The U.S. and Colombia pulled back from the brink of a trade war on Sunday after the White House said the South American nation had agreed to accept military aircraft carrying deported migrants.
U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened tariffs and sanctions on Colombia to punish it for earlier refusing to accept military flights carrying deportees as part of his sweeping immigration crackdown.
But in a statement late on Sunday, the White House said Colombia had agreed to accept the migrants after all and Washington would not impose its threatened penalties.
“The Government of Colombia has agreed to all of President Trump’s terms, including the unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay,” it said.
Draft orders imposing tariffs and sanctions on Colombia would be “held in reserve, and not signed, unless Colombia fails to honor this agreement”, it added.
“Today’s events make clear to the world that America is respected again. President Trump … expects all other nations of the world to fully cooperate in accepting the deportation of their citizens illegally present in the United States,” the White House statement said.
In a statement late on Sunday, Colombian Foreign Minister Luis Gilberto Murillo said: “We have overcome the impasse with the U.S. government”.
“The government of Colombia … has the presidential plane ready to facilitate the return of Colombians who were going to arrive in the country this morning on deportation flights.”
The statement did not specifically say that the agreement included military flights, but it did not contradict the White House announcement.
Murillo and Colombia’s ambassador to the United States will travel to Washington in coming days to follow up on agreements that led to the exchange of diplomatic notes between the two governments, the Colombian statement added.
Washington’s draft measures, now on hold, include imposing 25% tariffs on all Colombian goods coming into the U.S., which would go up to 50% in one week; a travel ban and visa revocations on Colombian government officials; and emergency treasury, banking and financial sanctions.
Trump also threatened to direct enhanced border inspections of Colombian nationals and cargo. Ahead of the announcement of an agreement on the flights, a State Department spokesperson said the United States had suspended visa processing at the U.S. embassy in Bogota.
Colombia is the third-largest U.S. trading partner in Latin America.
The U.S. is Colombia’s largest trading partner, largely due to a 2006 free trade agreement that generated $33.8 billion in two-way trade in 2023 and a $1.6 billion U.S. trade surplus, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
Migrants board a C-17 Globemaster III aircraft for a removal flight, Fort Bliss, Texas, January 23, 2025. Dept. of Defense/Handout via REUTERS Purchase Licensing Rights
Alejo Czerwonko, chief investment officer for emerging markets Americas at UBS Global Wealth Management, said Colombia relied on access to the U.S. market for about a third of its exports, or about 4% of its GDP.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro earlier condemned the military deportation flights and said he would never carry out a raid to return handcuffed Americans to the U.S.
“We are the opposite of the Nazis,” he wrote in a post on social media platform X.
He also said however that Colombia would welcome home deported migrants on civilian planes, and offered his presidential plane to facilitate their “dignified return”.
‘DEGRADING TREATMENT’
Trump declared illegal immigration a national emergency and has imposed a crackdown since taking office last Monday.
He directed the U.S. military to help with border security, issued a broad ban on asylum and took steps to restrict citizenship for children born on U.S. soil.
The use of U.S. military aircraft to carry out deportation flights is unusual. U.S. military aircraft carried out two flights, each with about 80 migrants, to Guatemala on Friday.
Mexico also refused a request last week to let a U.S. military aircraft land with migrants.
Trump has said he is thinking about imposing 25% duties on imports from Canada and Mexico on Feb. 1 to force further action against illegal immigrants and fentanyl flowing into the U.S.
Brazil’s foreign ministry on Saturday condemned “degrading treatment” of Brazilians after migrants were handcuffed on a commercial deportation flight. Upon arrival, some passengers also reported mistreatment during the flight, according to news reports.
The plane, which was carrying 88 Brazilian passengers, 16 U.S. security agents, and eight crew members, had been originally scheduled to arrive in Belo Horizonte in the southeastern state of Minas Gerais.
However, at an unscheduled stop due to technical problems in Manaus, capital of Amazonas, Brazilian officials ordered removal of the handcuffs, and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva designated a Brazilian Air Force (FAB) flight to complete their journey, the government said in a statement on Saturday.
The commercial charter flight was the second this year from the U.S. carrying undocumented migrants deported back to Brazil and the first since Trump’s inauguration, according to Brazil’s federal police.
U.S. President Donald Trump said Jordan and Egypt should take in Palestinians from war-ravaged Gaza, a suggestion rejected by Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that runs the enclave, and apparently rebuffed by Jordan and Egypt.
Asked if this was a temporary or long-term solution for Gaza, where Israel’s military assault has caused a dire humanitarian situation and killed tens of thousands, Trump said on Saturday: “Could be either.”
Jordan is already home to several million Palestinians, while tens of thousands live in Egypt. Both countries and other Arab nations reject the idea of Palestinians in Gaza being moved to their countries. Gaza is land that Palestinians would want as part of a future Palestinian state.
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has repeatedly called for the return of Jewish settlers to Gaza, welcomed Trump’s call as “an excellent idea” and said he would work to develop a plan to implement it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly rejected such notions, advocated by Smotrich.
A Hamas official echoed long-standing Palestinian fears about being driven permanently from their homes.
Palestinians “will not accept any offers or solutions, even if (such offers) appear to have good intentions under the guise of reconstruction, as announced in the proposals of U.S. President Trump,” Basem Naim, a member of the Hamas political bureau, told Reuters.
Another Hamas official, Sami Abu Zuhri, urged Trump not to repeat “failed” ideas tried by his predecessor Joe Biden.
“The people of Gaza have endured death and refused to leave their homeland and they will not leave it regardless of any other reasons,” Abu Zuhri told Reuters.
Jordan also appeared to reject Trump’s suggestion, with its Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi telling reporters that the country’s stance against any displacement of Palestinians from Gaza remains “firm and unwavering”.
Egypt’s foreign ministry followed suit, saying it categorically rejects any displacement of Palestinians from their land, be it “short term or long term”.
Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas condemned Trump’s remarks. “Our people will remain steadfast and will not leave their homeland,” said a statement published by the official Palestinian news agency WAFA.
Palestinian analyst Ghassan al-Khatib said Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza, as well as the Jordanians and Egyptians, would reject Trump’s plan: “I don’t think that there is a place in reality for such an idea.”
‘IT’S A REAL MESS’
Referring to a call he had on Saturday with Jordan’s King Abdullah, Trump told reporters: “I said to him I’d love you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now and it’s a mess, it’s a real mess. I’d like him to take people.”
Gaza, January 26, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer Purchase Licensing Rights
He added, “I’d like Egypt to take people,” and said he would speak to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi on Sunday.
“You’re talking about a million and half people, and we just clean out that whole thing,” Trump said.
The population in the Palestinian enclave prior to the start of the Israel-Gaza war was around 2.3 million.
Washington had said last year it opposed the forcible displacement of Palestinians. Rights groups and humanitarian agencies have for months raised concerns over the situation in Gaza, with the war displacing nearly the entire population and leading to a hunger crisis.
Washington has also faced criticism for backing Israel but has maintained support for its ally, saying it is helping Israel defend itself against Iranian-backed militant groups like Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.
“It’s literally a demolition site, almost everything is demolished and people are dying there, so I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they can maybe live in peace for a change,” Trump said on Saturday.
‘NEW AND BETTER LIVES’
Smotrich, who said only “out-of-the-box thinking” could achieve peace, said Trump’s plan would give Palestinians “the opportunity to build new and better lives elsewhere”.
“With God’s help, I will work with the prime minister and cabinet to develop an operational plan to implement this as soon as possible,” he said.
In a post on X, Francesca Albanese, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, said: “Ethnic cleansing is anything but an ‘out-of-the-box’ thinking, no matter how one packages it. It is illegal, immoral and irresponsible.”
Most of Gaza’s population has been internally displaced by the war. On Sunday, many of them rejected Trump’s suggestion.
“If he thinks he will forcibly displace the Palestinian people (then) this is impossible, impossible, impossible. The Palestinian people firmly believe that this land is theirs, this soil is their soil,” said Magdy Seidam.
“No matter how much Israel tries to destroy, break, and to show people that it had won, in reality it did not win.”
The Auckland skyline is seen at sunset, New Zealand, August 12, 2023. REUTERS/Molly Darlington/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
New Zealand will introduce looser visa rules to allow holiday makers to work remotely while visiting the country, to boost its tourism sector and economy, it said on Monday.
Erica Stanford, Immigration Minister said in a statement that the visitor visa would change from Jan. 27 to allow people to work while travelling in the country.
“This is a brand-new market of tourist New Zealand can tap into. We want people to see our country as the ideal place to visit and work while they do it,” she said.
She added in a press conference following the announcement that she was unsure how many people would take up the opportunity, but digital nomad visas had been “extraordinarily popular” overseas and that New Zealand was targeting people who would like the opportunity to work and travel here.
“I expect in their time here that they will spend longer than they normally would, they will spend more because they’re here for longer, and the thing that we’re really hoping, is that they fall in love with the place,” she said.
New Zealand’s economy sank into a technical recession in the third quarter of 2024 and the government is looking for ways to boost growth. The tourism sector has not fully bounced back from the closure of borders during the COVID-19 pandemic with international visitors at around 86% of 2019 levels.
“The government’s ambition is that new visa rules will put New Zealand boldly on the map as a welcoming haven for the world’s talent,” said Nicola Willis, Minister of Economic Growth.
“We hope that in some cases, it will encourage those people and the firms they represent to consider doing more business with New Zealand in the future,” Willis added.
U.S. search engine startup Perplexity AI has revised the merger proposal it had submitted to TikTok’s Chinese parent ByteDance to create a new entity combining Perplexity and TikTok U.S., a person familiar with the proposal told Reuters on Sunday.
The proposal calls for the U.S. government to own up to 50% of the new company upon a future initial public offering (IPO), the person said.
A Perplexity document shared with ByteDance and new investors proposed the creation of a new U.S. holding company called “NewCo”, the person said.
Under the proposal, ByteDance would sell TikTok U.S. to the investors, which would give TikTok’s existing investors equity in the company. The proposal would also exclude TikTok’s core recommendation algorithm, which ByteDance would keep, the person said.
The U.S. government would own up to half of the new structure once it goes through an IPO of a valuation of at least $300 billion.
Perplexity AI. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic Purchase Licensing Rights
Perplexity AI would also offer to be acquired by the holding company if its own investors received a distribution of the NewCo equity, the person said.
CNBC first reported news of the proposal.
TikTok services were restored last week after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would revive the app’s access in the country after returning to power. TikTok shut off its app for U.S. users due to a law that cited national security.
ByteDance and the White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. On Saturday, President Donald Trump said he was in talks with multiple people over buying TikTok and would likely have a decision on the popular app’s future in the next 30 days.
Earlier this month, Reuters reported that a source said Perplexity submitted a bid to ByteDance for the startup to merge with TikTok U.S., adding that Perplexity would merge with TikTok and create a new entity by combining the merged company with New Capital Partners.
Bill Gates addressed his controversial former relationship with the late Jeffrey Epstein, admitting it was “a huge mistake” to associate with the convicted child sex offender.
“In retrospect, I was foolish to spend any time with him,” the Microsoft co-founder told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published Friday.
“I think I was quite stupid. I thought it would help me with global health philanthropy. In fact, it failed to do that. It was just a huge mistake.”
Bill Gates addressed his controversial former relationship with Jeffrey Epstein during an interview with the Wall Street Journal. AP
According to the outlet, Epstein threatened to expose Gates’ alleged affair with Russian bridge player Mila Antonova in 2017 after Gates declined to join his multibillion-dollar charitable fund with JPMorgan Chase.
Epstein had known Antonova since 2013 and paid for her to enroll in software coding school.
Reflecting on his and Epstein’s relationship, Gates, 69, admitted he “definitely” became wary of building more connections after the disgraced financier died by suicide while awaiting trial on sex trafficking and federal conspiracy charges in 2019.
Epstein was 66.
The billionaire, who was married to Melinda Gates from 1994 to 2021, was allegedly in a relationship with Antonova for years.
In March 2022, Melinda, 60, claimed Epstein played a role in the demise of her and Bill’s marriage.
During an appearance on “CBS Mornings,” the philanthropist shared that she decided to leave her 27-year marriage “for many things,” including her ex-husband’s former relationship with Epstein.
“I did not like that he had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, no. I made that clear to him,” she said, claiming she only met Epstein once because she “wanted to see who” he was.
“I regretted it the second I walked in the door,” Melinda admitted. “He was abhorrent. He was evil personified. My heart breaks for these women.”
In an interview with the Times of London published Saturday, Bill said his divorce from Melinda will always be the “mistake” he regrets most.
It can feel magical when it works, but often Live AI feels more like Captain Obvious. Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge
Here’s the scene: I’m wearing Meta’s latest Ray-Ban glasses with a new feature called Live AI, which can answer questions about the world around you. I’m preparing for a four-hour road trip to my in-laws for the Christmas holiday. I’m preplanning the next day’s breakfast because I’m 99.9 percent certain I will have no brain cells to concoct an edible one at 5AM. I don’t even know if I have anything to make a meal with. I open the fridge door and say, “Hey Meta, start Live AI.” Suddenly, John Cena’s voice is in my ear telling me that a Live AI session has begun.
“What breakfast can I make with the ingredients in my fridge?” I ask.
The inside is a sad sight with month-old Thanksgiving leftovers, a carton of eggs, soda, condiments, a tub of Greek yogurt, and a big jug of maple syrup. Meta-AI-as-John-Cena replies that I can make a “variety of breakfast dishes,” such as “scrambled eggs, omelets, or yogurt parfaits.”
To be clear, there is not a single fresh fruit with which to make a parfait. The egg carton has two eggs in it. My spouse put an empty milk carton back in the fridge, meaning scrambled eggs and omelets are also out. My stomach rumbles, reminding me I skipped lunch. I bail on the breakfast idea and instead open the freezer door and ask what kind of dinner I can make with the ingredients inside. It’s mostly a bunch of frozen pizzas, an assortment of frozen veggies, and hamburger buns. I’m told, “frozen meals, stir-fries, and casseroles.”
I decide to order in for dinner. It’ll be a drive-through breakfast on the road.
This is the issue with Live AI. More often than not, I don’t know when to use it. When I do, the answers I get are too obvious to be helpful.
The pitch for Live AI is it allows you to speak to an AI assistant as you would a friend. While it’s similar in function to the glasses’ multimodal AI feature, you don’t have to constantly prompt the AI. It (supposedly) knows when you’re talking to it. You can also string together multiple queries and follow-up questions. If you’re in a cooking class and something looks a bit off, you’d flag the instructor and they’d look at the mess in your pan and tell you what you did wrong and how to fix it. This is kind of meant to be a version of that but with an incorporeal AI that lives in your glasses. It sees what you see and can help you out in real time.
It’s a cool concept. But I was stumped when it came time to use Live AI without guardrails. Whenever a question pops into my head, I automatically reach for my phone. That’s what I’ve been trained to do for over 10 years. The first and biggest hurdle to using Live AI was remembering it was an option.
The second problem was knowing when Live AI might be more useful than a quick Google search. Meta suggested I try scenarios involving fashion and cooking. I already told you how my cooking queries went. So, I asked the AI what color combinations I should try with a set of multicolored pastel press-on nails.
The AI suggested a “combination of pastel colors” would “complement the pink nails nicely.” I asked which of the books on my shelf I should read. The AI reminded me it “doesn’t have personal preferences or opinions” but that I should “read a book that interests [me] or one that [I’ve] been meaning to read for a while.” Dissatisfied, I asked which of the books was most highly acclaimed. It suggested I look that up online. I tried a few more scenarios and was left wondering: why would I ever talk to AI if all it does is restate the obvious and tell me to Google things myself?
The most useful experience I had with Live AI was when I asked it how to zhuzh up my home office. At first, I got another milquetoast answer — add artwork, plants, and rearrange the furniture to create a more cozy atmosphere. Annoyed, I asked it what type of artwork would look good. Again, it told me that “a variety of artwork” could look good “depending on [my] personal style.” Had I considered adding posters, prints, or paintings that reflected my interests or hobbies? I wanted to scream, but instead, I asked what style of poster would look good based on what was currently in the room. To that, I got my first somewhat useful answer: a colorful and playful poster with a fun design or cute character that would complement the stuffed animals in the room. I asked for artists to look into. It suggested Lisa Congdon, Camille Rose Garcia, and Jen Corace for their “playful and whimsical styles.”
And herein lies the biggest recurring problem I have with AI: you have to know how to ask the right questions to get the answer you want.
I could’ve saved myself some grief if I’d just told Meta AI, “I want to hang artwork in my room. Based on what’s currently here, what artists should I look into?” This skill comes naturally to some folks. My spouse is a whiz at prompting AI. But for the rest of us, it’s a skill that has to be learned — and few people right now are teaching us AI noobs how to rewire our brains to best make use of this tech.
After Googling the artists Meta AI suggested, I was left back at square one. I liked their art, but none of them felt like my style. I relayed the experience to my best friend, who rolled her eyes and promptly sent me three artists on Instagram. I loved all of them. In a chiding voice, she said I should’ve just asked her and not bothered with a bot. Because, unlike Meta AI, she said, she actually knows me.
The plan includes opening new bespoke paint operations in the UK and Slovakia
The UK’s largest luxury car maker, Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), says it will invest £65m ($81m) to expand its bespoke paint services in response to growing demand from wealthy customers.
The plan includes opening new paint facilities in Castle Bromwich, UK and Nitra, Slovakia.
The firm, which is owned by India’s Tata Group, says it expects to more than double its bespoke paint operation, including helping clients match the colour of exclusive Range Rover SV models to their private jets or yachts.
It follows a similar move by Rolls-Royce, which announced earlier this month that it was investing £300m to build more highly-customised versions of its cars for super-rich customers.
“Range Rover clients are increasingly choosing to tailor their vehicles with more exclusive bespoke and elevated palette paints,” said Jamal Hameedi, director of special vehicle operations at JLR.
“By increasing our capacity we can satisfy the demand growth from our Range Rover clients and… clients of our other brands.”
The company says the plan will also help it cut energy and water use as well as reduce paint waste.
Earlier this month, Rolls-Royce said it was expanding its Goodwood factory and global headquarters to meet growing demand for bespoke models.
Rolls-Royce said the plan would “also ready the manufacturing facility for the marque’s transition to an all-battery electric vehicle future”.
A key ally of President Donald Trump said the White House pardoning rioters who fought with police while storming the U.S. Capitol in 2021 is “sending the wrong signal” and expressed concern about the future ramifications of issuing sweeping clemencies.
“I have always said that, I think, when you pardon people who attack police officers, you’re sending the wrong signal to the public at large,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who is close to Trump, told CNN on Sunday. “It’s not what you want to do to protect cops.”
Within hours of taking office last week, Trump issued a sweeping clemency order covering around 1,500 rioters for their role on the Capitol attack that attempted to block congressional certification of Joe Biden ‘s 2020 election victory on Jan. 6, 2021.
Among those released from prison was Stewart Rhodes, founder of the far-right extremist group the Oath Keepers, who orchestrated the plot that resulted in the attack. Rhodes was among a large group of supporters who were standing and cheering behind Trump on stage when the president delivered a speech at the Circa resort and Casino in Las Vegas on Saturday, before flying to Florida to spend the rest of the weekend at his resort in Doral.
Asked about Rhodes attending the rally, Graham said, “I don’t think there’s a restriction on him being there.” The senator also noted that Biden had used his own string of pardons, including using his final hours in office to issue blanket clemencies for his relatives and leading government officials.
“I don’t like this. I don’t like it on either side. And I think the public doesn’t like it either,” Graham said. “So, if this continues, if this is the norm, there may be an effort to rein in the pardon power of the president as an institution.”
He said he saw what occurred with blanket clemencies “as a bigger precedent” and that he was “worried” about the future consequences.
“I have said clearly I do not like it when President Trump pardoned people who beat up cops. But I didn’t like it when Biden pardoned all of his family going out the door,” he said.
The senator made similar comments Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” saying that though Trump “had the legal authority” to issue such pardons, “I fear that you will get more violence.”
“Pardoning the people who went into the Capitol and beat up a police officer violently I think was a mistake,” he said.
Graham isn’t the only Trump ally who has struggled with Trump’s pardons for the Jan. 6 rioters.
The White House claimed victory in a showdown with Colombia over accepting flights of deported migrants from the U.S. on Sunday, hours after President Donald Trump threatened steep tariffs on imports and other sanctions on the longtime U.S. partner.
Long close partners in anti-narcotics efforts, the U.S. and Colombia clashed Sunday over the deportation of migrants and imposed tariffs on each other’s goods in a show of what other countries could face if they intervene in the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration. The White House held up the episode as a warning to other nations who might seek to impede his plans.
Earlier, the U.S. president had ordered visa restrictions, 25% tariffs on all Colombian incoming goods, which would be raised to 50% in one week, and other retaliatory measures sparked by President Gustavo Petro’s decision to reject two Colombia-bound U.S. military aircraft carrying migrants after Petro accused Trump of not treating immigrants with dignity during deportation. Petro also announced a retaliatory 25% increase in Colombian tariffs on U.S. goods.
Trump said the measures were necessary because Petro’s decision “jeopardized” national security in the U.S. by blocking the deportation flights.
“These measures are just the beginning,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. “We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States.”
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a late Sunday statement that the “Government of Colombia has agreed to all of President Trump’s terms, including the unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay.”
Leavitt said the tariff orders will be “held in reserve, and not signed.” But Leavitt said Trump would maintain visa restrictions on Colombian officials and enhanced customs inspections of goods from the country, “until the first planeload of Colombian deportees is successfully returned.”
The Colombian government late Sunday said it considered as “overcome” the episode with the Trump administration and Petro reposted the statement from the White House on X.
“We have overcome the impasse with the United States government,” said Colombian Foreign Minister Luis Gilberto Murillo. “We will continue to receive Colombians who return as deportees, guaranteeing them decent conditions as citizens subject to rights.”
Murillo added that the South American country’s presidential aircraft is available to facilitate the return of migrants who were to arrive hours earlier on the U.S. military airplanes.
Earlier Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced he was authorizing the visa restrictions on Colombian government officials and their families “who were responsible for the interference of U.S. repatriation flight operations.” They were being imposed on top of the State Department’s move to suspend the processing of visas at the U.S. Embassy in Colombia’s capital, Bogota.
Petro had said earlier that his government would not accept flights carrying migrants deported from the U.S. until the Trump administration creates a protocol that treats them with “dignity.” Petro made the announcement in two X posts, one of which included a news video of migrants reportedly deported to Brazil walking on a tarmac with restraints on their hands and feet.
“A migrant is not a criminal and must be treated with the dignity that a human being deserves,” Petro said. “That is why I returned the U.S. military planes that were carrying Colombian migrants… In civilian planes, without being treated like criminals, we will receive our fellow citizens.”
After Trump’s earlier tariff threat, Petro said in a post on X that he had ordered the “foreign trade minister to raise import tariffs from the U.S. by 25%.”
Colombia has traditionally been the U.S.’s top ally in Latin America. But their relationship has strained since Petro, a former guerrilla, became Colombia’s first leftist president in 2022 and sought distance from the U.S.
Colombia accepted 475 deportation flights from the U.S. from 2020 to 2024, fifth behind Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and El Salvador, according to Witness at the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data. It accepted 124 deportation flights in 2024.
Colombia is also among the countries that last year began accepting U.S.-funded deportation flights from Panama.
The U.S. government didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press regarding aircraft and protocols used in deportations to Colombia.
“This is a clear message we are sending that countries have an obligation to accept repatriation flights,” a senior administration official told AP. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss issue publicly.
Rubio in a statement said Petro “canceled his authorization” for the flights when the aircraft were in the air.
Colombians emerged in recent years as a major presence on the U.S. border with Mexico, aided in part by a visa regime that allows them to easily fly to Mexico and avoid trekking though the treacherous Darien Gap. They ranked fourth with 127,604 arrests for illegal crossings during a 12-month period through September, behind Mexicans, Guatemalans and Venezuelans.
Mexico hasn’t imposed visa restrictions on Colombians, as they have on Venezuelans, Ecuadoreans and Peruvians.
Petro’s government in a statement later announced that the South American country’s presidential aircraft had been made available to facilitate the return of migrants who were to arrive hours earlier on the U.S. military airplanes and guarantee them “dignified conditions.”
As part of a flurry of actions to make good on Trump’s campaign promises to crack down on illegal immigration, his government is using active-duty military to help secure the border and carry out deportations.
Two U.S. Air Force C-17 cargo planes carrying migrants removed from the U.S. touched down early Friday in Guatemala. That same day, Honduras received two deportation flights carrying a total of 193 people.
President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House on Jan. 20, 2025, the day of his Inauguration. Jim Watson/Getty Images
On Sunday, after the president of Colombia said he’ll deny entry of American aircrafts carrying Colombian migrants until the government creates favorable protocols, President Donald Trump retaliated by imposing 25% tariffs.
Trump’s edict was announced on social media after two military aircrafts were denied entry into the country.
According to a lengthy post published on his Truth Social platform, Trump will raise the 25% tariff to 50% within a week and also impose travel bans and visa sanctions against Colombia.
Trump promised to levy enhanced customs and border protection and financial sanctions against the country.
I was just informed that two repatriation flights from the United States, with a large number of Illegal Criminals, were not allowed to land in Colombia. This order was given by Colombia’s Socialist President Gustavo Petro, who is already very unpopular amongst his people. Petro’s denial of these flights has jeopardized the National Security and Public Safety of the United States, so I have directed my Administration to immediately take the following urgent and decisive retaliatory measures:
-Emergency 25% tariffs on all goods coming into the United States. In one week, the 25% tariffs will be raised to 50%.
-A Travel Ban and immediate Visa Revocations on the Colombian Government Officials, and all Allies and Supporters.
-Visa Sanctions on all Party Members, Family Members, and Supporters of the Colombian Government.
-Enhanced Customs and Border Protection Inspections of all Colombian Nationals and Cargo on national security grounds.
-IEEPA Treasury, Banking and Financial Sanctions to be fully imposed.
These measures are just the beginning. We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States!
Over the weekend Musk made a surprise virtual appearance at an AfD campaign rally. ALAIN JOCARD/AFP
Elon Musk sparked controversy by urging Germans to move past historical guilt and focus on preserving national culture at an election rally for Germany’s far-right AfD party in Halle.
The AfD, widely viewed as Germany’s most controversial political force, has been accused of fostering xenophobia and undermining democratic values. Musk has publicly endorsed the party and recently had a live chat on X with the party’s leader, Alice Weidel.
Over the weekend Musk made a surprise virtual appearance at an AfD campaign rally where he addressed the crowd, saying “children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents, let alone their great grandparents.”
Speaking via video link to 4,500 attendees at the AfD rally, Musk emphasized national pride and condemned excessive focus on Germany’s Nazi past, Reuters reported.
“There is too much focus on past guilt, and we need to move beyond that,” Musk added.
Musk’s remarks come after weeks of escalating tensions, including his criticism of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and online comparisons of him performing Nazi-era gestures during Trump’s inauguration events.
His comments aligned with AfD rhetoric, praising the party as Germany’s “best hope” for the future.
“It’s good to be proud of German culture, German values, and not to lose that in some sort of multiculturalism that dilutes everything,” Musk said.
Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina said they were working with Sweden to ‘assess the damage and its reason’ AFP
Sweden on Sunday said it had seized a ship suspected of having damaged a fibre-optic cable under the Baltic Sea linking the country to Latvia, which sent a warship to investigate the latest apparent act of sabotage.
The latest incident came as nations around the Baltic Sea scramble to bolster their defences after the suspected sabotage of undersea cables in recent months, with some observers blaming Russia.
Swedish prosecutors opened an investigation into “aggravated sabotage”, according to a statement from the Scandinavian nation’s prosecutors’ office.
“A vessel suspected of having committed the sabotage has been seized,” the statement added.
Latvia’s navy earlier said it had identified a “suspect vessel”, the Michalis San, near the location of the incident along with two other ships.
Several websites tracking naval traffic said the Michalis San was headed for Russia.
“We have a warship patrolling the Baltic Sea around the clock every day and night, allowing us to quickly dispatch it once we learnt about the damage,” Latvian navy commander Maris Polencs said at a briefing Sunday.
Prime Minister Evika Silina said Riga had notified the Swedish authorities and that the two countries were working together in response to the incident.
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson confirmed he had been in contact with Silina during the day.
“There is information suggesting that at least one data cable between Sweden and Latvia has been damaged in the Baltic Sea. The cable is owned by a Latvian entity,” he posted on X.
“Sweden, Latvia and NATO are closely cooperating on the matter,” he added.
Experts and politicians have accused Russia of orchestrating a hybrid war against the West as the two sides square off over Ukraine.
“The damage to the Sweden-Latvia undersea data cable is the latest in a series of systemic incidents affecting EU critical infrastructure,” Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga said Sunday on X.
“We express solidarity with the affected EU partners. An increased NATO presence in the Baltic Sea is critical to countering such threats.”
NATO earlier this month announced it was launching a new monitoring mission in the Baltic Sea involving patrol ships and aircraft to deter any attempts to target undersea infrastructure in the region.
The damage occurred in Swedish territorial waters at a depth of at least 50 metres (55 yards), officials said.
The cable belongs to Latvia’s state radio and television centre (LVRTC) which said in a statement that there had been “disruptions in data transmission services”.
The company said alternatives had been found and end users would mostly not be affected although “there may be delays in data transmission speeds”.
The statement added: “Based on current findings, it is presumed that the cable is significantly damaged due to external factors. LVRTC has initiated criminal procedural actions.”
Four more hostages are due to be released on Saturday as part of the second exchange of the Gaza ceasefire deal AFP
Hamas named on Friday four Israeli “women soldiers” held hostage since October 7 whom it plans to release from captivity in a second exchange under a ceasefire deal that has halted the Gaza war.
Israel confirmed it had received the list of names.
If all goes according to plan, after Hamas releases the four hostages on Saturday, Israel should free a group of Palestinian prisoners, though neither side has specified how many they will be.
The exchange is part of a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza war, which took effect on Sunday and saw three women hostages and 90 Palestinian prisoners freed.
The fragile truce is intended to pave the way to a permanent end to the war in Gaza, which began with Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel.
Abu Obeida, the spokesman for the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s armed wing, said on Telegram that “as part of the prisoners’ exchange deal, the Qassam brigades decided to release tomorrow four women soldiers”.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office confirmed it had received the names through mediators.
Bassem Naim, a member of Hamas’s political bureau based in Qatar on Friday told AFP that Palestinians displaced by the war to southern Gaza should be able to begin returning to the north of the devastated territory following the releases.
“An Egyptian-Qatari committee will oversee the implementation of this part of the agreement on the ground,” he said.
While displaced Gazans longed to return home after more than a year of war, many found only rubble where houses once stood.
“Even if we thought about returning, there is no place for us to put our tents because of the destruction,” Theqra Qasem, a displaced woman, told AFP.
The ceasefire agreement, brokered by Qatar, Egypt and the United States after months of fruitless negotiations, should be implemented in three phases.
US President Donald Trump, who has claimed credit for the agreement, said Thursday he believed that “the deal should hold”.
During the first, 42-day phase, 33 hostages Israel believes are still alive should be returned in exchange for around 1,900 Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails.
The next phase should see negotiations for a more permanent end to the war, while the last phase should see the reconstruction of Gaza and the return of the bodies of dead hostages.
The first swap on Sunday saw the release of Israeli hostages Emily Damari, Romi Gonen and Doron Steinbrecher.
Hours later, 90 Palestinian prisoners were freed from Israeli jails, most of them women and minors.
In Israel, families of hostages held for more than 15 months in Gaza fear that the ceasefire could collapse.
“The worry and fear that the deal will not be implemented to the end is eating away at all of us,” said Vicky Cohen, the mother of hostage Nimrod Cohen.
“Even these days, there are elements in the government who are doing everything in their power to torpedo the second phase.”
Some far-right members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition opposed the deal, with firebrand Itamar Ben Gvir pulling his party out of the coalition in protest.
During their 2023 attack on Israel, Hamas militants took 251 hostages, 91 of whom remain in Gaza, including 34 the Israeli military has confirmed are dead.
The attack, the deadliest in Israel’s history, resulted in the deaths of 1,210 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Israel’s retaliatory response has killed at least 47,283 people in Gaza, a majority civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry, figures which the UN considers reliable.
The war sparked a major regional crisis, with Israel’s northern neighbour Lebanon dragged into the conflict for more than a year.
Just a day after Hamas staged its attack on southern Israel, its Lebanese ally Hezbollah began low-intensity strikes on the north of the country, sparking a near-daily exchange of fire between the two sides.
The hostilities then escalated into a full-scale war that a November 27 ceasefire brought to a halt.
Under the agreement, Israeli forces were to withdraw from southern Lebanon by January 26, while the Lebanese army and UN peacekeepers deployed in the area.
Hezbollah, meanwhile, was to withdraw north of the Litani river in south Lebanon and dismantle its military assets in the area.
There are an estimated 11 million undocumented migrants in the United States, according to the government statistics (MICHAEL DANTAS) MICHAEL DANTAS/AFP/AFP
Brazil’s government expressed outrage on Saturday after dozens of immigrants deported from the United States arrived by plane in handcuffs, calling it a “flagrant disregard” for their rights.
The foreign ministry said it would demand an explanation from Washington over the “degrading treatment of passengers on the flight”.
The spat comes as Latin America grapples with US President Donald Trump’s return to power bringing a hard-line anti-immigration agenda, promising crackdowns on irregular migration and mass deportations.
When the plane landed in the northern city of Manaus, Brazilian authorities ordered US officials to “immediately remove the handcuffs,” the justice ministry said in a statement.
Justice Minister Ricardo Lewandowski told President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of “the flagrant disregard for the fundamental rights of Brazilian citizens,” the statement said.
Brazil will request “explanations from the US government about the degrading treatment of passengers” on the Friday night flight, the foreign ministry said on X.
The government said 88 Brazilians were aboard the aircraft.
Edgar Da Silva Moura, a 31-year-old computer technician, was on the flight, after seven months in detention in the United States.
“On the plane they didn’t give us water, we were tied hands and feet, they wouldn’t even let us go to the bathroom,” he told AFP.
“It was very hot, some people fainted.”
Luis Antonio Rodrigues Santos, a 21-year-old freelancer, recounted the “nightmare” of people with “respiratory problems” during “four hours without air conditioning” due to technical issues on the plane.
“Things have already changed (with Trump), immigrants are treated as criminals,” he said.
– Crackdown –
The flight was originally destined for the southeastern city of Belo Horizonte, but encountered a technical issue forcing it to land in Manaus.
A government source told AFP the deportation flight was not directly linked to any immigration orders issued by Trump upon taking office Monday, but rather stemmed from a 2017 bilateral agreement.
Brazil’s Minister of Human Rights, Macae Evaristo, told journalists that “children with autism … who went through very serious experiences” were also on the flight.
Footage on Brazilian television showed some passengers descending from the civilian aircraft, with their hands handcuffed and their ankles shackled.
“Upon learning of the situation, President Lula ordered that a Brazilian Air Force (FAB) aircraft be mobilized to transport the Brazilians to their final destination, in order to ensure that they could complete their journey with dignity and safety,” the justice ministry said.
Trump promised a crackdown on illegal immigration during the election campaign and began his second term with a flurry of executive actions aimed at overhauling entry to the United States.
On his first day in office he signed orders declaring a “national emergency” at the southern US border and announced the deployment of more troops to the area while vowing to deport “criminal aliens.”
Several deportation flights since Monday have garnered public and media attention, though such actions were also common under previous US presidents.
In a break with prior practice, however, the Trump administration has begun using military aircraft for repatriation flights, with at least one landing in Guatemala this week.
Paul McCartney and Nancy Shevell pose for photographers upon arrival for the premiere of the film ‘If These Walls Could Sing’ in London, Monday, Dec. 12, 2022. (Photo by Scott Garfitt/Invision/AP, File)
Paul McCartney urged the British government not to make a change to copyright laws that he says could let artificial intelligence companies rip off artists.
The government is consulting on whether to let tech firms use copyrighted material to help train artificial intelligence models unless the creators explicitly opt out.
McCartney told the BBC that would make it harder for artists to retain control of their work and undermine Britain’s creative industries.
“You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it. And anyone who wants can just rip it off,” the 82-year-old former Beatle said in an interview to be broadcast Sunday. An extract was released Saturday by the BBC.
“The truth is, the money’s going somewhere. When it gets on the streaming platforms, somebody is getting it, and it should be the person who created it. It shouldn’t be some tech giant somewhere.”
Britain’s center-left Labour Party government says it wants to make the U.K. a world leader in AI. In December, it announced a consultation into how copyright law can “enable creators and right holders to exercise control over, and seek remuneration for, the use of their works for AI training” while also ensuring “AI developers have easy access to a broad range of high-quality creative content.”
Publishers, artists’ organizations and media companies, including The Associated Press, have banded together as the Creative Rights in AI Coalition to oppose weakening copyright protections.
Congolese rebels say they have “taken” the key city of Goma in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
The leader of a rebel alliance that includes the M23 group reiterated on Sunday that government forces had until 3am to surrender their weapons.
It comes after 13 soldiers serving with peacekeeping forces in the DRC were killed in clashes with the rebels, United Nations officials said.
Congolese rebels and allied Rwandan forces entered the key eastern city of Goma on Sunday and the airport is no longer in use, according to the DRC’s top UN official.
“M23 and Rwandan forces penetrated Munigi quarter in the outskirts of Goma city, causing mass panic and flight amongst the population,” said the UN’s special representative in the DRC, Bintu Keita, to an emergency UN meeting on Sunday.
People displaced by the fighting with M23 rebels make their way to the centre of Goma on Sunday. Pic: AP
The strategic city of Goma has a population of about two million people and is a regional hub for security and humanitarian efforts.
The M23 is mainly made up of ethnic Tutsis who broke away from the Congolese army more than a decade ago.
It’s one of about 100 armed groups that have been vying for a foothold in the mineral-rich region, where a long-running conflict has created one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises.
In recent weeks, it has made significant territorial gains.
The DRC has accused neighbouring Rwanda of fuelling the M23 rebellion and has now severed diplomatic ties with it.
Rwanda has denied the claims but last year admitted it has troops and missile systems in eastern Congo to safeguard its security, pointing to a build-up of Congolese forces near the border.
“Rwanda is trying to get in by all means, but we are holding firm,” a Congolese military source told the Reuters news agency on Sunday.
“It is war, there are losses everywhere… the population must remain calm, we are fighting,” they added.
The DRC has recalled its diplomats from Rwanda and asked Rwandan authorities to cease diplomatic and consular activities in the Congolese capital, Kinshasa.
A UN Security Council meeting to discuss the escalating violence was scheduled for Monday but was brought forward to Sunday.
During that meeting, France and the UK pressured Rwanda over its role in the conflict.
France called for Rwanda to withdraw its troops from Congo territory, while Britain called for an end to attacks on peacekeepers by M23 rebels receiving support from Rwanda.
It comes after a Congolese military governor was killed while on the frontline during a M23 offensive on Friday.
On Saturday, the Congolese army said it foiled an M23 offensive towards Goma with the help of its allied forces, including UN troops and soldiers from the Southern African Development Community Mission, also known as SAMIDRC.
The burning wreckage of a white armoured fighting vehicle carrying UN markings could be seen on a road between Goma and Sake.
South Africa said nine of its peacekeepers had been killed amid the surge in fighting during the last few days.
Three Malawians and a Uruguayan were also killed, the UN said.
Decades of conflicts in the eastern DRC between rival armed groups over land and resources, and attacks on civilians, have killed hundreds of thousands of people and displaced more than seven million.
Hamas will release another round of hostages on Thursday, including Arbel Yehoud, after agreeing with Israel that displaced Palestinians will be allowed back into northern Gaza from Monday.
As well as Ms Yehoud, who was expected to be released yesterday, two more hostages including soldier Agam Berger will be released, according to the office of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Three additional hostages will also be released on Saturday under the new agreement.
Hamas also gave the government a list showing the status of all hostages due to be released in the first phase of the ceasefire.
In return, displaced Palestinians in southern Gaza will be allowed to travel back to northern areas.
Israel will also give Hamas a list of 400 Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons who have been arrested since 7 October 2023, according to a spokesperson for Qatar’s foreign ministry.
Tens of thousands of people were blocked from returning to northern Gaza after Israel refused to open checkpoints because it said Hamas had breached the ceasefire agreement.
Israel had insisted that Ms Yehoud be released on Saturday because she is a woman, a civilian and alive, and therefore should have been in the top category of hostages freed, according to the agreement.
When she wasn’t, the checkpoints remained closed.
Although Ms Yehoud wasn’t released, four Israeli female soldiers were reunited with families and 200 freed Palestinian prisoners were greeted as heroes in the West Bank.
Palestinians waiting to return to northern Gaza were frustrated by the weekend’s delays.
“A sea of people is waiting for a signal to move back to Gaza City and the north,” said Tamer al Burai, a displaced person from Gaza City.
Yoon was the first sitting South Korean head of state to be detained in a criminal probeImage: Kim Jae-Hwan/ZUMAPRESS/IMAGO
South Korean prosecutors on Sunday indicted impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol on charges of leading an insurrection by declaring martial law on December 3.
The decision came after anti-corruption investigators recommended last week that Yoon be formally charged.
“The prosecution has decided to indict Yoon Suk Yeol, who is facing charges of being a ringleader of insurrection,” Democratic Party spokesman Han Min-soo told a press conference.
“The punishment of the ringleader of insurrection now begins finally,” he added.
After declaring martial law, Yoon sent troops and police into the Assembly. However, enough lawmakers still managed to enter an Assembly chamber to unanimously vote down Yoon’s decree, forcing his cabinet to rescind it.
Political crisis in South Korea
Yoon was previously impeached and arrested over the martial law decree.
The Constitutional Court is separately considering whether to formally dismiss Yoon or reinstate him as president.
The crime of insurrection is one of the few criminal charges for which the president of South Korea does not enjoy immunity.
It is punishable by life imprisonment or death. However, South Korea has not executed anyone in decades.
The treatment of Brazilian citizens by the US will likely sour relations between the Trump administration and Brazilian President Lula’s governmentImage: DOUGLAS MAGNO/AFP
Brazil strongly condemned the US on Saturday after dozens of deportees arrived to the country in handcuffs.
A plane carrying 88 Brazilian passengers, 16 US security agents, and eight crew members, was originally scheduled to arrive in Belo Horizonte in the state of Minas Gerais, but had to make an emergency landing in the city of Manaus due to a technical error, said a statement by the Brazilian government.
Brazilian federal police received the plane at the instructions of Justice Minister Ricardo Lewandowski and intervened, asking US agents to remove handcuffs from the deportees.
Lewandowski told left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva it was a “blatant disrespect” of their fundamental rights, according to a statement by the Brazilian Ministry of Justice and Public Security.
“Upon learning of the situation, President Lula ordered that a Brazilian Air Force (FAB) aircraft be mobilized to transport the Brazilians to their final destination, in order to ensure that they could complete their journey with dignity and safety,” the ministry’s statement said.
Anti-immigration sentiment in the US
US President Donald Trump has taken a harsh anti-immigration stance since coming into office this week, and has vowed to remove undocumented migrants.
However, the deportation flight was a result of a 2017 bilateral agreement and did not stem from any of Trump’s orders on immigration, a government source told AFP news agency.
It was the second such flight carrying undocumented migrants from the US back to Brazil this year.
Alice Weidel, co-leader of the Alternative for Germany party (AfD), claps as SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is seen on screen during a central election campaign event of the AfD in Halle (Saale), Germany, January 25, 2025. REUTERS/Karina Hessland Purchase Licensing Rights
Elon Musk made a surprise appearance during Germany’s AfD (Alternative fuer Deutschland) election campaign event in Halle in eastern Germany on Saturday, speaking publicly in support of the far right party for the second time in as many weeks.
Addressing a hall of 4,500 people alongside party leader Alice Weidel, Musk spoke live via video link about preserving German culture and protecting the German people.
“It’s good to be proud of German culture, German values, and not to lose that in some sort of multiculturalism that dilutes everything,” Musk said.
Last week, the U.S. billionaire caused uproar after he made a gesture that drew online comparisons to a Nazi salute during U.S. President Donald Trump’s inauguration festivities.
On Saturday, he said “children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents, let alone their great grandparents,” apparently referring to Germany’s Nazi past.
“There is too much focus on past guilt, and we need to move beyond that,” he said.
Musk, who spoke of suppression of speech under Germany’s government, has previously attacked German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on X.
For his part, Scholz on Tuesday said he does not support freedom of speech when it is used for extreme-right views.
Musk spoke in favour of voting for the far right party, saying: “I’m very excited for the AfD, I think you’re really the best hope for Germany … fight for a great future for Germany,” he told onlookers.
Weidel thanked him, said the Republicans were making America great again, and called on her supporters to make Germany great again.
Earlier this month, Musk hosted Weidel in an interview on X, stirring concern about election meddling.
Despite winter weather, anti-far right campaigners were out in force on Saturday, with around 100,000 gathering around Berlin’s Brandenburg gate and up to 20,000 in Cologne, including people of all ages carrying colourful umbrellas.
Medical aid shipment from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.N. refugee agency, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) arrives at the Beirut-Rafic Hariri International Airport, in Beirut, Lebanon, October 4, 2024. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
President Donald Trump said on Saturday he may consider rejoining the World Health Organization, days after ordering a U.S. exit from the global health agency over what he described as a mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other international health crises.
“Maybe we would consider doing it again, I don’t know. Maybe we would. They would have to clean it up,” Trump said at a rally in Las Vegas.
The U.S. is scheduled to leave the WHO on Jan. 22, 2026. Trump announced the move on Monday after he was sworn in for a second term in the White House.
The U.S. is by far the biggest financial backer of the WHO, contributing around 18% of its overall funding. The WHO’s most recent two-year budget, for 2024-2025, was $6.8 billion.
Trump told the crowd in Las Vegas he was unhappy that the U.S. paid more into the WHO than China, which has a much bigger population.
He added that he will ask Saudi Arabia to make an investment of about $1 trillion in the U.S., up from the $600 billion the Saudis have pledged to invest.
North Korea said Sunday it tested a cruise missile system, its third known weapons display this year, and vowed “the toughest” response to what it called the escalation of U.S.-South Korean military drills that target the North.
The moves suggested North Korea will likely maintain its run of weapons tests and its confrontational stance against the U.S. for now, even though President Donald Trump said he intends to reach out to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
The official Korean Central News Agency said Kim observed the test of sea-to-surface strategic cruise guided weapons on Saturday.
The term “strategic” implies the missiles are nuclear-capable. KCNA said the missiles hit their targets after traveling 1,500-kilometer (932-mile) -long elliptical and figure-eight-shaped flight patterns, but that couldn’t be independently verified.
KCNA cited Kim as saying that North Korea’s war deterrence capabilities “are being perfected more thoroughly” and affirming that his country will make “strenuous efforts” to defend stability “on the basis of more powerfully developed military muscle.”
South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said North Korea had launched “several” cruise missiles toward its western waters from an inland area at around 4 p.m. on Saturday. It said South Korean maintains a readiness to “overwhelmingly” repel any provocations by North Korea in conjunction with its military alliance with the U.S.
In a separate statement carried by KCNA on Sunday, North Korea’s Foreign Ministry criticized the U.S. for committing “serious military provocations aiming at” North Korea with a series of military exercises with South Korea this month.
“The reality stresses that the DPRK should counter the U.S. with the toughest counteraction from A to Z as long as it refuses the sovereignty and security interests of the DPRK and this is the best option for dealing with the U.S,” the Foreign Ministry statement said.
DPRK stands for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the abbreviation of its formal name. The Foreign Ministry warning was in line with Kim’s vows to implement the “toughest” anti-U.S. policy during a year-end political meeting.
North Korea views U.S. military training with South Korea as invasion rehearsals though Washington and Seoul have repeatedly said their drills are defensive in nature. In recent years, the U.S. and South Korea have expanded their military exercises in response to North Korea’s advancing nuclear program.
The start of Trump’s second term raises prospects for the revival of diplomacy between the U.S. and North Korea, as Trump met Kim three times during his first term. The Trump-Kim diplomacy in 2018-19 fell apart due to wrangling over U.S.-led economic sanctions on North Korea.
During a Fox News interview broadcast Thursday, Trump called Kim “a smart guy” and “not a religious zealot.” Asked whether he will reach out to Kim again, Trump replied, “I will, yeah.”
Many experts say Kim likely thinks he has greater bargaining power than in his earlier round of diplomacy with Trump because of his country’s enlarged nuclear arsenal and deepening military ties with Russia.
In South Korea, many worry that Trump might scale back military drills with the Asian U.S. ally and abandon the goal of the complete denuclearization of North Korea and focus on eliminating its long-range missile program, which poses a direct threat to the U.S., while leaving its nuclear attack capabilities against South Korea intact.
Hermes illuminated a gloomy Paris afternoon with its fall men’s collection Saturday, as Veronique Nichanian turned to the racetrack for inspiration. Jockeys’ vibrant racing silks became her muse, a dynamic counterpoint to the French maison’s storied equestrian roots. “I wanted this collection to be strong and energetic,” Nichanian explained, her palette pivoting from deep browns and dark teals to flashes of tomato red and lemon yellow.
The collection radiated warmth, both in spirit and texture. Fuzzy mohair coats, velvet varsity jackets and plush sheepskin outerwear wrapped models in an embrace that seemed designed to counter winter’s chill. Layering was less pronounced this season, a deliberate move to retain sleek, streamlined silhouettes. Even gray pinstripe suits — pared back to essentials — eschewed bulk, echoing Nichanian’s vision of men unencumbered as they race through life.
Sweaters emerged as the collection’s unsung heroes. Their bold chevrons and geometric patterns were lifted directly from the vibrant stripes of racing silks, a playful nod to Palais d’Iéna’s soaring, angular architecture. A standout turtleneck, with its patchwork of triangles, rectangles, and squares in canary yellow, seemed to channel a nostalgic love for trigonometry. Elsewhere, a jacket with a shawl collar mirrored the same graphical bravado, rendered in cool tones of blue, black and white.
The US president was asked about the island in the Air Force One press room
President Donald Trump has said he believes the US will gain control of Greenland, after showing renewed interest in acquiring the autonomous Danish territory in recent weeks.
“I think we’re going to have it,” he told reporters on Air Force One on Saturday, adding that the island’s 57,000 residents “want to be with us”.
His comments come after reports that Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen insisted Greenland was not for sale in a fiery phone call with the president last week.
Trump floated the prospect of buying the vast Arctic territory during his first term in 2019, and has said US control of Greenland is an “absolute necessity” for international security.
“I think the people want to be with us,” Trump said when asked about the island in the press room on board the presidential plane.
“I don’t really know what claim Denmark has to it, but it would be a very unfriendly act if they didn’t allow that to happen because it’s for the protection of the free world,” he added.
“I think Greenland we’ll get because it has to do with freedom of the world,” Trump continued.
“It has nothing to do with the United States other than that we’re the one that can provide the freedom. They can’t.”
Despite Trump’s apparent confidence, the prime ministers of Greenland and Denmark have both previously said the island was not for sale.
Greenland’s PM Mute Egede said use of the territory’s land was “Greenland’s business”, though he did express a willingness to work more closely with the US on defence and mining.
Meanwhile, Danish premiere Frederiksen said earlier this month that “Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders”, and only the local population could determine its future.
Frederiksen reasserted her position in a heated 45-minute phone exchange with Trump last week, according to a report in the Financial Times.
The newspaper quoted an anonymous European official as saying the conversation was “horrendous”, and another saying Trump’s interest in acquiring Greenland was is “serious, and potentially very dangerous”.
The Danish prime minister reportedly insisted the island was not for sale, but noted the US’s “big interest” in it.
Greenland lies on the shortest route from North America to Europe, making it strategically important for the US. It is also home to a large American space facility.
In recent years, there has been increased interest in Greenland’s natural resources, including mining for rare earth minerals, uranium and iron.
Though the island has wide-ranging autonomy, it remains part of the kingdom of Demark.
But there is a general consensus in Greenland that it will eventually become independent, which could pave the way for a new kind of relationship with the US.
President Trump’s claim that the people of Greenland “want to be with us” may come as a surprise to some of the island’s residents.
Christopher Harkins was eventually jailed for 12 years after women came forward to report his crimes
It began with a short email from a stranger asking for help and it ended six years later with a violent fraudster and rapist being jailed for 12 years – thanks to an incredible group of women and their fight for justice.
It was 2017 and I was working as a newspaper reporter when I got the email from a woman who detailed how she had met a man named Christopher Harkins on Tinder and he had stolen £3,247 from her.
Lisa, who is using a pseudonym because she doesn’t want to be linked to this story forever, explained that Harkins had lovebombed her, suggested they go on holiday together and then, when she transferred the money, went quiet.
It quickly transpired the holiday wasn’t real and Harkins would not refund the cash.
Lisa was afraid Harkins would go on to scam someone else. It didn’t occur to Lisa – or to me – that it was a scam he had already honed with experience.
Lisa had gone to Police Scotland for help and been told the issue was a civil matter.
Frustrated, but determined, now she wanted to protect other people by exposing this man in the press.
We spoke on the phone and she laid out the situation, how he’d overwhelmed her with attention, had been the perfect gentleman. And how things had quickly changed when he decided to push her for money.
Lisa, a smart, impressive, professional woman in her 30s, provided screenshots of WhatsApp conversations and bank account details.
It was clear very quickly that this man was a master manipulator but it wasn’t until I spoke to him on the phone that I realised how skilled he was at the practice.
Tracking him down was the hard part.
Lisa had told Harkins that she had spoken to a journalist and he was, let’s say, unimpressed.
He promised repeatedly to give her the money back if she put a stop to the story – but didn’t actually make a move to return the cash.
When I called him – on the two numbers I had for him – he didn’t reply.
Lisa’s story was credible, and she had hard evidence, but we wanted to speak to Harkins to hear his side.
Suddenly, Lisa was in touch to say Harkins had agreed to return her money. She was to meet him at a chip shop on the south side of Glasgow.
I went with her, waiting outside with a photographer to try to speak to Harkins.
The money was there in an envelope. There was no sign of him though.
We decided to publish the story, having tried all we could to track him down. And then my phone rang. It was Harkins.
Speaking to him was a baffling experience. It was hard to keep him on track.
He would state one thing and then, when challenged, very quickly change his position.
He tried to persuade me that Lisa was threatening him and he was frightened of her.
Harkins had had his chance to have his say – and we published the story.
Within the hour of the article going online I had an email from another woman claiming to have been targeted by Harkins. And then another.
My phone started ringing. I could tell as soon as I picked it up that this would be another Harkins target – he clearly had a type: smart and articulate.
Lisa, who I was updating all the time, was appalled. Neither of us had any idea how prolific he might have been.
Some women wanted to tell their stories publicly while others just wanted an outlet to share what had happened to them.
I heard stories of fraud, of manipulation, of verbal abuse – and worse.
One caller was a man who had known Harkins in his early 20s and warned me to be careful.
He claimed to have known Harkins to be physically violent and wanted me to know what I was dealing with.
We ran a second story in the paper.
This was another woman who had been conned by the holiday scam – this time in England. Harkins, in turned out, had been operating across the country.
She lost £1,600 to the fake holiday con and had also been pressured to take out loans for him, which luckily she didn’t do.
More than 20 women had contacted me by now and I had interviewed several who wanted to go public, hearing dreadful stories of fraud but also physical and sexual violence.
Many had gone to the police only to be told – as Lisa had been – that this was a civil matter.
Then, Police Scotland contacted me. They said that they were going to investigate and could we please stop writing about Harkins so as not to tip him off to how much was known about him.
Not wanting to jeopardise any case, we agreed.
Women I had interviewed were contacted by Police Scotland and several decided to make formal complaints.
They knew it was going to be a long and gruelling process – but they wanted this man taken off the streets.
Months passed and the wait for the women was intensely stressful.
Finally, in December 2019, he was arrested. We all thought this was the beginning of the end and the women relaxed a little.
In early 2020 my phone rang. It was a woman in London.
This woman said that she had stayed with Harkins in a five star hotel in an upmarket part of the city.
A receptionist at the hotel had taken her aside and told her the man she was with was using a false name, was in fact called Christopher Harkins and she should Google him.
The woman told me she found my articles online and read them, with increasing horror.
I listened with my heart in my mouth as she told me she went back to their room, where Harkins was still asleep, and took his wallet from his bag.
His bank card said Christopher Harkins. She took her belongings and left.
Knowing, at that time, what I knew about Harkins’ other behaviour, which wasn’t in the public domain, I had such an overwhelming feeling of relief that he hadn’t woken up.
He scammed another woman in London, and she went to the Metropolitan Police, who acted quickly.
He was convicted and jailed, which was both a relief to the women in Scotland and a frustration.
The English proceedings meant the impending trial in Scotland would be delayed. Again.
Just before Harkins was imprisoned in England he called my editor to complain that I was orchestrating a campaign against him because I was obsessed with him. That took a bit of explaining.
The delays were intensely stressful to the women involved in the case but they were determined to see it through.
Their bravery and solidarity was incredible to witness.
When the case called at the High Court in Paisley last year I attended every day of court.
Four female Israeli soldiers were released by Hamas on Saturday in the second hostage release of the Gaza ceasefire deal.
Karina Ariev, Daniella Gilboa, Naama Levy and Liri Albag were handed to the Red Cross in Gaza City.
In exchange 200 Palestinian prisoners held in Israel are set to be freed.
The four women were serving as observers at the Nahal Oz army base on the border with Gaza when Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October, 2023.
Their release is part of the second such exchange since the ceasefire came into effect last Sunday. Three hostages and 90 Palestinian prisoners were released in the first swap.
In total, 33 hostages are set to be freed over six weeks in the first phase of the ceasefire, which came into effect on 19 January, 2025.
About 1,200 people were killed in the 7 October attack and 251 were taken back to Gaza as hostages.
More than 47,200 Palestinians, the majority civilians, have been killed in Israel’s offensive since then, the Hamas-run health ministry says.
Karina Ariev
Karina Ariev, 20, was serving at the Nahal Oz army base when she was kidnapped on 7 October, 2023.
Her sister Alexandra told the BBC she heard shooting as Karina called her during the attack, and later saw a video showing Karina being taken away in a vehicle.
“She called me to say goodbye, we could hear shooting,” she said.
“She was scared, crying, she was in panic. Her last message was ‘they’re here’, in the bomb shelter. This was the last contact we had with her.”
Alexandra then saw the video circulating on Telegram of her kidnapping. “We identified her, she had blood on her face, she was screaming.
“I would never wish anyone to feel this feeling,” she told the BBC. “Time has stopped.”
After her release, her family described her as a “symbol of courage, heart, and determination, and we are proud of her beyond words”.
“After 477 tumultuous days of pain, worry, and endless anxiety – we finally got to embrace our beloved Karina, hear her voice, and see her smile that once again fills us with light,” the statement read.
Naama Levy
Naama Levy, 20, was filmed being bundled into a jeep, her hands tied behind her back. The footage was released by Hamas and circulated widely on social media. According to her mother, the teenager had just begun her military service.
But she had previously been part of an Israeli-Palestinian peace initiative, and her family called her “a peace seeker”.
In a video of her kidnapping from the Nahal Oz army base, she was heard to tell her captors in English: “I have friends in Palestine.”
In May 2024 her brother, Amit, said her family released the footage to “encourage all sides to get back to the table” to solve “an unbearable humanitarian issue”.
“We feel like she’s handling the situation like the true superhero she is, like a hero fighting for her life.”
Daniella Gilboa
Daniella Gilboa, 20, was injured in the leg when she was kidnapped along with other female soldiers at Nahal Oz.
She has been seen in several videos, and in one last year asked the Israeli government why she had been “abandoned” and “discarded” while war raged around her.
Ms Gilboa’s mother, Orly, told the Jerusalem Post that the video showed her daughter was “strong and determined” and that wounds suffered on 7 October were not as serious as first feared. However, she said she was concerned about her “poor mental state”.
Meanwhile, her boyfriend’s father told Maariv that his son awaits her return – and planned to propose.
“My son asked her parents for her hand in marriage, to which they answered yes, even though they are only 19-20 years old. Right after that, he shouted to the sky – ‘I’m going to propose to you!'” the father said.
“He prays that she will come back soon and be reunited with him and her family.”
After her release, her family said she had “survived 477 days in the hell of Gaza and has finally returned to our family’s embrace”.
“How we’ve prayed for this moment!” the statement said.
The family went on to thank Israelis for their “prayers and support during this time”, adding “we couldn’t have made it through without you”.
Liri Albag
Liri Albag was 18 and had just started military training as an Army lookout when Hamas attacked the Nahal Oz base on 7 October 2023.
Her cousin Aya Albag, a corporal in the army, said she had told her she was “proud” of her passing her observation course before she went to the base
“She was motivated and so happy that she was assigned to Nahal Oz,” she told the Jerusalem Post. “She began her role on Thursday, and a day and a half later, on Saturday morning, she was kidnapped.”
Her family say that she has managed to pass messages back to them through released hostages.
In January 2024, footage of Albag was released by Hamas.
“I’m only 19 years old. I have my entire life in front of me, but now my entire life has been put on pause,” she is heard to say.
“The world is starting to forget about us. No one cares about us. We’re living in a nightmare.”
Hostages already released in latest ceasefire
Three female Israeli hostages were already released as part of the latest ceasefire and hostage release deal.
Romi Gonen, 24, was captured as she tried to escape the Nova music festival when it was targeted by the militant group as part of the 7 October 2023 attack.
She was freed alongside Doron Steinbrecher, 31, a veterinary nurse, and Emily Damari, 28, who holds dual British-Israeli nationality.
All three arrived back in Israel on Sunday after being released by Hamas in Gaza, and were reunited with their families.
Romi Gonen
Romi had travelled from her home in Kfar Veradim, northern Israel, to the Nova festival, which took place in the Negev Desert in the south.
More than 360 people were killed at the festival when Hamas fighters crossed over the border, 2km (1.3 miles) to the west. The desert landscape offered partygoers limited cover and exit routes were blocked by gunmen.
When sirens sounded as the attack unfolded, Romi called her family. Her mother, Meirav, recalled hearing shots and shouting in Arabic in the final call with her daughter.
Romi was ambushed by Hamas militants as she tried to flee.
The Hostages and Missing Families Forum said Romi had gone to the festival “to do what she loved, to dance” – something she had studied for 12 years, starring in solo performances and becoming an “amazing choreographer”.
A video posted by the families’ forum last November described her as “the girl with the biggest smile, the brightest light, the greatest friend”.
The forum also said that Romi’s bedroom at her home “remains exactly as it was when she left”, awaiting her return.
In a video clip shared by the Israeli military, Romi’s father was seen jumping in the air before breaking down in tears as he watched footage of his daughter’s release on Sunday.
Doron Steinbrecher
Doron, a 31-year-old veterinary nurse, was abducted from her apartment in Kibbutz Kfar Aza – near Gaza’s north-western border – when Hamas attacked.
The community, one of many Israeli villages along the border, was heavily targeted by armed militants during the 7 October attacks.
Israeli officials said Hamas burned homes and killed civilians, including whole families, as well as taking hostages.
When the assault began, Doron contacted her family and friends via WhatsApp to say she was hiding under the bed as militants advanced, the Hostages and Missing Families Forum said.
In her last voice message, she was heard screaming “they’ve caught me” as shouting and gunfire sounded in the background.
Doron’s family received no information about her whereabouts for nearly four months.
“After an unbearable 471 days, our beloved Dodo has finally returned to our arms,” her family said in a statement released by the missing families forum on Sunday.
They added: “We want to express our heartfelt gratitude to everyone who supported and accompanied us along this journey.”
She studied theatre and film in school, and developed a love for animals that led to her becoming a veterinary nurse.
Emily Damari
Emily, a 28-year-old British-Israeli national, was also taken hostage from Kibbutz Kfar Aza on 7 October 2023.
She was shot in the hand and taken into Gaza from her home during the attack, and also saw her dog shot and killed. Photographs after her release showed Emily with a bandaged hand and two missing fingers from that attack.
Her mother, Mandy Damari, was also in the kibbutz in her separate home on 7 October. Mrs Damari hid in the safe room and was saved by a bullet hitting the door handle, making it impossible for attackers to get in.
As the assault unfolded, Emily sent her mother a text message containing a single heart emoji – that was the last contact they had.
Emotional images showed Emily reunited with her mother in Israel on Sunday, hugging while on a video call with her brother.
“I want to thank everyone who never stopped fighting for Emily throughout this horrendous ordeal, and who never stopped saying her name,” Mrs Damari said.
“In Israel, Britain, the United States, and around the world. Thank you for bringing Emily home.”
Mrs Damari was born and raised in the UK, and met her husband on a holiday in Israel aged 20.
Emily, the youngest of four children, has strong connections with the UK – she is a Tottenham Hotspur fan and would often visit to see relatives.
A recent move by Meta to remove third-party fact checkers from its platforms such as Facebook has sparked worries this will fuel misinformation. (Illustration: CNA/Nurjannah Suhaimi)
One might argue that the slippery slide downhill for social media began in 2022, when the world’s richest man Elon Musk bought Twitter and renamed it X.
The head of electric vehicle maker Tesla quickly began using it to amass political influence, eventually clinching a role in the newly installed administration of President Donald Trump in Washington DC.
From the very first days, his takeover raised concerns about the impact of having an influential communications tool under the control of an already-powerful man.
In an online commentary at the time, Dr Nolan Higdon, a lecturer of history and media studies at California State University, East Bay, likened the emergence of Mr Musk and others like him to a second US Gilded Age.
The original Gilded Age, in the late 1900s, involved an economic boom characterised by wealthy industrialists, political corruption and a wide disparity in wealth across society.
Dr Higdon warned that this second Gilded Age is being marked by a new crop of rich and powerful business leaders, or oligarchs, using their vast wealth to purchase media and political influence.
It certainly did not help that shortly after the buyout, Mr Musk dissolved X’s trust and safety council, its advisory group of around 100 independent civil, human rights and other organisations. Twitter had formed the council in 2016 to address hate speech, child exploitation, suicide, self-harm and other problems on the platform.
Mr Musk also slashed the number of the renamed X’s safety engineers by 80 per cent. Early last year, he made further cuts to the platform’s global trust and safety team.
In place of its content moderation system, Mr Musk’s X relied instead on initiatives such as “community notes”, which allows users to add context and corrections to others’ posts, including ones they believe to be potentially misleading or non-factual.
Dr Saifuddin Ahmed, an assistant professor at Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), said that while such a system has the potential to democratise fact-checking by allowing more users to participate and hence increase transparency, these initiatives are limited in their ability to stop misinformation from spreading.
Misinformed users could undermine the quality control of this approach to fact-checking, Dr Ahmed said.
The system could also be exploited by malicious actors who may flood the platform with incorrect information, label accurate content as false or misleading, and thereby aim to manipulate public opinion, he added.
These fears materialised during the campaign ahead of last November’s US presidential election, as misinformation gained traction on the platform, sometimes led by posts or reposts by Mr Musk himself.
A 2024 report by non-profit group Center for Countering Digital Hate found that false or misleading claims by Mr Musk about the election had amassed two billion views on X.
Far from seeing this as a cautionary tale, it seems other big tech firms are taking a leaf out of Mr Musk’s playbook to get closer to the Trump administration.
Earlier this month, Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that the company would eliminate its third-party fact-checkers in the US, to be replaced with a community-based fact-checking system much like X’s.
Using language often used by Mr Trump and his followers, Mr Zuckerberg even accused the outgoing Biden administration of “censoring” social media posts by requiring fact-checking and content moderation.
Most recently, TikTok named Mr Trump as its saviour in the US when he agreed to restore the app’s services last Sunday (Jan 19). The platform had gone dark for a brief period in America, as a law banning the app on national security grounds came into effect.
In fact, it was Mr Trump himself, during his first term as president, who had led the effort to ban TikTok over concerns China was harvesting data from US citizens. But Mr Trump had then used TikTok during last year’s presidential campaign to appeal to younger voters, attracting over 15 million followers.
Commentators told CNA TODAY that these developments among the social media platforms are concerning not only due to allegations of pro-Trump bias, but also because of the broader implications for misinformation.
They added that these shifts could have ripple effects on governments and policymaking institutions, communication professionals and individual users alike.
Dr Ahmed said: “What we are witnessing with social media platforms globally highlights several key dynamics. Most importantly, the situation with TikTok highlights the vulnerability of these platforms to geopolitical tensions.”
For one thing, the decision to ban TikTok in the US, followed by its subsequent reinstatement under President Trump’s influence, demonstrates how political pressures can shape tech policy, said Dr Ahmed.
There has been speculation that Mr Musk may acquire TikTok, which, if true, would have an effect on global political discourse, he added.
“These developments also confirm that social media companies are no longer merely tech firms, and their platforms are no longer solely about social connections,” he said.
“The real risk lies in these platforms becoming major arenas for political maneuvering rather than spaces for political information and discussions.”
Dr Taberez Ahmed Neyazi, principal investigator at the National University of Singapore’s (NUS) Centre for Trusted Internet and Community, said that Meta’s decision to discontinue fact-checkers in the US was particularly worrying.
The move “reeks of dangerous opportunism, prioritising a ‘community-driven’ spin over accountability under the guise of freedom of speech”, he said.
Dr Taberez added: “By replacing professional fact-checkers with mechanisms like X’s community notes, Meta is gambling with truth in favour of populist appeal, a move that aligns ominously with the political zeitgeist.
“Community-driven moderation often falls short in rigour, impartiality and expertise to address complex and culturally nuanced falsehoods. Even more concerning, it creates opportunities for coordinated efforts by malicious groups to manipulate truth ratings.”
REGULATING SOCIAL MEDIA A LONG-TERM CHALLENGE
To be sure, challenges around regulating private tech giants are not new issues.
Even before the most recent spate of developments, governments around the world had been grappling with the challenge of regulating and holding social media platforms accountable for the spread of misinformation.
This has, however, arguably accelerated since Mr Musk’s takeover of Twitter, with extreme right-wing content flourishing on X ever since.
Social media users interviewed by CNA TODAY said this is something they have personally observed.
Mr Edo Lio, 28, a content creator and social media strategist for brands, said, for example, he has observed X users getting more aggressive in their exchanges, and that political discourse on the platform can be “quite intense”, with “fake news” and “shady” videos easily gaining traction.
He noticed this most around the time of the US elections, he added.
This is unsurprising, said experts.
Dr Ahmed of NTU said that, after all, the fundamental reality is that social media platforms operate as profit-driven entities, not services for societal good.
This makes it particularly challenging to regulate and cooperate with them when their business models are at stake, he added.
When it comes to regulating social media platforms, policymakers here face challenges such as defining platform accountability, managing the rapid speed at which misinformation spreads and navigating cross-border jurisdictional conflicts, said Dr Ahmed.
In Singapore, for example, much misinformation seen online originates from abroad, which further complicates enforcement. The rapid advancement of technology, such as the rise of deepfakes, also poses significant regulatory challenges, he added.
According to a 2024 report by the British broadcaster the BBC, social media algorithms could also work to perpetuate the spread of misinformation.
The algorithms are designed to maximise user engagement – and they do so by promoting content that elicits strong reactions.
This could result in sensational or emotionally-charged posts being prioritised on users’ feeds, regardless of their accuracy. That means misinformation spreads more rapidly, as the algorithms amplify false or misleading content.
Faced with these challenges, and in the absence of a central global authority to oversee private tech and social media companies, some governments have tried to take matters into their own hands.
In November last year, Australia’s parliament passed a law banning children under 16 from accessing social media.
Responding to queries by Members of Parliament on Jan 7 on whether Singapore would consider similar measures, Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Rahayu Mahzam said the authorities will continue to study the effectiveness of mandating age limits for social media access.
The Government is also engaging its Australian counterparts and social media platforms in discussions, which would inform their next steps, she said.
Currently, the authorities also have measures in place to guard against online harms and falsehoods.
These include the Code of Practice for Online Safety, which requires designated social media services, including Facebook and Instagram, to put in place systems and processes to enhance online safety and mitigate the spread of harmful content on their services.
Responding to queries from TODAY, a spokesperson from the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said on Friday (Jan 24) that the ministry is also aware of Meta’s recent policy changes in the US.
“We are monitoring the situation to understand the impact of these policy changes on online safety for Singapore users across Meta’s platforms.
“Social media platforms are our important partners in online safety. We will continue to engage and work with them to ensure the safety of Singapore users online and guard against misinformation.”
POLITICS AND POWER PLAY
The overt attempts made by the owners of the social media platforms to butter up the Trump administration has gotten observers worried that these major tech players are getting too close to the heart of US political power.
Tech billionaires – including Mr Musk, Mr Zuckerberg and Amazon’s founder Jeff Bezos – were given prime positions at Mr Trump’s inauguration last Monday (Jan 20). Mr Musk has also been given a job in the new administration by Mr Trump to cut waste in government spending.
In an unprecedented demonstration of their power and influence on US politics, TikTok CEO Chew Shou Zi, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai were also in attendance at the inauguration.
Commentators said that the implications of big tech firms and social media platforms lying outside of regulatory reach, are profoundly troubling.
Dr Taberez of NUS said: “Meta’s pivot (to replace its third-party fact-checkers with community notes) is a clarion call for governments, civil society and users to demand greater accountability from tech giants.
“This is not merely a shift in policy; it is a fundamental reshaping of the information ecosystem with consequences that will ripple across borders.”
The stakes are even higher for countries in Southeast Asia, like Singapore, because of the prevalence of local vernacular languages, through which many of these falsehoods thrive, Dr Taberez said.
“Without the support of platforms like Meta, fact-checkers may lose their battle against misinformation – a battle that underpins the very fabric of democracy and social cohesion in the region,” he added.
Public relations professionals told CNA TODAY that such policy shifts would likely lead to the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation corrupting the dissemination of government information. This would eventually erode trust in the authorities.
Misinformation generally refers to information that is simply untrue while disinformation refers to false information that is spread knowingly with the goal of achieving nefarious outcomes
Mr Ed Burleigh, head of the Public Relations and Communications Association (PRCA) Asia Pacific, said: “Just like the old adage ‘bad news travels fast’, misinformation often spreads far quicker than accurate information.”
This can be further compounded by user-driven narratives, and amplified by the social media platforms’ algorithms, which can make it very difficult to correct false narratives in real-time, he added.
To combat this, Ms Mayda Jutahkiti, managing director at public relations agency Elliot & Co, said that communications professionals and the industry would likely have to adapt by focusing on data-backed storytelling.
Crisis communication strategies will have to preempt and address misinformation more swiftly, while collaboration with ‘trusted’ voices on social media would take greater precedence for brands and policymakers, she added.
Policymakers already have some regulations in place on dealing with misinformation over government policies and communications, such as the 2019 Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act here.
But the effectiveness of these regulations is not without criticism.
If misinformation continues to spread unchecked across these platforms, social media users stand to lose, commentators said.
Mr Benjamin Ang, senior fellow and head of digital impact research at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), noted the volume and speed at which hate speech or harmful content is created and distributed.
He said this misinformation onslaught far outstrips the ability of any society to teach every individual about the dangers, or the ability of individuals to avoid exposure.
Mr Ang added that studies have shown how harmful this exposure is, both to individual mental health, and to social cohesion.
Additionally, given the significant presence of TikTok among local youth, regulatory and governance changes to the platform could reshape the content they consume, which may influence their understanding of global sociopolitical issues, said Dr Ahmed of NTU.
Mr Wong Hin-Yan, executive vice president and strategic planning and head of Asia Pacific intelligence at communications agency Weber Shandwick said that as social media users choose platforms that align with their values and beliefs, users may “switch off” from a platform for a while if it is flooded with misinformation or disinformation.
A DISCERNING APPROACH TO SOCIAL MEDIA
Policy flip-flopping by big tech firms to align with the government of the day, such as their recent pandering to Mr Trump, ultimately leaves users bearing the brunt of the consequences, commentators said.
This inconsistency erodes trust, fosters misinformation, and ultimately compromises the safety of the platforms for millions of users increasingly rely on them daily for news and other information, they added.
Data published in the 2023 Reuters Institute Digital News Report showed an acceleration in the structural shifts towards more digital, mobile and media environments.
This is where news content is delivered and consumed via social media – including video-led platforms such as TikTok – rather than via traditional “legacy” media, such as newspapers and television.
Dr Ahmed of NTU said: “Many users may assume that these developments won’t affect them, but that’s far from the truth.
“Everyday users should be concerned about these changes, as the decentralisation of fact-checking by Meta and the increasing political influence over platforms like TikTok will have significant consequences.”
For one thing, these shifts would likely increase the influx of misinformation, and worsen the already declining trust in social media platforms. Users may also struggle to discern credible information, leading to skepticism, said Dr Ahmed.
Additionally, the prevalence of algorithms prioritising self-aligning content will deepen echo chambers, where users are exposed only to information that reinforces their existing beliefs. As political influence over platform governance grows, public distrust in these platforms is likely to intensify, he added.
According to TikTok, however, its policies and algorithms did not change over the weekend when US service was restored.
Nevertheless, given these considerations, the experts stressed the importance of cultivating media literacy, and ensuring that users learn to consume information on social media with discernment.
This includes fact-checking their news and being aware of the underlying interests and agendas of different groups of people.
Dr Andrew Yee, an assistant professor at NTU’s Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, said: “The old adage is relevant here: Never believe everything you read on the internet. Every time one sees something that evokes a reaction, be ultra sceptical.
“If not, we run the risk of perpetuating misinformation when we share something untrue, or risk being manipulated by different groups with different interests. We essentially become a ‘useful idiot’.”
Users can also take an active role in curating their information feeds, said Dr Ahmed of NTU.
Many users in Singapore are not proactive in blocking or unfollowing sources known to spread misinformation, he said.
Developing such habits of removing unreliable sources and intentionally following credible ones, however, can significantly improve the quality of content one consumes on social media, said Dr Ahmed.
RSIS’ Mr Ang said: “We should develop mindful habits in our social media use like we should develop mindful habits in eating. Just like we stop to wash our hands before eating, we should stop to think before scrolling and especially before sharing.
“Just as we avoid binge eating junk food, especially when bored, we should avoid binge scrolling low-quality content. We need mindful habits to prevent emotional content from triggering our ‘system one’ thinking – of fast and automatic responses – which bypasses our media literacy.”
A handful of social media users and content producers interviewed by CNA TODAY said that they are aware of the need to practise these hygiene tips – adding that they have become more alert about doing so lately.
Ms Krysta Joy D’Souza, 26, said that given the prevalence of misinformation on social media, she is now much more careful over the type of content she interacts with and the amount of time she spends on the different platforms.
The musician and content creator said she tries to cross-reference information she consumes on social media with other reliable sources online, and engages in conversations with people whom she knows are experts in that specific field.
“I also intentionally engage in conversation with people outside of social media to ensure I am not stuck in an echo chamber while scrolling through my phone,” she added.
The State Department froze passport applications requesting gender identity changes or the nonbinary “X” sex marker. IleShadow2/X
The State Department froze passport applications requesting gender identity changes or the nonbinary “X” sex marker after Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered the move under an executive order signed on President Trump’s first day back in office.
“The policy of the United States is that an individual’s sex is not changeable,” Rubio said in an internal email to staff on Thursday, obtained by The Guardian. The directive explicitly states sex, not gender, is to be used in official documentation, including passports and consular birth records.
Per the new guidelines, staff must “suspend any application requesting an X sex marker” and halt processing for applicants seeking to change their sex marker under the executive order’s definition. The policy impacts both current and future passport applications.
The order, titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” mandates all federal identification documents reflect “an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female.”
While existing passports with an “X” designation remain valid, renewal options are expected to face complications per NOTUS. Guidance on handling such cases will be provided through other channels, according to Rubio’s email.
“As of today US Citizens can now request an X mark Gender”
In 2022 American passports allowed an ‘X’ as Gender option.
Trump is changing this law – these passports will no longer work – this will upset a lot of people.
Two women accused Spirit Airlines of sexism after being removed from a flight in October for wearing crop tops, the airline has introduced a new policy banning such attire. New York Post
Spirit Airlines is shaking up its in-flight policies with a new dress code unveiled Wednesday that could leave some passengers grounded for wearing “revealing” clothing or displaying “offensive” tattoos.
Under the updated terms of Spirit’s Contract of Carriage, passengers are prohibited from wearing see-through outfits, exposing private parts, or displaying lewd, obscene, or offensive body art.
The budget carrier clarified that guests agree to these terms when booking their tickets, making adherence mandatory.
The policy comes after an October incident captured in a viral video, where two women accused Spirit Airlines of sexism after being removed from a flight for wearing crop tops.
Bill Gates admitted his split from Melinda Gates after 27 years of marriage will always be the thing he regrets most in his life.
“I’m more cheerful now,” he admitted in an interview with the Times of London, published Saturday, but added that the unravelling of his marriage is “the mistake I most regret.”
Though he might have other failures, the Microsoft co-founder, 69, said the divorce is “at the top of the list.”
“There are others but none that matter,” he said. “The divorce thing was miserable for me and Melinda for at least two years.”
Bill Gates said his divorce from ex-wife Melinda Gates was one of his biggest regrets. Getty Images for Robin Hood
The pair — who are both dating other people now — have maintained a friendly relationship following their split.
“Melinda and I still see each other — we have three kids and two grandchildren so there are family events. The kids are doing well. They have good values,” Bill said.
Elsewhere in the profile, the billionaire said the couple’s marriage kept him “grounded” as he created his trillion-dollar company.
Bill and Melinda married in 1994 and share kids Jennifer, 28, Rory, 25, and Phoebe, 22. The couple confirmed their split in May 2021, though they’d been separated for a year before the announcement.
Melinda, 60, said that being separated during the Covid-19 pandemic helped give her clarity about the state of their marriage.
“It gave us the privacy to do what needed to be done in private,” she said in a June 2024 interview.
Though, the philanthropist has also admitted that while their split was the “healthier choice,” it was the “lowest moment” in her life.
During a 2022 interview with Savannah Guthrie, Bill admitted he “caused pain” when she confronted him about a report that he’d had an affair with a Microsoft employee.
“I certainly made mistakes, and I take responsibility,” he replied, adding, “I don’t think delving into the particulars at this point is constructive, but yes, I caused pain, and I feel terrible about that.”
Melinda, meanwhile, said another factor that led to the end of the marriage was Bill’s relationship with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
“I did not like that he had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, no. I made that clear to him,” she told Gayle King in 2022. “He was abhorrent. He was evil personified.”
A fallen tree on Cyprus Avenue, east Belfast. Pic: PA
Storm Eowyn was “probably the strongest” to hit the UK in at least a decade, according to the Met Office – and in some areas was the most intense in “20 or 30 years”.
But don’t expect settled weather because Storm Eowyn has gone, Sky News meteorologist Dr Chris England warned.
“The Spanish-named Storm Herminia will bring heavy rain, gales and hill snow up from the South West tomorrow and on Monday,” he said.
“It won’t be as windy as Friday, but with trees and structures already damaged in places, there’s a greater risk than normal with a storm of this intensity.”
More than a million people in the UK were left without power, and there was significant travel disruption across the UK and Ireland.
On Friday, a 100mph gust was recorded at Drumalbin in South Lanarkshire, Scotland, and parts of Ireland had the highest windspeeds since records began, getting up to 114mph in Mace Head, County Galway.
As of around 5pm on Saturday, SP Energy Networks in Scotland said 28,000 customers were still cut off.
In Northern Ireland, 140,000 homes and businesses remained without power and across the Republic of Ireland, around 460,000 had no power.
A Cobra meeting was held on Saturday to discuss Storm Eowyn and the government will “stand ready to provide further support”, a spokesperson said.
Engineers have been dispatched to Northern Ireland and Scotland, they said.
Scotland’s First Minister John Swinney has appealed for “patience” as work is carried out to restore power supplies and transport services in the storm’s aftermath.
On Friday, people all over Scotland were urged to stay indoors to avoid injury in hurricane-force winds, as a rare Met Office red weather warning was issued for much of the south of the country.
Among the buildings affected was a Co-op store in Scotland which collapsed on Friday after Storm Eowyn passed through Denny, Falkirk.
Man killed by falling tree
A man who died in County Donegal after a tree fell on his car during the storm has been named as 20-year-old Kacper Dudek. The incident happened around 5.30am on Friday at Feddyglass in Raphoe.
Police forensic collision investigators are carrying out a full examination of the scene.
What’s the forecast like for the next few days?
Although the storm has now cleared the UK, it will remain windy in the coming days, with “numerous yellow wind warnings” in place, the Met Office said.
Saturday into Sunday
A yellow warning for snow and ice runs from 6pm on Saturday to 10am on Sunday and covers large parts of Scotland and Northern Ireland, with a yellow wind warning from 6pm on Saturday to 6am on Sunday for the Highlands and Strathclyde.
Sunday
A yellow wind warning has been issued for parts of North West England, South West England, Northern Ireland, Wales and southwest Scotland, running from 8am until 3pm on Sunday.
“Winds are likely to gust 50 to 60mph quite widely, and around some exposed coasts and hills, gusts to 70mph are possible,” forecasters said.
Also, a yellow warning for heavy rain which may lead to local flooding will be in place from 8am on Sunday until 6am on Monday.
The warning was issued on Thursday and covers the East Midlands, West Midlands, North West England, South West England, East of England, London, South East England and Wales.
“Quite widely, 10-20mm will fall, with locally nearer 30-50mm over high ground,” said the Met Office.
Monday
For the start of the week, a yellow wind warning lasting from 6am on Monday to 6am on Tuesday has been issued covering the East of England, London and the South East, and the South West as well as much of Wales.
Gusts of 60 or 70mph are possible near the coast, with potential gusts of 50mph inland, said the Met Office.
Some coastal routes, sea fronts and coastal communities will probably be affected by spray or large waves.
The agency added that some disruption to transport and short-term power outages were likely.
There is also a yellow warning for heavy rain from 6am to 11.59pm on Monday that could bring “some disruption and flooding” in the West Midlands and much of Wales.
Elon Musk made a surprise appearance at a far-right campaign event in Germany where he urged supporters to move beyond their “past guilt”.
Speaking via video link to a hall of around 4,500 Alternative for Germany (AfD) supporters in the central city of Halle, the world’s richest man said: “It’s good to be proud of German culture, German values, and not to lose that in some sort of multiculturalism that dilutes everything.”
Mr Musk caused outrage last week after making a gesture at Donald Trump’s inauguration which many compared to a Nazi salute.
At the rally on Saturday he made an apparent reference to Germany’s Nazi past, saying “children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents, let alone their great grandparents”.
He added: “There is too much focus on past guilt, and we need to move beyond that.”
Speaking in favour of the far-right party, Mr Musk told the crowd: “I’m very excited for the AfD, I think you’re really the best hope for Germany. Fight for a great future for Germany.”
It was the second time in the last two weeks Mr Musk has publicly spoken in support of the anti-immigration, anti-Islamic party, which has been labelled right-wing-extremist by German security services.
He previously hosted AfD leader Alice Weidel in an interview on X, raising concerns of election meddling.
Tens of thousands protest against far-right
Meanwhile tens of thousands of anti-far right campaigners protested in Berlin and other German cities on Saturday.
A huge crowd at the capital city’s Brandenburg Gate sang anti-fascist songs and carried banners denouncing the AfD.
It comes after the three-party governing coalition led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz collapsed last year.
Towana Looney. Pic: Ms Looney / NYU Langone Health
A US woman has become the world’s longest-living recipient of a pig organ transplant, after living healthily with her new kidney for 61 days.
Towana Looney, 53, received the experimental organ in November after spending nearly eight years on the organ transplant list with little hope of finding a match.
She donated a kidney to her mother in 1999 but developed kidney failure several years later after a complication during pregnancy.
But now, she said she feels like “superwoman” after the successful transplant, laughing about outpacing family members on long walks around New York City.
“It’s a new take on life,” she told the Associated Press news agency.
She left the hospital just 11 days after her operation and is staying in New York for another month to be observed by doctors before heading home to Alabama.
Only four other Americans have received transplants of gene-edited pig organs and none lived for more than two months.
“If you saw her on the street, you would have no idea that she’s the only person in the world walking around with a pig organ inside them that’s functioning,” said Dr Robert Montgomery from NYU Langone Health, who led Ms Looney’s transplant.
Dr Montgomery called Ms Looney’s kidney function “absolutely normal”.
Ms Looney’s success means her medical team are now in unchartered territory.
“The truth is we don’t really know what the next hurdles are because this is the first time we’ve gotten this far,” Dr Montgomery said.
“We’ll have to continue to really keep a close eye on her.”
Genetically altered pig organs could help solve a severe shortage of organs available for transplant.
There are around 7,500 people on the UK Transplant Waiting List, according to the NHS.
Last year more than 415 people died while waiting for a transplant.
In the US, more than 100,000 people are waiting for a transplant, most who need a kidney.
“It’s a blessing,” said Looney. “I feel like I’ve been given another chance at life. I cannot wait to be able to travel again and spend more quality time with my family and grandchildren.”
There have been no UK transplants like Ms Looney’s, but in the US a handful of hospitals are sharing information about what worked and what did not.
That’s in preparation for the world’s first formal studies of xenotransplantation, which is expected to begin some time this year.
Clean-up operations in the Black Sea beach town resort of AnapaImage: Dmitry Feoktistov/dpa//TASS/picture alliance
A wave of cancellations is sweeping through spas and children’s camps in Anapa, a Russian town on the Black Sea, as many Russians abandon their holiday plans in the southern Krasnodar region because of pollution from a huge December 2024 oil spill washing onto the beaches.
According to the Telegram channel Kub Mash, “parents don’t want to send their children to the hazardous coastline.” It also reported that companies that had issued travel vouchers to employees as bonuses were now demanding refunds.
Speaking to the Russian paper Parlamentskaya Gazeta, the head of Russia’s State Duma Committee on Family Affairs, Nina Ostanina, said that bookings at Anapa’s children’s recreation and health retreats had plummeted by more than 27% in January and 40% for the summer.
The oil spillbegan when a storm hit two aging Russian tankers traveling through the Kerch Strait, which separates Russia from the Crimea, a peninsula in Ukraine currently occupied by Russia. One ship sank and the other was damaged when it ran aground.
Ongoing environmental disaster
Fuel oil continues to leak into the sea from the sunken tanker with Russian authorities reporting that they couldn’t weld the damaged part of the ship closed because it was too close to the oil.
According to official reports, up to 5,000 of the 9,200 tons of mazut, a heavy, low-quality oil product, being transported by the tankers may have already leaked into the sea.
The mazut has been settling on the seabed and washing ashore, contaminating at least 50 kilometers (31 miles) of coastline, mostly around Anapa.
While Russia’s Emergencies Ministry claims that there is no effective method to clean up this type of oil, environmental experts have said that appropriate methods have been available since 2002, when the Prestige tanker carrying similar heavy fule oil sank off the Spanish coast, polluting some 2,000 kilometers of coastline.
Meanwhile, Russian officials are warning of further problems in the summer, when rising temperatures cause the oil to dissolve and wash ashore in greater amounts.
Severe consequences for wildlife and people
Eugene Simonov, of the environmental protection group Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group, told DW it could take a decade for ecosystems to recover. “This oil spill could have disastrous consequences for some species,” he said.
The environmental organization Greenpeace reported the deaths of 32 dolphins and 1,355 birds as of early January. Anna Jerzak, an expert with the organization for Central and Eastern Europe, told DW that high concentrations of hydrocarbons had a toxic effect on fish, disrupting food chains and causing populations to decline.
“In the long term, oil products poison seaweeds, which destroys the habitats of a number of organisms,” she said.
Looking to the upcoming summer, Simonov said that the heavy fuel also posed health risks to swimmers. “People may experience a bad smell, for many, it will worsen existing respiratory issues, and all of this can have carcinogenic effects,” he said.
Greenpeace’s Jerzak also warned that toxic fumes, allergic reactions and skin inflammation were also likely.
Volunteers step in despite government inaction
Some 10,000 volunteers are helping with the clean up movement, which arose spontaneously, said ecologist Evgeny Vitishko.
Some 2,500 birds have been rescued so far, he said.
“That’s about half the birds affected by the oil spill, which is higher than the global average. Usually, only about 10-12% are rescued,” Vitishko said, adding that he was lobbying for a bird rehabilitation center where the rescued wildlife could be kept for three to six months.
“We’ve only got a month left before there are no more birds left to save,” he said.
One helper explained that the volunteer network had initially been funded by donations. In time, volunteers began asking donors to order the necessary supplies and gear online and have it shipped directly to the volunteer center.
All volunteers receive free lodging and provisions from local hotels, whose own survival depends on the upcoming summer season.
Authorities call for stricter monitoring
Initially, authorities had provided volunteers with protective suits from China, as DW learned, and the distribution of special gear was slow at best.
But even if these issues have since been resolved, many volunteers are under the impression that they, not the state, are the ones doing most of the clean-up. They complain that government representatives are only interfering with their work.
Apparently, in a ministerial meeting, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin had called upon those in office to engage more actively in clean-up duties.
When employees of Russian Environment Ministry visited Anapa in early January, they caused a scandal when they released some 160 rescued birds without consulting local volunteers in advance.
“They did it as a PR stunt,” one helper told DW. The incident took a tragic turn, when nearly all the birds that had been released were found dead along the coast the following day. Experts explained that the oil had damaged the natural insulation lining in the birds’ feathers, which hadn’t had the chance to recover in such a short period.
When you think of flowers, you probably think of gorgeous, delicate blossoms giving off the most soothing, pleasant scents. But nature gifted some with a decidedly more distinct aroma—like the corpse flower, which treats those near it to the smell of rotting flesh with each pungent bloom.
The corpse flower is an endangered plant, but two are kept safely in greenhouses on opposite sides of the world. There’s the ever-popular Putricia, affectionately named after its “putrid” smell, residing in the Royal Sydney Botanic Garden. And then there’s Smelliot, housed in New York City’s Brooklyn Botanic Garden.
Both Putricia and Smelliot graced their many fans with a rare bloom this week, with the Aussie flower bursting with decaying goodness on Thursday and its American counterpart following suit on Friday.
These enormous flowers can grow up to 9 feet tall, but Putricia stands at a petite 5 feet 3 inches. Smelliot is a tad taller at just under 6 feet.
Who would voluntarily inhale the sweet, sweet aroma of rotting flesh? A lot of people, apparently. Putricia’s many admirers waited hours in the Australian heat to get a good whiff of the temporarily blooming plant. Meanwhile, New Yorkers called out of work Friday to experience Smelliot’s acrid odor.
It’s not every day you can catch the “briny, dead fish” smell of the corpse flower, even if you’re a resident of Sydney or NYC. Putricia was the only one to bloom in the Royal Sydney Botanic Garden in 15 years. Smelliot’s bloom represented a first for the Brooklyn Botanic Garden.
Deportation flights take off from US as Donald Trump orders first wave of brutal mass exodus (Image: White House)
As a part of his ongoing effort to carry out mass-deportations throughout the country, President Donald Trump has employed the use of Department of Defense resources to return many migrants to their home countries.
Publicly available data suggests that using U.S. Military planes to fly migrants out of the country may be significantly more expensive than flights chartered by the Department of Homeland Security.
A US defense official told CNN that the military has not begun to calculate the costs of the flight since a national emergency was declared by Trump on Monday, and officials are moving as quickly as possible with little regard to cost, the official said.
The DOD reported on Wednesday that they would be providing two C-17s and two C-130E planes to help with what are known as “migrant repatriation flights.”
According to the DOD comptroller, as of fall 2022, the average hourly cost of operating a C-17 was about $21,000 and the average hourly cost of operating a C-130E was between $68,000 and $71,000. Based on these figures it can be estimated that the C-17 flight on Thursday that carried 80 migrants from El Paso, Texas to Guatemala City would have cost roughly $252,000. For the same 12-hour flight using the C-130E, it would cost between $816,000 and $852,000.
In comparison, a flight directly chartered by DHS’ Immigration and Customs Enforcement is $8,577, according to estimates posted by the agency.
Along with the military flights active duty troops have been deployed to the border to assist with the deportations and the Pentagon will likely move funds within its budget authorized by Congress for “unforeseen, high-priority missions,” retired Gen. Glen VanHerck, the former commander of US Northern Command, told CNN.
Troops have already arrived in various areas of the southern border, including 1,500 Marines from combat engineer battalions at Camp Pendleton, California.
ICE raids have already begun throughout the country, including one in New Jersey on Thursday, which saw several U.S. citizens, including, a U.S. military veteran detained by ICE. Newark Mayor Mayor Ras Baraka said in a statement that ICE “raided a local establishment” According to Baraka the agents did not produce a warrant and did detain several undocumented immigrants in addition to the U.S. citizens.
A “fiery” phone call between Trump and Mette Frederiksen has reignited the debate over Greenland’s future
The notion of the United States purchasing Greenland has been a topic of discussion for months, but recent developments suggest that President Trump’s administration is more serious about the proposition than initially thought.
A “fiery” phone call between President Donald Trump and Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has reignited the debate over Greenland’s future, with the US leader’s intentions remaining unclear.
Trump’s unwavering stance on taking over Greenland, despite officials’ repeated assertions that it’s not for sale, has left many in Denmark and Greenland reeling.
At the heart of Trump’s interest in Greenland lies its strategic importance for national security. The island is rich in minerals crucial for technology and defense, including rare earth elements used in mobile phones, electric vehicles, and weapons. With China dominating the global rare earth market, Greenland’s reserves have become increasingly vital to the US.
Trump has been wanting to take over the island nation of 56,000 people since his first term.
Greenland’s location, straddling the shortest route between Europe and North America, makes it a critical spot for the US military and its ballistic missile early-warning system. As China and Russia expand their influence in the Arctic, the US seeks to maintain its dominance in the region.
Brian Hughes, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, told Fox that Trump has made it clear “the safety and security of Greenland is important to the United States as China and Russia make significant investments throughout the Arctic region. The President is committed to not only protecting U.S. interests in the Arctic but also working with Greenland to ensure mutual prosperity for both nations”.
“He was very firm,” a source told the Financial Times, describing Trump’s tone during the phone call. “It was a cold shower. Before, it was hard to take it seriously. But I do think it is serious, and potentially very dangerous.”
The phone call was “fiery” with one official calling it “horrendous”, per the Financial Times.
The call “utterly freaked out” the Danes, one Danish official said. “The intent was very clear,” another official told the outlet. “They want it. The Danes are now in crisis mode.”
Trump’s aggressive pursuit of Greenland has been met with resistance from Denmark and Greenland. Frederiksen has emphasised that Greenland is not for sale, and its Prime Minister, Mute Edege, has reiterated that the island’s people do not want to be part of the US.
However, repeatedly, the US says that Greenland is important for its national security. Despite Frederiksen’s offer to increase the cooperation between Greenland and US on military bases and resources, Trump was aggressive and confrontational. Moreover he has not ruled out the possible use of military force in Greenland.
“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity,” Trump wrote on Truth Social last month.
The C.I.A. has said for years that it did not have enough information to conclude whether the Covid pandemic emerged naturally from a wet market in Wuhan, China, or from an accidental leak at a research lab there.
But the agency issued a new assessment this week, with analysts saying they now favor the lab theory.
That shift is based on “the available body of reporting,” although the other theory remains plausible, a spokeswoman for the agency said, adding that the agency will continue to evaluate any available credible new intelligence reporting.
Some American officials say the debate matters little: The Chinese government failed to either regulate its markets or oversee its labs. But others argue it is an important intelligence and scientific question.
John Ratcliffe, the new director of the C.I.A., has long favored the lab leak hypothesis. He has said it is a critical piece of intelligence that needs to be understood and that it has consequences for U.S.-Chinese relations.
The announcement of the shift came shortly after Mr. Ratcliffe told Breitbart News he no longer wanted the agency “on the sidelines” of the debate over the origins of the Covid pandemic. Mr. Ratcliffe has long said he believes that the virus most likely emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Officials said the agency was not bending its views to a new boss, and that the new assessment had been in the works for some time.
In the final weeks of the Biden administration, Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, ordered a new classified review of the pandemic’s origin. As part of that review, the agency’s previous director, William J. Burns, told analysts that they needed to take a position on the origins of Covid, though he was agnostic on which theory they should embrace, a senior U.S. intelligence official said.
Another senior U.S. official said it was Mr. Ratcliffe’s decision to declassify and release the new analysis.
There is no new intelligence behind the agency’s shift. Rather it is based on the same evidence it has been chewing over for months.
The analysis, however, is based in part on a closer look at the conditions in the high security labs in Wuhan province before the pandemic outbreak, according to people familiar with the agency’s work.
Since the outbreak of the pandemic, questions have swirled around whether the two labs handling coronaviruses in Wuhan had followed safety protocols strictly enough.
The agency made its new assessment with “low confidence,” which means the intelligence behind it is fragmentary and contradictory.
Even in the absence of hard intelligence, the lab leak hypothesis has been gaining ground inside spy agencies. But some analysts question the wisdom of shifting a position in absence of new information.
Former officials say they are not averse to a new examination of the Covid origins intelligence by the Trump administration. President Biden ordered a new review of the intelligence early in his administration after officials told the White House they had still-unexamined evidence.
Mr. Ratcliffe has raised questions about politicization in the intelligence agencies. Mr. Ratcliffe, who was the director of national intelligence in the first Trump administration, argued in an essay for Fox News in 2023 that the C.I.A. did not want to embrace the lab leak to avoid geopolitical problems for the Biden administration.
“The real problem is, the only assessment the agency could make — which is that a virus that killed over a million Americans originated in a C.C.P.-controlled lab whose research included work for the Chinese military — has enormous geopolitical implications that the Biden administration does not want to face head-on,” he said in the piece, which was written with Cliff Sims, a top aide. C.C.P. refers to China’s Communist Party.
Mr. Ratcliffe said on Thursday, when he was sworn in, that a look at the origins of Covid was a “Day 1” priority.
“I think our intelligence, our science and our common sense all really dictate that the origins of Covid was a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he told Breitbart. “But the C.I.A. has not made that assessment or at least not made that assessment publicly. So I’m going to focus on that and look at the intelligence and make sure that the public is aware that the agency is going to get off the sidelines.”
Senior intelligence officials in the Biden administration defend their process and methodology. They have said that no intelligence was suppressed and insist that politics did not play into their analysis.
These officials say that there are powerful logical arguments for both the lab leak and the natural causes theories, but that there simply is no decisive piece of intelligence on either side of the issue.
To boost the natural origins theory, intelligence officers would like to find the animal that passed it to a human or find a bat carrying what was the likely ancestor of the coronavirus that causes Covid.
Similarly, to seal the lab leak, the intelligence community would like to find evidence that one of the labs in Wuhan was working on a progenitor virus that directly led to the epidemic.
Neither piece of evidence has been found.
But Mr. Ratcliffe has promised a more aggressive C.I.A., and it is possible that he will order more actions to penetrate the labs in Wuhan or the Chinese government in a search for information.
It will not be an easy secret to steal. The senior ranks of the Chinese government do not know, and do not want to know, American officials have said. So if there is intelligence, it is probably hidden in a place that is hard to get to.
Intelligence officials interviewed in recent weeks say it is possible that such a piece of evidence exists in a lab in China, at least in theory. But, they said, it is still more likely that the answers to questions surrounding the virus’s origins will come through a scientific breakthrough, not an intelligence revelation.
All bird keepers, from people with pet birds to farmers with huge flocks, are now required to follow strict hygiene measures imposed by the government – and in some counties, birds must be kept indoors.
File pic: APRestrictions have been placed on the whole of England and Scotland to try to slow the spread of bird flu.
All bird keepers, from people with pet birds to farmers with huge flocks, are now required to follow strict hygiene measures imposed by the government.
In some counties, mostly across the east of England, even stricter rules are being put in place that mean birds must be kept indoors.
“I urge bird keepers to check which requirements apply to them,” said the UK chief veterinary officer, Christine Middlemiss.
“Continue to exercise robust biosecurity measures, remain alert for any signs of disease and report suspected disease immediately to the Animal and Plant Health Agency.”
Although the risk to humans is still low, according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), bird flu cases are rising around the world.
In the US, about 10% of the nation’s egg-laying hens have been culled, leading to soaring egg prices.
The New York Times reported that shops and restaurants are now paying a record $7 (£5.60) for a dozen eggs, up from $2.25 (£1.80) last autumn.
In the UK, the average egg price increased by 16% between early 2023 and early 2024, according to the government’s most recent figures.
Properly cooked poultry products, including eggs, are still safe to eat, according to DEFRA.
A housing order has been extended and from Monday will apply in York, North Yorkshire and Shropshire, and remains in force across East Riding of Yorkshire, the City of Kingston Upon Hull, Lincolnshire, Norfolk and Suffolk.
Mandatory housing also applies within 3km of any infected premises.
Since November, 22 confirmed avian flu cases have been found in England, with one in Scotland.
Four female Israeli soldiers who were taken in the attack that sparked the war in Gaza returned to Israel on Saturday after Hamas militants paraded them before a crowd of thousands in Gaza City and handed them over to the Red Cross. Israel later released 200 Palestinian prisoners in the second exchange of a fragile ceasefire.
The four Israelis smiled, waved and gave the thumbs-up from a stage in Palestine Square, with armed, masked militants on either side as Hamas sought to show it remained in control in Gaza after 15 months of war. The hostages likely acted under duress. Previously released ones said they were held in brutal conditions and forced to record propaganda videos.
Israel’s Prison Service said it released 200 Palestinians, including 121 people serving life sentences after being convicted of deadly attacks against Israelis, while others were held without charge.
Thousands of Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank city of Ramallah celebrated their arrival. Wan-looking and wearing gray prison sweatsuits, some donned Hamas headbands given to them by the crowd and rode on supporters’ shoulders.
In the deal’s first major crisis, Israel said it would not allow displaced Palestinians to return to northern Gaza by Sunday as anticipated, because civilian hostage Arbel Yehoud was not released as expected.
As mediators addressed that, hundreds of Palestinians gathered near the east-west Netzarim corridor dividing Gaza.
“Why are they treating us like this?” asked one man, Khalil Abd. Families huddled around bonfires against the winter cold.
Israeli forces shot and killed a Palestinian man close to the Netzarim corridor, Palestinian medical officials said. Israel’s military said it fired warning shots in response to “gatherings of dozens of suspects.” It said it was unaware of anyone harmed.
Israel insists on release of civilian hostage Arbel Yehoud
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said Israel would not allow Palestinians into northern Gaza until Yehoud, taken from a kibbutz in Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the war, was freed.
Hamas said it held Israel responsible for “any delay in implementing the agreement and its repercussions.”
A senior Hamas official said the group informed mediators that Yehoud will be released next week. An Egyptian official involved in negotiations called the matter a “minor issue” that mediators were working to resolve. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
The U.S. National Security Council continues to push for Yehoud’s release, a spokesperson said.
The ceasefire began last weekend with the release of three hostages and 90 prisoners. It is aimed at winding down the deadliest and most destructive war ever fought between Israel and Hamas. The deal has allowed for a surge of aid into tiny, devastated Gaza.
Who are the soldiers and prisoners released?
The four Israeli soldiers, Karina Ariev, 20, Daniella Gilboa, 20, Naama Levy, 20, and Liri Albag, 19, were taken from Nahal Oz base near the border with Gaza when Palestinian militants overran it, killing more than 60 soldiers.
The four squealed as they hurried to embrace loved ones. Thousands of people danced and celebrated as the soldiers arrived by helicopter near a Tel Aviv hospital, which said they were in stable condition.
“I had goosebumps watching them,” said Aviv Bercovich in Tel Aviv’s Hostages Square. “I just want the war to end.”
Thousands of Israelis gathered there again Saturday night to call for all hostages to be freed, amid fears the war will resume.
A fifth female soldier in the unit, Agam Berger, 20, also was abducted. “Now she’s there alone,” said family friend Yoni Collins.
In Gaza City, resident Radwan Abu Rawiya also watched the handover. “This is huge,” he said. “People forgot about the war, destruction and are celebrating.”
A video released by Hamas’ armed wing showed the hostages thanking the militants in Arabic for the “good treatment,” again likely under duress.
Israel’s army spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari criticized Hamas’ “cynical” display. He also said Israel is concerned about the two youngest hostages — Kfir and Ariel Bibas — and their mother, Shiri. Kfir Bibas marked his second birthday in captivity this month.
Reimagining Cinderella as a horror-comedy about the misery women endure to be attractive in the hopes of catching men’s eyes, The Ugly Stepsister—which just premiered at the Sundance Film Festival—assumes an alternate POV and piles on the gore, but says merely muddled things about vanity and misogyny.
As a crude plastic surgeon’s sign overtly announces, beauty is pain in this fairy tale, and young Elvira (a captivating Lea Myren) is more than willing to stomach it so long as she has a shot at royalty. Alas, what she learns is a rather obvious and pedestrian lesson, if one that’s embellished with a few memorably macabre sights.
In a distant land, Elvira, her sister Alma (Flo Fagerli), and their mother Rebekka (Ane Dahl Torp) arrive at the manor house of Otto (Ralph Carlsson), whom Rebekka is set to marry. Otto has a lovely blonde daughter named Agnes (Thea Sofie Loch Næss) who doesn’t look too kindly upon her stepmother and stepsiblings, and her fortunes take a nosedive when Otto suddenly dies on his wedding night, leaving her at the mercy of her new relatives.
For Rebekka, however, the real tragedy isn’t the loss of her sugar daddy but the revelation that he was penniless. As a result, she eagerly humors Elvira’s fantasies of marrying local Prince Julian (Isac Calmroth), whose book of poetry she religiously reads when not clutching it to her bosom and indulging in fantasies about him sweeping her off her feet to transport her into a future of wealth, romance, and bliss.
Elvira’s problem is that she’s the title character of The Ugly Stepsister: Her complexion is blotchy, her hair is a mess, and her teeth are encased in unsightly metal braces. Thanks to her fondness for cakes, she also has a supposedly doughy figure, although the evidence on display in an early nude scene—in which she inspects her body, unflatteringly, in the mirror—seemingly contradicts this portrayal.
Nonetheless, Norwegian writer/director Emilie Blichfeldt’s point is clear, and it continues to be so as Elvira is put through the surgical makeover grinder. To combat her weight, a finishing school headmistress (Cecilia Forss) has her ingest a tapeworm. To deal with her smile, her braces are removed with giant metal pliers. And to correct her imperfect profile, her nose is broken with a hammer and pick, leaving her with a swollen and bloodied proboscis that she covers with a metal snout affixed to her face via head straps, making her look like an iron-masked monster.
After Agnes is caught screwing the stableboy in the barn (complete with close-ups of his erect member and its gooey ejaculate), she’s officially consigned to serve as the household’s domestic Cinderella. Elvira, meanwhile, suffers the slings and arrows of her dance instructor (Katarzyna Herman) and eats whatever she can find to satisfy her constantly gurgling stomach—the byproduct of the tapeworm’s insatiable appetite.
It’s all quite ghastly and Blichfeldt drenches it in a wispy haziness that complements the action’s sense of lavish decay. An early pan across a dinner table that’s decorated with flowers, feathers, and candles, and which ends with the sight of Otto’s dead face, sums up the film’s gone-to-seed aesthetics, as well as the underlying corruption of this voracious milieu.
In its Grand Guignol depiction of Elvira’s painful cosmetic ordeal, The Ugly Stepsister appears to think it’s being funny, yet there’s little actual humor to its tale, which more or less follows Cinderella’s narrative template.
The tweaks to that formula include Cinderella’s mother serving as her fairy godmother and her blue dress—torn to shreds by a mad-with-jealousy Elvira—being repaired by maggots instead of silkworms. A variety of other touches similarly contribute to its off-kilter squishiness. At the same time, Elvira’s early forest encounter with Prince Julian and his buddies indicates that he might not be the ideal hunk she imagined, what with him telling his pals that he has no preference when it comes to his women being virgins or whores—and that the castle is out of butter because he’s been busy using it as a sexual lubricant.
While Myren’s Elvira isn’t blind to the appalling nature of her circumstances, she’s so zealously consumed with fulfilling her dream that she’s prepared to go to any lengths to achieve it. This, along with the grisliness of her transformation (which additionally involves stitching fake lashes onto her eyelids), is Blichfeldt’s way of slamming the beauty industrial complex.
Frustratingly, though, the writer/director doesn’t grapple with the fact that women of this era and culture had scant opportunities for self-sufficiency and, thus, options other than to court marriage—a fact that gets in the way of the film’s censure of Elvira’s focus on her exterior. Moreover, it says nothing about the fact that Cinderella, per tradition, winds up with Prince Julian despite his well-dramatized loutishness.
The problem, it seems, is that there’s no way to fully transform Cinderella into a feminist critique if Cinderella still gets her customary happily-ever-after; so long as her beauty and goodness (which are equated) win the day, how wrong can Elvira and her compatriots be for thinking that using their physical attributes to woo (awful) men is the surest path to money, comfort, and love?
Donald Trump ordered a 90-day pause in foreign development assistance hours after taking office. Pic: Reuters
The US State Department has ordered a freeze on new funding for almost all American foreign development assistance following an executive order issued by Donald Trump.
Hours after taking office on Monday, the US president ordered a 90-day pause in US-funded global projects pending a review of their efficiency and to check they are consistent with his foreign policy.
Secretary of state Marco Rubio’s directive excludes funding for emergency food programmes and military aid to Israel and Egypt. However, it remains to be seen whether it will affect the flow of vital US military assistance to Ukraine to help it fend off Russia’s invasion.
Joe Biden’s administration stepped up military aid to Ukraine before he left office due to doubts over whether Mr Trump would continue funding Kyiv.
Around $3.85bn (£3bn) in funding for future arms shipments to Ukraine – authorised by the US Congress – remains, but it is unclear whether Mr Trump will decide to spend it or not.
The US provides more foreign aid than any country around the world and budgeted around $60bn (£48bn), or 1% of the US budget, in 2023.
The waiver for emergency food programmes comes as humanitarian aid surges into the Gaza Strip following the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, and amid famine in war-torn Sudan.
But the order has been criticised by humanitarian officials because it did not exclude life-saving health programmes such as clinics and immunisation programmes.
Abby Maxman, head of Oxfam America, warned suspending funding “could have life or death consequences” for children and families around the world.
“By suspending foreign development assistance, the Trump administration is threatening the lives and futures of communities in crisis, and abandoning the United States’ long-held bipartisan approach to foreign assistance which supports people based on need, regardless of politics,” she added.
There is likely to be little impact on military assistance to Ukraine
On the face of it, this decision looks set to have wide-ranging consequences for the application of US aid globally.
Officials within the State Department and within the US Agency for International Development (USAID) are themselves working to understand the impact of the directive.
The consequences are likely to be widespread across the substantial foreign assistance portfolio.
We can expect significant confusion within USAID offices globally as well as within government departments of recipient countries.
In terms of Ukraine, there is likely to be little impact on the military assistance being provided because this has come from a mechanism known as a “presidential drawdown”, rather than a foreign assistance grant.
Former president Joe Biden also sought to “pre-load” his administration’s support for Ukraine in order to “Trump proof” it from precisely this sort of policy shift.
However, the new directive may impact economic aid for Ukraine and other programmes like de-mining.
We can expect plenty of shock policy shifts like this in many different areas as Mr Trump’s team takes control. It will take time to understand the impact these decisions have.
The order by Mr Rubio, which was delivered in a cable to US embassies worldwide, said the pause was necessary to ensure “appropriations are not duplicated, are effective, and are consistent with President Trump’s foreign policy”.
Standards for a review of all foreign assistance are expected to be set within the next month to ensure it is “aligned with President Trump’s foreign policy agenda,” the global cable said.
JFK waves at the crowds in Dallas shortly before his death. Pic: AP/Jim Altgens
Conspiracy theorists will be eagerly waiting to pour over thousands of classified files on former US president John F Kennedy’s assassination after Donald Trump signed an executive order to release them.
“That’s a big one, huh? A lot of people have been waiting for this for years, for decades,” Mr Trump said as he signed the order.
Some critics – including JFK’s grandson – have condemned the move, suggesting the president is using the notorious 1963 killing as a “political prop”.
Whatever his motives, the president is right; people have waited decades to learn more about the shooting of Kennedy.
Conspiracy theories have flourished in the decades since his death – ranging from the potentially plausible to the outlandish.
But what is the official explanation and what are some of the more well-known theories?
The official story: Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone
Kennedy was shot in downtown Dallas on 22 November 1963, as his motorcade passed the Texas School Book Depository building.
Former marine Lee Harvey Oswald, 24, had positioned himself from a sniper’s perch on the sixth floor of the building and fired multiple shots, killing the president, according to the official story.
Two days after Kennedy was killed, nightclub owner Jack Ruby fatally shot Oswald during a jail transfer.
A year after the assassination, president Lyndon Johnson ordered an investigation into the assassination called the Warren Commission, which concluded that Oswald acted alone and there was no evidence of a conspiracy.
Historians note that the investigation’s findings were widely accepted by the public immediately after its release – but scepticism from conspiracy theorists in the years that followed led many to start doubting the official story.
More than one shooter?
Alternative theories put forward include the claim that Oswald was framed – or that a second gunman also opened fire on the president at the same time.
These suggestions were fuelled by several witnesses to the assassination who believed that at least one of the shots came from a different area known as the “grassy knoll”, rather than the Texas School Book Depository.
The official inquiry into the assassination concluded that Oswald fired three times from the building, including one bullet which hit the president’s head and another which missed.
The Warren Commission said another bullet struck the president from behind, before it exited his body via the front of his throat. It then hit and injured Texas Governor John Connally Jr, who was also in the motorcade with Kennedy and his wife Jackie, the inquiry found.
That last bullet has since been referred to as “the magic bullet”, based on the unexpected trajectory it took.
One of the reasons investigators reached the conclusion that the injuries were caused by a single bullet was due to a bullet found on Connally Jr’s stretcher when he arrived at Parkland Memorial Hospital after the shooting.
To them, it showed that the bullet had passed through the president and then hit Connally Jr, before becoming dislodged on the stretcher while he was being treated.
The analysis was a significant factor in the investigators’ conclusion that Oswald acted alone.
But that finding was questioned in 2023 when ex-Secret Service agent Paul Landis, who witnessed the president’s death at close range, released a memoir in which he claimed he found the bullet in the seat of the car Kennedy was sitting in, pocketed it, and put it on the stretcher carrying the president later.
He guessed Kennedy and Connally Jr’s stretchers then somehow collided, meaning the bullet was shaken from one to the other.
This has led some to believe it wasn’t one bullet that caused so much damage to the pair, opening up the possibility that there were more bullets fired – and potentially more shooters involved.
Mr Landis’s claims are disputed by some other Secret Service agents present that day.
It was not the first time such speculation had been put forward.
The US House Select Committee on Assassinations argued in 1978 that more than one gunman was present that day.
Kennedy’s own nephew, Robert F Kennedy Jr, Mr Trump’s pick for health secretary, has also said he is not convinced just one man was behind his uncle’s murder.
This idea in turn has led to plenty of theories about a larger conspiracy involving powerful forces, domestically or internationally.
The US government
The fact there are so many conspiracy theories over JFK highlights the level of mistrust people have in government, according to Dr Darren Reid, associate professor at Coventry University and an expert in American politics and history.
But many of the conspiracies suggest the US government itself was directly involved in Kennedy’s death – though they aren’t always clear about who within the government might have been responsible.
One popular accusation claims Lyndon Johnson, Kennedy’s vice president, ordered the deed. According to the book The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against by libertarian political activist Roger Stone, Kennedy’s successor murdered not only Kennedy, but also several others on his path to political power.
Most believers of this theory say that Johnson had the motivation – a desire for the presidency – and that he worked with a shadowy group of co-conspirators.
The mafia
There are several iterations of the mafia theory, but they typically centre on New Orleans mobster Carlos Marcello, who was deported to Guatemala after Kennedy came to office and charged his brother, Robert, with tackling organised crime as the US attorney general.
When Marcello later made his way back to the United States, he allegedly made threats against the president. He also allegedly made a jailhouse confession of killing the president to an FBI informant.
Mafia conspiracy believers point to a trip Lee Harvey Oswald took to New Orleans prior to the assassination, as well as to the mob ties of Oswald’s killer Jack Ruby.
The CIA
Some Americans blame the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for Kennedy’s death, as they were on rough terms after the Bay of Pigs invasion – a failed military operation the president had ordered in Cuba in 1961.
Classified papers released in 2017 detailed unusual schemes the Kennedy administration and CIA came up with to kill Fidel Castro, who at the time was president of Cuba.
They included giving the leader, known for his love of diving, an exploding seashell or a contaminated diving suit.
Conspiracy theorists believe tension built up after the failed assassination attempt on Castro which led the CIA to retaliate by having Kennedy killed.
CIA conspiracies often overlap with mob conspiracies because of revelations that the agency worked with organised crime on its Castro schemes, at one point hiring an intermediary to approach mafia boss Sam Giancana to offer him “$150,000 to hire some gunman to go into Cuba and kill Castro”.
Fidel Castro
The finger of blame has also been pointed at the Cuban leader, who may have wanted to hit back at American attempts to kill him and overthrow his communist government.
Kennedy’s successor Johnson subscribed to this theory, revealing in two interviews in 1968 and 1969 that he thought Castro was behind the assassination.
Castro denied the allegations, calling the idea “absolute insanity” in a 1977 interview. He said that having the president killed would have been too dangerous for Cuba, as it risked a brutal US retaliation.
Someone else?
Dr Reid says JFK conspiracies are “so prolific” and that there are “too many to name”.
“I don’t think there’s any group or interest group that existed at that time which hasn’t in some way been accused or implicated in it [JFK’s death],” he tells Sky News.
Many, according to polls taken in the US on the subject, simply express dissatisfaction with the official story and believe there are plenty of viable alternatives.
Dr Reid believes the assassination – and the conspiracies around it – have become a part of US culture.
“It was so traumatic that people began to looking for explanations, and because it was an extraordinary event, they started to look for extraordinary explanations.
“The number of people who looked for those explanations in the first instance was relatively small, but over time, they wrote books, they made movies, they told stories, listened to radio broadcasts and watched TV shows.
“This conspiracy was depicted time after time after time, and it just worked its way into the popular culture.”
What documents are being released – and what will they show?
Over half a century after the assassination, there is a collection of over five million records relating to JFK’s death.
It has taken many years for the files to see the light of day. Congress ordered in 1992 that all remaining sealed files relating to the investigation into Kennedy’s death should be fully opened to the public by 2017, except for those the president authorised for further withholding.
In 2017, Mr Trump released a cache of records, but decided to release the remaining documents on a rolling basis.
Joe Biden’s government continued to release some files during his term, and now only a few thousand of the millions of records on the case are still to be fully declassified.
Thanks to Mr Trump’s executive order, the director of national intelligence and the attorney general must develop a plan to declassify the documents by 6 February.
Obviously, no members of the public can know what these documents will show before they are released.
Experts on the subject, though, have been giving their thoughts.
“There’s always the possibility that something would slip through that would be the tiny tip of a much larger iceberg that would be revealing,” says Larry J Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Centre for Politics and author of a book on Kennedy.
“That’s what researchers look for. Now, odds are you won’t find that but it is possible that it’s there.”
Mr Sabato previously said: “It just seemed so fantastical that one very disturbed individual could end up pulling off the crime of the century.
“But the more I studied it, the more I realized that is a very possible, maybe even probable in my view, hypothesis.”
Gerald Posner, author of Case Closed, which concludes that assassin Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, says: “Anybody waiting for a smoking gun that’s going to turn this case upside down will be sorely disappointed.”
Dr Reid says he’s “really excited to read what’s in these documents”, but admits he would “be surprised if there were any major revelations”.
“But there might be some intriguing clues and it will certainly be enough ambiguity to fuel a thousand more conspiracy theories for the next 50 years,” he concludes.
Makeshift rafts were used to rescue the tortoises. Pic: Lavavolo Tortoise Center/AP
Thousands of critically endangered tortoises in Madagascar have been rescued after they were swept away from their sanctuary and left swimming for their lives in floods.
The 12,000 radiated and spider tortoises were housed at the Lavavolo Tortoise Centre after being rescued from wildlife traffickers.
But earlier this month, Cyclone Dikeledi hit the southern part of the Indian Ocean, causing flooding a metre high to engulf the sanctuary, carrying the tortoises away.
Sanctuary staff, members of the local community and police officers joined together in a rescue effort.
They waded through the floodwater with large containers, rescuing the tortoises.
Some rescuers converted damaged building structures into makeshift rafts for the tortoises to float on.
Hery Razafimamonjiraibe, the Madagascar director for the Turtle Survival Alliance, which runs the sanctuary, said they were hopeful they had rescued more than 10,000 of the tortoises – but they still had to do an official count.
Rescuers had recovered around 700 dead tortoises so far, which Mr Razafimamonjiraibe said had been trapped by rocks and debris in the floods.
“Fortunately, most of the tortoises were able to float. Tortoises are actually very good swimmers, you should see them,” he said.
The rescue centre was badly damaged by the floods, which swept away much of its infrastructure.
Most of the rescued tortoises are relatively young for the species, aged 25-50 years old. They can reach 100 years or more.
A23a, on 25 November, off the coast of Antarctica. Pic: Crown Copyright/AP
The world’s largest iceberg is on a collision course with the British territory of South Georgia – potentially putting millions of penguins and seals in danger.
The trillion-tonne slab of ice, named A23a, broke free from its position last month and started drifting northwards.
The “megaberg” – which is twice the size of Greater London and 130 feet tall – is expected to approach the remote island off Antarctica in the next two to four weeks.
Experts fear for the island’s rich wildlife. If the iceberg gets wedged in the shallow waters close to the island, it could block vital pathways for penguins to get food for themselves and their chicks.
This would mean parent penguins would have to swim further, burning more energy and bringing back less to feed their offspring.
That could “dramatically increase mortality rates” among penguins, according to British Antarctic Survey physical oceanographer Andrew Meijer – something that has happened in the past.
He examined the “colossal ” iceberg up close in December 2023 when it drifted past the research ship RRS Sir David Attenborough.
“It’s a huge wall, a Game of Thrones-style wall of ice that towers above the ship,” he said.
“South Georgia is an amazingly ecologically rich island. It’s a breeding ground for a huge number of penguins, millions of penguins and seals,” Mr Meijers said.
“There’s lots of pups and chicks and they’re all still dependent on their parents.”
While the A23a represents a threat to the penguin colony on South Georgia, it doesn’t pose a greater risk to the overall penguin populations, University of Colorado ice scientist Ted Scambos said.
“The whole ecosystem in the Southern Ocean is very resilient to these events,” he wrote. “It has evolved with these icebergs being a factor for hundreds of thousands of years.”
The iceberg started moving for the first time in more than three decades in November 2023, scientists said.
On Monday, world leaders will gather at Auschwitz-Birkenau to mark 80 years since the camp’s liberation. One survivor has told Sky News why he fears the world isn’t in a much better place today.
Auschwitz survivors have told Sky News of their pessimism that lessons have not been learnt from history, ahead of the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the concentration camp.
“I hope I’m wrong,” says survivor Ivor Perl. “But there’s […] a saying that if one doesn’t learn from history, you’re cursed to live through it again.”
Ivor is nearly 93 years old and it took half a century for him to feel able to talk publicly about his time at the Nazi concentration camp.
“When I was younger I thought to myself, ‘I arrived in this world in a terrible time, 1932, at least when I leave it the world will be in a better place’,” he says. “But I’m doubting it very, very much.
“It’s not my job to cure the problem – my job is to tell you what the problem can be.
“I haven’t got any sign to see that the world has learnt [any lessons from] the Second World War.”
More than a million people, mostly Jewish, were murdered at Auschwitz – just one of the numerous death camps the Nazis built across mainland Europe. On Monday, world leaders will gather at Auschwitz-Birkenau to mark 80 years since its liberation.
Ivor was deported to Auschwitz from Hungary at the age of 12. He pretended to the Nazi guards that he was older and found himself sent to do slave labour. His lie almost certainly saved him from the gas chambers.
Out of his parents and their nine children, only Ivor and his brother Alec survived.
“You know why I’m alive today? Because I spoke Yiddish,” Ivor says. “Yiddish is very akin to German.”
When the cattle trucks arrived at Auschwitz, one of the first things Ivor saw was “people working in striped uniforms”.
He explains: “They were Polish Jews and they kept saying [in Yiddish] ‘eat all the food, don’t save any food’ and ‘if they are asked, children must say they are 16 years old at least’.
“We started marching and I went over to my mother’s side. And she said, ‘no darling, go back to your brother, don’t come to me’. I said: ‘Please mum, let me stay’.
“An officer with white gloves, who later said he was Dr Mengele, pointed people, right or left. The ones on the left, for death.”
Dr Mengele asked Ivor how old he was. “I said, ’16’. I can see his face even to this day.
The British campaign group “Led By Donkeys” has claimed responsibility for the stunt that authorities say may have breached German laws on the use of symbols linked to illegal organizations.
The imagery was projected onto the outside of Elon Musk’s Tesla Gigafactory near Berlin
German authorities are investigating images projected onto the Tesla Gigafactory just outside Berlin that depicted Elon Musk apparently performing a Nazi-style salute at US President Donald Trump’s recent inauguration.
The projection appeared on the outer facade of the electric vehicle factory in Grünheide, just outside the capital’s city limits, on Thursday night, with the image of Tesla owner Musk accompanied by the German word “Heil” (hail).
In conjunction with the name of Musk’s company, this formed the phrase “Heil Tesla” — a play on “Heil Hitler,” the phrase which accompanied the use of the Nazi stiff-armed salute during dictator Adolf Hitler time in power.
Musk made a gesture twice during a speech in Washington at an event celebrating the start of Trump’s second term in office, prompting debate as to whether his raised-arm gesture had constituted a Nazi salute, which was celebrated by US white nationalists.
Now, German security services have launched an investigation into the suspected use of symbols of anti-constitutional organizations, including the depicted salute itself, the use or display of which is illegal in Germany.
“After an appraisal by the responsible public prosecutor in Frankfurt (Oder), the projection of several logos by as yet unknown individuals and the distribution of the images online at least merits an initial suspicion of the use of symbols of anti-constitutional organizations,” read a police statement.
‘Led By Donkeys’: UK campaign group claims responsibility
Responsibility for the stunt has been claimed by the British political campaign group “Led By Donkeys” in conjunction with the German satirical “Center for Political Beauty.”
Some on the political left in Germany contended that if authorities convict any of the group’s members for projecting an illegal image, it would show — in Germany at least — that the gesture was indeed a Nazi salute and not a means of thanking the members of the audience at his speech as Musk and other have said.
Following the publication of the images online, several social media users and news outlets initially questioned the veracity of the stunt.
After initially denying that the action had actually taken place, a German police spokesman later told local public broadcaster RBB that officers were “no longer assuming that it didn’t happen,” having analyzed images online and been present on the ground.Originally established as an anti-Brexit campaign group in December 2018, “Led By Donkeys” has regularly carried out similar stunts in the United Kingdom, targeting populist British politicians such as former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson and far-right Brexit hardliner Nigel Farage in videos beamed onto famous buildings such as the Houses of Parliament in London.
Activists promise more stunts in the future
Philipp Ruch, artistic lead for the “Center for Political Beauty,” told the German dpa news agency that activists had used a special projector to beam a video onto the outside of the Tesla building from a distance of several hundred meters and promised similar stunts to come.
“The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, is promoting the far right in Europe,” wrote “Led By Donkeys” in a social media post accompanying the video that had been projected onto the factory. “Don’t buy a Tesla.”
A group spokesman told the British Press Association that Musk was “using his wealth from Tesla to back far-right parties and degrade democracy” and that he “shouldn’t be surprised if people don’t fancy driving round in his cars for much longer. Increasingly it’s not a great look.”
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the tech company will increase capital spending as much as $65 billion and build a data center that would occupy a large slice of Manhattan as it gears up for the future of artificial intelligence.
“This will be a defining year for AI,” Zuckerberg wrote on Facebook Friday.
He said Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, Threads and WhatsApp, will build an AI engineer that will contribute code to the company’s R&D efforts.
“To power this, Meta is building a 2GW+ data center that is so large it would cover a significant part of Manhattan. We’ll bring online ~1GW of compute in ’25 and we’ll end the year with more than 1.3 million GPUs,” he said, referring to graphics processing units used to process graphics, video and other visual info.
He also said Meta would hike capital expenditures to between $60 billion and $65 billion from the $40 billion it spent last year.
People walk near dolphins washed up on a beach outside Bosaso, Puntland, Northern Somalia, January 24, 2025. REUTERS/Feisal Omar Purchase Licensing Rights
More than 100 dead dolphins have been found on the coast of Somalia’s semi-autonomous Puntland region, with officials yet to establish what caused their deaths.
The region’s fisheries minister, Abdirisak Abdulahi Hagaa, told Reuters that so far at least 110 dead dolphins had been counted, not far from the port of Bosaso, and that samples had been taken to try to establish what happened.
“So far, we know their death was not caused by wounds from nets because there were no wounds or cuts on them,” he said, adding that officials did not believe toxic materials were to blame since fish in the area did not appear to have been affected.
Clockwise from top left: Karina Ariev, Naama Levy, Daniella Gilboa and Liri Albag
Hamas has named four hostages to be released on Saturday under the Gaza ceasefire deal.
It says they are soldiers Karina Ariev, Daniella Gilboa, Naama Levy and Liri Albag. They will be freed in exchange for 180 Palestinian prisoners held in Israel.
It will be the second such exchange since the ceasefire came into effect last Sunday.
Three hostages and 90 prisoners were released in the first swap.
The ceasefire halted the war which began when Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October 2023. About 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken back to Gaza as hostages.
More than 47,200 Palestinians, the majority civilians, have been killed in Israel’s offensive, Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry says.
It was originally thought that a female Israeli civilian, Arbel Yehud, would be included in the list of those to be released on Saturday.
It is unclear why her name is not on the list, though Israeli media reported that Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a separate group, is holding her.
Hamas is expected to provide information about the remaining 26 hostages due to be released over the next five weeks.
This includes the Bibas family – two parents and two children, one of whom, Kfir, was 10 months old when taken captive and is the youngest hostage. It is unclear if this information will include the names or just the number of living or dead hostages.
The prisoners who will be released are of a more serious category than those freed in the first exchange. They will include those who have killed, some of whom are serving sentences of more than 15 years.
Israel has insisted that no-one who was involved in the 7 October attacks will be freed.
Ariev, Gilboa, Levy and Albag were seized at the Nahal Oz military base which was overrun by Hamas gunmen. Footage showed them among a group of women being tied up with their hands behind their backs. They were seen pleading for help while being taunted by their captors.
The women were part of a unit which surveilled the Israel-Gaza border.
Three weeks ago Hamas released a video of Albag, 19, calling for the Israeli government to reach a deal.
The ceasefire was concluded after months of indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas, led by the US, Qatar and Egypt.
It will be implemented in three stages, with the second stage due to begin six weeks into the truce. About 1,900 Palestinian prisoners will be released during the first stage in exchange for 33 hostages. Israeli forces will also begin withdrawing from positions in Gaza and hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians will be able to return to areas they had fled or been forced from.
The ceasefire is meant to lead to a permanent end to the war in Gaza.
Ninety-one hostages taken on 7 October 2023 are still held in Gaza. Fifty-seven of them are assumed by Israel to still be alive. Three others – two of whom are alive – have been held for a decade or more.
Three female Israeli hostages have already been released as part of the latest ceasefire and hostage release deal.
Billionaire X owner and key Trump adviser Elon Musk is one of several potential buyers for the app
Jimmy Donaldson – aka MrBeast – was jubilant as he told his tens of millions of TikTok followers about his bid to buy the platform.
“I might become you guys’ new CEO! I’m super excited!” Donaldson said from a private jet. He then proceeded to promise $10,000 to five random new followers.
The internet creator’s post has been viewed more than 73 million times since Monday. Donaldson said he could not share details about his bid, but promised: “Just know, it’s gonna be crazy.”
Donaldson is one of multiple suitors who have expressed interest in purchasing TikTok, the wildly popular social media platform that’s become the subject of a fast-moving political drama in the United States.
Last year, then-President Joe Biden signed a law that gave TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance until 19 January to sell the platform or face a ban in the United States.
The legislation addressed concerns about TikTok’s links to the Chinese government and worries about the app being a national security risk.
President Donald Trump has floated the possibility of a joint venture.
“I would like the United States to have a 50% ownership position,” he said in a Truth Social post on Sunday. “By doing this, we save TikTok, keep it in good hands and allow it to [stay up].”
Trump has since signed an executive order that allows the app to stay operational for another 75 days.
Earlier this month, Bloomberg reported that China was considering a TikTok sale to Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a close ally of President Trump, who already owns the social media platform X.
Musk himself wrote on X this week that while he has long been against a TikTok ban, “the current situation where TikTok is allowed to operate in America, but X is not allowed to operate in China is unbalanced. Something needs to change”.
At a news conference Tuesday, Trump was asked by a reporter if he would be open to Musk buying the platform.
“I would be if he wanted to buy it, yes,” the president replied.
“I’d like Larry to buy it, too,” Trump added, referring to Oracle chairman Larry Ellison, a long-time Trump supporter who was on stage with him for a separate announcement.
Oracle is one of TikTok’s main server providers, managing many of the data centres where billions of the platform’s videos are stored.
Last year, Oracle warned that a TikTok ban could hurt its business. The cloud computing giant was also a leading contender to buy the social media platform in 2020, back when Trump was trying to ban it.
Billionaire investor Frank McCourt has also expressed interest in TikTok, and has been doing media interviews about the prospect for several months.
McCourt has said he wants TikTok to run on technology overseen by the Project Liberty Institute, which he founded. He has been critical of data collection practices of social media companies.
Project Liberty is bidding for TikTok without its proprietary algorithm. McCourt told CNBC this week that Project Liberty is “not interested in the algorithm or the Chinese technology” even as he acknowledged that the platform is “worth less” without it.
People are turning to ‘grief apps’ to cope with the loss of family and friends. But the new world of death data raises troubling questions.
When Nitika’s father passed away unexpectedly in 2023, she was a continent away from her support system. She had moved from India to Canada only a year prior, and was the first in her friend group to grapple with the death of a parent. “Living far away from my family and dealing with this massive loss was unbearable. I often felt lost and lonely,” says Nitika, who asked to withhold her full name to protect her privacy.
Then she came across an Instagram post from the grief app Untangle, which offers “personalised bereavement support” through virtual support groups and moderated forums, boosted with built-in AI features. Nitika downloaded the app. At first, she just read other people’s posts, drawing strength from how others’ experiences mirrored her own. The similarities made her feel less alone, and she started posting. “I mustered the courage to write about my story, and since then this app became my best friend,” Nitika says.
In soothingly serifed fonts and tasteful colour palettes that are muted but never sombre, Untangle and a number of other new “grief apps”, including DayNew and Empathy, seek to remake mourning for the modern era. They have the potential to democratise access to support that can otherwise be hard to find. But in doing so, privacy experts say these apps are introducing corporate technology – and all the problems of the digital age – into the vulnerability of grief.
For some, too much streamlining sands away the texture of human connection
The apps come with libraries of content dedicated to grief and mental health. Users can connect with other mourners and share photos and stories of their loved ones. Some apps offer AI features such as journaling prompts, personalised to-do lists, and advice from chatbot A few include administrative checklists and expert consultations to manage the mountain of legal and financial paperwork that comes with death.
“It’s optimised healing,” says Karine Nissim, co-founder of DayNew, an app that provides support for loss and other traumatic life changes. “It’s essentially your therapist, your best friend and your personal assistant in your pocket, helping you see the whole journey and create one workflow for it.”
But mourning is messy. It doesn’t typically hew to a workflow, and some argue it shouldn’t.
Grief apps introduce a new wrinkle to the ongoing conversation about which experiences can and should be mediated by apps and the companies behind them. Like almost all other apps, grief apps collect personal data. In the past, you might lose a loved one and decide to speak with a therapist or join an online or in-person support group. You wouldn’t have to worry how information you shared was being stored, or whether details about you were being tracked and sold by your psychologist or the group facilitator. Of course, if you couldn’t pay for therapy or find a group, you might also find yourself without support of any kind.
“I think the biggest draw is that we could potentially increase access to resources that people might not otherwise have,” says Adrian Aguilera, a psychologist and professor at UC Berkeley who studies digital mental health interventions. The most important thing grief apps can provide is consistency and accessibility, he says, and our pre-existing comfort with virtual interfaces can make them a natural-feeling extension of real life. “Social connection is one of the best aspects of digital technologies”, especially if you don’t have access to a peer or care provider.
But how much of your privacy would you trade to technology companies for accessibility, support and connection? And if grief apps replace support systems that have historically been made up of humans, does the comfort still feel the same?
How digital interfaces shape mourning
In the months after her mum died, Sofia Root, from Pennsylvania, US, felt a swirl of emotions: isolation, desperation, sorrow, anger, boredom. She was “not an online person, for the most part”, Root says, but she joined a few Reddit communities based around loss. It helped a bit. “Every now and then you get that little dopamine rush when you read something you can relate to, and it just distracts you from your own issues for a minute.”
Then, like Nitika, she was served an Instagram ad for Untangle. She gave the app a try, and soon noticed a comment from one of the community managers on another user’s post. To Root, the comment sounded like it was written by artificial intelligence. “The idea that they might be using AI to produce something that’s supposed to be about connecting with real people, it seemed a little fraudulent to me,” Root says. “It goes back to that isolation.”
Untangle does have AI-enabled features, including internal tools for employees, and personalised recommendations for breathing exercises and meditations. But the company maintains it doesn’t use AI to respond to users’ posts.
These people [and the] community understand me, and that was the most important part of me using this app – Nitika
Emily Cummin, chief executive of Untangle, recalls the incident. “I spoke about it with that community manager, because she was actually horrified that someone thought that she was an AI,” Cummin says. “My belief is probably that people feel a bit uncomfortable that they’d be talking to an automated system when they’re at a really vulnerable time.”
But the liberal sprinkling of artificial intelligence throughout grief apps can introduce doubt. When amplified by the overwhelming cycle of grief, that doubt can be enough to do damage. Root reached out to the community manager, who assured her she hadn’t used AI to draft the comment, but it was all too much. Feeling betrayed, Root deleted the app. “Interacting on this stupid little smartphone, with just your thumbs? It’s not gonna replace what you lost, and it’s only gonna take you so far,” Root says.
Root, for one, says she found more comfort speaking to other people grappling with loss than she did from a therapist. Nitika says the community she found on Untangle helped her feel heard. “We often talk to each other now, as we learn to live this life again,” she says. “These people [and the] community understand me, and that was the most important part of me using this app.”
Big grief meets big data
Health apps sometimes exist in a grey area when it comes to laws that regulate personal data. When you talk to a therapist in the US, the UK and the EU, for example, you can rest assured the law protects your privacy. But if you type the same information into an app that isn’t connected to an official medical provider, the rules aren’t always clear. And whether or not regulations are in place, once your data is collected, it can be impossible to know where it ends up next.
Hundreds of “illegal immigrant criminals” in the United States were arrested Thursday and hundreds of others were flown out of the country on military aircraft as President Trump’s promised mass deportation operation got underway, the White House said.
In a post on X Thursday night, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “The Trump Administration arrested 538 illegal immigrant criminals including a suspected terrorist, four members of the Tren de Aragua gang, and several illegals convicted of sex crimes against minors.” Tren de Aragua is a violent gang that started in Venezuela and has now started to spread into the U.S. It became something of a flashpoint during the presidential campaign.
Those 538 arrests included 373 people with criminal records and 165 people without criminal records aside from immigration violations, according to documentation provided by a senior administration official. Another 1,041 people were removed or repatriated, according to those records.
Arrests included a 23-year-old Ecuadorian citizen convicted of rape. He was arrested in Buffalo. Another arrest in Buffalo was that of a man from the Dominican Republic who was previously convicted of continuous sexual conduct against a child. In San Francisco, ICE arrested a man convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child aged 14 or younger, and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Meanwhile, a defense official said there had been two flights overnight. Both went to Guatemala, according to two sources. A Guatemalan migration official said three flights have arrived: A flight from El Paso, with 80 people, arrived early Friday morning. Another flight from Tucson, which also carried 80 people, arrived at around 7 a.m., and a third flight from El Paso with around 105 people arrived Friday afternoon.
Leavitt stated, “The Trump Administration also deported hundreds of illegal immigrant criminals via military aircraft. The largest massive deportation operation in history is well underway.”
President Trump was asked about the flights upon landing in Asheville, North Carolina, where he was surveying the destruction caused by Hurricane Helene late last year. He told reporters, “Deportation is going very well. We’re getting the bad, hard criminals out.” He added, “These are people that have been as bad as you get, as bad as anybody you’ve seen. We’re taking them out first.” The Trump administration has not released further criminal information about those who were on the deportation flights.
Three officials say the plan to use military aircraft for the deportation flights was approved under the Trump administration, not the Biden administration. The flights are part of the actions the acting secretary of defense announced on Wednesday following Mr. Trump’s executive action ordering the U.S. military to step up its presence on the border.
Canada is not for sale” hats created by Jackpine are displayed at Ontario College of Art & Design University (OCAD University) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Kyaw Soe Oo Purchase Licensing Rights
Donald Trump’s verbal threats towards Canada are paying off for one entrepreneur, after the new U.S. president’s belligerent approach gave him an idea.
Liam Mooney, founder of an Ottawa-based design firm, made a hat emblazoned with “Canada is Not for Sale” in response to Trump’s tariff threats and suggestions that Canada become the 51st U.S. state.
The hats gained attention after Ontario Premier Doug Ford wore one during a meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other premiers in Ottawa last week to discuss Trump’s vow to impose tariffs on imports from Canada.
According to Mooney, tens of thousands of hats have been ordered online since then.
Mooney told Reuters he designed the hats as a creative rebuttal to President Trump’s rhetoric, aiming to cut through political discourse with a message of nationalism and unity.
“It’s an opportunity to bring people together from all of civil society, regardless of political persuasion,” Mooney said.
Tariffs would cripple Canada’s economy and also raise the price of oil and other goods in the United States.
Trump is threatening tariffs at a time of political turmoil in Canada, with Liberal leader Trudeau set to resign in March after nearly a decade in power and the opposition Conservatives leading in the polls ahead of a federal election later this year.
Mooney said that he and his business partner designed the hats after seeing one of Ford’s recent interviews on Fox News. The host urged the premier to consider annexation, suggesting it would be a “privilege” for Canada to merge with the U.S.
Boebert was overheard on the House floor telling members that she had discovered Delaware Democrat Sarah McBride in the women’s bathroom
Lauren Boebert ‘stormed’ out of the women’s bathroom to complain that she had seen ‘a guy’ in there (REUTERS)MAGA firebrand Lauren Boebert “stormed” into a women’s restroom in the Capitol to get “a guy” removed by security on Thursday.
But the conservative Trump loyalist ended up apologizing after it turned out to be a case of “mistaken identity.”
Boebert was overheard on the House floor telling members that she had discovered Delaware Democrat Sarah McBride in the women’s bathroom, according to the Daily Beast.
McBride, the first transgender member of Congress, is not permitted to use the women’s bathrooms after Speaker Mike Johnson renewed a ban on transgender people using single-sex bathrooms.
Boebert told other members that when she thought she saw McBride walking into the bathroom, she said, “You shouldn’t be here,” an anonymous Republican lawmaker told the outlet.
But the Colorado congresswoman then realized the person in the bathroom was not McBride. “I overheard Boebert say she went to apologize,” the lawmaker added.
Bloomberg Congress reporter Billy House also witnessed the incident and described Boebert “bursting out” of the women’s bathroom “complaining to security personnel stationed in the nearby Speakers Lobby of “a guy” inside.”
House said he was “intrigued” and saw four other people leave the bathroom after Boebert. “All women,” he noted in a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter).
“Within minutes, however, Boebert was storming back from the House floor into the restroom — reinforced by Rep. Nancy Mace in tow.”
“But alas, just seconds after this duo entered the bathroom, they come back out — and went back quietly to the floor,” House said.
Boebert admitted she “made an error regarding a mistaken identity” in a statement to the Daily Beast. “I apologized, learned a lesson, and it won’t happen again,” Boebert said.
President Donald Trump has revoked security protection for former top US health official Anthony Fauci, who has faced death threats since leading the country’s Covid-19 response.
“You can’t have a security detail for the rest of your life because you work for government,” Trump told reporters, when asked about the decision on Friday. “It’s very standard.”
This week, Trump also revoked security protections for his former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, his former National Security Adviser John Bolton and former envoy Brian Hook, who all faced threats from Iran.
Dr Fauci has now hired his own private security team that he will pay for himself, US media report.
Asked whether he felt responsible for the officials’ safety, Trump said on Friday: “They all made a lot of money. They can hire their own security too.”
Dr Fauci was previously protected by federal marshals, and then a private security company, which was paid for by the government, according to the New York Times.
One of Dr Fauci’s most vocal Republican critics, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, had called for his security to be revoked.
He wrote in a post on X on Thursday that he had “sent supporting information to end the 24 hr a day limo and security detail for Fauci”.
“I wish him nothing but peace but he needs to pay for his own limos,” he said.
Trump has also revoked the security clearances of 51 intelligence officials who had claimed that Hunter Biden’s laptop had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Under US protocol, former presidents and their spouses are granted security protection for life. But protection for other US officials is decided based on the threat assessment from the intelligence community.
As the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr Fauci faced death threats during and after the coronavirus pandemic, as well as criticism from Republicans over mask mandates and other Covid restrictions.
He led the institute for 40 years, including during Trump’s first term. Trump had also awarded presidential commendations to Dr Fauci who served on the Operation Warp Speed task force during the pandemic.
Trump teased ‘everything will be revealed’ as he signed an order to release the remaining JFK files
REPUBLICAN Congress members are calling on President Donald Trump to release evidence related to the case of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The effort by two GOP Tennessee representatives comes after Trump signed an executive order to declassify documents about the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, his brother Robert F. Kennedy, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein pictured in March 2017 in his New York State Sex Offender Registry photoCredit: AP
Epstein died in August 2019 while awaiting trial for federal sex trafficking charges in New York.
The disgraced financier, 59, was found dead in his jail cell at the Manhattan Detention Complex.
A medical examiner ruled his death a suicide.
Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and Representative Tim Burchett, both of Tennessee, told the Daily Mail they have been fighting for years to unseal the documents related to Epstein’s case.
Blackburn told the outlet she has pushed for the release of unredacted versions of Epstein’s flight logs and the complete version of Ghislaine Maxwell’s “little black book.”
The explosive contact book contained a list of names and phone numbers of some of the world’s most powerful and wealthy individuals, according to court documents.
A few pages of the book were released in a redacted version during Maxwell’s 2021 child sex trafficking trial.
However, the full unredacted version has never been released to the public.
Maxwell, a British socialite who groomed and sex trafficked young girls for Epstein, is currently serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted of child sex trafficking charges in December 2021.
“Jeffrey Epstein built a disgusting global sex trafficking network that caused irreparable damage to countless women,” Blackburn told the Daily Mail.
“Americans deserve to know exactly who was affiliated with this network.
“This is not about celebrities – this is about what happened to victims and survivors.”
Burchett repeated Blackburn’s sentiment, telling the outlet the time to release the Epstein files is now as Republicans control both the House and Senate.
‘I’D TAKE A LOOK AT IT’
In January 2024, hundreds of pages containing names of over 170 of Epstein’s associates were released to the public.
The documents contained the names of former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, late British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, and even President Trump himself.
However, the documents did not contain any incriminating evidence or Epstein’s supposed list of clients.
In an interview with podcast host Lex Fridman in September, Trump again distanced himself from the convicted pedophile, saying he was never involved with Epstein.
But, he said, if elected president, he would support the release of Epstein’s supposed list of clients.
“It’s just very strange for a lot of people that the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public,” Fridman told Trump.
“Yeah, it’s very interesting, isn’t it. I’d certainly take a look at it,” Trump replied.
Trump has not publicly commented on the Epstein files since he was inaugurated on Monday.
Mexico denied a U.S. military plane access to land Thursday, at least temporarily frustrating the Trump administration’s plans to deport immigrants to the country, according to two U.S. defense officials and a third person familiar with the situation.
Two Guatemala-bound Air Force C-17s, carrying about 80 people apiece, flew deportees out of the U.S. Thursday night, the sources said. The third flight, slotted for Mexico, never took off.
It was not immediately clear why Mexico blocked the flight, but tensions between the U.S. and Mexico, neighbors and longtime allies, have risen since President Donald Trump won the November election. Trump has threatened to slap 25% across-the-board tariffs on Mexico in retaliation for migrants crossing the border the countries share. But he has not yet put them in effect.
A White House official said in a text message that “the flights thing was an administrative issue and was quickly rectified.”
After the publication of this article, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt tweeted, “Yesterday, Mexico accepted a record 4 deportation flights in 1 day!”
A White House official, however, did not clarify whether they were military, commercial or private flights.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s government has said it opposes Trump taking “unilateral” action to implement restrictive immigration standards — including the reinstatement of a “remain in Mexico” policy that forces migrants to stay in that country while they await adjudication of asylum claims. Flying deportees into a foreign country requires the cooperation of that nation’s government.
In a statement, Mexico’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not go into detail on why the U.S. plane was not allowed to land in the country.
“Mexico has a very good relationship with the United States government and we cooperate with respect for our sovereignty on a wide range of issues, including migration,” the statement read. “When it comes to repatriations, we will always welcome the arrival of Mexicans to our territory with open arms. Mexico embraces you.”
On Friday, Guatemala received three flights from the U.S. with Guatemalan nationals who had been sent back to their home country. A spokesperson for the Guatemalan Migration Institute told NBC News that two of Friday’s flights were on military aircraft and the other was on a non-military plane. The total number of Guatemalans who arrived in Guatemala City from the three flights was about 265.
The Senate confirmed Pete Hegseth as the nation’s defense secretary late Friday in a dramatic tie-breaking vote, swatting back questions about his qualifications to lead the Pentagon amid allegations of heavy drinking and aggressive behavior toward women.
Rarely has a Cabinet nominee faced such wide-ranging concerns about his experience and behavior as Hegseth, particularly for such a high-profile role atop the U.S. military. But the Republican-led Senate was determined to confirm Hegseth, a former Fox News host and combat veteran who has vowed to bring a “warrior culture,” rounding out President Donald Trump’s top national security Cabinet officials.
Vice President JD Vance arrived to break the 50-50 tie, highly unusual for Cabinet nominees and particularly defense secretaries, who typically win wider bipartisan support. Hegseth himself was at the Capitol with his family.
“We have a great secretary of defense and we’re very happy,” Trump said as he boarded Air Force One after surveying fire devastation in California.
Trump said he didn’t care about the dissent from Sen. Mitch McConnell, the influential former Republican leader — who joined two other Republicans, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, in voting against Hegseth — because the “important thing is winning.”
The Senate’s ability to confirm Hegseth despite a grave series of allegations against him provides a measure of Trump’s political power and ability to get what he wants from the GOP-led Congress, and of the potency of the culture wars to fuel his agenda at the White House.
Only once before has the vice president had to break a tie on a Cabinet nominee — during Trump’s first term, when Vice President Mike Pence cast the vote to confirm Betsy DeVos as education secretary.
Next week senators will be facing Trump’s other outside Cabinet choices including particularly Kash Patel, a Trump ally who has published an enemies list, as the FBI director; Tulsi Gabbard as director of the office of national intelligence; and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the anti-vaccine advocate, at Health and Human Services.
“Is Pete Hegseth truly the best we have to offer?” said Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, urging his colleagues to think seriously about their vote. All Democrats opposed the nominee.
But Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Hegseth, as a veteran of the Army National Guard who served tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, “will bring a warrior’s perspective” to the top military job.
“Gone will be the days of woke distractions,” Thune said, referring to the diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives being slashed across the federal government. “The Pentagon’s focus will be on war fighting.”
Hegseth himself was working the phones late Friday to shore up his support, his confirmation at stake.
“He’s a good man,” Trump said of Hegseth while departing the White House to visit disaster-hit North Carolina and Los Angeles. “I hope he makes it.”
The uncertainty sent tensions soaring late Friday at the Capitol. It takes a simple majority to confirm nominees, and Republicans, with a 53-47 majority in the Senate, could only lose one more objection after Murkowski and Collins already announced they would vote no.
McConnell had signaled skepticism in an earlier speech when he declared he would confirm nominees to senior national security roles “whose record and experience will make them immediate assets, not liabilities.”
One Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, sent the Senate swirling as he raised fresh questions and was provided information and answers.
But Tillis ultimately voted to confirm Hegseth, who he said “has a unique perspective” and is passionate about modernizing the military. He said he spoke to Hegseth for “nearly two hours” about his concerns.
In contrast, McConnell said after the vote said Hegseth “did not reckon” with the reality of job, noting that the nominee’s “mere desire to be a ‘change agent’ is not enough.”
Democrats, as the minority party, have helped confirm Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe in bipartisan votes to Trump’s national security team.
But Democrats gravely opposed to Hegseth had little power to stop him, and instead resorted to dragging out the process. Hours before the vote, Democrats took to the Senate floor to object.
Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said there were few Trump nominees as “dangerously and woefully unqualified as Hegseth.”
Hegseth faced allegations that he sexually assaulted a woman at a Republican conference in California, though he has denied the claims and said the encounter was consensual. He later paid $50,000 to the woman.
More recently, Hegseth’s former sister-in-law said in an affidavit that he was abusive to his second wife to the point that she feared for her safety. Hegseth has denied the allegation, and in divorce proceedings, neither Hegseth nor the woman claimed to be a victim of domestic abuse.
During a fiery confirmation hearing, Hegseth dismissed allegations of wrongdoing one by one, and vowed to bring “warrior culture” to the top Pentagon post.
Hegseth has promised not to drink on the job if confirmed.
Republican senators facing an intensive pressure campaign by Trump allies to support Hegseth stood by his nomination, echoing his claims of a “smear” campaign against him.
A Princeton and Harvard graduate, Hegseth represents a newer generation of veterans who came of age in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. He went on to a career at Fox News as the host of a weekend show, and was unknown to many on Capitol Hill until Trump tapped him for the top Defense job.
Hegseth’s comments that women should have no role in military combat drew particular concern, including from lawmakers who themselves served. He has since tempered those views as he met with senators during the confirmation process.
Murkowski said in a lengthy statement ahead of a test vote on Hegseth that his behaviors “starkly contrast” with what is expected of the military.
“I remain concerned about the message that confirming Mr. Hegseth sends to women currently serving and those aspiring to join,” Murkowski wrote on social media.
Collins said that after a lengthy discussion with Hegseth, “I am not convinced that his position on women serving in combat roles has changed.”
But one prominent Republican, Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, herself a veteran and sexual assault survivor, came under harsh criticism for her skepticism toward Hegseth and eventually announced she would back him.
Hegseth would lead an organization with nearly 2.1 million service members, about 780,000 civilians and a budget of $850 billion.
Sandra Ramos plays with her daughterat an improvised shack built with the help of the US Agency for the International Development (USAID) following hurricanes in in La Lima, Honduras, in July 2022 (Orlando SIERRA) Orlando SIERRA/AFP/AFPLess
The United States, the world’s biggest donor, froze virtually all foreign aid on Friday, making exceptions only for emergency food, and military funding for Israel and Egypt.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio sent an internal memo days after President Donald Trump took office vowing an “America First” policy of tightly restricting assistance overseas.
“No new funds shall be obligated for new awards or extensions of existing awards until each proposed new award or extension has been reviewed and approved,” said the memo to staff seen by AFP.
The sweeping order appears to affect everything from development assistance to military aid — including to Ukraine, which received billions of dollars in weapons under Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden as it tries to repel a Russian invasion.
The directive also means a pause of at least several months of US funding for PEPFAR, the anti-HIV/AIDS initiative that buys anti-retroviral drugs to treat the disease in developing countries, largely in Africa.
Launched under president George W. Bush in 2003, PEPFAR is credited with saving some 26 million lives and until recently enjoyed broad popular support along partisan lines in Washington.
But the memo explicitly made exceptions for military assistance to Israel — whose longstanding major arms packages from the United States have expanded further since the Gaza war — and Egypt, which has received generous US defense funding since it signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Rubio also made an exception for US contributions to emergency food assistance, which the United States ahs been contributing following crises around the world including in Sudan and Syria.
Lawmakers from the rival Democratic Party said that more than 20 million people relied on medication through PEPFAR and 63 million people on US-funded anti-malaria efforts including nets.
“For years, Republicans in Congress have decried what they see as a lack of U.S. credibility vis-a-vis countries like China, Russia, and Iran,” said Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Relations Committee, and Representative Lois Frankel.
“Now our credibility is on the line, and it appears we will cut and run from American commitments to our partners around the world,” they wrote in a letter.
Washington has long leveraged aid as a tool of its foreign policy, saying it cares about development and drawing a contrast with China, which is primarily concerned about seeking natural resources.
Meeks and Frankel also noted that foreign assistance is appropriated by Congress and said they would seek its implementation.
– ‘Life or death consequences’ –
The memo allows the State Department to make other case-by-case exceptions and temporarily to fund salaries to staff and other administrative expenses.
The memo called for an internal review of all foreign assistance within 85 days.
In justifying the freeze, Rubio — who as a senator was a supporter of development assistance — wrote that it was impossible for the new administration to assess whether existing foreign aid commitments “are not duplicated, are effective and are consistent with President Trump’s foreign policy.”
The United States has long been the world’s top donor in dollar terms, although a number of European nations, especially in Scandinavia, give significantly more as a percent of their economies.
The United States gave more than $64 billion in overseas development assistance in 2023, the last year for which records were available, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which advises industrialized countries.
Trump had already on taking office Monday signed an executive order suspending foreign assistance for 90 days, but it was not immediately clear how it would be implemented.
Anti-poverty group Oxfam said that Trump was abandoning a longstanding consensus in the United States for foreign assistance.
A federal judge blocked Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday from implementing the Republican president’s executive order curtailing the right to automatic birthright citizenship in the United States, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”
Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour issued a temporary restraining order, at the urging of four Democratic-led states – Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon – preventing the administration from enforcing the order. Trump had signed the order on Monday, his first day back in office.
The judge, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, dealt the first legal setback to the hardline policies on immigration that are a centerpiece of Trump’s second term as president.
“Obviously we’ll appeal,” Trump said of Coughenour’s ruling.
Trump’s executive order had directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither their mother nor father is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
“I am having trouble understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this order is constitutional,” the judge told a U.S. Justice Department lawyer defending Trump’s order. “It just boggles my mind.”
The states argued that Trump’s order violated the right enshrined in the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment that provides that anyone born in the United States is a citizen.
“I’ve been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour said of Trump’s policy.
Coughenour’s order, announced following a short hearing in a packed courtroom with other judges watching, prevents Trump’s policy from being enforced nationwide for 14 days while the judge considers whether to issue a long-lasting preliminary injunction. He will hear arguments over whether to do so on Feb. 6.
Under Trump’s order, any children born in the United States after Feb. 19 whose mother and father are not American citizens or lawful permanent residents would be subject to deportation and would be prevented from obtaining Social Security numbers, various government benefits and the ability as they get older to work lawfully.
“Under this order, babies being born today don’t count as U.S. citizens,” Washington state Assistant Attorney General Lane Polozola, referring to Trump’s policy, told the judge during the hearing.
U.S. President Donald Trump stands after delivering remarks on AI infrastructure at the Roosevelt room at White House in Washington, U.S., January 21, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate argued that Trump’s action was constitutional and called any judicial order blocking it “wildly inappropriate.” But before Shumate had even finished responding to Polozola’s argument, Coughenour said he had signed the temporary restraining order.
‘VIGOROUSLY DEFEND’
The Justice Department plans to file papers next week to urge the judge not to issue a longer injunction, Shumate said. A Justice Department spokesperson said it plans to continue to “vigorously defend” Trump’s order.
“We look forward to presenting a full merits argument to the court and to the American people, who are desperate to see our nation’s laws enforced,” the spokesperson said.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, a Democrat, said he sees no reason to expect that the Justice Department would succeed in overturning Coughenour’s ruling on appeal, even if the matter goes to the U.S. Supreme Court, whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump.
“You are an American citizen if you were born on American soil – period,” Brown said. “Nothing that the president can do will change that.”
More than 150,000 newborn children would be denied citizenship annually if Trump’s order is allowed to stand, according to the Democratic-led states.
Since Trump signed the order, at least six lawsuits have been filed challenging it, most of them by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states.
Democratic state attorneys general have said that the understanding of the Constitution’s citizenship clause was cemented 127 years ago when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents are entitled to American citizenship.
The 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868 following the U.S. Civil War, overturned the Supreme Court’s notorious 1857 Dred Scott decision that had declared that the Constitution’s protections did not apply to enslaved Black people.
In a brief filed late on Wednesday, the Justice Department called the order an “integral part” of Trump’s efforts “to address this nation’s broken immigration system and the ongoing crisis at the southern border.”
A worker installs a QR code-based GIS plate, a geo-tagging process, on a plane tree, locally known as Chinar, as part of the tree conservation, on the Kashmir University campus, in Srinagar, January 22, 2025. REUTERS/Sharafat Ali Purchase Licensing Rights
Authorities in Indian Kashmir are geo-tagging thousands of ‘Chinar’ trees to create a comprehensive database for their management and help conserve them amid threats from rising urbanisation, road-widening projects and diseases.
The trees are a cultural and ecological symbol of the restive northern territory, which is claimed in full by India and Pakistan and ruled in part by both, but hundreds of them have been lost over the last few decades.
Under the geo-tagging process, QR codes are attached to each surveyed tree, recording information about 25 characteristics, including its geographical location, health, age, and growing patterns, enabling conservationists to track changes and address risk factors.
The public can also scan the code to access the details, Syed Tariq, the head of the project, told Reuters.
“We have geo-tagged nearly 29,000 trees, but we still have more small-sized trees that haven’t been tagged… These will be tagged in due course,” Tariq said.
The Chinar trees take around 150 years to reach their full size of up to 30 metres (100 ft) in height with a girth of 10 to 15 metres (30 to 50 ft) at ground level.
The oldest Chinar in the region lies on the outskirts of the city of Srinagar and is around 650 years old.
“We are using a USG-based (ultrasonography-based) gadget capable of determining risk levels without human intervention. The gadget will assess risk factors, eliminating the need for manual evaluation,” Tariq said.
The portion of Kashmir under India’s control was roiled by violence for decades as militants fought security forces, but the conflict has eased in recent years, leading to a gradual rise in development projects and tourism.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Kashmir last week to inaugurate a tunnel and, during the event, said that numerous road and rail connectivity projects in the region would be completed in the coming days.
Argentina’s libertarian President Javier Milei defended Elon Musk’s ‘innocent’ hand gesture that caused a stir AFP
There is a buzzword at the annual meeting of the world’s elites in the Swiss luxury resort of Davos: tariffs, although artificial intelligence has been another big theme.
For the World Trade Organization chief, it’s time cooler heads prevailed as she warned against tit-for-tat tariffs.
That might be easier said than done for the countries that could be in line for US tariffs after US President Donald Trump indicated he could deliver on his many threats.
Here is what happened so far at the forum on Thursday:
WTO head Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala appeared to have reached a point of exasperation amid the panic of what might happen if the United States unleashes painful duties.
“Please let’s not hyperventilate. I know we are here to discuss tariffs. I’ve been saying to everybody: could we chill, also. I just sense a lot of hyperventilation,” she told a panel called “debating tariffs”.
“Even if a tariff is levied, please keep calm, don’t wake up and without the necessary groundwork levy your own,” she said.
Her remarks come after expectations that if Trump slaps higher levies, countries will respond with tit-for-tat actions of their own.
One of this year’s stars at Davos has been Argentina’s libertarian President Javier Milei, who delivered another bombastic speech after his first at last year’s WEF.
This time, Milei defended tech billionaire Elon Musk after he caused a stir this week by making hand gestures at an inauguration event for US President Donald Trump.
Milei said his “dear friend Musk” has been “unfairly vilified by wokeism in recent hours for an innocent gesture that only means… his gratitude to the people”.
There may be a lot of hype about AI and what more it can do for businesses and people but Pope Francis had a warning: be vigilant, especially over the lies it tells.
The pope is familar with AI and its risks of deepfakes. In 2023, an AI-generated image of Pope Francis in a puffer jacket went viral.
THE CEO of CNN has warned the network’s future is in jeopardy if it does not adapt to the changing landscape of legacy media.
Over 200 layoffs were announced on Thursday and one of the network’s mainstays, Jim Acosta, was booted from his time slot as bosses scramble to address issues in the business.
CEO Mark Thompson warned that the company must adapt to changing trendsCredit: Getty
Acosta, who clashed with President Trump during his first term, lost his 10 am time slot to Wolf Blitzer’s political show, The Situation Room.
Blitzer, who previously occupied the early evening hours, will now host The Situation Room between 10 am and noon EST alongside fellow CNN star Pamela Brown.
The Situation Room has been on the network’s schedule for almost 20 years.
Acosta could get pushed down to a midnight time slot on the East Coast, per the Los Angeles Times.
This means his new show would air at 9pm on the West Coast, but Acosta has reportedly been told he does not have to relocate.
The network often airs repeat episodes after 11 pm EST.
However, sources told the Los Angeles Times that Acosta could leave the network.
A potential schedule shakeup had been in the works for days, according to Variety.
The network’s changes will see around 200 jobs in traditional TV cut.
The company said it was planning on hiring about 200 staffers to focus on its digital services, including data scientists and product engineers as part of the pivot.
The job cuts equate to around 6% of the workforce.
Bosses are rushing to meet the target of raising $1 billion in digital revenue by 2030.
Mark Thompson, who was named CEO in August 2023, warned that if the network doesn’t adapt, its future prospects could be plunged into jeopardy.
“This is a moment where the digital story feels like an existential question,” he told The New York Times.
“If we do not follow the audiences to the new platforms with real conviction and scale, our future prospects will not be good.”
Chiefs are already in the process of developing a new streaming platform, according to a company memo seen by The U.S. Sun.
CNN’s star shakeup & layoffs
CNN CEO Mark Thompson has announced there will be around 200 job cuts in TV as the network shifts its strategy to focus on digital services.
The company is to hire data scientists and product engineers.
Journalist Jim Acosta has reportedly been bumped down the schedule to a midnight eastern slot.
Renowned journalist Wolf Blitzer’s show The Situation Room is set to fill the mid-morning slot left by Acosta.
Blitzer and Pamela Brown will host the mid-morning show.
Chiefs are also aiming to publish between 50 and 100 vertical videos per day as part of their digital strategy.
Bosses are also creating a new streaming platform.
“Some of today’s announcements mean significant new job opportunities at CNN, but others will lead to the loss of some valued colleagues,” Thompson told colleagues in a note seen by The U.S. Sun.
“That too is an unwelcome but inevitable part of the change process. We will aim to contact every colleague who will be impacted by these changes as soon as we possibly can – and will of course help and support them in any way we can thereafter. In the year and a quarter since I arrived at CNN, we’ve had an incredible period of news and have already made significant progress on our transition to the future.
“I am grateful to every one of these colleagues for everything they’ve done for this company in my time and the years before.”
A new TV schedule is also in the works, according to the company.
“It’s early days but we’ve already established that there’s immense demand for it not just in America, but across much of the world,” Thompson said in a memo to CNN staff.
He said decisions were made to try to ensure CNN is one of the world’s greatest news networks.
Thompson admitted that changes can be difficult, but are necessary.
“Our objective is a simple one: to shift CNN’s gravity towards the platforms and products where the audience themselves are shifting and, by doing that, to secure CNN’s future as one of the world’s greatest news organizations,” he said.
“The process of change is essential if we’re to thrive in the future, but I both acknowledge and regret its very real human consequences.”
When he assumed the role of chief executive, Thompson emphasized that he wanted to build a “successful future” for the network.
“I couldn’t be more excited about the chance to join CNN after years of watching it and competing against it with a mixture of admiration and envy,” the media mogul said at the time of his appointment.
“Where others see disruption, I see opportunity. I can’t wait to roll up my sleeves and get down to work with my new colleagues to build a successful future for CNN.”
The cuts come as the network has seen a dip in its ratings.
Since the election, CNN has seen a near 50 percent drop in prime-time viewership, down to 394,000 overall viewers, according to the Washington Post.
The declining viewership forced CNN to move around its television schedule, including changing the time slots for six of its shows.
Scholz was speaking in BerlinImage: Michael Kappeler/dpa
Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Thursday said it was “outrageous and shameful” that the Jewish community still faces discrimination.
The German leader made the comments as he attended a ceremony in Berlin almost 80 years to the day after the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
“Anyone who supports terrorism, anyone who incites antisemitism must expect to be prosecuted,” Scholz said at the event organized by the International Auschwitz Committee.
“We do not tolerate antisemitism,” he said.
Scholz said combating antisemitism is a task for all citizens, especially because of the “increasingly shameless attempts to normalize far-right positions.”
“On the contrary: let’s stand up and fight back,” he said.
Holocaust a ‘responsibility we all bear’ in Germany
Scholz called the Holocaust a “responsibility that each and every one of us bears in our country — regardless of family history, regardless of religion or the birthplace of our parents or grandparents.”
Approximately 6 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust, according to the latest research described on the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial website.
Around 1 million Jews were murdered in the Auschwitz camp, which was liberated by Soviet troops on January 27, 1945. These were “more than a million unique people, individuals, wives and husbands, boys and girls, grandmothers and grandfathers. They were gassed, shot, they died of hunger, forced labour and medical experiments,” Scholz said.
He also honored other victims of the Holocaust, including Sinti and Roma, political opponents of the Nazi regime, homosexuals, the sick and people with disabilities.
“The uniqueness of the Shoah must be communicated again … to counteract the countless attempts to falsify and relatives history,” Scholz said.
“This fight for the inviolability of the dignity of each and every individual continues,” he added, citing attacks targeting people because of their beliefs, gender or skin color. “Our responsibility, 80 years on, is to resist this hatred.”
Germany has marked International Holocaust Remembrance Day since 1996.
“Emilia Pérez,” a musical about a drug kingpin who undergoes gender affirming surgery, topped the 2025 Oscar nominations with 13 nods. It was followed closely behind by “The Brutalist,” a historical epic the examines the immigrant experience, and “Wicked,” the hit screen version of a long-running Broadway sensation, which both nabbed 10 nominations. “Conclave,” a thriller about the election of a new pope, and “A Complete Unknown,” a look at Bob Dylan’s early, freewheelin’ years, each had eight nominations. All five of those films are up for best picture, the ceremony’s top prize, alongside indies like “Anora,” “Nickel Boys,” and “I’m Still Here,” as well as the body horror film, “The Substance,” and “Dune: Part Two,” one of the rare studio blockbusters to garner Oscar attention.
The Academy Awards nominations were unveiled Thursday after voting had been extended twice because of the wildfires that have devastated Los Angeles, resulting in the deaths of at least 28 people and catastrophic property damage. This week, the Oscars announced that its March telecast will “acknowledge those who fought so bravely against the wildfires.”
Timothée Chalamet, who has proved his box office drawing power with “Dune” and “Wonka,” was nominated for best actor for his chameleonic performance as Dylan in “A Complete Unknown.” He will face off against “The Brutalist” star Adrien Brody, who became the youngest best actor winner in history at 29 for 2003’s “The Pianist.” Other best actor nominees include Colman Domingo (“Sing Sing”), Ralph Fiennes (“Conclave”), and Sebastian Stan (“The Apprentice”). Stan’s recognition came after “The Apprentice,” a Donald Trump biopic in which he plays the real estate mogul, struggled to get distribution — companies were concerned about getting on the bad side of the 47th president. His co-star Jeremy Strong, who plays Trump mentor Roy Cohn, was also nominated for best supporting actor.
Demi Moore, who had been one of Hollywood’s brightest stars in the 1990s, continued her career comeback, capturing a best actress nomination for “The Substance,” a subversive horror film that examines the movie industry’s sexism and ageism. Her fellow best actress contender, “Emilia Pérez” star Karla Sofía Gascón, made history as the first openly transgender actor nominated for an Oscar. Mikey Madison (“Anora”), Fernanda Torres (“I’m Still Here”) and Cynthia Erivo (“Wicked”) rounded out the list of best actress nominees.
Strong’s “Succession” co-star Kieran Culkin was also nominated for best supporting actor for his work as a young man whose wisecracks mask his emotional turmoil in “A Real Pain.” He is widely considered to be the frontrunner after earning several critics prizes and a Golden Globe. Culkin and Strong will vie for the prize against Edward Norton (“A Complete Unknown”), Yura Borisov (“Anora”) and Guy Pearce (“The Brutalist”).
Zoe Saldaña, best known for headlining blockbusters like “Avatar,” got to show her singing-and-dancing side as an idealistic lawyer in “Emilia Pérez.” She was rewarded with a best supporting actress nomination. Her competition includes Ariana Grande (“Wicked”), Felicity Jones (“The Brutalist”), Monica Barbaro (“A Complete Unknown”) and Isabella Rossellini (“Conclave”). Rossellini’s mother, Ingrid Bergman, won the third of her Oscars in the best supporting actress category for 1974’s “Murder on the Orient Express.”
Brady Corbet, who struggled for nearly a decade to bring “The Brutalist” to the screen after financing for the project collapsed several times, was nominated for best director. His competition includes French auteurs Jacques Audiard (“Emilia Pérez”) and Coralie Fargeat (“The Substance”), as well as arthouse maverick Sean Baker (“Anora”) and studio mainstay James Mangold (“A Complete Unknown”). Every one of those filmmakers was nominated in multiple categories, having performed several different roles on the movies they made. Baker, for instance, is also nominated for editing, producing and penning the screenplay, while Audiard was recognized for writing a song his film, as well as co-writing its script.
Universal, which owns indie label Focus, dominated the nominations with 25 nods, the bulk of which came for “Wicked” and “Conclave.” Netflix, which released “Emilia Pérez,” scored 16 nominations, while A24, a plucky indie distributor known for embracing risky fare such as”The Brutalist,” a three-hour meditation on art and commerce, had 14 nominations.
There were several notable snubs and surprises. Denzel Washington, once seen as a lock for his villainous performance in “Gladiator II,” was overlooked, as was Margaret Qualley, who earned raves for playing Moore’s younger doppelgänger in “The Substance.” And Edward Berger, who gave “Conclave” its propulsive energy, and Jon M. Chu, who designed “Wicked’s” electrifying musical sequences, were shut out of the best director race, while “A Real Pain” failed to capture a best picture nomination despite earning some of the year’s best reviews.
The Oscars were first handed out nearly a century ago as a way to promote the movie business. In the ensuing 97 years, the film industry has undergone tectonic shifts — introducing sound and color (revolutions that changed the business forever), as well as 3D and Smell-O-Vision and 4DX (gambits that had less of an impact) — but few have been more significant than the rise of streaming platforms like Netflix.
These services have fundamentally altered the way movies are seen and experienced, and the theatrical part of the film business has often struggled to keep up. At the same time, COVID and a series of labor strikes in 2023 has left Hollywood with fewer movies to screen in cinemas. The impact of those disruptions can be tracked empirically, as the box office has failed to fully rebound from the pandemic. Domestic ticket sales in 2024 topped out at $8.7 billion, down more than 3.3% from 2023 (when revenues hit $9.04 billion) and down 23.5% from 2019 (when revenues reached $11.3 billion in the last pre-COVID period). And the stalled recovery has come as studios and streamers have enacted a series of cutbacks and shed jobs. Many of these companies — from Warner Bros. Discovery to Paramount Global — have sold themselves as the business has engaged in a period of frenzied consolidation that shows no signs of stopping.
The natural disasters that Los Angeles is still experiencing, as well as the corporate upheaval the business is stumbling through, means that the Academy Awards may feel less celebratory than usual. It will fall to Conan O’Brien, a former late night talk show staple turned podcasting mogul, to try to lift spirits as he embarks on his first stint as Oscars host. The show that O’Brien presides over will be held at the Dolby Theatre on March 2, with the Oscars airing, as it long has, on ABC. For the first time, it will also be available to stream live on Hulu, a concession to the shifting ways that audiences are watching movies and shows.
See the full list of nominees below as they’re announced.
Best Picture
“Anora,” (Neon) Alex Coco, Samantha Quan and Sean Baker, Producers
“The Brutalist” (A24)
“A Complete Unknown” (Searchlight) Fred Berger, James Mangold and Alex Heineman, Producers
“Conclave” (Focus Features) Tessa Ross, Juliette Howell and Michael A. Jackman, Producers
“Dune: Part Two” (Warner Bros.) Mary Parent, Cale Boyter, Tanya Lapointe and Denis Villeneuve, Producers
“Emilia Pérez” (Netflix)
“I’m Still Here” (Sony Pictures Classic)
“Nickel Boys” (Orion Pictures/Amazon MGM Studios)
“The Substance” (MUBI)
“Wicked” (Universal) Marc Platt, Producer
Best Director
Sean Baker, “Anora”
Brady Corbet “The Brutalist”
James Mangold, “A Complete Unknown”
Jacques Audiard, “Emilia Pérez”
Coralie Fargeat, “The Substance”
Actor in a Leading Role
Adrien Brody, “The Brutalist”
Timothée Chalamet, “A Complete Unknown”
Colman Domingo, “Sing Sing”
Ralph Fiennes, “Conclave”
Sebastian Stan, “The Apprentice”
Actress in a Leading Role
Cynthia Erivo, “Wicked”
Karla Sofía Gascón, “Emilia Pérez”
Mikey Madison, “Anora”
Demi Moore, “The Substance”
Fernanda Torres, “I’m Still Here”
Actor in a Supporting Role
Yura Borisov, “Anora”
Kieran Culkin, “A Real Pain”
Edward Norton, “A Complete Unknown”
Guy Pearce, “The Brutalist”
Jeremy Strong, “The Apprentice”
Actress in a Supporting Role
Monica Barbaro, “A Complete Unknown”
Ariana Grande, “Wicked”
Felicity Jones, “The Brutalist”
Isabella Rossellini, “Conclave”
Zoe Saldaña, “Emilia Pérez”
Adapted Screenplay
“A Complete Unknown”, Screenplay by James Mangold and Jay Cocks
“Conclave,” Screenplay by Peter Straughan
“Emilia Pérez,” Screenplay by Jacques Audiard in collaboration with Thomas Bidegain, Léa Mysius and Nicolas Livecchi
“Nickel Boys,” Screenplay by RaMell Ross & Joslyn Barnes
“Sing Sing,” Screenplay by Clint Bentley, Greg Kwedar, Story by Clint Bentley, Greg Kwedar, Clarence Maclin, John “Divine G” Whitfield
Original Screenplay
“Anora,” Written by Sean Baker
“The Brutalist,” Written by Brady Corbet, Mona Fastvold
“A Real Pain,” Written by Jesse Eisenberg
“September 5,” Written by Moritz Binder, Tim Fehlbaum, Co-Written by Alex David
“The Substance,” Written by Coralie Fargeat
Animated Short Film
“Beautiful Men,” (Miyu Distribution) Nicolas Keppens and Brecht Van Elslande
“In the Shadow of Cypress,” Shirin Sohani and Hossein Molayemi
“Magic Candies,” (Toei Animation) Daisuke Nishio and Takashi Washio
“Wander to Wonder,” ” (Miyu Distribution) Nina Gantz and Stienette Bosklopper
“Yuck!” (Miyu Distribution) Loïc Espuche and Juliette Marquet
Costume Design
“A Complete Unknown,” Arianne Phillips
“Conclave,” Lisy Christl
“Gladiator II,” Janty Yates and Dave Crossman
“Nosferatu,” Linda Muir
“Wicked,” Paul Tazewell
Live Action Short Film
“A Lien,” Sam Cutler-Kreutz and David Cutler-Kreutz
“Anuja,” Adam J. Graves and Suchitra Mattai
“I’m Not a Robot” (The New Yorker) Victoria Warmerdam and Trent
“The Last Ranger,” Cindy Lee and Darwin Shaw
“The Man Who Could Not Remain Silent” (Manifest) Nebojša Slijepčević and Danijel Pek
Makeup and Hairstyling
“A Different Man,” Mike Marino, David Presto and Crystal Jurado
“Emilia Pérez,” Julia Floch Carbonel, Emmanuel Janvier and Jean-Christophe Spadaccini
“Nosferatu,” David White, Traci Loader and Suzanne StokesMunton
“The Substance,” Pierre-Olivier Persin, Stéphanie Guillon and Marilyne Scarselli
“Wicked,” Frances Hannon, Laura Blount and Sarah Nuth
Original Score
“The Brutalist,” Daniel Blumberg
“Conclave,” Volker Bertelmann
“Emilia Pérez,” Clément Ducol and Camille
“Wicked,” John Powell and Stephen Schwartz
“The Wild Robot,” Kris Bowers
Animated Feature Film
“Flow” (Sideshow/Janus Films)
“Inside Out 2” (Walt Disney) Kelsey Mann and Mark Nielsen
“Memoir of a Snail” (IFC Films) Adam Elliot and Liz Kearney
“Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl” (Netflix)
“The Wild Robot” (Universal) Chris Sanders and Jeff Hermann
Cinematography
“The Brutalist,” Lol Crawley
“Dune: Part Two,” Greig Fraser
“Emilia Pérez,” Paul Guilhaume
“Maria,” Ed Lachman
“Nosferatu,” Jarin Blaschke
Documentary Feature Film
“Black Box Diaries” (MTV Documentary Films) Shiori Ito, Eric Nyari and Hanna Aqvilin
“No Other Land,” Basel Adra, Rachel Szor, Hamdan Ballal and Yuval Abraham
“Porcelain War” (Picturehouse) Brendan Bellomo, Slava Leontyev, Aniela Sidorska and Paula DuPre’ Pesmen
“Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat” (Kino Lorber) Johan Grimonprez, Daan Milius and Rémi Grellety
Netflix | Mubi/Everett Collection | Mike Coppola/Getty Images
The Academy unveiled its full line-up of Oscar nods Thursday morning, with “Emilia Pérez” leading the field with 13 nominations, followed by “The Brutalist” and “Wicked” with 10 each. While guild nominations and other preliminary awards bodies can help provide a comprehensive forecast for Oscar nominations, there are always a few curveballs mixed into the proceedings. Big names like Angelina Jolie and Denzel Washington missed out on acting nominations this year — and there were many, many more surprises.
SNUB: Angelina Jolie Misses for ‘Maria’
The star earned some of the best reviews of her career out of the Venice Film Festival for her portrayal of the opera icon Maria Callas. Director Pablo Larrain previously delivered Oscar nominations to two of his stars playing historical figures — Natalie Portman for “Jackie” in 2017 and Kristen Stewart for “Spencer” in 2022. But Jolie didn’t land a nod, falling behind in a highly competitive best actress field.
SNUB: Nicole Kidman Blanks for ‘Babygirl’ in Best Actress
The “Babygirl” star won the best actress prize at the Venice Film Festival and later won the same award from the National Board of Review. But after blanking at the Screen Actors Guild and BAFTAs, Kidman’s performance as a glum tech CEO who begins an office affair with young intern had lost too much momentum for Oscar recognition.
SNUB: Selena Gomez Misses in Supporting Actress
“Emilia Pérez” had no trouble securing its status as an awards frontrunner with an impressive number of nominations. But Gomez, the biggest name in Jacques Audiard’s audacious cartel musical, wound up missing in the supporting actress category. Certainly the Academy can be welcoming to pop stars entering prestige fare, as evidenced by Ariana Grande’s nod for “Wicked.” Gomez’s miss is a conspicuous one for a film that was otherwise top-to-bottom loved by the Academy.
SURPRISE: Jeremy Strong Gets His First Oscar Nomination
The “Succession” star earned rave reviews for “The Apprentice,” the Donald Trump origin story sparked by Strong’s turn as the ferocious Roy Cohn. After a splashy debut at Cannes, no major U.S. distributor seemed willing to touch the controversial feature until upstart Briarcliff picked it up. Even with Trump back in office and awards season speeches so far staying light on politics, Strong’s performance managed to draw enough support to put him in the supporting actor race.
SNUB: ‘Gladiator II’ Comes Up Empty for Best Picture and Denzel Washington
Ridley Scott’s decades-later follow-up to his best picture Oscar winner only landed a costume design nod. Heading into the fall, the Paramount blockbuster was seen as a potential awards juggernaut, with some expecting Scott to be a competitor for the best director prize. Despite a successful run in theaters and strong buzz for Denzel Washington, the swords-and-sandals sequel didn’t find support with the Academy beyond craft.
SURPRISE: ‘The Substance’ Lands in Best Picture
Even as Demi Moore delivered a standout speech accepting the best actress prize at the Golden Globes, it seemed unlikely that her ooey-gooey horror film would be able to find widespread support among the Academy. Oscar voters love to recognize the career of a legacy star — but butt shots? Goblin transformations? Firehoses of blood? Well, they like those too apparently, since “The Substance” surged in for a best picture nomination that seemed unlikely even mere weeks ago.
SURPRISE: Sebastian Stan Surges With ‘The Apprentice’
Despite its controversial take on Donald Trump, Stan’s award season narrative made plenty of noise for the Ali Abbasi film. Stan’s well-documented research for and commitment to the role was enough to get Academy attention.
SNUB: Denis Villeneuve Misses in Best Director
Even though the “Dune” filmmaker missed a directing nomination for his first entry in the sci-fi action series, Villeneuve was widely seen as a shoo-in for a nod after “Dune: Part II” debuted nearly a year ago, remaining one of 2024’s best-reviewed (and most commercial) films through year’s end. Alas, Villeneuve was overlooked again. Some prognosticators compare “Dune’s” awards chances with Peter Jackson’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy, which largely swept the Oscars with its third and final entry “Return of the King.” Notably, Jackson also blanked in the best director category for his series’ second entry, “The Two Towers.” Perhaps Villeneuve will finally get his flowers with his eventual trilogy capper “Dune Messiah.”
SURPRISE: Fernanda Torres Is Still Here in the Best Actress Race
Despite going up against Academy-friendly names like Nicole Kidman and Kate Winslet, the “I’m Still Here” star was able to break through in the awards race to land an acting nomination. After surprising with a best actress win at the Golden Globes, Torres’ momentum has only surged since. As Academy voters caught up with the Brazilian drama, a wave of support unfurled from vocal fans on social media. Now, “I’m Still Here” is one of the few foreign-language features to land an above-the-line nomination at the Oscars.
SNUB: Edward Berger shut out for directing “Conclave”
The “All Quiet on the Western Front” director’s popular papal follow-up scored eight nods, including best picture. Berger was a frontrunner in directing, but couldn’t make it into the crowded field. Yet the snub isn’t any sort of bellwether of the film’s best picture chances, as “Green Book,” “CODA” and “Argo” have all taken home that top statue in recent years without a best director nomination.
SURPRISE: “I’m Still Here” enters the best picture race
Despite strong support for Fernanda Torres and a shoo-in for a nomination in best international feature film, “I’m Still Here” wasn’t widely predicted to elevate into a best picture slot.
SNUB: Pamela Anderson and Jamie Lee Curtis couldn’t land acting nods for “The Last Showgirl”
Anderson made a splash in the awards race with her portrayal of showgirl Shelly Gardner, which showed another side of the actor. Hollywood loves a comeback story, so when she received nods at the Gotham Awards, the Golden Globes and the SAGs, it seemed there was a chance for her to disrupt a competitive category. Additionally, Curtis — who won the best supporting actress statue in 2023 for her role in “Everything Everywhere All at Once” — earned buzz for another supporting role in “Showgirl.” Curtis also received a SAG and a BAFTA nod for playing former showgirl Annette in the film.
SNUB: Daniel Craig misses acting nomination for “Queer”
Craig had a strong campaign for his vulnerable turn in Luca Guadagnino’s adaptation of the William S. Burroughs work. The actor’s portrayal of William Lee was celebrated by a National Board of Review best actor win and a Golden Globe nomination, but couldn’t keep up momentum for an Oscar nom.
SURPRISE: The little-seen “Better Man” gets a best visual effects nod
Due to his lack of American star power, this Robbie Williams biopic was a colossal box office flop. Yet apparently enough voters saw the film to celebrate the high-concept, chimpanzee-forward musical.
SNUB: Clarence Maclin shut out of an acting nod for “Sing Sing”
“Sing Sing” had a long campaign cycle, given its July 2024 release date and modest box office returns. Yet the acclaimed film was able to make big waves during the Oscar nominations, as it landed three nods. That said, Clarence Maclin, a favorite for supporting actor by playing himself, was snubbed despite a strong campaign. Yet he did receive an adapted screenplay nomination for the movie, which he co-wrote. Colman Domingo was also nominated for lead actor, and the film’s “Like a Bird” received a best original song nod.
FILE – Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud attends an event on the day of the G20 summit in New Delhi, Sept. 9, 2023. (AP Photo/Evelyn Hockstein, Pool, File)
Saudi Arabia’s crown prince said Thursday the kingdom wants to invest $600 billion in the United States over the next four years, comments that came after President Donald Trump mused about returning to the kingdom as his first foreign trip.
The comments from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, reported early Thursday by the state-run Saudi Press Agency, came in a phone call with Trump.
“The crown prince affirmed the kingdom’s intention to broaden its investments and trade with the United States over the next four years, in the amount of $600 billion, and potentially beyond that,” the report said.
There was no immediate readout from the White House on the call. The crown prince, the de facto ruler of the oil-rich kingdom, also spoke with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio early Thursday.
On Monday after his inauguration, Trump talked about possibly heading to the kingdom again as his first foreign trip, like he did in 2017.
More than 100 Reddit communities have banned users from posting links to X in protest at owner Elon Musk’s controversial arm gesture at a rally celebrating Donald Trump’s return to office.
The billionaire twice extended his arm out straight as he thanked the crowd for “making it happen.”
Critics, including some historians, said it was a Nazi salute – Mr Musk has dismissed that, saying comparisons with Hitler were “tired” and “dirty tricks.”
However many Reddit users have been unpersuaded by his response describing his actions as “hateful”, leading the moderators of scores of communities – or subreddits – to stop content being shared on X.
X has not commented but Reddit has stressed there is no sitewide ban on X links, telling the BBC in a statement it “has a longstanding commitment to freedom of speech and freedom of association”.
However the platform relies heavily on community moderation, where unpaid individuals known as Redditors decide what is – and isn’t – allowed to be published on their own corner of the website.
In many instances, those Redditors have reached a different conclusion, deciding Mr Musk’s actions were so offensive that they won’t link to content from their subreddits on X, potentially reducing traffic, engagement and – ultimately – revenue.
The biggest subreddits to have enforced the ban include basketball community r/NBA, which has 15 million members, female-focused community r/TwoXChromosomes, which has 14 million members, and American football community r/NFL, which has 12 million members.
It is worth remembering that subreddits are almost always run by fans – it does not mean that the NFL or NBA organisations are taking a stance against Musk.
The BBC has independently verified that at least 100 subreddits have banned X posts.
Of this number, more than 60 have at least 100,000 members.
But the actual number that have instituted the ban will likely be significantly higher by taking into account smaller subreddits with only a few thousand members.
And there are many more communities discussing a potential blacklisting.
Who and why?
The subreddits run by fans of football clubs Liverpool, Celtic and Tottenham Hotspur have all instituted the bans, as have communities for many US sports sides as well as Formula 1.
The subreddits where residents of many cities and countries gather around the world – ranging from New Jersey to South Korea – have also blocked posts to X.
And gamers are also amongst those to bring in the ban for video games including Baldur’s Gate 3 and World of Warcraft.
But while the blacklisting may have first started in some of these communities, it is popping up in a variety of places now where people gather to discuss all sorts of topics, ranging from RuPaul’s Drag Race to Disneyland and even the military.
While the vast majority of subreddits discussing a ban are in favour of it, there are some that have refused.
The moderators of the Maine community for example say they won’t institute a ban so long as “the state maintain official accounts there”.
And those running a group for people in British Columbia said they simply aren’t “doing censorship here”.
Does it matter?
Though there are many subreddits which already disallow posts from social media, those built around professional sports in particular may have a big impact on referrals to X.
That’s because sports subreddits generally get a lot of content from links to athletes, analysts and journalists who spend a lot of time posting online.
For example, the top two most popular posts of all time on the NBA subreddits are screenshots taken from X, while three of the top ten most popular posts of all time on the AEW wrestling subreddit are screenshots from the platform.
And gaming subreddits have a similar story, with the top posts on the Animal Crossing and Kingdom Hearts communities both screenshots from X.
But that is not to say the bans will necessarily be permanent – Reddit is known for this sort of community movement to protest against wider issues, which doesn’t always work out.
Evacuation orders were lifted Thursday for tens of thousands as firefighters with air support slowed the spread of a huge wildfire churning through rugged mountains north of Los Angeles, but new blazes erupted in San Diego County, briefly triggering more evacuations.
Southern California is under a red flag warning for critical fire risk through Friday. The area has been facing constant challenges in controlling the fires, as dangerous winds gained strength again Thursday.
The Hughes Fire broke out late Wednesday morning and in less than a day charred nearly 16 square miles (41 square kilometers) of trees and brush near Castaic Lake, a popular recreation area about 40 miles (64 kilometers) from the devastating Eaton and Palisades fires that are burning for a third week.
Crews made significant progress by late afternoon on the Hughes Fire, with more than one-third of it contained.
Two new blazes were reported Thursday in the San Diego area. Evacuations were ordered but were later lifted after a brush fire erupted in the late afternoon in the wealthy enclave of La Jolla near the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine. Further south, near the U.S.-Mexico border, another blaze was quickly spreading through the Otay Mountain Wilderness, home to the endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly and other unique species.
In Ventura County, a new fire briefly prompted the evacuation of California State University Channel Islands in Camarillo. Water-dropping helicopters made quick progress against the Laguna Fire that erupted in hills above the campus of about 7,000 students. The evacuation order was later downgraded to a warning.
Rain is forecast for the weekend, potentially ending Southern California’s monthslong dry spell. Winds are also not as strong as they were when the Palisades and Eaton fires broke out, allowing for firefighting aircraft to dump tens of thousands of gallons of fire retardant.
That helped the fight against the Hughes Fire in the Castaic area north of Los Angeles, allowing helicopters to drop water, which kept it from growing, fire spokesperson Jeremy Ruiz said.
“We had helicopters dropping water until around 3 a.m. That kept it in check,” he said.
Nearly 54,000 residents in the Castaic area were still under evacuation warnings Thursday, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said. There were no reports of homes or other structures burned.
Kayla Amara drove to Castaic’s Stonegate neighborhood Wednesday to collect items from the home of a friend who had rushed to pick up her daughter at preschool. As Amara was packing the car, she learned the fire had exploded in size and decided to hose down the property.
Amara, a nurse who lives in nearby Valencia, said she’s been on edge for weeks as major blazes devastated Southern California.
“It’s been stressful with those other fires, but now that this one is close to home it’s just super stressful,” she said.
The Palisades Fire was more than three-quarters contained, and the Eaton Fire was 95% under control Thursday. The two fires have killed at least 28 people and destroyed more than 14,000 structures since they broke out Jan. 7.
Rain was expected to start Saturday, according to the National Weather Service. Officials welcomed the wet weather, but crews also were shoring up hillsides and installing barriers to prevent debris flows as residents returned to the charred Pacific Palisades and Altadena areas.
The California fires have overall caused at least $28 billion in insured damage and probably a little more in uninsured damage, according to Karen Clark and Company, a disaster modeling firm known for accurate post-catastrophe damage assessments.
On the heels of that assessment, California Republicans are pushing back against suggestions by President Donald Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson and others that federal disaster aid for victims of wildfires should come with strings attached.
The oil price is lower following President Trump’s comments on oil
President Donald Trump said he would ask Saudi Arabia and other Opec nations to “bring down the cost of oil” and doubled-down on his threat to use tariffs.
In a speech to executives at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday, the US president said he was ‘surprised’ that Opec hadn’t brought down the price of oil before the elections.
“Right now the price is high enough that that war will continue,” he said, referring to the Russia-Ukraine war and suggesting that the higher oil price was helping to sustain funding for the conflict in Moscow.
“You gotta bring down the oil price, that will end that war. You could end that war,” he added
The president’s comments on the oil price came after he spoke to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Wednesday. According to Saudi State media Bin Salman pledged to invest as much as $600bn in the US over the next four years, however this figure was not mentioned in the White House statement after the call.
Despite the cordial exchange, Trump said he would be asking “the Crown Prince, who’s a fantastic guy, to round it out to around $1tn”.
The price of crude fell by 1% following Trump’s comments.
According to David Oxley, Chief Climate and Commodities Economist at Capital Economics these comments are in keeping with Trump’s desire for lower gasoline prices.
“[It’s] his clear intention to use energy as leverage over Russia to end the war in Ukraine. That said, lower oil prices will certainly not incentivise US oil producers to “drill, baby, drill” – particularly in high-cost Alaska.”
“Of course, Saudi Arabia would not be guaranteed to heed a request by President Trump to expand oil production and to bring down global oil prices.”
The US president’s appearance via video at the World Economic Forum marked his first address to a global audience since his inauguration earlier this week.
He used the platform to insist that companies around the world manufacture their products in the US or face bruising tariffs on imported goods entering the American market.
BBC reporter, Oliver Smith, who was in the room with the delegates as the President made his speech, said there were “a few stoney faces” as executives left the hall after the speech, but some happy ones too.
“A very powerful speech,” says one.
“I liked it, I thought it was really good” says another, a delegate from the US.
“A lot of it made sense. Common sense. He’s just looking for fair trade”, he added
One Swiss executive though was pretty downbeat. “It’s nothing new, but it’s clear what he wants to do”, he said.
“Am I happy? No I’m not happy. I think it’s bad for the world,” he adds
Trump also said he would demand an immediate drop in interest rates, which he said had led to deeper deficits and resulted in what he described as economic calamity under the tenure of his predecessor, President Joe Biden.
“This begins with confronting the economic chaos caused by the failed policies of the last administration,” he said.
“Over the past four years, our government racked up $8 trillion in wasteful deficit spending and inflicted nation wrecking energy restrictions, crippling regulations and hidden taxes like never before.”
Southport murderer Axel Rudakubana has been jailed for a minimum of 52 years – with the judge saying it’s “highly likely” he will never be released.
Warning: This article contains details of violence that some readers might find distressing.
The 18-year-old pleaded guilty to murdering Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class.
Rudakubana also admitted trying to murder eight other children, as well as instructor Leanne Lucas and businessman John Hayes, on 29 July last year.
The judge, Mr Justice Goose, gave him 13 life sentences and said if Rudakubana had been 18 at the time of the attack he would have received a whole-life term – meaning no possibility of release.
He said the killings had caused “shock and revulsion” to the nation and Rudakubana would have killed all 26 children if he’d been able.
Alice, Bebe and Elsie were stabbed multiple times in a ferocious attack that lasted 15 minutes.
Prosecutors told the court that, while in custody, the 18-year-old said: “It’s a good thing those children are dead, I’m so glad, I’m so happy.”
Elsie Dot Stancombe, Alice da Silva Aguiar and Bebe King. Pic: Merseyside Police
Rudakubana’s attack on “innocent, happy young girls” was clearly premeditated and he had showed no remorse, the judge added.
He will be 70 before a parole board can consider releasing him, but the judge said it was “highly likely” he will never be freed.
The triple-killer was sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court, but was not present for the judge’s remarks after telling his lawyer he would be “disruptive” during proceedings.
During sentencing earlier in the day he was twice ordered out of the dock after shouting that he “felt ill”.
Rudakubana told his lawyer he had chest pains, was too ill to continue and wanted to see a paramedic, but the judge said two paramedics had deemed him fit to continue.
‘How can I live knowing children died?’
Before sentencing, the court heard emotional statements from victims and families.
Alice’s family – who had been planning to surprise her with a trip to Disneyland – said she was “strong and confident” with “unlimited potential”. They said her death had “shattered our souls”.
Elsie’s mum said Rudakubana was a coward and “beyond contempt”.
“He took our daughter. There’s no greater loss and no greater pain. He has left us with a lifetime of grief,” she said.
Dance teacher Leanne Lucas, who was stabbed in the back, said she couldn’t give herself “compassion or accept praise, as how can I live knowing I survived when children died?”.
Killer pulled girl back inside
Rudakubana was 17 when he walked into the dance studio before silently, indiscriminately stabbing his victims with a kitchen knife – a 20cm blade he had bought on Amazon using encrypted software to hide his identity.
He stabbed some of his victims in the back as they tried to escape, pulling one girl back inside to attack her – she was knifed dozens of times but survived.
Police arrested Rudakubana inside the Hart Space venue as he stood over a body, still holding the knife.
Officers later found a plastic kitchen box containing the toxin ricin under his bed in the village of Banks, Lancashire, along with other weapons including a machete and arrows.
An analysis of his devices revealed an obsession with violence, war and genocide, with documents discovered including an academic study of an al Qaeda training manual.
Police believe he used techniques he learned from the PDF file, which contained instructions on how to commit knife and ricin attacks, to carry out the mass stabbing.
‘Cowardly and vicious’
The 18-year-old pleaded guilty to charges of producing ricin and possession of information useful for the purposes of terrorism.
The judge said it was highly likely he would have used the potent toxin if he hadn’t carried out the stabbing attack.
Merseyside police chief Serena Kennedy said there was no evidence Rudakubana ascribed to any political or religious ideology and was not fighting for a cause, so the “cowardly and vicious attack” was not treated as terrorism.
“This is a young man with an unhealthy obsession with violence,” she said.
“His only purpose was to kill the youngest and most vulnerable and spread the greatest level of fear and outrage, which he succeeded in doing.”
The attack sparked the UK riots last summer after false claims online that Rudakubana – born in Cardiff to Christian parents from Rwanda – was a newly arrived asylum seeker.
Missed opportunities
The government has announced an inquiry into how the state failed to recognise the risk posed by Rudakubana and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he will consider changing the definition of terrorism if necessary.
The teenager was referred three times by schools to the government’s anti-extremism programme between 2019 and 2021 over concerns about his interest in school shootings, Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, and the London Bridge attacks.
He also had repeated contact with police, the courts, the justice system and mental health services in the years before he carried out the attack, including over using school computers to research acts of violence.
Donald Trump has ordered the release of thousands of classified files on the assassination of President John F Kennedy.
The 1963 killing in Dallas is the source of one of the most well-known conspiracy theories of modern times.
Lee Harvey Oswald was said to be the gunman, but was shot dead himself two days after JFK’s killing.
Conspiracy theories have always swirled around the 1963 assassination. Pic: Reuters
Theories that have persisted include that there was a second shooter and that it was plot connected to communist Cuba.
President Trump had promised during his election campaign to make public the last withheld records on the case.
He signed an executive order to that effect on Thursday, telling reporters “everything will be revealed”.
The order will also declassify remaining federal records on the assassinations of civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr in 1968, and JFK’s brother, Robert F Kennedy, who was shot dead the same year while running for president.
Mr Trump had promised to uncover the documents during his first term but agreed with CIA and FBI pleas to keep some secret.
JFK’s nephew, Robert F Kennedy Jr, is the president’s pick for health secretary and has said he is not convinced just one man was behind his uncle’s murder.
After signing the order, Mr Trump ordered the pen should be given to RFK Jr.
However, JFK’s grandson Jack Schlossberg hit back at President Trump’s executive order, saying there was “nothing heroic” about it.
“The truth is alot sadder than the myth – a tragedy that didn’t need to happen. Not part of an inevitable grand scheme,” he wrote on X.
“Declassification is using JFK as a political prop, when he’s not here to punch back.”
The attorney general and head of national intelligence must now come up with a plan in the next 15 days to declassify the JFK files, and within 45 days for the other cases.
It is therefore unclear exactly when they will see the light of day – and experts on the case are not holding their breath for any major revelations.
Only a few thousand of the millions of records on the JFK case are still to be fully declassified.
“There’s always the possibility that something would slip through that would be the tiny tip of a much larger iceberg that would be revealing,” said Larry J Sabato, author of a book on Kennedy.
“That’s what researchers look for. Now, odds are you won’t find that but it is possible that it’s there.”
Facebook owner Meta has denied claims from some users that they have been “forced” to follow social media accounts belonging to the Trump administration.
Users on Facebook and Instagram have claimed they found they were “automatically” following the official accounts of Donald Trump and JD Vance following their inauguration on Monday.
The claims come after Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta made a number of policy changes to its social media apps which better aligned them with the Trump administration.
But Meta has denied it forced anyone to follow the accounts, and highlighted that the president and vice president’s accounts are linked to the US offices rather than the individual, meaning supporters who followed those accounts for the previous president and vice president still do so despite Mr Trump and Mr Vance taking them over from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Some users had made further claims that they were being forced to follow the accounts, and had been unable to unfollow them when trying to do so.
Singer Gracie Abrams, in a post to her Instagram Stories, said she had to “unfollow @vp and @potus three separate times today because Meta kept automatically refollowing the accounts”.
She added: “How curious! Had to block them in order to make sure I am nowhere near that.”
In a statement, a Meta spokesperson said: “People were not made to automatically follow any of the official Facebook or Instagram accounts for the president, vice president or first lady.
President Donald Trump signed executive orders that roll back protections for transgender peopleImage: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
US President Donald Trump has had a busy first few days in office. He has signed more than 100 executive orders, directives the president can give to federal agencies and departments without having to consult Congress. Several of them were related to LGBTQ+ rights.
During his inauguration speech, Trump announced that under his leadership the US government would only recognize two genders. This means that the government will not allow nonbinary and intersex people, who are neither male nor female, to have their identities reflected on their passports and other official documents.
“It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” the executive order Trump signed on day one of his second term reads. “These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.”
The order, titled “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” also makes clear that the US government does not recognize transgender people’s identities any longer.
Trump: ‘False claim’
“Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women,” the presidential directive states. “This is wrong.”
It is a “false claim,” according to Trump’s executive order, that people born with a prostate could “identify as and thus become women and vice versa.”
There are about 1.6 million transgender people in the United States aged 13 and older, according to the Williams Institute School of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles. The American Medical Association (AMA) is in favor of facilitating gender-affirming health care, which is any medical care that helps people transition to the gender they identify with.
Receiving this care is important for transgender people; the AMA states that such care “has been linked to dramatically reduced rates of suicide attempts [and] decreased rates of depression and anxiety.”
No more diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives
Trump also signed an executive order to end all “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives in federal departments and agencies. According to supporters, DEI programs ensure that underrepresented groups — be that based on race, gender or other markers — get a fair chance and equal treatment in the workplace. Opponents call DEI initiatives “immoral discrimination programs” and “public waste,” as Trump’s directive states.
In addition to signing his own executive orders, the US president can also reverse those signed by his predecessor. Trump on the first day of his second term revoked a Joe Biden directive titled “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.”
It ordered all federal departments to review and, if necessary, revise their policies prohibiting sex discrimination to make sure that they also banned discrimination against members of LGBTQ+ communities. This is no longer valid.
What will the effects of Trump’s executive orders be?
Since 2022, US citizens were able to select X as a sex marker on their passports instead of M or F for “male” or “female.” It is unclear as of yet what will happen with passports that currently have the X mark. But since only two genders are recognized by the Trump administration, people who identify as nonbinary or intersex will not be able to receive new documents that reflect that identity any longer. This can also be an obstacle to having their identity recognized elsewhere, for example at school or at work.
Not recognizing transgender and nonbinary identities comes with a slew of consequences for the people affected. Trans people are now unable to change their sex on government documents to align their IDs with their gender identity. The order also puts a stop to the requirement at federal government workplaces that transgender employees be referred to by their preferred pronouns.
Since the government will only recognize a person as being the gender they were assigned at birth, transgender women will be sent to men’s prisons. And transgender employees at federal government departments and agencies will have to use the restrooms of the sex they were born with, not the one they identify as.
All DEI officers at federal agencies and departments are on paid leave starting Wednesday as their initiatives will be shut down.
The rescinding of Biden’s executive order means that there is no regulation for employers distinctly stating that they cannot discriminate against employees with LGBTQ+ identities. This could include a transgender person trying and failing to get their employer to refer to them by the pronouns that match their identity, or someone being excluded from networking events because they wanted to bring their same-sex spouse.
Demi Moore landed a best actress Oscar nomination (Picture: AP)
The Oscar 2025 nominees were announced on Thursday afternoon and fans have been shocked by some of the top selections.
Saturday Night Live and Wicked star Bowen Yang and Bodies Bodies Bodies actress Rachel Sennott announced the nods this morning, while Conan O’Brien will host the main show next month.
Among the Academy Award nominees, Demi Moore landed her first nomination for her efforts in the Substance, after smashing her awards season.
The 62-year-old was mentioned in the best actress list, alongside WIcked’s Cynthia Erivo, Anora star Mikey Madison, Fernanda Torres for I’m Still Here and Karla Sofía Gascón for Emilia Pérez.
Timothee Chalamet has been recognized for his efforts as Bob Dylan in the recent A Complete Unknown biopic, earning a best actor nod alongside a host of other huge stars.
The Brutalist star Adrien Brody also makes up the list, beside Ralph Fiennes for Conclave, Sing Sing’s Colman Domingo and The Apprentice actor Sebastian Stan.
Cynthia’s Wicked co-star Ariana Grande earned her first ever Oscar nod in the best supporting actress category, going up against Monica Barbaro for A Complete Unknown, Felicity Jones in the Brutalist, Conclave’s Isabella Rossellini and Zoe Saldana for Emilia Pérez.
Succession stars Kieran Culkin and Jeremy Strong will be battling it out against each other for supporting actor, thanks to their incredible efforts in A Real Pain and The Apprentice respectfully.
Anora star Yura Borisov, A Complete Unknown’s Edward Norton and The Brutalist actor Guy Pearce also make up the category.
In the running for best director, A Complete Unknown filmmaker James Mangold is up against Anora’s Sean Baker, Brady Corbet for the Brutalist, Jacques Audiard for Emilia Pérez and Coralie Fargeat for the Substance.
Best picture nominees include Anora, The Brutalist, Emilia Pérez, I’m Still Here, Nickel Boys and The Substance.
Wicked, Dune: Part Two, Conclave and A Complete Unknown make up the rest of the list.
Who was snubbed in the Oscars 2025 nominations?
Although Emilia Pérez raked in 13 nominations in total, including nods for Zoe Saldana, director Jacques Audiard and Karla Sofía Gascón, there was a major snub for Selena Gomez, who was tipped to be mentioned in the acting categories.
The Only Murders actress played Jessi in the hit film, and had garnered attention during awards season so far – with Bafta and Golden Globes nods for the role.
Daniel Craig was also left off the best actor list, despite impressing critics and fans alike with his efforts in Queer.
The film was nowhere to be found in the nominations announcement on Thursday morning.
Angelina Jolie has also earned rave reviews for her efforts as opera icon Maria Callas, but was not recognized by the Academy for the film – which only picked up one nomination in total, for cinematography.
Another huge shock was the absence of Kneecap – Rich Peppiatt’s movie about the iconic Irish group.
The film was met with huge applause when it premiered at Sundance last year, and was tipped to take home a trophy in a few months.
Instead, I’m Still Here, The Girl With The Needle, Emilia Pérez, The Seed of the Sacred Fig and Flow were nominated in the international feature film category.
Film fans were left shocked when Challengers, starring Zendaya, snubbed from the shortlist.
Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’ efforts on the soundtrack could not secure a mention in the best original score category.
In a huge change from previous years, the Academy announced that there would be no live performances of the best original song nominees – due to the ongoing LA wildfires.
Normally the festivities include live performances of all the nominees for the best original song category, Last year memorably included a larger-than-life I’m Just Ken rendition led by Ryan Gosling and a whole host of fellow Kens.
An internal letter, via Entertainment Weekly, said the show will ‘reflect on the recent events while highlighting the strength, creativity, and optimism that defines Los Angeles and our industry’ and include ‘powerful musical moments.
‘We will celebrate their artistry through personal reflections from the teams who bring these songs to life. All of this, and more, will uncover the stories and inspiration behind this year’s nominees.’
Instead, there is expected to be a spotlight on the songwriters behind the nominations.
The Substance nabbed five nominations, and all eyes will be on Demi to take home the best actress trophy next month.
The body horror flick, starring the Ghost legend and Margaret Qualley, has delighted and disgusted fans since it was released in September 2024.
She shared her delight at the nomination on Instagram, in a post on her story.
Sharing a post from the official Substance Instagram page, she simply wrote: ‘Thank you @theacademy. And congratulations @trythesubstance @coralie_fargeat.’
In a further statement to Us Weekly, she added: ‘Being nominated for an Oscar is an incredible honor and these last few months have been beyond my wildest dreams.
‘Truly there are no words to fully express my joy and overwhelming gratitude for this recognition. Not only for me but for what this film represents. I am deeply humbled.’
Demi made history at the Golden Globes recently, as she won the Best Actress award for the first time ever.
‘Thirty years ago, I had a producer tell me that I was a popcorn actress and at that time, I made that mean that this wasn’t something that I was allowed to have, that I could do movies that were successful, that made a lot of money, but that I couldn’t be acknowledged,’ she said.
‘I bought in, and I believed that, and that corroded me over time, to the point where I thought a few years ago that maybe this was it, maybe I was complete. I’ve done what I was supposed to do.
‘And as I was at kind of a low point, I had this magical, bold, courageous, out-of-the-box, absolutely bonkers script come across my desk called The Substance, and the universe told me that you’re not done.’
The film has also received five Bafta nominations, plus six Critics Choice Award nominations.
The Brutalist scored 10 nods and has received high praise from critics – the nearly four-hour-long film from Brady Corbet has already won three Golden Globe Awards, including Best Motion Picture Drama.
The Brutalist won nine Bafta nominations and another nine nominations at the Critics Choice Award.
The epic period drama film is the biopic of an imaginary Hungarian architect and Holocaust survivor, László Tóth – played by Adrian Brody.
Wicked also got 10 nominations, including a best actress mention for Cynthia, and a best supporting actress tip for Ariana, marking her first Oscar nod.
Taking to Instagram after the announcement, the Glinda actress thanked the Academy in a lengthy post, sharing that she was ‘picking her head up between sobs’.
‘Picking my head up in between sobs to say thank you so much to @theacademy for this unfathomable recognition. I cannot stop crying, to no one’s surprise,’ she wrote.
‘I’m humbled and deeply honored to be in such brilliant company and sharing this with tiny Ari who sat and studied Judy Garland singing Somewhere Over the Rainbow just before the big, beautiful bubble entered. I’m so proud of you, tiny.
‘Thank you again, from the bottom of my heart, for this acknowledgement @theacademy. Thank you @jonmchu for taking this chance on me and for being the most unbelievably brilliant leader, human being, and most fierce friend.
‘I am so deeply proud of my beautiful Wicked family. I am so proud of my Elphie, my sister, my dear @cynthiaerivo. Your brilliance is never ending and you deserve every flower (tulip) in every garden. I love you unconditionally, always.
‘I don’t quite have all my words yet, I’m still trying to breathe. but thank you. Oh my goodness, thank you. Universal, Marc, my family, my heart. Lemons and melons and pears, oh my.’
Cynthia followed suit on her own page, writing: ‘Moments like this don’t come along very often, and when they do, it is sacrilege to let them pass by without a moment of gratitude.
‘I am grateful, grateful to @theacademy, grateful to be a part of something that makes people feel seen, grateful to be a cog in the wheel of a piece that makes us believe in magic, grateful to have experienced a dream come true, and deeply deeply grateful for this unbelievable recognition.
‘I often get asked what I would say to my younger self. Well today there’s nothing to be said. She is smiling, beaming, glowing from ear to ear. That speaks volumes.’
To my sister, @arianagrande, what a joy it is to be here with you watching as you ascend and amaze and become the actress you were meant to be,’ she continued. ‘Congratulations first time nominee, I’m so so proud of you!! There is no one in the world I would have wanted to do this with more than you.
‘Thank you @jonmchu, our fearless leader whose kindness provided us with the room to play, you are deserving of all good things and I’m lucky to call you my brother. Marc, Winnie, Stephen, Universal fam, Wicked fam!!! LETS GO!!!’
Zoe celebrated her best actress mention for Emilia Pérez on social media earlier today, posting a smiling selfie with her loved ones.
‘I am truly honored and grateful for the nomination,’ she captioned the post. ‘Thank you so much for considering me for this award. I am thrilled to be among such talented company. Emilia Pérez was made with love.
‘Thank you to @theacademy and its members for recognizing our work. Jacques!!!!! BINGO!’
While Ralph opened up about his nod in a message shared via PA, which read: ‘I’m thrilled to be nominated and to be celebrating the other nominations for Conclave.
‘Edward Berger brought an extraordinary cast and crew together – he is an inspirational director with rare insight and a unique vision which lies at the heart of this film.’
The awards season has already been filled with drama as shows have been boycotted and cancelled because of the fires.
Some celebrities – including Stephen King – have spoken about cancelling the Oscars and revealed that he wouldn’t be voting for any of the films in the lead-up to the show.
Despite winning four Golden Globes, five European Film Awards and being nominated for eleven Baftas, Emilia Pérez, Jacques Audiard’s musical about a Mexican drug lord, has been hit with major criticism for its depiction of Mexico.
A California woman was arrested Wednesday after 27 dead horses were found across her multiple properties, officials said.
Jan Johnson, of Clements, was booked in the San Joaquin County Jail on charges of cruelty to an animal, threatening a public official, criminal threats and possession of a short-barrel shotgun.
Sheriff’s deputies along with Animal Services officers executed a search warrant at properties in Clements, located about 40 miles southeast of Sacramento, as part of an ongoing animal neglect investigation.
“During the operation, several malnourished horses were discovered on the premises with limited access to any food or water and approximately 27 deceased horses were located,” the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office said in a Facebook post.
Animal Services officers and veterinarians immediately began to triage and evaluate the horses. Four horses and one bull had to be euthanized because of the neglect, the sheriff’s office said.
A suspected cartel terrorist attacked and shot an American hiker multiple times near the San Diego-Mexico border, according to the US Customs and Border Protection.
Border patrol said a group of hikers were bombarded with gunfire, with the victim struck twice and robbed in El Centro Sector’s area in the Jacumba Wilderness.
“Cartels think they can bring their war here. Think again!” Chief Patrol Agent Gregory K. Bovino posted to X Wednesday afternoon.
The border agents arrive at the scene. USBPChiefELC/X
“Americans won’t be intimidated. Our agents & BORTAC will confront these threats HEAD ON!”
Bovino included a video in his social post of nearly a dozen agents carrying what appears to be the victim on a gurney into a helicopter.
A Canadian citizen was also shot at and later robbed during the callous attack, US Border Patrol El Centro Sector posted on Facebook. He was not wounded.
“He was here legally, visiting and out for a hike with his friends,” according to the post.
“He was shot at (uninjured) and later robbed after bravely staying at his wounded friend’s side.”
It remains unclear when the incident happened and if the attacker was taken into custody.
Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice for defense secretary, appears before the Senate Armed Services Committee for his confirmation hearing, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2025. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, paid $50,000 to the woman who accused him of sexual assault in 2017, according to answers he provided to a senator during his confirmation process that The Associated Press has obtained.
The written answers were provided to Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in response to additional questions she had for Hegseth as part of the vetting process.
His attorney, Timothy Parlatore, declined to comment Thursday on the dollar figure, which was previously unknown. In November, Parlatore confirmed that the settlement payment had been made, and Hegseth told senators during his confirmation hearing last week that he was “falsely accused” and completely cleared.
News of the payment came as the Senate advanced Hegseth’s nomination along party lines, with a final vote on his confirmation expected Friday. Democrats — and two Republicans — have raised concerns about Hegseth, who also has faced allegations of excessive drinking and abuse of his second wife, which he denies.
Two days after Hegseth was grilled by senators at this confirmation hearing, Trump’s transition team briefed the two leaders of the Senate Armed Services Committee on an additional statement that Hegseth’s second wife, Samantha Hegseth, had provided to the FBI.
In the statement that the transition team read Jan. 16 to Mississippi Republican Roger Wicker and Rhode Island Democrat Jack Reed, she said Pete Hegseth had and continues to have a problem with alcohol abuse, a person familiar with the FBI briefing and its findings told The Associated Press.
Reed has called Hegseth’s FBI background check substandard. He said in a statement Thursday that he and Wicker received multiple FBI briefings about the defense secretary nominee, something he had not seen in more than 25 years on the Armed Services Committee, and that “the recent reports about the contents of the background briefings on Mr. Hegseth are true and accurate.”
Parlatore, Hegseth’s attorney, said Thursday that “Reed is knowingly lying” because what Samantha Hegseth actually told the FBI is that Pete Hegseth drinks more often than not, but she also acknowledged that she had not spent time with him for about seven years.
Senators also received an affidavit Tuesday from a former sister-in-law of the Pentagon nominee alleging his repeated drunkenness and that he was abusive to Samantha Hegseth to the point where she feared for her safety. He and his ex-wife have denied that he was abusive, and Parlatore called the affidavit a “clear and admitted partisan attempt to derail Mr. Hegseth’s confirmation.”
Meanwhile, the $50,000 payment was made years after the woman told police that Hegseth sexually assaulted her in a California hotel room in 2017 after he took her phone, blocked the door and refused to let her leave, according to an investigative report released in November.
Hegseth told police at the time that the encounter had been consensual and denied any wrongdoing.
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, looks on during a Travalyst event marking the non-profit’s fifth anniversary during Climate Week, in the borough of Manhattan in New York City, U.S., September 24, 2024. REUTERS/Bing Guan/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
Six years ago, as he and his American wife Meghan were seemingly enjoying a hugely successful royal tour to Africa, Prince Harry issued a surprise, stinging rebuke to the British press, accusing papers of waging a ruthless campaign against them.
“Put simply, it is bullying, which scares and silences people,” his statement said. “We all know this isn’t acceptable, at any level. We won’t and can’t believe in a world where there is no accountability for this.”
It marked the start of the prince’s mission to take on those in the media world he accuses of destroying people’s lives with impunity – one which led him to leave his royal role, become ostracised from his father King Charles and the rest of his family, and to face a barrage of criticism.
By obtaining a full apology from Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers along with an admission for the first time of unlawful behaviour by its Sun tabloid towards him and his late mother, Princess Diana, Harry basked on Wednesday in what he called a “monumental victory”.
“Today the lies are laid bare. Today, the cover-ups are exposed. And today proves that no one stands above the law,” he said in a statement with his joint claimant, former senior British lawmaker Tom Watson.
Unlike other claimants who accepted payouts from newspaper groups to avoid the risk of a multi-million-pound legal bill, Harry had refused to settle, forcing Murdoch’s group to make an apology, meaning there was no full trial.
Through a variety of court cases, both criminal and civil, British publishers have admitted that in the late 1990s and early 2000s, British tabloids unlawfully targeted thousands of victims, hacking their voicemails, and obtaining personal information by deception.
In 2023, Harry won a case against Mirror Group Newspapers, publisher of three British tabloids, with the judge ruling his phone had been hacked and that senior editors had known.
Watson said Harry had brought accountability to a part of the media world that thought it was untouchable: “I once said that the big beasts of the tabloid jungle have no predators.
“I was wrong.”
NOT A TOTAL VICTORY
But, Wednesday’s deal, while a vindication for the prince, does not give him the same satisfaction as victory after a trial would have done. NGN’s apology was limited, and many of Harry’s accusations remained unproven.
Harry had alleged that figures such as Rebekah Brooks, former Sun editor and now chief executive of News UK – News Corp’s British arm, and Will Lewis, now publisher of the Washington Post, knew about the wrongdoing and covered it up, deleting millions of incriminating emails in the process.
But there was no admission of this from NGN.
“These allegations were and continue to be strongly denied,” an NGN spokesperson said. “Extensive evidence would have been called in trial to rebut these allegations from senior staff from technology and legal.”
Fouzi Lekjaa, President of the FRMF, and other representatives from Morocco, leave after a meeting with the Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Finnish, Faroese and Icelandic Soccer Unions to present their bid to host the Soccer World Cup 2026, in Copenhagen, Denmark, May 3, 2018. Ritzau Scanpix/Anders Kjaerbye/via REUTERS/ File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
Morocco aims to complete construction of a 115,000-seater stadium in Benslimane near Casablanca by 2027, three years before the World Cup it is co-hosting with Spain and Portugal, the country’s World Cup organising committee chairman said on Wednesday.
The stadium, one of the largest in the world, will cost up to 5 billion dirhams ($500 million) to build, the Moroccan government has said.
Morocco is aiming to complete the upgrade and expansion of stadiums in Rabat and Tangier within the next two months, Fouzi Lekjaa told members of the Moroccan employers federation (CGEM) in Casablanca.
After Morocco has hosted the Africa Cup of Nations starting in December, works will start on the stadiums in World Cup host cities Agadir Marrakech and Fez.
Elephants walk at the Amboseli National Park in Kajiado County, Kenya, April 4, 2024. REUTERS/Monicah Mwangi/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
Five elderly African elephants at a Colorado zoo will stay there, after the state’s highest court said the animals have no legal right to demand their release because they are not human.
Tuesday’s 6-0 decision by Colorado’s Supreme Court means Jambo, Kimba, LouLou, Lucky and Missy will remain at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo in Colorado Springs.
It followed a similar decision in 2022 by New York state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, that another aged elephant, Happy, had to remain at New York City’s Bronx Zoo.
An animal rights non-profit, Nonhuman Rights Project, brought both cases on the elephants’ behalf under a legal doctrine known as “habeas corpus,” saying the animals should live in sanctuaries.
Citing affidavits from seven animal biologists, the group told the Colorado court that elephants are highly social and mobile, share many cognitive abilities with humans including empathy and self-awareness, and when confined in zoos can experience boredom and stress that could lead to brain damage.
But the court said Colorado’s habeas statute applies to persons, not to nonhuman animals “no matter how cognitively, psychologically, or socially sophisticated” they might be.
It also said Nonhuman Rights Project’s concession during oral argument that it was seeking only different confinement, not complete freedom, for the elephants was another reason to treat them and humans differently.
The case “does not turn on our regard for these majestic animals generally or these five elephants specifically,” Justice Maria Berkenkotter wrote. “Because an elephant is not a person, the elephants here do not have standing to bring a habeas corpus claim.”
In a statement, Nonhuman Rights Project said the decision “perpetuates a clear injustice” that consigns the five elephants to “a lifetime of mental and physical suffering.” It has not determined its next legal steps.
The zoo welcomed the outcome in a separate statement, but expressed disappointment at having spent 19 months defending against a “frivolous” case that the animal rights group has pursued unsuccessfully against several other reputable zoos.
“We’ve wasted valuable time and money responding to them in courts and in the court of public opinion,” the zoo said.
Workers unload construction materials from a trailer, where Mexican authorities will build a temporary shelter for migrants deported from the United States, in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, January 21, 2025. REUTERS/Jose Luis Gonzalez Purchase Licensing Rights
Mexican authorities have begun constructing giant tent shelters in the city of Ciudad Juarez to prepare for a possible influx of Mexicans deported under U.S. President Donald Trump’s promised mass deportations.
The temporary shelters in Ciudad Juarez will have the capacity to house thousands of people and should be ready in a matter of days, said municipal official Enrique Licon.
“It’s unprecedented,” Licon said on Tuesday afternoon, as workers unloaded long metal bracings from tractor trailers parked in the large empty lot yards from the Rio Grande, which separates the city from El Paso, Texas.
The tents in Ciudad Juarez are part of the Mexican government’s plan to ready shelters and reception centers in nine cities across northern Mexico.
Authorities at the site will provide deported Mexicans with food, temporary housing, medical care, and assistance in obtaining identity documents, according to a government document outlining the strategy, called “Mexico embraces you.”
The government is also planning to have a fleet of buses ready to transport Mexicans from the reception centers back to their hometowns.
Trump has vowed to carry out the largest deportation effort in U.S. history, which would remove millions of immigrants. An operation of that scale, however, would likely take years and be hugely costly.
Nearly 5 million Mexicans are living in the United States without authorization, according to an analysis by Mexican think tank El Colegio de la Frontera Norte (COLEF) based on recent U.S. census data.
Many are from parts of central and southern Mexico wracked by violence and poverty. Some 800,000 undocumented Mexicans in the United States are from Michoacan, Guerrero, and Chiapas, according to the COLEF study, where fierce battles between organized crime groups have forced thousands to flee in recent years, sometimes leaving whole towns abandoned.
MEXICO COULD STRUGGLE
The Mexican government says it is ready for the possibility of mass deportations. But immigration advocates have their doubts, fearing that the combination of mass deportations and Trump’s measures to prevent migrants from entering the U.S. could quickly saturate Mexican border cities.
The Trump administration on Monday ended a program, known as CBP One, that allowed some migrants waiting in Mexico to enter the U.S. legally by obtaining an appointment on a government app. On Tuesday it said it was reinstating Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), an initiative that forced non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for the resolution of their U.S. cases.
On Monday, Jose Luis Perez, then director of migration issues for Tijuana, became one of the few Mexican officials to raise public concerns about whether Mexico was really prepared.
“Basically, with the cancellation of CBP One and deportations, the government isn’t coordinated to receive them,” he said.
Hours later, he was fired in what he said was retaliation for issuing such warnings.
The municipal government did not answer questions about his termination.
“Mexico will do everything necessary to care for its compatriots, and will allocate whatever is necessary to receive those who are repatriated,” Mexico’s Interior Minister Rosa Icela Rodriguez said on Monday during the daily morning press conference.
But with sluggish economic growth projected this year, Mexico could struggle to absorb millions of Mexicans deported from the U.S., while a significant drop in remittances could cause “serious economic disruptions” in the towns and villages across the country that depend on such income, said Wayne Cornelius, distinguished emeritus professor at the University of California-San Diego.
Elon Musk is clashing with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman over the Stargate artificial intelligence infrastructure project touted by President Donald Trump, the latest in a feud between the two tech billionaires that started on OpenAI’s board and is now testing Musk’s influence with the new president.
Trump on Tuesday had talked up a joint venture investing up to $500 billion through a new partnership formed by OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, alongside Oracle and SoftBank.
The new entity, Stargate, is already starting to build out data centers and the electricity generation needed for the further development of fast-evolving AI technology.
Trump declared it “a resounding declaration of confidence in America’s potential” under his new administration, with an initial private investment of $100 billion that could reach five times that sum.
But Musk, a close Trump adviser who helped bankroll his campaign and now leads a government cost-cutting initiative, questioned the value of the investment hours later.
“They don’t actually have the money,” Musk wrote on his social platform X. “SoftBank has well under $10B secured. I have that on good authority.”
Altman responded Wednesday to say Musk was “wrong, as you surely know” and inviting Musk to come visit the first site in Texas that is already under construction.
“(T)his is great for the country. i realize what is great for the country isn’t always what’s optimal for your companies, but in your new role i hope you’ll mostly put (America) first,” Altman wrote, using a U.S. flag emoji to represent America.
Behind the feud
The public clash over Stargate is part of a years-long dispute between Musk and Altman that began with a boardroom rivalry over who should run OpenAI, which both men helped found.
Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, sued the artificial intelligence company last year alleging it had betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public good rather than pursuing profits.
Musk has since escalated the dispute, adding new claims and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI’s plans to convert itself into a for-profit business more fully. A hearing is set for February in a California federal court.
The world’s richest man, whose companies include Tesla, SpaceX and X, last year started his own rival AI company, xAI, that is building its own big data center in Memphis, Tennessee. Musk says it faces unfair competition from OpenAI and its close business partner Microsoft, which has supplied the huge computing resources needed to build AI systems such as ChatGPT.
When did Stargate start?
Tech news outlet The Information first reported on an OpenAI data center project called Stargate in March 2024, indicating that it’s been in the works long before Trump announced it.
Another company — Crusoe Energy Systems — announced in July it was building a large and “specially designed AI data center” at the northwest edge of Abilene, Texas at a site run by energy technology company Lancium. Crusoe and Lancium said in a joint statement at the time that the project was “supported by a multibillion-dollar investment” but didn’t disclose its backers.
AI technology requires huge amounts of electricity to build and operate and both companies said the project would be powered with renewable sources such as nearby solar farms, in a way that Lancium CEO Michael McNamara said would “deliver the maximum amount of green energy at the lowest possible cost.” Crusoe said it would own and develop the facility.
It’s not clear how and when that project became the first phase of the Stargate investment revealed by Trump. Abilene Mayor Weldon Hurt said construction began about nine months ago but “we didn’t know it was going to be quite this big. We thought it was going to be about a third of this size.”
Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison said Tuesday that the Abilene project is the first of about 10 data center buildings currently being built and that number could expand to 20.
Hurt told The Associated Press that the region surrounding Abilene, a city of about 130,000 people, benefits from a wealth of energy sources, including oil, gas, solar and some of the “largest wind farms in the world,” though Trump signaled opposition to wind power this week by temporarily halting approval of wind projects on federal lands.
“We have the capability to produce the energy for this market so it really means a lot for a town like Abilene,” Hurt said. “To have this opportunity here in west-central Texas, to have something like this to make Abilene substantial, we’re just excited about it.”
Where is Microsoft?
Missing from Trump’s press conference Tuesday was Microsoft, which has long supported OpenAI with billions of dollars in investments and enabling its data centers to be used to build the models behind ChatGPT and other generative AI tools.
Microsoft is also a technology partner in the Stargate project, along with chipmakers Nvidia and Arm, but put out a statement noting that its OpenAI partnership will “evolve” in a way that enables OpenAI “to build additional capacity, primarily for research and training of models.”
The Pentagon said Wednesday it has begun deploying 1,500 active duty troops to help secure the southern border, putting in motion plans President Donald Trump laid out in executive orders shortly after he took office to crack down on immigration.
Acting Defense Secretary Robert Salesses said the troops will fly helicopters to assist Border Patrol agents and help in the construction of barriers. The Pentagon also will provide military aircraft for Department of Homeland Security deportation flights for more than 5,000 detained migrants.
The number of troops and their mission may soon change, Salesses said in a statement. “This is just the beginning,” he said.
“In short order, the department will develop and execute additional missions in cooperation with DHS, federal agencies, and state partners to address the full range of threats outlined by the President at our nation’s borders,” Salesses said.
Defense officials added that the department is prepared to provide many more troops if asked, including up to 2,000 more Marines.
Officials said there was no plan now for the troops to do law enforcement, which would put them in a dramatically different role for the first time in decades. Any decision on this would be made by the White House, they said.
The active duty forces will join the roughly 2,500 U.S. National Guard and Reserve forces already there. Until this deployment, there were no active duty troops working along the roughly 2,000-mile border.
A couple hundred troops started moving to the border earlier Wednesday, according to a senior military official. The military official and a defense official briefed reporters on the condition of anonymity to provide additional details on the deployment. The troops will include 500 Marines from Camp Pendleton in California, and the remainder will be Army.
The U.S. forces being used for the deportation flights are separate from the 1,500 deployed for the border mission. Those flights will involve four Air Force aircraft based in San Diego an El Paso, along with crews and maintenance personnel.
Troops have done similar duties in support of Border Patrol agents in the past, when both Trump and former President Joe Biden sent active duty troops to the border.
Troops are prohibited by law from doing law enforcement duties under the Posse Comitatus Act, but that may change. Trump has directed through executive order that the incoming secretary of defense and incoming homeland security chief report back within 90 days if they think an 1807 law called the Insurrection Act should be invoked. That would allow those troops to be used in civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil.
The last time the act was invoked was in 1992 during rioting in Los Angeles in protest of the acquittal of four police officers charged with beating Rodney King.
The widely expected deployment, coming in Trump’s first week in office, was an early step in his long-touted plan to expand the use of the military along the border. In one of his first orders on Monday, Trump directed the defense secretary to come up with a plan to “seal the borders” and repel “unlawful mass migration.”
“This is something President Trump campaigned on,” said Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary. “The American people have been waiting for such a time as this — for our Department of Defense to actually implement homeland security seriously. This is a No. 1 priority for the American people.”
On Tuesday, just as Trump fired the Coast Guard commandant, Adm. Linda Fagan, the service announced it was surging more cutter ships, aircraft and personnel to the “Gulf of America” — a nod to the president’s directive to rename the Gulf of Mexico.
Trump said during his inaugural address on Monday that “I will declare a national emergency at our southern border. All illegal entry will immediately be halted, and we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places in which they came.”
Military personnel have been sent to the border almost continuously since the 1990s to help address migration. drug trafficking and transnational crime.
In executive orders signed Monday, Trump suggested the military would help the Department of Homeland Security with “detention space, transportation (including aircraft), and other logistics services.”
There are about 20,000 Border Patrol agents, and while the southern border is where most are located, they’re also responsible for protecting the northern border with Canada. Usually agents are tasked with looking for drug smugglers or people trying to enter the country undetected.
More recently, however, they have had to deal with migrants actively seeking out Border Patrol in order to get refuge in America — taxing the agency’s staff.
In his first term, Trump ordered active duty troops to the border in response to a caravan of migrants slowly making its way through Mexico toward the United States in 2018. More than 7,000 active duty troops were sent to Texas, Arizona and California, including military police, an assault helicopter battalion, various communications, medical and headquarters units, combat engineers, planners and public affairs units.
At the time, the Pentagon was adamant that active duty troops would not do law enforcement. So they spent much of their time transporting Border Patrol agents to and along the border, helping them erect additional vehicle barriers and fencing along the border, assisting them with communications and providing some security for border agent camps.
The military also provided Border Patrol agents with medical care, pre-packaged meals and temporary housing.
It also was not yet clear if the Trump administration will eventually order the military to use bases to house detained migrants. The defense officials said such a request has not been made as of yet.
Bases previously have been used for that purpose, and after the 2021 fall of Kabul to the Taliban, they were used to host thousands of Afghan evacuees. The facilities struggled to support the influx.
In 2018, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis ordered Goodfellow Air Force Base in San Angelo, Texas, to prepare to house as many as 20,000 unaccompanied migrant children, but the additional space ultimately wasn’t needed and Goodfellow was determined not to have the infrastructure necessary to support the surge.
Hundreds of LGBTQ+ couples in Thailand are expected to make their wedded status legal Thursday, the day a law took effect granting them the same rights as heterosexual couples.
The enactment of the Marriage Equality Act makes Thailand the first country in Southeast Asia and the third place in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage, after Taiwan and Nepal.
As many as 300 couples are expected to complete the formalities at a daylong gala celebration in an exhibition hall at a shopping mall in central Bangkok.
Hundreds more were predicted to register at district offices around the country. They included actors Apiwat “Porsch” Apiwatsayree and Sappanyoo ‘Arm’ Panatkool, who tied the knot at the Phra Nakorn district office in central Bangkok.
“We can love, we love equally, legally,” said Sappanyoo.
(asterisk)And we can build our family in our own way because I believe that every kind of love, every kind of family is beautiful as it is,” his partner Apiwat said.
They posed afterwards on a terrace at the office, smiling and waving while clutching a bouquet of flowers.
Activists said they hoped at least 1,448 same sex marriages would take place Thursday, in reference to Civil and Commercial Code’s Article 1448.
Thailand’s marriage equality bill, which sailed through both houses of parliament, amended Article 1448 to replace the words “man and woman” and “husband and wife” with “individuals” and “marriage partners.” It is intended to grant full legal, financial and medical rights to LGBTQ+ couples.
In Taiwan, which in 2019 was the first place in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage, 526 people registered on the first day, according to its government’s Department of Household Registration.
Partners will have equal rights and responsibilities in dealing with joint assets, tax obligations and deductions, inheritance rights and survivor benefits.
Thailand has a reputation for acceptance and inclusivity, and thousands of people from around the world attend the annual Bangkok Pride parade. But rights advocates have struggled for decades to pass a marriage equality law in a largely conservative society where members of the LGBTQ+ community say they face discrimination in everyday life, although they note that things have improved greatly in recent years.
Couples interviewed earlier this month by The Associated Press expressed happiness with the new law, even those already settled in contented long-term relationships.
Patherine Khunnares, 37, a web designer, said she and researcher Vivian Chullamon, 36, “have a supportive social circle, friends, and family who accept us for who we are and accept the person we love. Marriage, it seems, isn’t everything that fulfills us emotionally.
“However, ultimately, we believe that as two human beings, we should be granted the same basic legal rights as heterosexual couples. We are a complete family in spirit, but legal recognition would alleviate our future anxieties. In the end, we aren’t asking for anything special — we just want a simple, happy family life.”
A report out Thursday said a record 47% of the European Union’s electricity came from renewable sources in 2024, and experts called it a promising sign for the world’s ability to transition away from fossil fuels that are driving climate change.
Here’s a look at the world’s largest generators of electricity and the share of their electricity that comes from renewables. Data is from the climate energy think tank Ember and is for 2023.
Whitney Cummings poked fun at Lauren Sánchez’s polarizing inauguration look — and Jeff Bezos’ fiancée responded.
The comedian told her Instagram followers Tuesday that she is “not gonna hate on” the 55-year-old for wearing a white Alexander McQueen pantsuit and peekaboo lace bra at Donald Trump’s swearing-in ceremony.
“She is a businesswoman, and her decisions have gotten her this far,” Cummings, 42, continued. “I respect this woman’s judgment, alright? We all wish we had it, let’s be honest.”
Lauren Sánchez showed support for Whitney Cummings’ take on her inauguration look. whitneycummings/Instagram
The actress admitted that the 55-year-old’s lingerie looked “cheap” on Monday but clarified, “I don’t blame her. I blame white lace. … This is probably $1,000, like, Dolce & Gabbana.
“But we’ve all done it,” she added. “We’ve all bought, like, a cute white lace bra and you take your shirt off and … it always looks like you’ve been trafficked.”
Cummings joked that “it looks cute in a mirror but then in a photo no bueno,” labeling it “‘Bachelor in Paradise’ meets ‘Love Is Blind’ energy.”
After sending her “thoughts and prayers,” the “2 Broke Girls” co-creator concluded, “She’s with the head of Amazon, and she looked like she got that top on Temu.”
Cummings noted in her caption that “this wouldn’t have been [her] outfit selection but” doubled down on her claim that “white lace is a scam.”
Sánchez commented on the social media upload with a heart emoji.
The former news anchor made headlines Tuesday for “liking” other supportive comments on her most recent Instagram posts.
One such comment read, “Girl you ate that inaugural look don’t pay attention to no haters. Only opinion that matters is your own and Jeff’s.”
Sánchez has yet to react to Megyn Kelly comparing her to a “hooker” and Christine Quinn blasting her “chesticles [being] hoisted” at the Washington, DC, event.
Variety Awards Circuit section is the home for all awards news and related content throughout the year, featuring the following: the official predictions for the upcoming Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and Tony Awards ceremonies, curated by Variety senior awards editor Clayton Davis. The prediction pages reflect the current standings in the race and do not reflect personal preferences for any individual contender. As other formal (and informal) polls suggest, competitions are fluid and subject to change based on buzz and events. Predictions are updated every Thursday.
Against the backdrop of devastating wildfires that ravaged southern California, the 97th Academy Awards are poised to announce their nominations. The fires, which have brought destruction and grief to Los Angeles and its surrounding areas, hit close to home for the entertainment industry, with roughly 60% of the Academy’s 10,000 eligible voting members residing in the City of Angels.
To accommodate those impacted, the Academy extended its voting deadline by five days, sparking speculation on how this extension might influence the final nominations. Did this extra window allow underdog films to gain last-minute momentum, or did the chaos of the fires dampen turnout among voters directly affected by the tragedy?
Despite these uncertainties, this year’s Oscar race is as competitive and unpredictable as ever. At the forefront of the conversation is Jacques Audiard’s genre-blending crime musical “Emilia Pérez,” projected to garner to be one of the leaders, ranging from 10-14 nominations. This potentially would set the record as the most-nominated non-English film in Oscar history (surpassing the 2000’s “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” and 2018’s “Roma”).
At the heart of “Emilia Pérez” is Karla Sofía Gascón’s incredible performance, which could make history as the first openly transgender acting nominee. However, with such a competitive lead actress race and critical darlings like Marianne Jean-Baptiste (“Hard Truths”) and Fernanda Torres (“I’m Still Here”) surging in the final days of voting, this could be a year where a presumed “lock” is absent on nomination morning. Or something completely unexpected, a category switch with Zoe Saldaña’s performance cited in the lead, alongside her co-star, which would be the first co-leading duo recognized since Geena Davis and Susan Sarandon for “Thelma & Louise” (1991). Or perhaps Gascón’s work would mimic the year when “Judas and the Black Messiah” (2021) saw both Lakeith Stanfield and Daniel Kaluuya nominated in supporting, despite the former campaigning in the lead.
Projected nominee leaders (films): “Conclave,” “Emilia Pérez” and “Wicked” (10); “The Brutalist” (8) and “A Complete Unknown” (7); “Anora” and “Dune: Part Two” (6); “Nosferatu,” “Sing Sing” and “The Substance” (4); “Gladiator II” and “A Real Pain” (3)
Projected nominee leaders (studios): Netflix (15); Focus Features (14); A24 (13); Searchlight Pictures and Universal Pictures (10); Warner Bros. (7); Neon (6); Janus Films and Sony Pictures Classics (5); Mubi and Paramount Pictures (4)
*** = PREDICTED WINNER
(All predicted nominees listed below are in alphabetical order)
Best Picture
“Anora” (Neon)
“The Brutalist” (A24)
“A Complete Unknown” (Searchlight Pictures)
“A Real Pain” (Searchlight Pictures)
“Sing Sing” (A24)
“The Substance” (Mubi)
“Wicked” (Universal Pictures)
Director
Jacques Audiard “Emilia Pérez” (Netflix) Sean Baker “Anora” (Neon) Edward Berger***
“Conclave” (Focus Features) Brady Corbet “The Brutalist” (A24) Payal Kapadia
“All We Imagine as Light” (Janus Films/Sideshow)
Actor
Adrien Brody “The Brutalist” (A24) Timothée Chalamet *** “A Complete Unknown” (Searchlight Pictures) Daniel Craig
“Queer” (A24) Colman Domingo “Sing Sing” (A24) Ralph Fiennes “Conclave” (Focus Features)
Actress
Cynthia Erivo “Wicked” (Universal Pictures) Marianne Jean-Baptiste
“Hard Truths” (Bleecker Street) Mikey Madison “Anora” (Neon) Demi Moore *** “The Substance” (Mubi) Fernanda Torres “I’m Still Here” (Sony Pictures Classics)
Supporting Actor
Yura Borisov “Anora” (Neon) Kieran Culkin *** “A Real Pain” (Searchlight Pictures) Clarence Maclin “Sing Sing” (A24) Edward Norton
“A Complete Unknown” (Searchlight Pictures) Guy Pearce
“The Brutalist” (A24)
Supporting Actress
Monica Barbaro “A Complete Unknown” (Searchlight Pictures) Jamie Lee Curtis “The Last Showgirl” (Roadside Attractions) Ariana Grande “Wicked” (Universal Pictures) Isabella Rossellini “Conclave” (Focus Features) Zoe Saldaña ***
“Emilia Pérez” (Netflix)
Original Screenplay
“All We Imagine as Light” (Janus Films/Sideshow)
Payal Kapadia
“Anora” (Neon) ***
Sean Baker
“The Brutalist” (A24)
Brady Corbet, Mona Fastvold
“A Real Pain” (Searchlight Pictures)
Jesse Eisenberg
“The Substance” (Mubi)
Coralie Fargeat
Adapted Screenplay
“A Complete Unknown” (Searchlight Pictures)
Jay Cocks, James Mangold
“Conclave” (Focus Features) ***
Peter Straughan
“Emilia Pérez” (Netflix)
Jacques Audiard
“Sing Sing” (A24)
Clint Bentley, Greg Kwedar, Clarence Maclin, John “Divine G” Whitfield
“Wicked” (Universal Pictures)
Winnie Holzman, Dana Fox
Animated Feature
“Flow” (Janus Films/Sideshow)
“Inside Out 2” (Pixar)
“Memoir of a Snail” (IFC Films)
“Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl” (Netflix)
“The Wild Robot” (DreamWorks Animation) ***
Production Design
“The Brutalist” (A24)
Judy Becker
“Conclave” (Focus Features)
Suzie Davies, Roberta Federico
“Dune: Part Two” (Warner Bros.)
Zsuzsanna Sipos, Shane Vieau, Patrice Vermette
“Nosferatu” (Focus Features)
Craig Lathrop
“Wicked” (Universal Pictures) ***
Nathan Crowley, Lee Sandales
Cinematography
“The Brutalist” (A24) ***
Lol Crawley
“Conclave” (Focus Features)
Stéphane Fontaine
“Emilia Pérez” (Netflix)
Paul Guilhaume
“Maria” (Netflix)
Edward Lachman
“Nosferatu” (Focus Features)
Jarin Blaschke
“Anora” (Neon)
Sean Baker
“Conclave” (Focus Features) ***
Nick Emerson
“Dune: Part Two” (Warner Bros.)
Joe Walker
“Emilia Pérez” (Netflix)
Juliette Welfling
“Wicked” (Universal Pictures)
Myron Kerstein
Makeup and Hairstyling
“Dune: Part Two” (Warner Bros.)
Love Larson, Eva Von Bahr
“Emilia Pérez” (Netflix)
Julia Floch Carbonel, Simon Livet
“Nosferatu” (Focus Features)
Traci Loader, Suzanne Stokes-Munton, David White
“The Substance” (Mubi)
Pierre-Olivier Persin
“Wicked” (Universal Pictures) ***
Frances Hannon, Sarah Nuth, Laura Blount
MF Husain’s paintings have often attracted controversy due to their depiction of Hindu gods
A court in the Indian capital, Delhi, has ordered the seizure of two “offensive” paintings by MF Husain, one of India’s most famous artists.
The court on Monday granted permission for the police to seize the artworks after a complaint was filed alleging that the paintings, displayed at an art gallery and featuring two Hindu deities, “hurt religious sentiments”.
Husain, who died in 2011 aged 95, often faced backlash for the depictions of nude Hindu gods in his paintings.
The Delhi Art Gallery (DAG), which hosted the exhibition, denied any wrongdoing and stated that a “detailed” police investigation found no “cognisable offence” by the gallery.
The exhibition Husain: The Timeless Modernist at DAG showcased over 100 paintings from 26 October to 14 December.
The complainant, Amita Sachdeva, a lawyer, said on X that on 4 December, she photographed the “offensive paintings” displayed at the DAG and, after researching previous complaints against the late artist, filed a police complaint five days later.
On 10 December, Ms Sachdeva reported that she visited the gallery with the investigating officer, only to discover that the paintings had been removed. She claimed that the gallery officials asserted they had never exhibited the paintings.
The paintings that Ms Sachdeva shared online depicted Hindu gods Ganesha and Hanuman alongside nude female figures. She also alleged that the Delhi police had failed to file a report.
She later petitioned the court to preserve the CCTV footage from the gallery during the period when the paintings were reportedly on display, according to media reports.
On Monday, a judge at Delhi’s Patiala House Courts said that the police had accessed the footage and submitted their report. According to the inquiry, the exhibition was held in a private space and was intended solely to showcase the artist’s original work, the judge added.
The DAG said in a statement that it had been assisting police with their inquiries. It said the exhibition had attracted about 5,000 visitors and had received “positive reviews in the press as well as from the public”.
The complainant had been the only person to raise any objection to any of the artworks in the exhibition, the gallery said.
“The complainant has herself displayed and publicised the images of the drawings over social media and television news media deliberately intending them to be viewed by a larger audience, while contending that the same images hurt her personal religious sentiments.”
Maqbool Fida Husain was one of India’s biggest painters and was called “Picasso of India” but his art often stirred controversy in the country. His works have sold for millions of dollars.
His career was marked by controversy when he was accused of obscenity and denounced by hardline Hindus for a painting of a nude goddess.
In 2006, Husain publicly apologised for his painting, Mother India. It showed a nude woman kneeling on the ground creating the shape of the Indian map. He left the country the same year and lived in self-imposed exile in London until his death.
In 2008, India’s Supreme Court refused to launch criminal proceedings against Husain, saying that his paintings were not obscene and nudity was common in Indian iconography and history.
The court had then dismissed an appeal against a high court ruling that quashed criminal proceedings against Husain in the cities of Bhopal, Indore and Rajkot, condemning the rise of a “new puritanism” in India.
The court also rejected calls for Husain, then in exile, to be summoned and asked to explain his paintings, which were accused of outraging religious sentiments and disturbing national integrity.
“There are so many such subjects, photographs and publications. Will you file cases against all of them? What about temple structures? Husain’s work is art. If you don’t want to see it, don’t see it. There are so many such art forms in temple structures,” the top court said.
Police cordoned off the park after the knife attack on Wednesday morning
A two-year-old boy and a man aged 41 have been killed in a stabbing in a German park.
Police confirmed that a 28-year-old man from Afghanistan was arrested following the attack in Bavarian city of Aschaffenburg.
Two others were taken to hospital with serious injuries and the public park was cordoned off by officers.
Joachim Herrmann, Bavaria’s interior minister, said the suspect was previously detained at least three times for violent behaviour, but was released after he had psychiatric treatment. He was due to return to Afghanistan after his claim for asylum was rejected.
It is the latest fatal knife attack in Germany in recent months, and comes weeks before a federal election on 23 February.
Police said their investigation into the stabbing was ongoing, but that the attack had taken place at about 11:45 (10:45 GMT) at Schöntal Park in Aschaffenburg, about 22 miles (36 kilometres) south-east of Frankfurt.
The attack involved a kindergarten group and other people were injured, including another child, Herrmann said in a statement near the park.
Markus Söder, the Bavarian state premier, called it a “cowardly and despicable act”. German reports suggested the suspect had a history of mental health issues.
He added that the boy was of Moroccan descent, and the man killed was a German passer-by “who happened to be at the scene of the crime”.
Mr Söder described the man as “a helper who paid for his civil courage with his own life”.
The suspect was arrested close to the scene. Officers said a second person was initially detained at the scene but was now being treated as a witness.
Officials said a search of his room had not revealed signs of the suspect being motivated by radical Islam.
Police said there was no danger to the public.
Söder said it was a terrible day and called for a pause: “We mourn the loss of a small, innocent child.”
Police said they were investigating a motive and the background to the attack remained unclear. The suspect was said to have been staying in accommodation for asylum seekers.
Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who was on a visit to France, condemned an “unbelievable act of terror”. He posted on social media that he was tired of seeing “such acts of violence every few weeks” and urged authorities to find out why the suspect was still in Germany.
The German government has come under increasing pressure to take a harder line on immigration after a number of fatal attacks, and with federal elections due on 23 February, the anti-immigration, far-right AfD is second in the polls.
Donald Trump has signed sweeping executive orders on his return to the US presidency, vowing swift action on some of his top campaign issues.
Among the directives that have gained the most publicity are an immigration crackdown and rollbacks of some climate-friendly policies.
But even presidential powers have their limits – and in some cases, he faces hurdles before his plans can become reality.
Here are six of Trump’s eye-catching actions with analysis by BBC reporters, who give their verdict on whether each order could take effect.
Declaring drug cartels as ‘foreign terrorist organisations’
By Bernd Debusmann Jr, at the White House
What does the order say?
The order argues that cartels have “engaged in a campaign of violence and terror” throughout the hemisphere, and flooded the US with crime, posing a national security risk to the US.
Additionally, the order specifies that the US policy is to “ensure the total elimination” of these groups in the US. It gives US agencies 14 days to provide recommendations on which groups are to be designated and be ready to expedite the removal of individuals from the US.
What are the roadblocks?
Designating a cartel as a terrorist group could open the door to prosecuting US citizens or even legitimate businesses found to be somehow tied to those groups. The designation could also strain relations with countries including Mexico, which has vocally called for its sovereignty to be respected.
What is the potential impact?
For one, the designation of these groups as foreign terrorist organisations could ultimately be used to justify military action against targets in Mexico or other countries in which similar groups operate.
The designation could also see the US federal government dedicate more resources and enhanced legal tools to fight cartels and other gangs, and go after their business and financial interests on both sides of the border.
While it would make “material support” of these groups a crime, it remains unclear what that could mean. In theory, that could mean that drug dealers and users, including US citizens, could be charged with aiding terrorists – as could US citizens or businesses on the border that are extorted to pay them.
Pulling out of Paris climate accord
What does the order say?
The executive order asks the US ambassador to the UN to “immediately” submit a formal written request to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.
It says the accord does not reflect the country’s values or its economic and environmental objectives.
What are the roadblocks?
Any country can withdraw from the global climate pact, but UN regulations mean the process of removing a country can be drawn out.
Trump announced his intent to withdraw during his last term in 2017, but it was not formally finalised until 2020. We can expect another waiting period this time of at least one year.
President Joe Biden rejoined it shortly after taking office in 2021
What is the potential impact?
The US is responsible for around 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions, making it the second biggest polluter behind China. This damages the global effort to limit emissions.
Its withdrawal in the past has raised issues of trust on climate leadership, and questions about whether the agreement itself has been effective.
The withdrawal is also in line with Trump’s goal to boost domestic oil and gas production, though the US is already the number one producer of both in the world. It is one of several of Trump’s reversals of environmental protections that were enacted by the Biden administration.
Ending birthright citizenship
By Jake Horton, BBC Verify
What does the order say?
This order aims to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to immigrant parents who are in the country illegally, as well as those born to parents who are in the country on a temporary basis.
There have been reports that the administration will enforce the order by withholding documents, such as passports, from people it deems ineligible for citizenship.
What are the roadblocks?
The principle of birthright citizenship is established in the US Constitution. The 14th Amendment says that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States” are citizens of the United States.
The legal challenges are already under way – one claims the order is “unconstitutional, and flouts fundamental American values”.
“Ultimately this will be decided by the courts. This is not something [Trump] can decide on his own,” Saikrishna Prakash, a constitutional expert, told the BBC.
What is the potential impact?
Trump has threatened mass deportations, which could include those whose birthright citizenship is revoked if Trump is successful in enforcing this executive action.
Legal cases could ultimately have to be decided by the US Supreme Court, which could take a long time.
Withdrawing from World Health Organization (WHO)
By Dominic Hughes, health correspondent
What does the order say?
The order says the US was withdrawing “due to the organization’s mishandling of the Covid-19 pandemic”.
Trump’s longheld antipathy towards the WHO is rooted in a perception that it was dominated by – and so soft on – China, which the president has long believed was responsible for the spread of the virus.
It also mentions “unfairly onerous payments” the US made to the WHO.
What are the roadblocks?
It is the second time Trump has ordered the US be pulled out of the WHO. He began the process and Biden later reversed the decision after taking office.
The US exit won’t take effect until 2026 at the earliest, but leaving will require the approval of Congress.
On paper, the Republicans have a majority in both houses of Congress. But their numerical advantage is slim, and it would only take a few Republican defectors to potentially block the move.
What is the potential impact?
“Catastrophic”, “disastrous”, “damaging” is how some global public health experts are describing it.
Of the 196 member states, the US is by far the largest individual funder, contributing almost a fifth of the total WHO budget.
It’s possible that funding could disappear almost overnight and that could have an impact on the ability of the WHO to respond to emergencies.
There is also concern among some scientists that this would leave the US isolated when it comes to access to programmes such as pandemic preparedness and seasonal influenza strain sequencing, which is used to develop annual flu jabs.
That could ultimately harm the health of Americans, and the US national interest.
Some argue US withdrawal could prompt further reforms of how the WHO works, making it a body that better serves the public health needs of people around the globe.
Renaming Gulf of Mexico
By Jake Horton, BBC Verify
What does the order say?
The order calls for the Gulf of Mexico to “officially be renamed the Gulf of America”.
Trump can change the name of the Gulf on official US government documents.
This has happened on some documents already – including a weather update from Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, which refers to “an area of low pressure moving across the Gulf of America”.
What are the roadblocks?
Trump can’t force other countries or companies to change the name.
For example, it’s currently still labelled as the Gulf of Mexico on Google Maps.
What is the potential impact?
There’s no formal international agreement for the naming of maritime areas – although there is a body that seeks to resolve disputes if raised.
So Mexico could raise an official dispute, and allies of the US and Mexico could be caught up in a diplomatic spat between the two countries.
In response to the order, Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum said the US can call it the “Gulf of America”, but this won’t change what Mexico and the rest of the world call it.
A peer has claimed ADHD is a “fashionable disorder” and that many diagnosed with the condition are “not that ill or not ill at all”.
Baroness Claire Fox, who used to be a member of the Brexit Party, spoke about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a debate in the House of Lords.
She said there was an 18% rise in ADHD prescriptions between April 2023 and March 2024.
Many NHS trusts have stopped diagnosing ADHD and prescribing medication to adults, and there are long waiting lists for children to get appointments.
However, private clinics can offer diagnosis and medication on the NHS in some cases – although there have been questions raised about the robustness of their practices.
Baroness Fox said: “Isn’t it tragic that so many people want their children, or want themselves, to have these drugs in order to feel that they can cope? When they’re actually, really, not that ill, or not ill at all, but they’ve got the label.
Peers were debating the Mental Health Bill.
The peer claimed “therapeutic experts, councillors and psychological practitioners” are becoming “diagnostically trigger happy in labelling people as ill”.
She said this has lead to “clamouring” – especially with young people – for “pills to help them with the cope with the travails of life”.
Baroness Fox claimed to have witnessed a debate where young people became “quite aggressive”, with the peer saying they “demanded treatment”.
ADHD is the fashionable disorder of the day”, adding that “it’s often diagnosed promiscuously”.
The comments come after Ofqual released figures in November for the number of pupils given extra time to complete their exams – which can be due to youngsters being diagnosed with disorders like ADHD – showing that the number being given an extra 15 minutes rising by 42% between 2018/19 and 2022/23. The issue was more prevalent in independent schools (39% of pupils in 2022/23) than in non-selective state schools (24% in 2022/23).
Baroness Elaine Murphy, an independent peer and former psychiatrist, told the Lords: “There’s no doubt that there is massive overdiagnosis of things that are called mental disorder but are distress and need a different sort of approach.”
She added: “There are a lot of websites which are utter rubbish, and are encouraging people to pay money to see psychotherapy, psychotherapists and other counsellors to see what’s the matter with them, and pay money so other people can put money in their pockets for doing not much.”
Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, spoke to the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge about the growing number of people being signed off work with mental health issues.
The cabinet minister said there were “a lot of complicated things going on here” – before welcoming the reduction in stigma around mental health issues.
The Duke of Sussex has received a full apology and substantial damages from the publisher of The Sun for “serious intrusion” into his private life.
Harry and former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson brought legal action against News Group Newspapers (NGN) over allegations of unlawful information gathering by journalists and private investigators between 1996 to 2011.
NGN, which also ran the now-defunct News Of The World, had denied any unlawful activity took place at The Sun.
However, in a statement it said there had been “serious intrusion” including “incidents of unlawful activities” which it acknowledged had inflicted “damage” to “relationships, friendships and family”.
An up to 10-week trial was set to begin at the High Court in London on Tuesday, but three requests for adjournments and a Court of Appeal bid meant the case remained unopened.
On Wednesday morning, Harry’s barrister David Sherborne said the parties had “reached an agreement” and that NGN had offered an apology to the 40-year-old and would pay “substantial damages”.
The settlement is worth more than £10m, mostly in legal fees, a source familiar with the deal told news agency Reuters.
Lord Watson was also taking legal action against the publisher, but also settled his claim.
He called for NGN’s owner Rupert Murdoch to make a “personal apology” to the Duke of Sussex and to the King.
NGN said its agreements with Harry and Lord Watson “draws a line under the past” and “brings an end to this litigation”.
Outside the court, Mr Sherborne said it was a “monumental victory” and accused newspaper executives of running a “criminal enterprise” – and praised Harry and Lord Watson for showing “sheer resilience”.
‘Serious intrusion by The Sun’
In a statement read out in court, NGN offered Harry a “full and unequivocal apology” for the “serious intrusion by The Sun between 1996 and 2011 into his private life”.
It said these included “incidents of unlawful activities” carried out by private investigators working for The Sun.
NGN also apologised for the “phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators” at the News Of The World.
In a lengthy statement, NGN apologised for the impact on Harry of the “extensive coverage and serious intrusion” into the private life of his late mother Diana, “in particular during his younger years”.
“We acknowledge and apologise for the distress caused to the duke, and the damage inflicted on relationships, friendships and family, and have agreed to pay him substantial damages,” NGN added.
Apology for placing Lord Watson ‘under surveillance’
NGN also offered Lord Watson a “full and unequivocal apology” for the “unwarranted intrusion carried out into his private life during his time in government” by the News Of The World during the 2009-2011 period.
“This includes him being placed under surveillance in 2009 by journalists at the News Of The World and those instructed by them,” it added.
“NGN also acknowledges and apologises for the adverse impact this had on Lord Watson’s family and has agreed to pay him substantial damages.”
NGN said information received in 2011 that details were being “passed covertly to Lord Watson from within News International” was “false” and apologised.
Prince Harry. File pic: Reuters
‘They ran a criminal enterprise’
Mr Sherborne said Harry’s victory proves “no one stands above the law” and NGN had shown “blatant disregard for the law”.
He said more than 100 private investigators had been “engaged” by NGN over at least 16 years on more than 35,000 occasions to intrude into the prince’s private life.
This isn’t the end of this story
Prince Harry all along wanted to make sure this wasn’t simply about the stories written about him, but wanted them in court to admit there had been some kind of cover-up by senior executives who, he says, had known unlawful activities were being carried out by reporters and private investigators.
It won’t have been fully fulfilled because the News Group Newspapers apology did not admit to breaking the law on that front. That phrase, “without any admission of illegality”, is the really important one.
Because of that, Prince Harry’s lawyer has said he wants the rule of law to take its course and that a dossier will be handed to the police now court proceedings have concluded.
A victory for Prince Harry today – but you can see that all claimants involved do want this to go further.
Mr Sherborne said: “At her trial in 2014, Rebekah Brooks said ‘when I was editor of The Sun we ran a clean ship’.
“Now, 10 years later when she is CEO of the company, they now admit, when she was editor of The Sun, they ran a criminal enterprise.
“Far from being relics of a distant past, many of those behind these unlawful practices remain firmly entrenched in senior positions today, both within News UK and other media outlets across the world, wielding editorial power and perpetuating the toxic culture in which they continue to thrive.
“This represents a vindication for the hundreds of other claimants who were strong-armed into settling, without being able to get to the truth of what was done to them.”
The lawyer said Harry and Lord Watson support calls for the police and MPs to investigate “not only the unlawful activity now finally admitted, but the perjury and cover-ups along the way”.
Who is Rebekah Brooks?
Rebekah Brooks was the editor of the News Of The World from 2000 to 2003, before holding the same role at The Sun from 2003 to 2009.
When phone hacking accusations were made public, Ms Brooks herself was thrust into the spotlight.
She stood trial alongside fellow ex-News Of The World editor Andy Coulson for conspiracy to hack phones in 2014 – but while Coulson was found guilty, Ms Brooks was cleared.
She returned to News UK in 2015 and has been its chief executive since.
‘There are strong controls at our titles today’
NGN said its agreements with Harry and Lord Watson “draws a line under the past” and “brings an end to this litigation” and it was “in the interests of all the parties to come to a settlement”.
A spokesperson added: “Today, our apology to the Duke of Sussex includes an apology for incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for The Sun, not by journalists, during the period 1996-2011.
“There are strong controls and processes in place at all our titles today to ensure this cannot happen now.
“There was no voicemail interception on The Sun.”
Experts called this a “huge victory” for Prince Harry and said the apology was “pretty sensational”.
Royal commentator Jennie Bond told Sky News: “When you read that apology, albeit without an admission of illegality, it is extraordinary.
“It allows him to move forward with his life now, which I think is where he’s going. He’s trying to not always look backwards.
“I think what was so precious to him was to have an apology for his late mother because he has spoken about her so much and how she was persecuted.”
Campaign group, Hacked Off, which calls for the reform of UK press self-regulation, said the result was “humiliating” for The Sun.
Investors in Klarna have been told to indicate their interest in selling their shares by early next month, in a further indication that the buy now pay later (BNPL) giant is about to kickstart a US listing valuing it at about $20bn.
Sky News has learnt that shareholders in one of Europe’s biggest fintechs have been handed a 5 February deadline to register to sell down their stock as part of its looming initial public offering (IPO).
Banking sources also said on Wednesday evening that Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, two of the lead banks on the IPO, would publish equity research in the coming days – another sign that a listing is imminent.
Klarna, which is based in Sweden but now has 85 million customers globally, announced in November that it had filed paperwork with US regulators for a public listing of its shares.
Its valuation is expected to fall within a range of $15bn-$20bn, although a number of the company’s existing shareholders believe it could be priced substantially higher than that.
Klarna has established a UK-registered holding company as part of the journey towards a public listing, with more than a dozen banks now hired to work on it.
Last week, Klarna announced an expanded partnership with Stripe, the payments group, to offer its products to a larger population of consumers.
Klarna, which employs about 5,000 people, was founded by chief executive Sebastian Siemiatkowski, who last year also set up a new holding company in Britain.
Nevertheless, its listing in the US delivered a fresh disappointment to the London Stock Exchange, which had been pushing for it to float in the UK.
The most popular person in Russia right now is, of course, Elon Musk. Everyone loves him: officials, businessmen, and ordinary citizens alike. His unusual gesture during a speech before the inauguration surprised many, as it’s commonly believed in Russia to resemble a Nazi salute. However, this did nothing to tarnish the image of the owner of SpaceX and the social network X.
It’s rather surprising that in the month leading up to Donald Trump’s inauguration, most conversations in Russia revolved around Elon Musk. All hopes are pinned on him.
Eight years ago, when Trump was first elected President of the United States, he was considered “Russia’s guy” by many Moscow. Now, no one harbors such illusions. Instead, the title of “our man in America” has shifted to Elon Musk.
From Russia with X
The latest rumor circulating among Russian political elites is about the possible unblocking of the former Twitter. The X platform was banned in Russia in 2022, shortly after the invasion of Ukraine. But much has changed since then, and many Russian officials now believe that X must be urgently unblocked to help normalize relations with America. One of the supposed supporters of this idea is Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov. Allegedly, he argues that Musk is not an enemy of Russia, nor is his social network. After all, it was X that once spread Tucker Carlson’s interview with Vladimir Putin to a global audience. This fact greatly pleased the Kremlin.
This doesn’t necessarily mean that the Russian government has any real levers of influence—rather, they seem to believe that the world’s richest man is deeply interested in Russia and enjoys his self-appointed role as an unofficial chief negotiator with Moscow.
Troubled Friendship
In the popular biography of Elon Musk, published in 2015, there’s a story about how the budding entrepreneur traveled to Moscow in 2001 to buy a ballistic missile. Initially, the negotiations were fruitless—one general reportedly even spat in Musk’s direction upon hearing his plans to colonize other planets. Ultimately, the deal fell apart over pricing: the Russians wanted $8 million for one missile, while Musk was willing to pay that amount for two.
Over time, Musk’s seriousness became apparent. In Russia, there was once an official who attempted to compete with him: Dmitry Rogozin, a well-known populist and even nationalist politician, whom Putin inexplicably appointed to head Roscosmos, Russia’s equivalent of NASA. Rogozin was keen to prove he was superior to Musk and frequently made absurd statements. For instance, he mockingly suggested that after the retirement of the Space Shuttle program, Americans would need to send their astronauts to the ISS using a trampoline. When Musk successfully launched the Crew Dragon to the ISS, he responded on Twitter with a triumphant “HA! The trampoline is working,” delivering a perfect retort to the Russian official’s empty bravado.
Dmitry Rogozin’s career, incidentally, ended ingloriously. He was dismissed at the very beginning of the war and later embarked on a propaganda tour to the Donbas, where he was injured while dining in a restaurant—sustaining damage to his buttocks. The incident sparked a wave of jokes, as practically no one missed the opportunity to mock it. As for Musk, jokes about him in Russia have long ceased. The closer he aligned politically with Trump, the more seriously the political elite began to regard him.
Many in Russia have their own stories of chance encounters with Musk. For instance, he holds great respect for Sergey Korolev, the founder of the Soviet space program, and maintained contact with Korolev’s family—a stark contrast to the Russian authorities’ indifference toward the legacy of the visionary engineer who sent the first human into space.
“А Man Who Cannot Be Stopped”
After the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Musk provided access to his Starlink network to the Ukrainian armed forces. However, as reported by The Wall Street Journal and confirmed by sources in Moscow, Musk also began regularly speaking with Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials, such as Sergey Kiriyenko, the Kremlin’s deputy chief of staff in charge of domestic policy. The longer these conversations continued, the more critical Musk became of Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelensky. In Moscow, they are convinced that Musk relishes this role, effectively acting as an unofficial secretary of state for relations with Russia.
From the perspective of the Russian elite, Musk is somewhat influenced by Putin. He is reportedly flattered by being a regular interlocutor of the Russian president and seems to trust many of Putin’s arguments. Putin, for his part, tries to reciprocate. A year ago, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, the Russian president called Musk “a man who cannot be stopped.”
Elon Musk has long been admired by many Russian oligarchs, who see him as embodying their dreams. A businessman wielding state-level power without holding any official position perfectly reflects the aspirations of Russian big business in the 1990s, when problems were solved through threats, bullying, and brute force. No one back then could have imagined that something similar would unfold in the West.
Musk as Berezovsky
Observing the initial steps of the Trump-Musk tandem through the lens of Russian political history, it’s hard to shake a sense of déjà vu. Something strikingly similar happened in Moscow exactly 25 years ago.
At the time, Vladimir Putin had just been elected President of Russia, with the all-powerful oligarch Boris Berezovsky standing behind him.
Berezovsky had played a pivotal role in securing Putin’s presidency. He believed the new Russian leader would remain indebted to him, preserving the loyalty and obedience that Berezovsky had come to expect. However, the oligarch overstepped his bounds far too quickly.
Just three months after Putin’s inauguration, Berezovsky resigned from his position as a member of the Russian parliament and fled to London, entering voluntary exile. He was confident it would only be temporary, convinced that Putin would falter, that no one would dare strip him of his power and wealth. But Berezovsky was wrong.
Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump’s choice to be defense secretary, at the National Gallery of Art in Washington this monthMark Schiefelbein/AP
NBC broke the story of sworn testimony from the ex-sister-in-law of Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump’s pick for secretary of defense. In an affidavit, which was released for senators to review ahead Hegseth’s confirmation hearing this week, Danielle Hegseth alleged that Hegseth’s former wife Samantha Hegseth had often feared for her safety. Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) said in a press release that the affidavit alleged that Samantha Hegseth “had an ‘escape plan’ that involved texting a ‘safe word’ to friends and family to urgently request assistance without putting herself in more danger with Mr. Hegseth.”
Buried toward the end of Reed’s press release was another eye-opening detail: Pete Hegseth allegedly believed that “women should not vote or work and that Christians needed to have more children so they could overtake the Muslim population.”
Even as Hegseth has repeatedly called for an end to women serving in combat roles in the military, the extreme nature of those remarks might seem astonishing for a candidate slated to assume one of the highest leadership roles in the US government. But in the religious movement that Hegseth is connected to, beliefs about the subservient role of women are widely held.
As I noted at the time that Trump nominated Hegseth:
What Hegseth does have are connections to the TheoBros, a group of mostly millennial, ultra-conservative men, many of whom proudly call themselves Christian nationalists. Among the tenets of their branch of Protestant Christianity—known as Reformed or Reconstructionist—is the idea that the United States should be subject to biblical law.
Last year, the magazine Nashville Christian Family ran a profile of Hegseth, in which he mentioned being a member of a “Bible and book study” that focused on the book My Life for Yours by Doug Wilson, the 71-year-old unofficial patriarch of the TheoBros. Patriarch is the right word: When I interviewed Wilson a few months ago, he said that he, like many other TheoBros, believes women never should have been given the right to vote.
Hegseth attends a Tennessee church in the denomination founded by Wilson.
Leaders in Wilson’s movement believe that women are called by God to obey their husbands. “Elevate women to positions of civil authority or save the lives of babies,” Joel Webbon, a Texas-based pastor and leader in the TheoBros movement, wrote on X in September. “A nation cannot do both.” In a 2023 post, Wilson alluded to “something called the patriarchy—that which, according to our soi disant and lisping political theorists, must be smashed. Only they say something like thmasth.”
A new wildfire that broke out north of Los Angeles on Wednesday rapidly spread to more than 9,400 acres (38 square km), fueled by strong winds and dry brush, forcing mandatory evacuation orders for more than 31,000 people.
The Hughes fire about 50 miles (80 km) north of Los Angeles further taxed firefighters in the region who have managed to bring two major fires in the metropolitan area largely under control.
In just a few hours on Wednesday the new fire grew to two-thirds the size of the Eaton Fire, one of the two monster conflagrations that have ravaged the Los Angeles area.
Officials warned people in the Castaic Lake area of Los Angeles County that they faced “immediate threat to life,” while much of Southern California remained under a red-flag warning for extreme fire risk due to strong, dry winds.
Some 31,000 people were under mandatory evacuation orders and another 23,000 face evacuation warnings, Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna told a press conference.
The Angeles National Forest said its entire 700,000-acre (2,800-sq-km) park in the San Gabriel Mountains was closed to visitors.
As a result of the red-flag warning, some 1,100 firefighters were deployed around Southern California in anticipation of fast-moving fires, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) said. More than 4,000 firefighters were working on the Hughes Fire, Los Angeles County Fire Chief Anthony Marrone said.
Southern California has gone without significant rain for nine months, contributing to hazardous conditions, but some rain was forecast from Saturday through Monday, possibly giving firefighters much-needed relief.
Flames rise behind vehicles as the Hughes Fire burns in Castaic Lake, California, January 22. REUTERS/David Swanson Purchase Licensing Rights
Helicopters scooped water out of a lake to drop on the fire while fixed-wing aircraft dropped fire retardant on the hills, video on KTLA television showed. Flames spread to the water’s edge.
Interstate 5, the major north-south highway in the western United States, was temporarily closed in the mountain pass areas known as the Grapevine due to poor visibility from the smoke, the California Highway Patrol said. But firefighters were able to suppress enough of the fire to reopen the highway, Marrone said.
While the new fire raged, the two deadly fires that have ravaged Los Angeles since Jan. 7 came under greater control, Cal Fire said.
The Eaton Fire that scorched 14,021 acres (57 square km) east of Los Angeles was 91% contained, while the larger Palisades Fire, which has consumed 23,448 acres (95 square km) on the west side of Los Angeles, stood at 68% contained.
Containment measures the percentage of a fire’s perimeter that firefighters have under control.
Since the two fires broke out on Jan. 7, they have burned an area nearly the size of Washington, D.C., killed 28 people and damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures, Cal Fire said. At one point, 180,000 people were under evacuation orders, according to Los Angeles County officials.
President Trump announced Tuesday night that he had granted a “full and unconditional” pardon to Ross Ulbricht, founder of the notorious dark website Silk Road.
Trump, 78, announced his grant of clemency, first reported earlier Tuesday by The Post, on Truth Social.
“I just called the mother of Ross William Ulbright [sic] to let her know that in honor of her and the Libertarian Movement, which supported me so strongly, it was my pleasure to have just signed a full and unconditional pardon of her son, Ross,” he wrote.
“The scum that worked to convict him were some of the same lunatics who were involved in the modern day weaponization of government against me. He was given two life sentences, plus 40 years. Ridiculous!”
A source close to the White House told The Post at midday Tuesday that executive action to turn Ulbricht loose was “incoming.”
“Ross Ulbricht and his family are deeply and eternally grateful to President Trump for his extraordinary act of grace in granting Ross a full and unconditional pardon. After enduring over a decade of incarceration, this decision offers Ross the opportunity to begin anew, to rebuild his life, and to contribute positively to society,” lawyer Brandon Sample told The Post via email.
“This moment marks the end of a long and challenging journey for Ross and his loved ones, and they are overwhelmed with gratitude for this life-changing gesture of mercy and justice.”
President Trump signs documents as he issues executive orders. Getty Images
Trump had vowed in May to reduce Ulbricht’s life sentence on charges of drug trafficking and money laundering “down to time served” if he won the 2024 election.
Ulbricht was arrested in October 2013 in San Francisco and accused of running the notorious website — which sold drugs and other illegal products while accepting bitcoin as payment — under the pseudonym “Dread Pirate Roberts.”
Now 40, Ulbricht was convicted in February 2015 on charges including drug trafficking and conspiracies to commit money laundering and computer hacking. He was sentenced that May to two life terms in prison, plus 40 years.
Ulbricht had unsuccessfully appealed his conviction and sentence up to the Supreme Court, leaving him to serve out his time at a maximum-security prison in Arizona.
On Tuesday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) sent a letter to Trump asking him to show mercy.
“I write to urge you to follow through on your stated intention to commute the sentence of Ross Ulbricht. Mr. Ulbricht is serving two life sentences plus forty years without parole for nonviolent offenses related to the website he launched in early 2011,” Paul’s letter read.
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin speaking at a conference in 2017
Donald Trump has warned he will impose high tariffs and further sanctions on Russia if Vladimir Putin fails to end the war in Ukraine.
Writing on his social media platform Truth Social, he said that by pushing to settle the war he was doing Russia and its president a “very big favour”.
Trump had previously said he would negotiate a settlement to Russia’s full-scale invasion launched in February 2022, in a single day.
Russia has not yet responded to the remarks, but senior officials have said in recent days that there is a small window of opportunity for Moscow to deal with the new US administration.
Putin has said repeatedly that he is prepared to negotiate an end to the war, which first began in 2014, but that Ukraine would have to accept the reality of Russian territorial gains, which are currently about 20% of its land. He also refuses to allow Ukraine to join Nato.
Kyiv does not want to give up its territory, although President Volodymyr Zelensky has conceded he may have to cede some currently occupied land temporarily.
On Tuesday Trump told a news conference he would be talking to Putin “very soon” and it “sounds likely” that he would apply more sanctions if the Russian leader did not come to the table.
But in his Truth Social post on Wednesday, he went further: “I’m going to do Russia, whose Economy is failing, and President Putin, a very big FAVOR,” he wrote.
“Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous War! IT’S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE. If we don’t make a ‘deal’, and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries.”
Continuing, he said: “Let’s get this war, which never would have started if I were President, over with! We can do it the easy way, or the hard way – and the easy way is always better. It’s time to “MAKE A DEAL”.”
Russia’s deputy UN ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy earlier told Reuters news agency that the Kremlin would need to know what Trump wants in a deal to stop the war before the country moves forward.
Meanwhile Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told the World Economic Forum on Tuesday that at least 200,000 peacekeepers would be needed under any agreement.
And he told Bloomberg that any peacekeeping force for his country would have to include US troops to pose a realistic deterrent to Russia.
“It can’t be without the United States… Even if some European friends think it can be, no it will not be,” he said, adding that no-one else would risk such a move without the US.
While Ukraine’s leaders might appreciate this tougher-talking Trump – they have always said Putin only understands strength – the initial reaction in Kyiv to the US president’s comments suggest that it is actions people are waiting for, not words.
Trump has not specified where more economic penalties might be aimed, or when. Russian imports to the US have plummeted since 2022 and there are all sorts of heavy restrictions already in place.
Currently, the main Russian exports to the US are phosphate-based fertilisers and platinum.
On social media, there was a generally scathing response from Ukrainians. Many suggested that more sanctions were a weak reply to Russian aggression. But the biggest question for most is what Putin is actually open to discussing with Ukraine at any peace talks.
In Moscow meanwhile, some people are seeing signs that the Kremlin may be readying Russians to accept less than the “victory” once envisaged, which included tanks rolling all the way west to the southern Ukrainian port city of Odesa.
TV editor Margarita Simonyan, who is stridently pro-Putin, has begun talking of “realistic” conditions for ending the war, which she suggests could include halting the fighting along the current frontline.
That would mean the four Ukrainian regions that Putin illegally pronounced as Russian territory more than two years ago, like Zaporizhzhia, still being partially controlled by Kyiv.
Russian hardliners, the so-called “Z” bloggers, are furious at such “defeatism”.
In his social media post, Trump also couched his threat of tariffs and tighter sanctions in words of “love” for the Russian people and highlighted his respect for Soviet losses in World War Two – a near-sacred topic for Putin – though Trump massively overestimated the numbers and appeared to think the USSR was Russia alone. In reality, millions of Ukrainians and other Soviet citizens also lost their lives.