The ceasefire will see an initial 60-day halt to fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon but does not address the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip. After the ceasefire began, Israel imposed a sudden curfew in southern Lebanon.
Israel has imposed a last-minute curfew forbidding any Lebanese from crossing into the south of the country.
Starting in the early hours of this morning, Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a 60-day pause halting a conflict that has killed thousands in Lebanon and displaced many more.
At 2.30pm UK time (4.30pm locally), Israel’s Arab spokesperson warned movement south of the Litani River in Lebanon is “absolutely forbidden” – starting in half an hour.
“Whoever is north of the Litani River is prohibited from moving south. Whoever is south of the Litani River must remain where he is,” the statement added.
“We remind you that the IDF is still deployed in its positions in southern Lebanon in accordance with the terms of the ceasefire agreement, and our forces will deal firmly with any movement that violates this agreement.”
The ceasefire deal, published by Lebanon’s cabinet, marks an area delineated by a red line labelled “New 2024 line” running east-west across the country.
This area – mostly along the Litani River before diverging slightly north and covering the south of the country – must remain free of Hezbollah weapons, according to the deal.
The terms stipulate only “official military and security forces” in Lebanon are authorised to carry arms, with the foreign minister saying it could deploy at least 5,000 troops.
If Israel believes Hezbollah has violated the terms, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said they have the right to attack, though Lebanese and Hezbollah officials reportedly claim otherwise.
The deal expects Hezbollah forces to leave their positions in southern Lebanon and retreat north of the Litani River, US President Joe Biden said.
Israel will withdraw its forces from Lebanon over a period of 60 days, he added, as the Lebanese army takes control of the area to ensure Hezbollah does not rebuild there.
Deal a success for Biden – but Gaza failure diminishes legacy
James Matthews
US correspondent
@jamesmatthewsky
The Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire lifts Biden’s legacy – but only so far.
It is a significant result, assuming it holds – placing a cap, as it does, on hostilities and on the prospect of conflict escalation.
Biden rightly takes credit because America was the deal-broker at the heart of it. It is, however, a qualified success.
The bigger story is the ongoing conflict in Gaza, in which more than 40,000 people have been killed and where a deal remains elusive.
Against that backdrop, Biden is the US president unable to shape events as he would have wanted, with catastrophic consequences. America’s global influence has, accordingly, been diminished.
It has been a defining feature of his presidency and it has harmed him. “Weakness on the world stage” was a central strand of the Trump election campaign.
Biden talked up the prospect of a wider peace agreement as he left the White House for a family Thanksgiving celebration in Nantucket.
He will hope events leave Hamas further isolated and increasingly pressured to seek compromise. The fact is, however, a wider peace deal seems as elusive as ever.
As much as ambitions burn within Biden for a resolution before he leaves office, he knows there’s every chance it will come under a new president, his old foe.
And that’s got to burn.
Around an hour after the truce started, Reuters reported streams of cars were already heading to south Lebanon.
Within Israel, there was significant opposition to the ceasefire, with a poll conducted by Israel’s Channel 12 TV station finding 37% were in favour of the ceasefire and 32% against.
In Lebanon, people cheered on the streets as the truce was confirmed.
Gunfire was also heard in the early hours of Wednesday morning in Beirut after the ceasefire began – it was not clear if it was celebratory.
Dark clouds hang over Middle East
Alistair Bunkall
Middle East correspondent
@AliBunkallSKY
A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah has been agreed, to celebrations in Lebanon but scepticism in Israel.
Lebanese people are finally looking forward to some calm after months of heavy bombardment in the capital Beirut and across the country.
An estimated 1.2 million people have been displaced and many towns and villages heavily damaged.
But a snap poll for one Israeli news channel found only 37% of Israelis are in favour of the deal. Not everyone in the Israeli cabinet was supportive either.
Itamar Ben-Gvir describes it as “a historic mistake” but did not threaten to withdraw his party from government. He was the one person who voted against the truce.
So what have those critics extracted from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in return for their support? Some have recently been pushing for Israeli occupation of Gaza or annexation of the West Bank.
The concern in Israel largely centres on enforcement and doubts that Hezbollah will stay true to the terms of the deal.
As long as the hostages remain in Gaza, however, and the humanitarian crisis there worsens with the onset of winter rains and lack of aid, the dark clouds will continue to hang over the Middle East.