The United States has been hitting back at Iran-linked militants after a barrage of attacks on American targets in the Middle East in recent weeks, with U.S. forces conducting several retaliatory strikes that run the risk of kicking off a wider war.
Although the U.S. says the operations are aimed at deterring further attacks against its forces in the region, the retaliatory strikes haven’t been entirely successful. Just on Friday, U.S. military bases bore the brunt of three attacks in both Iraq and Syria, according to a report from the AP.
The ongoing clashes have raised concerns that the U.S. may inadvertently set off a wider escalation, as opposed to the intended goal of deterring attacks on American forces in the region. While the U.S. has been able to counterattack without a massive escalatory response from Iran so far, the back-and-forth—and ongoing attacks against U.S. forces in the region—paves the way for possible accidents and misinterpretation.
That’s according to Brian Finucane, who previously worked in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the State Department, where he advised on the legal and policy issues relating to counterterrorism and the use of military force.
“There’s plenty of room for miscalculation or mishap on both sides,” Finucane, now a Senior Adviser for the U.S. Program of the International Crisis Group, told The Daily Beast. “If U.S. service members were God forbid killed in an attack, the U.S. may feel it has to ratchet up its response further, potentially to include directly targeting IRGC personnel, which the administration has not done thus far.”
One of the stated goals of the Biden administration’s attacks on Iran-linked targets is to prevent spillover of Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza. “The president has no higher priority than the safety of U.S. personnel, and he directed today’s action to make clear that the United States will defend itself, its personnel, and its interests,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in a statement on Sunday.”
U.S. officials have been warning Iran and its proxies for weeks to stay out of Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza. Nevertheless, Iranian-linked forces have launched a slew of attacks against U.S. forces in Syria and Iraq almost daily since mid-October.
A U.S. warship had to take out several missiles and drones that Iran-backed Houthis launched from Yemen last month. On Tuesday, Iran-backed Houthis said it had fired ballistic missiles on Israeli targets.
In Finucane’s view, neither the United States nor Iran are likely seeking wider war. Iran is currently juggling an attempt to assert itself against the United States’ support for Israel with an attempt to not trigger a wider war—no easy feat of a task, said Finucane.
“Iran is walking a fine line here where they, on the one hand, want to maintain pressure on the U.S., including in response to U.S. support for Israel in Gaza, but they don’t want a regional war themselves,” Finucane said.
The Pentagon has been working to spin a narrative that the U.S. counterstrikes against Iranian targets in recent days is an indication that U.S. deterrence is working. That’s in part because the Department of Defense claims that the counterstrikes have helped prevent the Israel-Hamas war from spilling over into the region, Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh told reporters Tuesday.
“This war we want to see is contained to Israel and within Gaza. We do not want to see a wider regional conflict,” Singh said. “As of today, that has not happened. We have not seen this war spillover into other neighboring countries and into the region.”
But that’s in the eye of the beholder, said Finucane. As of late March, Iran and its proxy forces had attacked U.S. forces 83 times since President Joe Biden took office, according to Task and Purpose. Iran-linked attacks on U.S. forces since just October 7 have tallied to approximately 60.
An argument can be made that Iran’s attacks on U.S. forces in the region represent a spillover of the Israel-Hamas war, according to Finucane’s count.
“There has been a spillover of this war. There was a lull of these attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria, and that lull stopped, it ended… in the midst of this conflict,” Finucane said. “The conflict has spilled over.”
In response to questions about why the Department of Defense views its counterstrikes as successful given the attacks against U.S. forces continue, the Pentagon insisted Tuesday that the continued attacks against U.S. troops are a “separate issue” from deterring Iran.
But even if that were true, U.S. officials have admitted that a goal of the counterstrikes is to respond to Iranian provocations—not just to prevent spillover.
Gen. Michael Kurilla, the head of U.S. Central Command, said that the attacks were a “response” to “continued provocations by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and their affiliated groups in Iraq and Syria.”