.
The Super Moon sets behind the Christ the Redeemer statue in Brazil’s Rio de Janeiro.

The Super Blue Moon rises above the winding tower of the former Gneisenau coal mine in Dortmund, western Germany.

A rare, once-in-a-year sighting of the Super Blue Moon as it rises near the Colosseum in Rome.

A Super Blue Moon rises behind the 15 July Martyrs Bridge and Camlıca Mosque in Istanbul.

Source: https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/in-pics-rare-super-blue-moon-seen-across-the-world-6380969

Experts believe the mummified woman died in agonising pain – hence her screaming expression

THE chilling face of a mummy that died screaming in agony can be seen for the first time in 3,500 years after experts rebuilt her likeness.

After a recent study revealed a painful death was to blame for the mummy’s contorted expression, experts decided to construct her living face.

The mummy, dubbed “The Screaming Woman”, was found in 1935 in Deir Elbahari, Egypt, in the family tomb of a royal architect.

Brazilian graphics expert Cicero Moraes said he created various versions of the mummy’s face using different techniques to create the incredible final product.

These include using advanced CT scan data from living people and tracing structures in profile like the nose and lateral face – leading to the creation of the incredible images.

In one version, the mummy’s eyes are closed and the image is in greyscale to avoid any speculations or judgements on her skin or eye colour.

Another is supposed to be more subjective, showing the woman as she might have appeared in life – with the images being in colour and the woman wearing the wig she was buried in.

And a third captures her terrifying scream, revealing how she may have looked when she was first buried in agonising pain.

Sahar Saleem, a researcher from Cairo University, said her scream was a result of cadaveric spasm — a rare form of muscular stiffening caused by violent deaths under extreme stress.

She explained: “This mummified Screaming Woman is a true ‘time capsule’ of the way that she died, revealing some of the secrets of mummifications.”

The cause of her painful death, however, remains unclear.

Using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) on the remains, the team found that the body was buried with juniper and frankincense – products of nature found in plants and trees.

These were costly – and were imported from the Eastern Mediterranean and Southern Arabia back then.

The mummy also wore a wig made of fibres from the date palm, which were treated with quartz, magnetite, and albite crystals.

This was probably to stiffen the locks and turn them black which was a colour thought to represent youth by ancient Egyptians.

It also suggested that the woman was from a wealthy clan.

Dr Saleem continued: “The excavation notes mentioned she was wearing two rings with jasper scarabs set on gold and silver respectively.

“The material used for these amulets and jewellery denote the person’s wealth and socio-economic status.”

ROYAL HISTORY
Despite her wealth, the mummy was not identified by name, but her place of burial offers a clue.

She was mummified in the family tomb of Senmut, a royal architect who was thought to be a lover of a great Pharaoh.

Dr Saleem said: “Senmut was a very powerful stateman at the time of Hatshepsut and the teacher of her daughter, Princess Nefrure.

“The family burial contained Senmut’s mother, Hat Nufer, and his father, Ra Mose.

“Although no name was recorded on the screaming mummy, she was likely a close family member of Senmut to share his parents’ eternal resting place.”

Scientists believe she was roughly 48 years old when she died, on the basis of the joint between her two pelvic bones, which smoothens with age.

Other medical checks including CT scans, electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction analysis found the woman also suffered from mild arthritis of the spine.

Several teeth were missing too – likely lost before death since there were signs of bone resorption, which occurs when a tooth comes out and the socket is left to heal.

The Screaming Woman’s remains are now kept by the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, while her coffin and rings are kept by the Metropolitan Museum in New York, which excavated her tomb in 1935.

Mr Moraes added: “I decided to do my part by putting a face to the discovery.”

Source: https://www.the-sun.com/news/12240606/face-screaming-mummy-revealed-reconstruction-egyptian/

STRANDED in the International Space Station, over 200 miles from Earth, astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams have been told they may not be rescued until February 2025.

The American duo – who were initially due to spend just eight days in space – will now have to sit it out for eight months due to helium leaks in the Boeing Starliner spacecraft that dropped them there in June.

Now British astronaut Meganne Christian, who is part of the UK Space Agency’s reserve team for a mission to space, has shared her insight into exactly what Butch, 61, and Suni, 58, will be going through on board the isolated ISS.

Meganne, 36, says the pair will have no showers, drink recycled urine and face radiation during their extended stay.

Meganne says: “Suni and Butch were prepared for a long duration mission should it happen. Space is hard, that is the line that we always take.”

The British scientist knows all about being stranded in an isolated research lab with little hope of immediate rescue – even though she’s yet to leave the Earth’s atmosphere.

From 2018 to 2019, she lived on a remote research station in Antarctica nicknamed White Mars – nearly 400 miles from civilisation, further than the space station, which is 248 miles away.

Here she reveals the everyday trials of the ISS inhabitants.

Grim recycling

Suni and Butch were on a test flight, trying out the Starliner for the first time with humans on board.

The US space agency Nasa is now carrying out tests to decide whether it is safe for them to fly back on the Boeing or if they’ll need to come back on one of Elon Musk’s SpaceX vehicles, due to arrive in February.

When billionaire Jared Isaacman self-funded a mission to orbit Earth in 2021, the project was billed as a childhood cancer fundraiser — and made for an eye-popping entrance into the private space tourism world. The four-person crew of people from various backgrounds with no prior spaceflight experience spent three days orbiting Earth together in a 13-foot-wide SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule.

Upon his return, Isaacman imagined he likely would not go to space again.

“We kind of checked every one of the boxes we set out to achieve,” Isaacman told CNN, saying that Inspiration4 showed how people from various walks of life can train for and execute a mission to orbit. ”(I thought) that maybe I wouldn’t go back, that maybe the bar was set sufficiently high that this was a good time to stop.”

That assessment of his future in spaceflight, however, did not stick.

On Monday, Isaacman and three crewmates — including his close friend and former Air Force pilot, Scott “Kidd” Poteet, as well as two SpaceX engineers, Anna Menon and Sarah Gillis — will arrive at Kennedy Space Center in Florida to prepare for the launch of a far grander, more dangerous, and experimental trip to space.

The mission, called Polaris Dawn, is slated to take off no earlier than 3:30 a.m. ET on August 26.

While prior missions to space that were funded by wealthy businesspeople may have conjured images of self-indulgent joy rides, Polaris Dawn is a test mission designed to push boundaries.

Isaacman, Menon, Gillis and Poteet will spend five days aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule that will soar to altitudes higher than any human has traveled since NASA’s Apollo program ended in the 1970s. Their orbital path will extend high enough to plunge the vehicle and crew into a radiation belt, adding another element of peril to the already treacherous experience of spaceflight.

This crew of private citizens will also open the hatch of their spacecraft and expose themselves to the vacuum of space, marking the first time such a feat has been attempted by non-government astronauts. During this endeavor, the astronauts will be protected solely by brand-new Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) suits, which SpaceX designed and developed in just two and a half years.

With Polaris Dawn, Isaacman — the founder of payment services company Shift4, who is also a jet pilot with lifelong dreams of space travel — is making clear he is not just interested in duplicating what professional astronauts have experienced. He is seeking to advance space technology, helping to fund the development of new hardware as well as personally exposing himself to the risks of testing out that technology where it matters most: in the unforgiving void of outer space.

“What Jared is doing — he’s not just going for a joyride,” said Garrett Reisman, a former NASA astronaut who serves as a SpaceX consultant and helped lead the development of Crew Dragon. “Jared (wants) do things that SpaceX wasn’t necessarily doing on its own, to increase their capabilities, to get them to move the ball further downfield.”

An unprecedented mission
First announced in 2022, Polaris Dawn is the first of three testing and development missions under the Polaris Program that Isaacman said he will jointly execute and fund alongside SpaceX. He declined to say how much this mission cost.

The end goal of the Polaris Program is to take the first steps toward validating technology that SpaceX will one day need if it carries humans deeper into the cosmos — including spacesuits, EVA and life-support technologies.

After launch, the Polaris Dawn crew will travel into an oval-shaped orbit that extends as high as 870 miles (1,400 kilometers) from Earth. That’s well into the inner band of Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts, which begin at around 600 miles (1,000 kilometers) in altitude. The belts are areas where concentrations of high-energy particles that come from the sun and interact with Earth’s atmosphere are trapped, creating two dangerous bands of radiation, according to NASA.

Almost immediately after reaching space, the Polaris Dawn crew will begin a “pre-breathe” process to prepare for the spacewalk. It’s akin to what scuba divers do to avoid decompression sickness, otherwise known as “the bends.” The crewmates must purge nitrogen from their blood so that when the Dragon capsule is depressurized and exposed to the vacuum of space, the gas doesn’t form bubbles in their bloodstream — a potentially lethal condition.

“We don’t have an airlock on this mission,” Gillis told CNN, referring to the areas on board the International Space Station (ISS) that serve as special decompression chambers for astronauts heading out for a spacewalk. Polaris Dawn will instead take “a really novel and different approach” to the pre-breathing process that involves “slowly decreasing cabin pressure and raising oxygen concentration.”

Unlike any pre-breathe attempted on the International Space Station, the process will take roughly 45 hours — nearly two days, said Gillis, who works as a lead space operations engineer at SpaceX and trained the Inspiration4 crew for their mission.

Finally, to kick off their third day in space, the Polaris Dawn crew will open the Crew Dragon’s hatch as they’re about 435 miles (700 kilometers) above Earth. All four of the crew members and the entirety of the spacecraft’s interior will be exposed to the expansive void. Only Isaacman and Gillis will actually exit the spacecraft, however, tethered by a couple of umbilicals.

From beginning to end, the Polaris Dawn mission exposes the crew to more risk than other orbital space tourism missions have, including SpaceX missions that have carried paying customers to the International Space Station, which orbits about 250 miles (400 kilometers) above Earth.

Toxins and radiation
Over the two and a half years SpaceX and the Polaris Dawn crew have prepared for this mission, numerous technical challenges had to be addressed.

Even the EVA suits that SpaceX developed for this mission are high-stakes pieces of technology. For context, NASA has already tried for years to lock down a viable replacement for the aging puffy, white spacesuits used aboard the International Space Station.

However, Reisman notes, the SpaceX suits do not include a Primary Life Support System, or PLSS, which is essentially a backpack that allows ISS astronauts to float more freely through space to carry out complex tasks, such as repairing and replacing hardware outside the space station. Instead, the Polaris Dawn crew will receive their life support from long hoses attached to their spacecraft.

Then there’s the matter of the Crew Dragon vehicle itself. To make sure the spacecraft’s avionics — or electronics used for navigation and communication — could survive the heavy radiation environment encountered during the Polaris Dawn mission, engineers “literally strapped a lot of the avionics to a gurney and brought it to an oncology lab,” Isaacman said.

The SpaceX team hammered the avionics components with radiation until they broke, Isaacman said, to precisely determine when and how the technology might fail.

Once the Crew Dragon spacecraft is exposed to the vacuum of space, components inside the spacecraft could then vent off toxins — a natural trait of certain materials used to make various components — as the cabin is repressurized after the spacewalk, according to Menon.

To avoid that, the Crew Dragon and “a lot of the pieces of hardware that are flying in the vehicle went through basically a bake-out before we will ever go into space. What that does is it off-gasses a lot of those toxins,” said Menon, a lead space operations engineer at SpaceX who will also serve as the crew’s medical officer.

The “bake-out” involved putting the vehicle into a vacuum chamber at high temperatures, allowing the hardware to release the toxins before flight.

SpaceX also implemented automatic rebooting software, according to Menon, which can — without human intervention — troubleshoot computers that might malfunction due to radiation.

‘Significant risks’

Putting such a novel mission together in less than three years is incredibly fast by aerospace standards.

“Going faster is not necessarily more risky,” Reisman said, referring to rapid speed of development and extensive ground testing that SpaceX has carried out. “Taking large risks in testing when the consequences of failure are low results in reduced risk later when the consequences of failure are high.”

But “you should be nervous about (this mission),” he added. “Anytime you try something for the first time there are significant risks. I’ll feel much better when they are back inside with the hatch closed and latched” after the spacewalk.

SpaceX teams tried to mitigate risks and prepare for every potential challenge through a barrage of tests, some as simple as putting a handrail into a freezing chamber — set to negative 90 degrees Celsius — to see how cold to the touch a ladder might be when exposed to space, Isaacman said.

They even took the spacesuits to a testing site at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. There, the suits were struck by small pieces of debris traveling at orbital velocities to see how they could withstand micrometeorites and avoid punctures that would endanger the crew, according to Isaacman. (Objects in orbit around Earth travel at more than 17,000 miles per hour.)

Adding to the pressure to perform a perfect spacewalk is the fact that time will be extremely limited because the crew will have to lean heavily on oxygen supplies during the pre-breathe.

Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/19/science/spacex-polaris-dawn-jared-isaacman-spacewalk/index.html

Asteroid 2024 JV33 is part of the Apollo group, a category of asteroids known for their frequent crossings of Earth’s orbit.

NASA has issued an urgent alert regarding a significant near-Earth asteroid named 2024 JV33, which is expected to make its closest approach on August 19. This asteroid, roughly the size of a building at about 620 feet in diameter, is anticipated to pass Earth at a distance of approximately 2,850,000 miles.
Asteroid 2024 JV33 is part of the Apollo group, a category of asteroids known for their frequent crossings of Earth’s orbit. Traveling through space at a remarkable speed of 24,779 miles per hour, this asteroid will come relatively close to our planet, though it will still be three times farther away than the Moon. In astronomical terms, this proximity is significant enough for NASA to continue monitoring the situation closely.

To put things in perspective, despite its considerable distance, 2024 JV33 is classified as a near-Earth object (NEO), which requires careful monitoring. NASA’s continuous tracking efforts ensure that we stay informed about any potential space threats.

Source: https://www.ndtv.com/science/building-sized-asteroid-approaching-earth-at-alarming-speed-today-warns-nasa-6371249

Some keen stargazers may be able to spot Juice pass overhead, with the spacecraft flying directly over South East Asia and the Pacific Ocean.

The European Space Agency’s Juice craft will return to Earth tonight, taking part in a “world first” fly-by.

Flight controllers will guide the Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (Juice), with UK-made scientific instruments on board, past the moon and then Earth.

The risky manoeuvre will take Juice on a shortcut to Jupiter via Venus, using the moon’s gravity and then Earth’s, as a natural brake – slowing itself down and then sling-shotting on to the next phase of its journey.

The mission launched in April 2023 on a 4.1 billion-mile journey which will take more than eight years.

Onboard are 10 scientific instruments, which will investigate whether Jupiter’s three moons – Callisto, Europa and Ganymede – can support life in its oceans.

Experts from the European Space Agency (ESA) admit the slightest mistake could take the spacecraft off course and mean the end of the mission.

From around 11.57pm on Monday into the early hours of Tuesday, the agency says a double world first will take place with the lunar-Earth fly-by and the double gravity assist manoeuvre.

The move will change Juice’s speed and direction to alter its course through space.

Earth will bend Juice’s trajectory through space, redirecting it on course for a fly-by of Venus in August 2025.

From then on, energy boosts will begin, with the spacecraft being sped up by Venus and then twice by Earth.

Some keen stargazers may be able to spot Juice pass overhead, with the spacecraft flying directly over South East Asia and the Pacific Ocean.

Powerful binoculars or a telescope will give them the best chance of seeing the spacecraft.

Two cameras on board Juice will be taking photos throughout the lunar-Earth flyby, which will be shared publicly as they are received on Earth.

Source: https://news.sky.com/story/juice-spacecraft-to-pass-over-earth-in-world-first-fly-by-13199181

Three large asteroids are on a trajectory that will bring them near Earth between August 19 and August 27.

In the coming days, Earth will have a front-row seat to a spectacular cosmic event as three sizable asteroids zip past our planet. According to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), these space travellers are set to make their closest approaches between August 19 and August 27. Despite their impressive sizes, none of these asteroids pose a threat to Earth.

The first of the trio, asteroid 2024 JV33, is a colossal 620 feet across—roughly the height of a high-rise building. Scheduled to make its closest approach on August 19, it will swing by at a distance of 2,850,000 miles. Despite this proximity, NASA assures us there’s no cause for alarm.

Next up, on August 20, asteroid 2024 PQ5 will make its appearance. Measuring about 140 feet in diameter, this smaller asteroid will pass Earth from a distance of 3,210,000 miles. Like JV33, it is deemed harmless.

Finally, asteroid 2020 RL, which is roughly the size of a jet at 110 feet wide, is set to glide past on August 27. It will come within 2,910,000 miles of Earth, but, as with its companions, it poses no danger.

Source: https://www.moneycontrol.com/science/nasa-alerts-of-a-building-sized-asteroid-approaching-earth-at-high-speed-check-the-next-3-asteroids-hurtling-towards-us-article-12799715.html

According to Dr Somanath, all the systems for the Gaganyaan rocket code named G1 will reach Satish Dhawan Space Centre in November this year and the target for the rocket flight is December.

The first test flight of India’s human rated rocket for its human space mission ‘Gaganyaan’ is expected to take place in December 2024, said a top official of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO).
Speaking to the media after the successful orbiting of India’s earth observation satellite-08 (EOS-08) Dr S Somanath, Chairman, ISRO said: “The Gaganyaan rocket’s three stages have come to Satish Dhawan Space Centre. The integration of the crew module is happening at VSSC (Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram).”

According to Dr Somanath, all the systems for the Gaganyaan rocket code named G1 will reach Satish Dhawan Space Centre in November this year and the target for the rocket flight is December.

On Friday morning ISRO’s new rocket – Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV) successfully put into orbit two satellites EOS-08 and SR-0 belonging to a space start-up Space Rickshaw in copy book style.

It was the third and final development flight of SSLV.

Dr Somanath said the third development flight of SSLV has been successfully accomplished.

“We can declare the process of SSLV development has been completed. We are in the process of transferring the SSLV technology to the industries,” he said.

Dr Somanath said the SSLV design has been kept simple for the industry to make it.

The SSLV designed and developed by ISRO has a payload capacity of 500 kg and is powered by solid fuel.

The space agency will not only transfer the SSLV technology to Industry for commercial production but also teach the process of building the rocket.

“We will transfer the knowledge and not just the drawings. The industry people will come to ISRO to learn how to build rockets,” he added.

Last year the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe), the regulator for private players in the Indian space sector, had announced ISRO’s decision to transfer the SSLV technology to private companies.

Source: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/first-test-flight-of-indias-human-space-mission-rocket-likely-in-december-6350996

Is this the tipping point that causes third-party iOS app stores to take off?

For the first time since August 2020, Fortnite is back on iOS, and it’s just as exciting and engaging as ever — although a lot has changed in that time.

Following years of legal battles, rumors, and the launch of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Epic Games’ flagship title has reappeared on the newly launched Epic Games Store on iOS and Android, as well as the AltStore PAL third-party marketplace.

There are some caveats. While Android users across the globe can take the plunge, only EU-based iPhone owners can download the store as a result of the DMA prying open Apple’s grip. The launch of the Epic Games Store gives us a glimpse at what’s possible following these regulations and could be a seismic moment for third-party iOS marketplaces in general.

While four alternative app stores have been released since the EU’s March compliance date, none have particularly taken the sector by storm. Setapp Mobile is constantly adding more apps but remains in closed beta; Mobivention is B2B-focused; Aptoide hasn’t fully launched and only allows 500 additional users a day; and AltStore PAL has had minimal success getting apps notarized.

But today’s launch of the Epic Games Store may change all that. The company’s catalog of world-famous titles like Fortnite and Fall Guys may be the spark that ignites a public fervor for alternative app stores.

Before we discuss what that future could look like, we first need to take a step back and actually install the Epic Games Store.

The SSLV-D3-EOS-08 mission follows the second successful launch of the second test flight of the Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV-D2-EOS-07) in February 2023.

Sriharikota: The countdown for the launch of an earth observation satellite, onboard the third and final development flight of Small Satellite Launch Vehicle-03 commenced on Friday, ISRO said.

The SSLV-D3-EOS-08 mission follows the second successful launch of the second test flight of the Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV-D2-EOS-07) in February 2023.

Today’s mission is the third for the Bengaluru-headquartered space agency in 2024, after the successful PSLV-C58/XpoSat in January and GSLV-F14/INSAT-3DS missions in February.

It’s strange to sit down at my desk and talk to an AI about my life — but that’s what I spent my Tuesday doing.

I’d gotten access to OpenAI’s Advanced Voice Mode, the new ChatGPT feature that sounds strangely like a human. When counting quickly, it’ll pretend it’s out of breath. It says “um” and “uh.” It laughs. It changes tone when talking about difficult or upbeat topics. After messing around with it, I felt equal parts amazed and uncomfortable. It sounds natural (when it isn’t glitching), it responds in seconds, and you’re able to interrupt it and ask new things — but do we need chatbots that sound like us?

Advanced Voice Mode features several different voice options, and I chose Juniper, a feminine persona reminiscent of the movie Her. (CEO Sam Altman referenced the film — where a lonely man falls in love with an AI — around the feature’s debut, and OpenAI even got accused of mimicking the voice of Scarlett Johansson, who plays the eponymous AI. That voice, named Sky, was removed.) I asked Juniper if it knew about the movie, and it cheerfully responded.

“Her is about a very advanced AI assistant, much more sophisticated than me. But the idea of interacting with technology in such a personal way is definitely interesting,” the chatbot told me. “I’m here to chat and help, but I don’t have feelings or consciousness like the AI in that movie.”

Google just wrapped up its Made by Google hardware event, where we got an official look at the refreshed Pixel 9 lineup and updates across Google’s other devices. Even though the Pixel event confirmed many of the leaks we’ve seen over the past several weeks, Google still shared some announcements we haven’t heard about yet.

Here’s a roundup of all the exciting news from Google’s Pixel 9 event.

Google’s Pixel 9 lineup gives you another Pro to choose from

Google has finally taken the wraps off its Pixel 9 lineup, which includes three slab phones and a folding phone. The regular lineup consists of a base Pixel 9 with a 6.3-inch display, a Pixel 9 Pro XL with a 6.8-inch screen, and a new, smaller Pixel 9 Pro option measuring 6.3 inches. The trio of devices comes with a redesigned oval-shaped camera housing, Google’s updated G4 Tensor chip, better battery life, and a new satellite SOS feature.

While the Pixel 9’s $799 starting price is $100 more than last year’s model, the Pixel 9 Pro starts at $999, and the Pro XL will cost $1,099 and up. The Pixel 9 and 9 Pro XL start shipping on August 22nd, with availability for the smaller Pixel 9 Pro starting in September.

The Pixel 9 Pro Fold gets bigger screens and a slimmer profile

In addition to three new standard Pixel devices, Google showed off the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The refreshed Fold is taller and thinner than its predecessor, offering larger displays measuring 6.3 inches on the outside and eight inches on the inside.

The device, which also comes with a G4 Tensor chip, features an inner display with a higher peak brightness at 2,700 nits as opposed to 1,450 on the original Pixel Fold. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold costs $1,799 and starts shipping on September 4th.

AI features galore

Of course, Google’s new Pixel devices feature the company’s Gemini AI assistant, which you can use to find information within your apps or ask a question about a photo you just took. The Pixel 9 lineup also ships two new AI apps: Pixel Screenshots, which uses on-device AI to let you search for information in saved screenshots, and Pixel Studio, a text-to-image generator.

Google tossed in some AI image editing tools to go along with the Pixel 9 lineup’s upgraded cameras, such as an “Add Me” option that puts someone in a group photo by stitching two scenes together. Magic Editor in Google Photos now also lets you use generative AI to replace entire sections of a photo, like the sky.

Google Pixel Watch 3 has a larger 45mm option

Google’s Pixel Watch 3 comes in a larger 45mm option alongside the 41mm model. In addition to thinner bezels that offer more screen real estate, the Pixel Watch 3 has a new ultra wideband chip, a brighter display that hits up to 2,000 nits, and a boatload of new fitness features.

One of the most notable features coming to the Pixel Watch 3 is the ability to detect whether the wearer’s pulse has stopped, allowing it to call emergency services if the wearer doesn’t respond to a prompt to check in and it doesn’t sense any movement. This feature will roll out in Europe to start. The 41mm Pixel Watch 3 starts at $349.99 with Bluetooth, while the 45mm watch starts at $399.99. Both sizes will be available on September 10th.

The Pixel Buds Pro 2 get upgrades inside and out

Not only are Google’s Pixel Buds Pro 2 smaller and lighter, but they now come equipped with 11-millimeter drivers and a new Tensor A1 chip that’s supposed to improve active noise cancellation (ANC). The new buds also have a wing fin design, which should help them stay in your ears during a workout, along with up to eight hours of audio playback with ANC enabled (or up to 30 hours with the case).

At $229, the Pixel Buds Pro 2 cost a bit more than their predecessors, which launched at $200. They start shipping on September 26th.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/24218825/google-pixel-9-event-announcements-products

Polish billionaire Rafal Brzoska and his wife plan to sue Meta (META.O), opens new tab over fake advertisements on Facebook and Instagram that feature his face and false information regarding her circulating on the social media platforms.
Brzoska said they have not yet decided on a jurisdiction to file the planned lawsuit, which would be another in a series of attempts globally to hold the internet giant accountable for ads that keep appearing even after users inform the company about problems.

A Meta spokesperson said the company removes false ads from its platforms when it learns about them, and works with local authorities to battle scammers.
Brzoska, creator of Polish parcel locker company InPost (INPST.AS), opens new tab, said he notified Meta of the problem beginning of July, but it failed to find a solution.
“We plan to file a private lawsuit against Meta… We have not yet determined in which jurisdictions we will sue Meta. We will decide in the next few weeks,” Brzoska told Reuters.

Longtime Google rivals like Yelp and DuckDuckGo received a huge victory Monday when a federal judge ruled that Google is an illegal monopoly. But their statements on the ruling expressed restraint. That’s because the work of restoring competition has just begun, and the judge has yet to decide what that work will include. With a lot of options on the table, Google’s competitors are pushing for changes they believe will help their businesses, which might be harder than it sounds.

“While we’re heartened by the decision, a strong remedy is critical,” Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman wrote in a blog post after the ruling, referencing the new trial phase that will kick off in September.

“We’ve passed a key milestone, but there’s still a lot of history to be written,” Kamyl Bazbaz, senior vice president of public affairs for DuckDuckGo, said in a statement. “Google will do anything it can to get in the way of progress which is why we hope to see a robust remedies trial that can really dig into all the details, propose an array of remedies that will actually work, and set up a monitoring body to administer them.”

These statements reflect an understanding that Judge Amit Mehta’s decision on how to restore competition will be just as — if not more – important than his finding that Google violated antitrust law. The recently concluded liability phase determined that Google violated the Sherman Act through exclusionary contracts with phone and browser makers to maintain its default search engine position. In the remedies phase, Mehta will decide how to restore competition in general search services and search text advertising. But a weak remedy will simply give Google a pass.

DuckDuckGo knows better than most how important effective remedies are. Google was ruled a monopolist in the European Union years ago, and the region imposed a choice screen in an attempt to create competition, asking device users to select their default search engine. But the approach hasn’t seemingly produced as much of an impact as competitors once hoped — and Google remains overwhelmingly dominant.

“[W]e can’t underscore this enough: the implementation details matter,” Bazbaz said. In the EU, “there are some solutions that are promising, but Google has found it relatively easy to work around their implementations.” DuckDuckGo is calling for a group of “truly independent” technical experts to monitor any remedies imposed by the court, “to ensure Google doesn’t find new ways to give itself preferential treatment.”

DuckDuckGo said that some solutions from Europe could be effective, if implemented in a better way. Instead of showing up only once during initial setup, for instance, a choice screen could pop up “periodically.” Conversely, the company wants a ban on “dark pattern” popups that push people back toward the default, something it says isn’t enforced in the EU.

DuckDuckGo also proposes that the court bar Google from buying default status or pre-installation (which could scuttle its multibillion-dollar deal with Apple) and provide access to its search and ad APIs.

Yelp’s Stoppelman says that Google should be required to “spin off services that have unfairly benefited from its search monopoly, a straightforward and enforceable remedy to prevent future anticompetitive behavior.” The judge should also prohibit Google from using exclusive default search deals and from “self-preferencing its own content in search results,” Stoppelman said.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/11/24216760/google-trial-monopoly-remedies-rivals

Cisco (CSCO.O), opens new tab will cut thousands of jobs in a second round of layoffs this year as the U.S. networking equipment maker shifts focus to higher-growth areas, including cybersecurity and AI, people familiar with the matter said.
The number of people affected could be similar to or slightly higher than the 4,000 employees Cisco laid off in February, and will likely be announced as early as Wednesday with the company’s fourth-quarter results, said the sources, who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Reuters exclusively reported the job cut that San Jose, California-based Cisco announced in February, prior to the company announcing it.
The company employed around 84,900 people as of July 2023, according to its annual filing. That number does not account for the February layoffs.
Cisco did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Its shares fell nearly 1% after Reuters first reported the cuts. The stock was down over 9% this year as of Thursday’s close.

Cisco, the largest maker of the routers and switches that direct internet traffic, has been grappling with sluggish demand and supply-chain constraints in its mainstay business.
That has pushed the company to diversify with moves such as its $28-billion buyout of cybersecurity firm Splunk, which it completed in March. The acquisition will reduce its reliance on one-time equipment sales by boosting its subscription business.

Source: https://www.reuters.com/technology/cisco-lay-off-thousands-more-second-job-cut-this-year-sources-say-2024-08-09/

Apple’s (AAPL.O), opens new tab lucrative deal with Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab could be under threat after a U.S. judge ruled that the Alphabet-owned search giant was operating an illegal monopoly.
A potential remedy for Google to avoid antitrust actions could involve terminating the agreement, which makes its search engine a default on Apple devices, Wall Street analysts said on Tuesday.
Google pays Apple $20 billion annually, or about 36% of what it earns from search advertising made through the Safari browser, for the privilege, according to Morgan Stanley analysts.

Apple’s shares were trading flat on Tuesday, underperforming a recovery in the broader market after Monday’s global selloff. Alphabet was little changed, after falling 4.5% in the previous session.

“The message here is that if you’ve got a dominant market position with a product, you’d better avoid the use of exclusive agreements and make sure any agreement you make gives the buyer free choice to substitute away,” said Herbert Hovenkamp, a professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania.

To be sure, the “remedy” phase could be lengthy, followed by potential appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals, the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. The legal wrangling could play out into 2026.
AI TILT
Still, if the tie-up is scrapped, Apple will have several options including offering customers alternatives such as Microsoft Bing to customers, or potentially a new search product powered by OpenAI.
Analysts agree that the ruling will speed up Apple’s move towards AI-powered search services. It recently announced that it would bring OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot to its devices.
In a shift away from exclusive deals that would help Apple ward off regulatory scrutiny, the company has said it is also in talks with Google to add the Gemini chatbot and plans to add other AI models as well.

Source: https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-antitrust-ruling-may-pose-20-billion-risk-apple-2024-08-06/

The significant electricity consumption of these companies calls for ongoing discussions around sustainability and renewable energy adoption.

Tech giants Google and Microsoft each consumed 24 TWh of electricity in 2023, surpassing the consumption of more than 100 countries, new research claims.
Analysis by Michael Thomas, shared on X, states that both Google and Microsoft used the same amount of energy as Azerbaijan, which has a GDP of $78.7 billion. In 2023, Google’s revenue was $307.4 billion, and Microsoft’s was $211.9 billion, Tech Radar reported.

This massive energy usage underscores the significant environmental impact of these companies but also highlights their potential to lead more sustainable initiatives.

For comparison, Iceland, Ghana, the Dominican Republic, and Tunisia each consumed 19 TWh, while Jordan consumed 20 TWh. Libya (25 TWh) and Slovakia (26 TWh) used slightly more power.

The comparison between entire countries and two single companies emphasizes the colossal energy demands of Big Tech. It also points to the environmental impacts of data centers that power cloud services and the new generation of artificial intelligence.

The significant electricity consumption of these companies calls for ongoing discussions around sustainability and renewable energy adoption. Both Google and Microsoft have pledged to be carbon-free or carbon-negative by the end of the decade and have significantly scaled up investments in cleaner energies and energy matching.

Source: https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/google-and-microsoft-now-consume-more-power-than-several-large-countries-6122921

Billionaire Elon Musk revived a lawsuit against ChatGPT maker OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman on Monday, saying that the firm put profits and commercial interests ahead of the public good.
The lawsuit marks Musk’s latest attempt to oppose the startup he co-founded in 2015 and left three years later. Since his exit, OpenAI has gone on to become the face of generative AI, while Musk started another rival startup, xAI, last year that was valued at $24 billion in May.

The latest lawsuit seeks a judicial determination that OpenAI’s license to Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab to use its AI models is null and void. Musk also contends that the language models are outside the scope of OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft.
Filed in the Court for the Northern District of California, the suit is similar to the one Musk filed in February before withdrawing it in June without any explanation just a day before a judge was set to hear OpenAI’s bid to dismiss the lawsuit.

NASA’s Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, who have spent over a month in space, are capable of returning to Earth in case of an emergency, or on a spacecraft other than Boeing’s Starliner. But there’s catch. And what if thrusters on spacecraft malfunction on return mission?

Are NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore really “stuck” in space or is it their choice to spend more time in weightlessness than scheduled? Here’s a deep dive into two factors that may explain the idea behind Starliner astronauts’ extended stay in space.

1. Starliner could return ‘if absolutely necessary’
First, Steve Stich, manager of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, said earlier this month, “Starliner is ‘go’ to return in an emergency.” His statement came as NASA maintained that Starliner could still return astronauts to Earth if absolutely necessary.

But in what conditions would Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore be brought back from space? The “absolutely necessary” situation will arise if the Starliner capsule must serve as an escape pod from the ISS in an emergency or if any of Starliner’s perishable items – such as its solar panels – show signs of expiring earlier than planned, Reuters reported.

Wilmore said that on July 10, two astronauts tested a “Safe Haven procedure,” sheltering inside Starliner in the event they needed to suddenly undock from the ISS. The test went well, he said.

Meanwhile, Sunita Williams explained one of the checks for Starliner involved practicing for safe haven “to make sure that we have all the emergency equipment laid out and we need to have to get into or spacecraft and use it as a safe haven – in case something happens to the space station,” she said.

An official also spoke about how they will return to Earth if they were to do it today. On July 10, the official said that if they were to do the “undocking today”, they would just perform a nominal undocking and return. He said that the propulsion system is highly redundant on each other. “So if there was an issue in any one of the thrusters, the redundance will take over and bring us safely home,” he added.

2. Starliner is not the only option NASA has to bring back astronauts
If not Boeing’s Starliner, NASA also has the fallback option to bring back the two astronauts quickly from space using a rival company’s spacecraft, SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, if there were a true emergency.

The Crew Dragon ferried four astronauts to the station in March and is able to fit more people in an emergency. But the use of Crew Dragon seems unlikely. SpaceX is Boeing’s competitor.

However, NASA focuses on safely returning Williams and Wilmore to Earth, and the prime option is to return on Boeing’s Starliner capsule.

On August 2, Boeing said in a statement that it “remains confident in the Starliner spacecraft and its ability to return safely with crew”.

So, why are Starliner astronauts overstaying in space?
Earlier this month, Wilmore said that human space flight is not easy in any regime and there have been multiple issues with every spacecraft that has ever been designed, and “that’s the nature of what we do”.

“The mantra you have heard that failure is not an option, that’s why we are staying here now,” he had said.

On their extended stay in space, Wilmore added the crew faced degradation in the thrusters. “And that’s why we are staying because we are going to test it…We are going to get the data we need to help inform our decision so we make the right decision,” he said.

Meanwhile, Sunita Williams explained why studies on Starliner were important. She said that the service module (SM), where the thrusters are situated, will detach from the capsule and burn up in the atmosphere. This would mean the end of being able to study how they react in space.

“We have practised a lot, and I have a real good feeling that the spacecraft will bring us back home…we are learning now to optimize our specific situation to make sure that we know everything about it [the spacecraft]…,” Sunita Williams said on July 10, in her first interaction with media after Starliner launch.

NASA had earlier rescheduled the planned return three times, and now has no date set for it. As per a Reuters report, Starliner could stay docked at the ISS for up to 72 day while relying on various backup systems.

Why Starliner’s return delayed: ‘Helium leaks, thruster anomalies’
Starliner, which was supposed to return around mid-June, has now been in space for over 50 days as the crew pursues fixes mid-mission.

The team, in space and on ground, has been conducting thruster testing and working on a return flight readiness review to prepare for Starliner’s eventual undocking and landing.

Starliner launched on June 5 on Crew Flight Test (CFT), carrying Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station (ISS) for a planned week-long stay. The spacecraft reached the ISS on June 6.

During the trip, Starliner experienced helium leaks and thruster anomalies – which delayed the spacecraft’s return. The capsule has had five helium leaks, five maneuvering thrusters go dead and a propellant valve fail to close completely.

Starliner’s propulsion system is part of the craft’s “service module”. The problems center on this system, which is needed to back the capsule away from the ISS and position it to dive through Earth’s atmosphere, Ruters reported.

Many of Starliner’s thrusters have overheated when fired, and the leaks of helium – used to pressurize the thrusters – appear to be connected to how frequently they are used, according to Stich.

Source: https://www.livemint.com/science/news/sunita-williams-really-stuck-in-space-or-is-it-choice-nasa-starliner-astronauts-could-return-if-11722698040722.html

Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-in), the centre’s security advisor, flagged the security issues in a Friday advisory.

The government has flagged “multiple vulnerabilities” in iPhones, iPads and other Apple products that could lead to spoofing and even leak sensitive information. Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), the centre’s security advisor, flagged the security issues in a Friday advisory.
“Multiple vulnerabilities have been reported in Apple products which could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, execute arbitrary code, bypass security restrictions, cause denial of service (DoS) and perform spoofing attacks on the targeted system,” the advisory said.

The vulnerabilities affect a range of Apple software including iOS and iPadOS versions prior to 17.6 and 16.7.9, macOS Sonoma versions prior to 14.6, macOS Ventura versions prior to 13.6.8, macOS Monterey versions prior to 12.7.6, watchOS versions prior to 10.6, tvOS versions prior to 17.6, visionOS versions prior to 1.3, Safari versions prior to 17.6.

The severity of the vulnerabilities was marked “high” in the advisory.

Apple, which doesn’t confirm security issues until they conduct an investigation, had issued their latest security updates last week. The latest versions of these software are also listed on their portal.

Country musician Tift Merritt’s most popular song on Spotify, “Traveling Alone,”, opens new tab is a ballad with lyrics evoking solitude and the open road.
Prompted by Reuters to make “an Americana song in the style of Tift Merritt,” the artificial intelligence music website Udio instantly generated “Holy Grounds,”, opens new tab a ballad with lyrics about “driving old backroads” while “watching the fields and skies shift and sway.”

The big record labels are worried too. Sony Music (6758.T), opens new tab, Universal Music Group (UMG.AS), opens new tab and Warner Music (WMG.O), opens new tab sued Udio and another music AI company called Suno in June, marking the music industry’s entrance into high-stakes copyright battles over AI-generated content that are just starting to make their way through the courts.
“Ingesting massive amounts of creative labor to imitate it is not creative,” said Merritt, an independent musician whose first record label is now owned by UMG, but who said she is not financially involved with the company. “That’s stealing in order to be competition and replace us.”

Suno and Udio pointed to past public statements defending their technology when asked for comment for this story. They filed their initial responses in court on Thursday, denying any copyright violations and arguing that the lawsuits were attempts to stifle smaller competitors. They compared the labels’ protests to past industry concerns about synthesizers, drum machines and other innovations replacing human musicians.

UNCHARTED GROUND

The companies, which have both attracted venture capital funding, have said they bar users from creating songs explicitly mimicking top artists. But the new lawsuits say Suno and Udio can be prompted to reproduce elements of songs by Mariah Carey, James Brown and others and to mimic voices of artists like ABBA and Bruce Springsteen, showing that they misused the labels’ catalog of copyrighted recordings to train their systems.

Mitch Glazier, CEO of the music industry trade group the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), said that the lawsuits “document shameless copying of troves of recordings in order to flood the market with cheap imitations and drain away listens and income from real human artists and songwriters.”

“AI has great promise – but only if it’s built on a sound, responsible, licensed footing,” Glazier said.

Asked for comment on the cases, Warner Music referred Reuters to the RIAA. Sony and UMG did not respond.

The labels’ claims echo allegations by novelists, news outlets, music publishers and others in high-profile copyright lawsuits over chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude that use generative AI to create text. Those lawsuits are still pending and in their early stages.

Both sets of cases pose novel questions for the courts, including whether the law should make exceptions for AI’s use of copyrighted material to create something new. The record labels’ cases, which could take years to play out, also raise questions unique to their subject matter – music.

The interplay of melody, harmony, rhythm and other elements can make it harder to determine when parts of a copyrighted song have been infringed compared to works like written text, said Brian McBrearty, a musicologist who specializes in copyright analysis.

“Music has more factors than just the stream of words,” McBrearty said. “It has pitch, and it has rhythm, and it has harmonic context. It’s a richer mix of different elements that make it a little bit less straightforward.”

Some claims in the AI copyright cases could hinge on comparisons between an AI system’s output and the material allegedly misused to train it, requiring the kind of analysis that has challenged judges and juries in cases about music.

In a 2018 decision that a dissenting judge called “a dangerous precedent,” Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams lost a case brought by Marvin Gaye’s estate over the resemblance of their hit “Blurred Lines” to Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up.” But artists including Katy Perry and Ed Sheeran have since fended off similar complaints over their own songs.

Suno and Udio argued in very similar court filings that their outputs do not infringe copyrights and said U.S. copyright law protects sound recordings that “imitate or simulate” other recorded music.

“Music copyright has always been a messy universe,” said Julie Albert, an intellectual property partner at law firm Baker Botts in New York who is tracking the new cases. And even without that complication, Albert said fast-evolving AI technology is creating new uncertainty at every level of copyright law.

WHOSE FAIR USE?

The intricacies of music may matter less in the end if, as many expect, the AI cases boil down to a “fair use” defense against infringement claims – another area of U.S. copyright law filled with open questions.

Fair use promotes freedom of expression by allowing the unauthorized use of copyright-protected works under certain circumstances, with courts often focusing on whether the new use transforms the original works.

Defendants in AI copyright cases have argued that their products make fair use of human creations, and that any court ruling to the contrary would be disastrous for the potentially multi-trillion-dollar AI industry.

Suno and Udio said in their answers to the labels’ lawsuits on Thursday that their use of existing recordings to help people create new songs “is a quintessential ‘fair use.'”

Fair use could make or break the cases, legal experts said, but no court has yet ruled on the issue in the AI context.

Albert said that music-generating AI companies could have a harder time proving fair use compared to chatbot makers, which can summarize and synthesize text in ways that courts may be more likely to consider transformative.

Imagine a student using AI to generate a report about the U.S. Civil War that incorporates text from a novel on the subject, she said, compared to someone asking AI to create new music based on existing music.

The student example “certainly feels like a different purpose than logging onto a music-generating tool and saying ‘hey, I’d like to make a song that sounds like a top 10 artist,'” Albert said. “The purpose is pretty similar to what the artist would have had in the first place.”

Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/music-labels-ai-lawsuits-create-new-copyright-puzzle-us-courts-2024-08-03/

Look, fun is fun and all, but sometimes boring is better.

A flip phone dripping with nostalgia that comes in bold colors and lets you run apps all willy-nilly on the cover screen? With inviting wallpapers and playful UI touches? That’s fun. It’s also not the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6. But while I thoroughly enjoyed using the Motorola Razr Plus — the fun flip phone — reliability wins out in the end.

Samsung’s newest clamshell-style foldable is a light update on last year’s model. It costs $1,099, which is a hundred dollars more than last year but also just what flagship phones cost these days. The inner and outer screens get a little brighter in direct sunlight, there’s a slightly bigger battery, and there’s an upgraded main camera, plus the latest Qualcomm chipset, naturally.

That paragraph could describe any number of new Android phones this year. And in the case of the Z Flip 6, that’s actually a good indication of how far Samsung’s flip phone has come. Last year’s update from a small cover screen to the current 3.4-inch OLED took the Flip series from “eh, it’s kinda cool” to “okay this is something.” It’s a far cry from Samsung’s earliest attempts.

But the Z Flip 6 hasn’t totally reached parity with slab phones; it’s certainly not the most fun flip phone. Sure, it’s the best Samsung flip phone — I just wish it would borrow a few ideas from some of the competition.

If I’d never picked up the Motorola Razr Plus, I’d think the Z Flip 6’s outer screen was pretty darn good. But the Razr’s bigger, higher-res screen wraps all the way around the punchouts for the lenses and flash. It makes the Flip 6’s cover screen, which keeps well away from that whole area, look stodgy and cramped by comparison.

And not to get too caught up about wallpapers, but Samsung’s best idea about new wallpapers for the outer screen is… a donut that bounces around when your phone moves? There’s so much more fun stuff you could do with this! Moto’s wallpapers are colorful and inviting, there’s an adorable turntable that spins when you’re playing audio, and I swear one of the background options is blurple. The Z Flip 6 comes with a proper always-on display this time around, but it lacks the sense of fun that I’d expect from a flip phone. Motorola has a mode that turns the whole phone into a retro flip phone, for Pete’s sake. Let’s live a little.

The Flip 6’s cover screen is a little more customizable than last year’s, which limited you to swiping through a bunch of full-screen widgets. Now, it’s more like a traditional home screen. You can still opt for a full-screen widget or add multiple smaller widgets to the same panel. The result feels much more streamlined; I don’t have to dedicate a whole panel to a timer; I can just add it as a smaller widget on a screen with weather info and my calendar.

And as much as I loved the playfulness of Motorola’s cover screen treatment, Samsung’s widgets are more reliable. Specifically, the Spotify panel on the Razr Plus cover screen often needs to refresh before it’ll actually work. The Spotify controls on the Z Flip 6 work flawlessly. Fun only goes so far.

Still, Motorola’s method for approving apps to run on the cover screen is much better than Samsung’s. Out of the box, Samsung will only allow you to run a handful of full apps on the small screen. To add any others, you need to go through a convoluted process: downloading Good Lock and another module from the Galaxy Store and then adding a launcher as a cover screen widget. Motorola doesn’t require any of that futzing about.

This is worth complaining about because I still think that being able to run a full app on the outer screen is one of the best things about a folding phone. Is it an ideal experience opening Strava on a tiny square? No! But I can tap, like, two things to start recording a bike ride without having to come face-to-face with everything else on my phone. It’s glorious.

For years, Microsoft’s list of competitors has included familiar names like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Meta.

The lines are blurring between collaboration and competition in the world of AI. Microsoft, in its latest annual report, has officially designated OpenAI, the artificial intelligence startup it has heavily invested in, as a competitor. This unexpected move highlights the increasingly complex relationship between the two tech giants.

For years, Microsoft’s list of competitors has included familiar names like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Meta. But the addition of OpenAI signals a shift, acknowledging that despite their close partnership, the two companies are increasingly encroaching on each other’s territory.

Microsoft has invested a reported $13 billion in OpenAI and serves as its exclusive cloud provider. OpenAI’s powerful AI models are integrated into various Microsoft products for both commercial and consumer use.

However, both companies are now offering competing products and services in the AI space. While some companies opt to work directly with OpenAI, others access its models through Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI Service. Microsoft has also developed its own AI chatbot, Copilot, which is integrated into Bing search and Windows operating systems.

An OpenAI spokesperson downplayed the significance of the listing, stating that the competitive aspect was always understood within the partnership. An OpenAI spokesperson told CNBC that nothing about the relationship between the two companies has changed and that their partnership was established with the understanding that they would compete. “Microsoft remains a good partner to OpenAI,” the spokesperson said.

A Tumultuous Relationship

Despite the reassurances, the Microsoft-OpenAI partnership has faced its share of turbulence this year. The abrupt ousting and subsequent reinstatement of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in November reportedly caught Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella off guard. Microsoft recently relinquished its non-voting board seat at OpenAI.

Furthermore, Nadella’s recent appointment of Mustafa Suleyman, a co-founder of Google’s DeepMind AI research lab, to lead Microsoft’s new AI unit has fuelled speculation about internal competition and the company’s long-term AI strategy.

Source: https://www.businesstoday.in/technology/news/story/microsoft-officially-lists-chatgpt-maker-openai-as-competitor-despite-deepening-partnership-440041-2024-08-03

Although our universe may seem stable, having existed for a whopping 13.7 billion years, several experiments suggest that it is at risk – walking on the edge of a very dangerous cliff. And it’s all down to the instability of a single fundamental particle: the Higgs boson.

In new research by me and my colleagues, just accepted for publication in Physical Letters B, we show that some models of the early universe, those which involve objects called light primordial black holes, are unlikely to be right because they would have triggered the Higgs boson to end the cosmos by now.

The Higgs boson is responsible for the mass and interactions of all the particles we know of. That’s because particle masses are a consequence of elementary particles interacting with a field, dubbed the Higgs field. Because the Higgs boson exists, we know that the field exists.

You can think of this field as a perfectly still water bath that we soak in. It has identical properties across the entire universe. This means we observe the same masses and interactions throughout the cosmos. This uniformity has allowed us to observe and describe the same physics over several millennia (astronomers typically look backwards in time).

But the Higgs field isn’t likely to be in the lowest possible energy state it could be in. That means it could theoretically change its state, dropping to a lower energy state in a certain location. If that happened, however, it would alter the laws of physics dramatically.

Such a change would represent what physicists call a phase transition. This is what happens when water turns into vapour, forming bubbles in the process. A phase transition in the Higgs field would similarly create low-energy bubbles of space with completely different physics in them.

In such a bubble, the mass of electrons would suddenly change, and so would its interactions with other particles. Protons and neutrons – which make up the atomic nucleus and are made of quarks – would suddenly dislocate. Essentially, anybody experiencing such a change would likely no longer be able to report it.

Constant risk
Recent measurements of particle masses from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern suggest that such an event might be possible. But don’t panic; this may only occur in a few thousand billion billion years after we retire. For this reason, in the corridors of particle physics departments, it is usually said that the universe is not unstable but rather “meta-stable”, because the world’s end will not happen anytime soon.

To form a bubble, the Higgs field needs a good reason. Due to quantum mechanics, the theory which governs the microcosmos of atoms and particles, the energy of the Higgs is always fluctuating. And it is statistically possible (although unlikely, which is why it takes so much time) that the Higgs forms a bubble from time to time.

However, the story is different in the presence of external energy sources like strong gravitational fields or hot plasma (a form of matter made up of charged particles): the field can borrow this energy to form bubbles more easily.

Therefore, although there is no reason to expect that the Higgs field forms numerous bubbles today, a big question in the context of cosmology is whether the extreme environments shortly after the Big Bang could have triggered such bubbling.

However, when the universe was very hot, although energy was available to help form Higgs bubbles, thermal effects also stabilised the Higgs by modifying its quantum properties. Therefore, this heat could not trigger the end of the universe, which is probably why we are still here.

Primordial black holes
In our new research, we showed there is one source of heat, however, that would constantly cause such bubbling (without the stabilising thermal effects seen in the early days after the Big Bang). That’s primordial black holes, a type of black hole which emerged in the early universe from the collapse of overly dense regions of spacetime. Unlike normal black holes, which form when stars collapse, primordial ones could be tiny – as light as a gram.

The existence of such light black holes is a prediction of many theoretical models that describe the evolution of the cosmos shortly after the Big Bang. This includes some models of inflation, suggesting the universe blew up hugely in size after the Big Bang.

However, proving this existence comes with a big caveat: Stephen Hawking demonstrated in the 1970s that, because of quantum mechanics, black holes evaporate slowly by emitting radiation through their event horizon (a point at which not even light can escape).

Hawking showed that black holes behave like heat sources in the universe, with a temperature inversely proportional to their mass. This means that light black holes are much hotter and evaporate more quickly than massive ones. In particular, if primordial black holes lighter than a few thousands billion grams formed in the early universe (10 billion times smaller than the Moon’s mass), as many models suggest, they would have evaporated by now.

In the presence of the Higgs field, such objects would behave like impurities in a fizzy drink – helping the liquid form gas bubbles by contributing to its energy via the effect of gravity (due to the mass of the black hole) and the ambient temperature (due to its Hawking radiation).

Source: https://studyfinds.org/higgs-boson-particle-could-have-ended-the-universe/?nab=0

A cyber attack ransom ware hit on financial technology service provider of digital Payment Systems forced shutdown of nearly 300 cooperative and regional rural banks across India.

A cyber attack ransom ware hit on financial technology service provider of digital Payment Systems forced shutdown of nearly 300 cooperative and regional rural banks across India.

The mobile and online financial systems of Unified Payment Interface (UPI), electronic fund transfer system Immediate Payment Service (IMPS) and retail payments of 300 small banks were shut down as precautionary measures after the ransom ware attack on tech provider C-Edge Technologies on Wednesday.

The cyber attack on C-Edge Technologies forced over 30O small banks using the financial technology services to temporarily stop payment systems.

The connectivity with the payment systems was restored late Thursday by NCPI after security review conducted by an independent forensic auditing firm, confirmed that the impacted systems were isolated to contain potential spread of the ransomware.

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) had issued notices to UPI and IMPA payment services on Wednesday to isolate C-Edge Technologies from accessing NPCI retail payment systems to limit the impact of the cyber attack.

In iOS 18’s latest developer preview, Siri gets a glow-up. Like, the whole phone actually glows around the edges when you invoke Siri.

A splash screen reintroduces you to the virtual assistant once you enable Apple Intelligence, an early version of which is now available on the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max in a developer beta. You’ll know Siri is listening when the edges of the screen glow, making it pretty obvious that something different is going on.

The big Siri AI update is still months away. This version comes with meaningful improvements to language understanding, but future updates will add features like awareness of what’s on your screen and the ability to take action on your behalf. Meanwhile, the rest of the Apple Intelligence feature set previewed in this update feels like a party waiting for the guest of honor.

That said, Siri’s improvements in this update are useful. Tapping the bottom of the screen twice will bring up a new way to interact with the assistant: through text. It’s also much better at parsing natural language, waiting more patiently through hesitations and “um”s as I stumble through questions. It also understands when I’m asking a follow-up question.

Outside of Siri, it’s kind of an Easter egg hunt finding bits of Apple Intelligence sprinkled throughout the OS. They’re in the mail app, with a summarize button at the top of each email now. And anywhere you can type and highlight text, you’ll find a new option called “writing tools” with AI proofreading, writing suggestions, and summaries.

“Help me write something” is pretty standard fare for generative AI these days, and Apple Intelligence does it as well as anyone else. You can have it make your text more friendly, professional, or concise. You can also create summaries of text or synthesize it into bulleted lists of key points or a table.

I’m finding these tools most useful in the Notes app, where you can now add voice recordings. In iOS 18, voice recordings finally come with automatic transcriptions, which is not an Apple Intelligence feature since it also works on my iPhone 13 Mini. But Apple Intelligence will let you turn a recording transcript into a summary or a checklist. This is helpful if you want to just free-associate while recording a memo and list a bunch of things you need to pack for an upcoming trip; Apple Intelligence turns it into a list that actually makes sense.

These writing tools are tucked out of the way, and if you weren’t looking for them, you might miss them entirely. The more obvious new AI features are in the mail app. Apple Intelligence surfaces what it deems to be important emails in a card that sits above the rest of your inbox marked as priority. Below that, emails show a brief summary in place of the first line or two of text that you’d normally see.

There’s something charming about AI’s sincere attempt to summarize promotional emails, trying to helpfully pull out bits of detail like “Backpacks and lunch boxes ship FREE” and “Organic white nectarines are sweet and juicy, in season now.” But the descriptions in my inbox were accurate — helpful in a few instances and harmless at worst. And the emails it gave priority status to were genuinely important, which is promising.

The search tool in the Photos app now uses AI to understand more complicated requests. You can ask for pictures of a particular person wearing glasses or all the food you ate in Iceland, all in natural language.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/31/24209910/apple-intelligence-ios-18-preview-siri

Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab has agreed to pay $1.4 billion to Texas to resolve the state’s lawsuit accusing the Facebook parent of illegally using facial-recognition technology to collect biometric data of millions of Texans without their consent.
The terms of the settlement, disclosed on Tuesday, mark the largest accord ever by any single state, according to the lawyers for Texas, whose legal team included the plaintiffs firm Keller Postman.

Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab relied on chips designed by Google rather than industry leader Nvidia to build two key components of its artificial intelligence software infrastructure for its forthcoming suite of AI tools and features, an Apple research paper published on Monday showed.
Apple’s decision to rely on Google’s (GOOGL.O), opens new tab cloud infrastructure is notable because Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab produces the most sought-after AI processors.

Including the chips made by Google, Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab and other cloud computing companies, Nvidia commands roughly 80% of the market.
In the research paper, Apple did not explicitly say that it used no Nvidia chips, but its description of the hardware and software infrastructure of its AI tools and features lacked any mention of Nvidia hardware.
Apple did not comment on Monday.
The iPhone maker said that to train its AI models, it used two flavors of Google’s tensor processing unit (TPU) that are organized in large clusters of chips.

In the race towards a quantum future, researchers at the University of Bath have made a significant development that could revolutionize how we transmit data in the quantum age. Their innovation? A new generation of specialty optical fibers designed specifically to meet the unique challenges of quantum communication.

As we stand on the brink of the quantum computing era, promising unparalleled computational power and unbreakable encryption, our current data transmission infrastructure faces a critical limitation. The conventional optical fibers that form the backbone of today’s global internet are simply not up to the task of quantum communication. But fear not – a solution is on the horizon, and it’s thinner than a human hair.

“The conventional optical fibers that are the workhorse of our telecommunications networks of today transmit light at wavelengths that are entirely governed by the losses of silica glass,” says study co-author Dr. Kristina Rusimova, from the Department of Physics at Bath, in a statement. “However, these wavelengths are not compatible with the operational wavelengths of the single-photon sources, qubits, and active optical components, that are required for light-based quantum technologies.”

Enter the microstructured optical fiber. Unlike traditional optical fibers with their solid glass cores, these new fibers feature a complex pattern of air pockets running along their entire length. This seemingly simple change opens up a world of possibilities for controlling and manipulating light in ways crucial for quantum technologies.

One of the most exciting applications of these fibers is in creating the building blocks of a quantum internet. By carefully designing the structure of these fibers, researchers can generate pairs of entangled photons – particles of light that are inextricably linked, no matter how far apart they are. This quantum entanglement is the secret sauce that makes many quantum technologies possible.

“A quantum internet is an essential ingredient in delivering on the vast promises of such emerging quantum technology. Much like the existing internet, a quantum internet will rely on optical fibers to deliver information from node to node,” says Dr. Cameron McGarry, first author of the paper. “These optical fibers are likely to be very different to those that are used currently and will require different supporting technology to be useful.”

Source: https://studyfinds.org/next-gen-optical-fibers-quantum-computing/

The new computers come with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite processor and a dedicated Qualcomm Hexagon Neural Processing Unit (NPU), capable of performing 45 trillion operations per second (TOPS) to run language models and generative AI locally on the device.

Source: https://www.deccanherald.com/technology/hp-launches-omnibook-x-elitebook-ultra-copilot-pcs-in-india-3126709 

Hi, friends! Welcome to Installer No. 47, your guide to the best and Verge-iest stuff in the world. (If you’re new here, welcome, so psyched you found us, and also you can read all the old editions at the Installer homepage.)

This week, I’ve been reading about Skibidi Toilet and the future of mall brands and the legacy of Bell Labs, watching Dirty Pop and catching up on Cobra Kai, downloading every single podcast episode mentioned in this excellent Reddit thread, writing stuff down with Napkin, and trying desperately to figure out what I forgot to pack for vacation. I’ve also been trying new blueberry muffin recipes all week — thanks to everyone who sent me one!

Speaking of which: As I mentioned last week, Installer is taking a summer break. I’m going to go sit outside and stare at trees for a couple of weeks. (If you have good fun books I should read, by the way, please send them my way.) I’ll be back here August 17th with a big catch-up Installer, but I hope you have a great couple of weeks, and keep telling me about everything you’re into!

Before I go, I also have for you a new way to use Apple Maps, an interesting interview with Mark Zuckerberg, the best way to watch the Olympics, some of the internet’s best and silliest websites, and much more. Let’s do it.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/28/24206986/watch-olympics-multiview-apple-maps-meta-ai-installer

The US space agency maintains that Sunita Williams and the eight other astronauts on board the International Space Station are safe and in ‘good spirits’

Fifty days and counting, Indian-origin astronaut Sunita Williams remains in limbo, uncertain of when and how she may return to Earth. However, the US space agency maintains that she and the eight other astronauts on board the International Space Station are safe and in ‘good spirits’.
An Indian space expert, speaking with a touch of humour, likened her situation to being in a state of ‘Trishanku’-a state where one is indeterminably but willingly stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Today, NASA provided further updates, indicating that they are closer to identifying the root cause of the Boeing Starliner’s malfunctioning systems, such as the failed thrusters and a series of helium leaks during its maiden test flight. However, there was no clarity on when, or if, Astronaut Sunita Williams and her crewmate Butch Wilmore will return, or if they will do so aboard the same Boeing Starliner spacecraft.

According to Boeing, the Starliner can remain docked with the space station for a maximum of ninety days, after which the batteries on board the spacecraft may deplete. As a result, US space technologists have approximately forty days left to determine whether Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore will return to Earth on the impaired Boeing Starliner, or if they will use SpaceX’s Crew Dragon or the Russian Soyuz spacecraft. Both these standby vehicles are already docked at the space station, so neither Sunita Williams nor the other eight astronauts are truly stranded in space.

NASA Commercial Crew Program Manager Steve Stich noted that the crew is in good spirits and making the most of their time on the station as part of Expedition 71, given that both Sunita and Butch have previously undertaken long-duration missions. He added that `contingency plans’ are in place, but the current effort is focused on bringing both Sunita and Butch back to Earth on the Boeing Starliner itself.

Putting a brave face on the situation, Mark Nappi, Starliner program manager and vice president of Boeing, said, “I’m very confident we have a good vehicle [in Boeing Starliner] to bring the crew back with.”

Boeing has encountered several setbacks during the Starliner’s development. Originally contracted for $4.2 billion, the company has now spent approximately $5.7 billion, with the mission still incomplete. NASA sought a second alternative to SpaceX’s Crew Dragon, which is why Boeing Starliner was being developed. Boeing is also facing broader difficulties, with its aviation and aircraft business stumbling, and recently, Boeing CEO David Calhoun was questioned by US Senators regarding the company’s safety culture and transparency during a US Congress appearance. If the Boeing Starliner fails to return the two astronauts to Earth, it would represent a significant setback for this aerospace and space technology giant.

In a statement today, NASA said, ‘With ground testing of a Reaction Control System (RCS) thruster complete and disassembly and inspections concluding, the Starliner team is reviewing data that will aid in future missions and pave the way for NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams to return to Earth. A landing date for the Starliner Crew Flight Test (CFT) will be scheduled following the Flight Test Readiness Review planned for later next week, with landing opportunities available throughout August. Testing of the RCS thruster at NASA’s White Sands Test Facility in New Mexico yielded meaningful findings for root cause assessments and to finalise flight rationale in support of a nominal undock and landing.

The Starliner team plans to hot-fire 27 of 28 RCS thrusters this weekend while safely docked to the space station. This test aims to verify thruster performance, similar to what would be done during future missions. The team also seeks another data point on helium leaks, which have remained stable since the spacecraft’s arrival at the station on June 6. The helium system has been closed for most of the time while docked, so no helium is leaking in that configuration.

Google is dying. Google is unstoppable. Somehow, right now, it feels like both of those things are true. For the first time in more than a decade, there appear to be products that might actually threaten Google Search as the centerpiece of the web — including OpenAI’s new SearchGPT. And yet Google Search continues to dominate the market and make truly unfathomable amounts of money.

On this episode of The Vergecast, we discuss the launch of SearchGPT, Google’s latest earnings, and the increasingly brazen ways AI companies are scraping the web for their own purposes. Who will win the future of search is anyone’s guess, but one thing’s for sure: the way the web used to work doesn’t work anymore. We need new rules, new norms, and new ideas about how the internet ought to be.

After that, we talk through yet another big week of gadget news, including the revelation that Amazon’s Alexa project is a money pit of epic proportions. We also talk about our reviews of the Samsung Galaxy Ring and Z Fold 6 and the Asus ROG Ally X.

Finally, in the lightning round, we talk about Apple Maps on the web, the NBA on Prime Video, and the increasing lengths to which you have to go to stream in 4K. The future is ads, apparently — and slightly blurry ones at that.

Apple Maps is finally available on the web. Through a beta that launched on Wednesday afternoon, you can now get driving and walking directions as well as view ratings and reviews from the web version of Apple Maps in a desktop or mobile browser.

Apple Maps is available through the beta.maps.apple.com site. You can do most of what you can do in the iOS version of the app, including view guides, order food directly from Maps, explore cities, and get information about businesses. Apple says it’s going to launch additional features, like Look Around, in the coming months.

The web-based version of Apple Maps is only available in English for now and is compatible with Safari and Chrome on Mac and iPad, along with Chrome and Edge on Windows PCs. Apple plans on rolling out support for other languages, browsers, and platforms in the future. Apple notes that all developers using its MapKit JS tool can link out to Maps on the web.

Since the launch of Apple Maps on the iPhone in 2012, Apple has been gradually adding new features to the service, including detailed city maps, multi-stop routing, cycling directions, EV routing, and offline navigation.

Previously, versions of Apple Maps were available on the web through the work of developers, who used the API to create maps for sites like DuckDuckGo. Its official availability on the web is a big expansion and could help the app compete with Google, which has been available from web browsers for years.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/24/24205449/apple-maps-web-beta