In past month, 100 children visited hospital OPD at Mira Road with symptoms like breathing difficulties, cough
Viral pneumonia is a lung infection caused by viruses such as influenza. Representation Pic
Private paediatricians in Mumbai and neighbouring areas have been noticing an increase in respiratory illnesses among children. Dr Ankit Gupta, a paediatric critical care specialist at Wockhardt Hospital at Mira Road, said that the hospital’s paediatric intensive care unit is seeing a high number of cases involving children under the age of three, especially those under six months old, who have been admitted with viral pneumonia, a lung infection caused by viruses such as influenza, which infect the lungs and lead to inflammation.
In the past month alone, over 100 children with various symptoms have visited the OPD of Wockhardt at Mira Road. Dr Pramod Padwal, head of the women and child department at Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation, said, “We do not have a separate age-wise column for the data we receive from private hospitals, so we can’t confirm any increase. At least in municipal corporation facilities, we have not noticed any trend in viral pneumonitis (inflammation of the lungs caused by all viruses, not just those that cause pneumonia).”
Dr Padwal, an infectious disease specialist, said, “The government is planning to introduce a system where private hospitals will have to provide us with detailed data on health conditions.” Paediatrician Dr Deepak Ugra, who practises at Lilavati Hospital and Hinduja Hospital in Khar, said, “There is an increase in the number of children coming to the hospital, but most cases are on an OPD basis.”
For a country with the world’s lowest fertility rate – one that has spent hundreds of billions of dollars trying to encourage women to have more babies – the idea of barring children from places like cafes and restaurants might seem a little counterproductive.
But in South Korea, “no-kids zones” have become remarkably popular in recent years. Hundreds have sprung up across the country, aimed largely at ensuring disturbance-free environments for the grown-ups.
There are nearly 80 such zones on the holiday island of Jeju alone, according to a local think tank, and more than four hundred in the rest of the country, according to activist groups.
Doubts, though, are beginning to creep in about the wisdom of restricting children from so many places, fueled by concerns over the country’s growing demographic problems.
In addition to the world’s lowest birthrate, South Korea has one of the world’s fastest aging populations. That has left it with a problem familiar to graying nations across the world, namely: how to fund the pension and health care needs of a growing pool of retirees on the tax income generated by a slowly vanishing pool of workers.
And South Korea’s problem is more acute than most.
Last year, its fertility rate dropped to a record low of 0.78 – not even half the 2.1 needed for a stable population and far below even that of Japan (1.3), currently the world’s grayest nation. (And even further below the United States, which at 1.6 faces aging problems of its own).
With young South Koreans already facing pressure on multiple fronts – from sky-high real estate costs and long working weeks to rising economic anxiety – critics of the zones say the last thing the country needs is yet one more thing to make them think twice about starting a family.
The government, they point out, should know this better than anyone. After all, it’s spent more than $200 billion over the past 16 years trying to encourage more people to have children. Critics suggest that, rather than throwing more money at the problem, it needs to work on changing society’s attitudes towards the young.
A widely circulated crowd-sourced Google Map shows the location of many of South Korea’s no-kids zones, as identified by users.
‘Society must be reborn’
With polls suggesting a majority of South Koreans support no-kids zones, shifting those mindsets won’t be easy. But there are signs opinions may be shifting.
In recent weeks, a pushback against the zones has gained momentum thanks to Yong Hye-in, a mother and a lawmaker for the Basic Income Party who, in a show of defiance to mark Children’s Day, took her 2-year-old son to a meeting of the National Assembly – where babies are not usually allowed.
“Everyday life with children is not easy,” she told the assembled lawmakers in an impassioned speech, during which she was pictured both cuddling her son and letting him wander around the podium. “Our society must be reborn into one where children are included.”
That speech gained media coverage across the world, but it is not the only sign attitudes may slowly be changing.
Jeju island – a tourist hotspot off the southern tip of the Korean peninsula – recently debated the country’s first-ever bill aimed at making such zones illegal (though if passed it would apply only to the island).
The move by its provincial council comes amid growing concerns that the age limits imposed by many guesthouses and campsites on the tourism-dependent island may be damaging its reputation for hospitality.
As Bonnie Tilland, a university lecturer who specializes in South Korean culture, puts it: “Families with children who travel to Jeju on holiday are disgruntled if they drive to a scenic café only to be told that their children are not allowed.”
Other critics say the problem goes deeper than lost business opportunities. Some see no-kids zones as an unjustifiable act of age discrimination that runs contrary to the Korean constitution.
