CJI also commented on the dangers children face on digital platforms and cited the example of the “Momo Challenge”, a viral internet hoax that targeted children, particularly adolescents.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud on Saturday said the way people treat children leaves a lasting impact on their mind, as he revealed how corporal punishment he faced at his school has remained imprinted in his heart and soul.
The CJI recalled how he was caned on his hands though he had requested the teacher to cane him on his “bum”.
“How you treat children leaves a deep impact in their mind for lifetime. I will never forget the day in school, I was not a juvenile delinquent, when I was caned on my hands and my offence was not to bring right sized needles to class for a craftwork. I still remember pleading my teacher to cane me on my bum and not my hand,” CJI Chandrachud recalled.
CJI added that he was too ashamed to inform his parents about it even as suffered in pain for the next few days and kept hiding the marks on his body.
“That left an imprint in my heart and soul and that it still is with me when i do my work. Such deep is the imprint of travesty on children,” he said.
CJI Chandrachud made the comments during the keynote address delivered by him at National Symposium on Juvenile Justice which was organised by the Supreme Court of Nepal.
Calling for a sensitive and reform-oriented approach to the children in conflict with law as well as child victims of various crimes, CJI said,
“When discussing Juvenile Justice, we have to recognise the vulnerabilities and unique needs of children embroiled in legal conflicts and ensure that our justice systems respond with empathy, rehabilitation, and opportunities for reintegration into society. It is crucial to grasp the multifaceted nature of juvenile justice and its intersections with various dimensions of our societies”
Commenting on the larger concept of juvenile justice, CJI Chandrachud referred to a recent case in which the Supreme Court had to deal with a plea seeking termination of pregnancy of a minor rape victim.
“Juvenile justice is not confined solely to the dictates of the Juvenile Justice Act but is rather shaped by the intricate interplay of various legislative acts. A recent case brought before the Supreme Court of India exemplifies this: a 14-year-old sought permission to terminate her pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971. Fearing repercussions and hindered by her innocence, she kept silent about the abuse she endured until she was well into her pregnancy. Recognizing the importance of safeguarding her mental and physical well-being, the court granted her request for termination. However, she ultimately decided against it,” the CJI said.
In the context of internet anonymity, the CJI commented on the dangers children face on digital platforms.
Citing the example of the “Momo Challenge”, a viral internet hoax that targeted children, the CJI said,
“This hoax purported a series of escalating dares, including self-harm or suicide, although it was later debunked. Its rapid dissemination highlights the susceptibility of juveniles to online dangers. There is a need for proactive measures to educate and safeguard young individuals in the digital age, emphasizing digital literacy, responsible online behaviour, and effective parental guidance as crucial components in mitigating cyber-related risks“.